Tuesday, July 28, 2015

I'D RATHER LOSE TO A REAL LEFTIST . THAN WIN WITH A RINO:BY HOWARD GALGANOV

WH

IT MIGHT BE TIME FOR A THIRD AMERICAN PARTY

If you think the problems in America, including Canada started just with the LEFT, think again!
The LEFT are a big part of the problem, but the BIGGER part belongs to people who campaign as Conservatives and govern as Center Left, when they have the trust of the people to do the right thing . . . BUT DON’T.
Years ago, when I was in an all out fight against Ethnocentric French Quebec Nationalists, and the English Language Media, which invented ways to apologize for Ethnocentric French Nationalist’s inexcusable behavior, I was called an ANGRYPHONE, which was an INSULTING play-on-words that described me as being an ANGRY-ANGLO.
When responding to the English Language Media at a press conference in Montreal, following a speech I gave to about a thousand supporters, I was asked in what was a GOTCHA question by the Media . . . HOW IT FELT BEING AN ANGRYPHONE?

MY RESPONSE TO THE SMUG ENGLISH LEFTIST MEDIA WAS SUCCINCT:

If after losing your rights to live an equal life, as an English speaking person in your own province doesn’t make you ANGRY . . . then you are an IDIOT.
I was never asked that question again.

GOOD ON HUCKABEE – AND SHAME ON THE JEWISH AMERICAN LEFTISTS:

I watched Huckabee on FOX News on the FIVE this Monday (July 27), as Geraldo Rivera aggressively insulted Huckabee, who was supposed to be a guest on their show, but was treated more like an idiot and warmonger, because Huckabee referred to Obama/Kerry’s/Iran deal as a March Back to the Holocaust Ovens for Israel.
The way Huckabee was treated was disgraceful. But, to Mike Huckabee's GREAT CREDIT – he didn’t back down or temper his statement.

HEADLINE . . . TRUMP RAPED HIS FORMER WIFE:

So . . . the big breaking news about Trump, is that before divorcing his wife Ivana in 1993, she made allegations that he raped her while still married, which she later walked-back as an exaggeration.

TO ME . . . THIS ALLEGATION GIVES MORE REASON TO SUPPORT TRUMP:

I know from first hand-experience . . . what is the power of DEMAGOGUERY, as an underhanded weapon used by people without a legitimate argument. And the only way to defend against this scurrilous attack is to ATTACK BACK – without surrendering an inch.

TRUMP DOES IT BEST:

And the more the LEFT and RINOS throw this type of CRAP at Trump and other real Conservatives; THE MORE – OTHERS WILL SUPPORT HIM AND THEM.

I DON’T SEE MUCH HOPE FOR THE REPUBLICANS:

With each passing day, all I see from the Republican Party . . . is how they are trying to control the debate and keep the status quo alive. THEY ARE NOT GETTING THE MESSAGE FROM THE PEOPLE.
The Republican controlled HOUSE and SENATE . . . are working-proof, of who and what the RINOS really are . . . and what they stand for.

IF ANOTHER LEFTIST/RINO TAKES POWER IN THE USA . . . IT WILL BE A GAME CHANGER:

I am almost fully convinced that the Republican Party has become an INCORRIGIBLE political group, that has become so far removed from the people they purport to represent, and so reliant on SPECIAL INTERESTS and the LOBBY CULTURE, that they have become an enemy to their own electorate.
I think, that if this RINO philosophy continues, the Republican Establishment will have to worry an awful lot less about TRUMP running as an INDEPENDENT . . . AND WORRY MUCH MORE ABOUT AN INDEPENDENT CONSERVATIVE PARTY.
The more I see and hear of this crop of mainstream Republicans being hyped by RINO insiders, in the names of Bush, Christie, Perry, Rubio and several others, the more I’m thinking there should be a separate Conservative Party, and a REAL FIGHT FOR STATES’ RIGHTS.

WHAT THE LEFT & RINOS HAVE DONE TO AMERICA IS UNCONSCIONABLE:

If things do not change significantly for the RIGHT . . . the RIGHT better think significantly about change.
I would rather see a REAL DEBATE between Walker, Trump, Cruz, Fiorina, Carson, Huckabee and Santorum – than between pretenders who want to win the “throne”.
SPECIAL NOTE . . . I’m not going to be getting into a debate with visitors to Galganov.com, who wish to leave a COMMENT on the current Editorial Page with a LINK to another website(s).
I thought I made it pretty clear, that if a person wishes to send me a personal link to a different website, do it privately. I guess I wasn’t clear enough though, when I wrote that people who leave links on my COMMENT Page would have their comments removed . . . which I’ve done, with a polite note explaining the policy.
BUT . . . when a visitor to my BLOG repeatedly comments with LINKS, after he was politely asked not to – the cost of abusing the PRIVILEGE to COMMENT will be . . . to be permanently BLOCKED from being included in the Galganov Directory, and from ever being allowed to COMMENT.
Please enjoy reading and commenting on Galganov.com
Best Regards . . . Howard Galganov

House lawmaker files motion to oust Boehner

WH 

boehnerinternal15151.jpg
In a move unprecedented in the history of the House of Representatives, a Republican lawmaker filed a motion Tuesday to remove House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, from his post, in another sign of dissatisfaction with Boehner’s leadership by a number of House conservatives.
Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., filed the resolution -- a “motion to vacate the chair” -- late Tuesday, claiming that he “has endeavored to consolidate power and centralize decision-making, bypassing the majority of the 435 Members of Congress and the people they represent.”
The proposal was referred to a committee stocked with leadership loyalists, and therefore unlikely to emerge.
The motion says that Boehner has caused the power of Congress to atrophy, “thereby making Congress subservient to the Executive and Judicial branches, diminishing the voice of the American People.”
The motion also claims that Boehner has used the power of his office to “punish Members who vote according to their conscience instead of the will of the Speaker.”
Last month, the leadership briefly stripped Meadows of his subcommittee chairmanship over his votes but later relented after conservatives objected.
The resolution could place House Democrats in a difficult, and unusual, position. Democrats would face a dilemma of either voting to help preserve Boehner – with whom they have frequently clashed – or backing House conservatives and gambling on pandemonium by helping to throw Boehner out.
Some GOP members told Fox News that Meadow’s resolution is the best thing that could happen for President Obama, taking attention away from the contentious issues of the Iranian nuclear deal, and the swirling controversy surrounding Planned Parenthood for the August recess.
A senior GOP source told Fox News that the motion would now make the Republican leadership the topic du jour instead of the Iran deal.
Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., was swift to dismiss the resolution.
"You don't raise any money, you need a way to raise money, you do gimmicks like this," said Nunes, who is close to Boehner.
But Rep. Walter Jones, R-N.C., appeared to back Meadows, saying that GOP leadership is "not listening to the American people." Jones complained specifically about leadership not allowing quick votes against same-sex marriage and federal money for Planned Parenthood.
Speaker Boehner was not expected to address the resolution Tuesday.

MEET MARK MEADOWS
CLICK BELOW TO LEARN
ABOUT MARK MEADOWS 
CONTACT MARK MEADOWS
SUPPORT MARK MEADOWS

Meadows Explains Effort to Overthrow Boehner

Meadows, R-N.C., is taking his dissatisfaction with GOP leadership to the next level (CQ Roll Call File Photo)
Meadows,is taking his dissatisfaction with leadership to the next level. (Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call File Photo)
So why exactly did Rep. Mark Meadows offer a resolution to strip Speaker John A. Boehner of his gavel?
Holding court with reporters Tuesday night, nearly an hour after stunning colleagues by filing a motion to “vacate the chair,” the North Carolina Republican’s message was simple: He was left with no choice.
“It’s really more about trying to have a conversation about making this place work, where everybody’s voice matters, where it’s not a punitive culture,” said Meadows, who has felt the repercussions of bucking leadership.
Just last month, Meadows saw his subcommittee chairmanship revoked, then reinstated as leadership attempted to put the two-term congressman in his place for joining 33 other Republicans in trying to sink a key procedural rule vote on trade legislation.
In filing his motion in a non-privileged form — meaning it did not require immediate consideration, or consideration at all — Meadows said he wanted to see if just raising the issue of dissatisfaction with Boehner might prompt some changes at the top. He said he hoped for a “family discussion,” borrowing Boehner’s favorite euphemism for ugly intraparty fights.
But when he was asked if a lack of results on that front could culminate in Meadows bringing the motion up again, this time as privileged, Meadows was clear.
“Correct,” he said.
Republicans speculated Tuesday night that Meadows knew he didn’t have the votes at this point to remove Boehner and deliberately filed the motion as a non-privileged measure in order to let the prospect of a leadership change — however far-fetched — simmer over the monthlong August recess.
Speaking on background to scrums of reporters lingering near the Speaker’s Lobby, some lawmakers dismissed the attention-grabbing move as a gambit by Meadows to gin up fundraising. They also accused the North Carolina congressman of needlessly creating a distraction that could overshadow what many Republicans would prefer to focus for the next several weeks: Bashing President Barack Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran.
Meadows objected to both accusations.
“I haven’t raised money off of anything that has happened to me in this House,” he said.
“There’s no one that’s been stronger on the Iran message, and to suggest we can only have one message when we go back home to talk to the American people would be to imply that our town halls can only have one question,” he said.
As for whether a motion to vacate the chair could succeed if brought to the floor for a vote, Meadows either didn’t know or wouldn’t say. As it was, he didn’t file the resolution with co-sponsors, and told very few people of his plans to take this action, even those in the close-knit House Freedom Caucus.
“I ran it by several friends,” Meadows said, clarifying that he did, indeed, mean congressional colleagues. He also said he told his wife and kids, “because the implications certainly are profound.”
Asked if he had considered the consequences of his resolution, whether it could backfire and perhaps even result in the installation of a Democratic speaker, Meadows said he firmly believed a Republican would maintain the gavel. A Republican, he added, who would take input from all corners of the conference and would allow members to vote their conscience.
“Let me just say I’m not into embarrassing anybody,” Meadows said. “Anybody who knows me knows that I’m not into embarrassing anyone, and so that’s never been the motive or the intention.”
But if he just wanted a family discussion, why not bring this up behind closed doors?
Meadows replied there’d been a lot of talk already within the conference about what is and isn’t appropriate, and he disagreed that leaders should be allowed to punish members for voting their conscience.
“It comes down to one thing,” Meadows said. “And that is, the voice of the American people needs to be heard.”
While the current resolution faces long odds, Meadows said names that have been discussed over the recent weeks and months to replace Boehner include: Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., GOP Conference Chairwoman Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., Homeland Security Chairman Michael McCaul, R-Texas — even Agriculture Chairman K. Michael Conaway, R-Texas, with whom Meadows was seen huddling on the House floor long after legislative business had concluded. (Meadows said, for the record, Conaway did not approve of his tactic.)
Meadows also mentioned Rep. Daniel Webster, R-Fla., whose surprise candidacy for speaker at the start of the 114th Congress ended up costing him a seat on the powerful Rules Committee.
Ultimately, Meadows wasn’t predicting anything.
“Today, I am 56 years old. Today is my birthday,” he said. “So I have lived long enough to know that anything, if you live long enough, can happen.”

,MUSIC, Ray Jessel - That Was A Surprise;) Song - AGT 2014

WH
MEET RAY JESSEL ON AMERICA'A GOT TALENT -  HE'S 84 YEARS OLD




Feds gave low-income housing to millionaires By Elizabeth Harrington

WH

HUD_logo.jpg
 (AP)
The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) gave low-income housing to millionaires, according to a recent audit.
The Office of Inspector General (OIG) found over 25,000 families who earned too much to qualify for subsidized apartments, which will cost taxpayers $104.4 million this year.
“Public housing authorities provided public housing assistance to as many as 25,226 families whose annual household income exceeded HUD’s 2014 program eligibility income limits,” according to the audit. “Most of these families had earned more than the qualifying amount for more than 1 year, were not participating in programs that would allow them to reside in public housing, and occupied units while many families were waiting for public housing assistance.”
“This condition occurred because HUD regulations require families to meet eligibility income limits only when they are admitted to the public housing program,” it said. “The regulations do not limit the length of time that families may reside in public housing.”
Of the 25,226 overincome families identified, 47 percent earned at least $10,000 more than the income limit, and 70 percent lived in subsidized housing for more than a year.
A millionaire in Oxford, Neb., has been able live in low-income housing since 2010. The monthly rent is $300.
“As of April 2014, the single-member household’s annual income was $65,007, while the low-income threshold was $33,500,” the OIG explained. “Also, this tenant had total assets valued at nearly $1.6 million, which included stock valued at $623,685, real estate valued at $470,600, a checking account with a balance of $334,637, and an individual retirement account with a balance of $123,445.”

NEW VIDEO: Technician details harvesting fetal parts for Planned Parenthood in latest video

WH
WARNING: GRAPHIC CONTENT.


Human Capital - Episode 1: Planned Parenthood's Black Market in Baby Parts

A technician who said she worked for a company that partnered with Planned Parenthood to harvest fetal tissue said there’s “incentive to try and get the hard stuff ‘cause you’re going to get more money,” in the latest undercover video targeting Planned Parenthood.
“For whatever we could procure, they would get a certain percentage,” said Holly O’Donnell, identified as an ex-procurement technician for StemExpress, a Placerville, Calif., company. “The main nurse was always trying to make sure we got our specimens. No one else really cared, but the main nurse did because she knew that Planned Parenthood was getting compensated.”

The new, graphic video from the Center for Medical Progress appears to show technicians using tweezers to pick through aborted fetal tissue for baby parts. After one person in the video picks out a pair of intact kidneys someone off-camera laughs and says, “Five stars!”
O’Donnell said she fainted the first time she was part of this process and was told by someone in the room, “some of us don’t ever get over it.”

“If you can somehow procure a brain or a heart you’re going to get more money than just Chorionic villi or umbilical cord.”
- Holly O'Donnell
O'Donnell said she worked for six months identifying pregnant women at Planned Parenthood who met the standards for fetal tissue orders and then helped to harvest fetal body parts after abortions at Planned Parenthood facilities.
StemExpress “supplies human blood, tissue products, primary cells and other clinical specimens to biomedical researchers around the world,” according to its website.
O’Donnell describes the company a different way.

“StemExpress is a company that hires procurement techs to draw blood and dissect dead fetuses and sell the parts to researchers,” she said. “They’ve partnered with Planned Parenthood and they get part of the money because we pay them to use their facilities. And they get paid from it. They do get some kind of benefit.”
Planned Parenthood has denied selling fetal tissue for a profit, which is against federal law.
“If you can somehow procure a brain or a heart you’re going to get more money than just Chorionic villi or umbilical cord,” O’Donnell said.

The video is the third to be released by the Center for Medical Progress. Like the first two, it contains undercover video of Planned Parenthood officials and associates, but is heavily reliant on an interview with O’Donnell.
Previous videos show Dr. Mary Gatter, a Planned Parenthood medical director in Southern California, meeting with people posing as buyers of fetal specimens. The conversation focuses on how much money the buyers should pay, although Planned Parenthood insists that it only sought to cover its expenses. The videos have brought investigations of Planned Parenthood's policies on aborted fetuses by three Republican-led congressional committees and three states.
Federal law prohibits the commercial sale of fetal tissue, but it allows the not-for-profit donation of tissue if the women who underwent abortions give their consent. Planned Parenthood says the payments discussed in the videos pertain to reimbursement for the costs of procuring the tissue -- which is legal.

Monday, July 27, 2015

Head of House investigative panel calls on Obama to fire IRS chief

WH 
CLICK ON PICTURE OR URL TO SEE STORY

THE HEAD OF the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee has called on President Obama to dismiss IRS Commissioner John Koskinen, near left, claiming that he has repeatedly 'obstructed' investigations of the agency's targeting of conservative groups.

OBAMA'S FRIENDS AND ENEMIES OR "HOW TO PISS OFF YOUR FRIENDS AND SCARE THE HELL OUT OF THE REST OF THE WORLD ! ! !

WH

President Obama and his administration's contempt for our traditional allies, coupled with his comfort with our traditional adversaries can no longer be attributed to inexperience, or even incompetence. It must be due to ideology.

Just Like Obama, Valerie Jarrett’s Family Investigated by FBI For Communist Ties – FBI Files Included…

WH 
EDITORS NOTE: I DON'T HAVE THE ANSWERS TO ALL HIS SECRET'S BUT HERE ARE SOME ANSWERS AND A LOT ABOUT THE REAL BOSS IN THE WHITE HOUSE VALERIE JARRETT AND HER FAMILY BACKGROUND ! IF YOU WANT TO KNOW THE REST: CALL THE FBI - IM SURE THEY KNOW-  DOUBT THEY WILL TELL YOU!
Before reading the rather extensive FBI files on the communist family of Valerie Jarrett, it’s much more valuable to review this backstory first. Please watch the following video from Bill Whittle before reviewing the FBI files:

Judicial Watch filed for, and received, the FBI investigative files of Valerie Jarrett:

Obama with Valerie Jarrett

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) files obtained by Judicial Watch reveal that the dad, maternal grandpa and father-in-law of President Obama’s trusted senior advisor, Valerie Jarrett, were hardcore Communists under investigation by the U.S. government.
Jarrett’s dad, pathologist and geneticist Dr. James Bowman, had extensive ties to Communist associations and individuals, his lengthy FBI file shows. In 1950 Bowman was in communication with a paid Soviet agent named Alfred Stern, who fled to Prague after getting charged with espionage. Bowman was also a member of a Communist-sympathizing group called the Association of Internes and Medical Students. After his discharge from the Army Medical Corps in 1955, Bowman moved to Iran to work, the FBI records show.
According to Bowman’s government file the Association of Internes and Medical Students is an organization that “has long been a faithful follower of the Communist Party line” and engages in un-American activities. Bowman was born in Washington D.C. and had deep ties to Chicago, where he often collaborated with fellow Communists.
JW also obtained documents on Bowman from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) showing that the FBI was brought into investigate him for his membership in a group that “follows the communist party line.”
The Jarrett family Communist ties also include a business partnership between Jarrett’s maternal grandpa, Robert Rochon Taylor, and Stern, the Soviet agent associated with her dad.


Jarrett’s father-in-law, Vernon Jarrett, was also another big-time Chicago Communist, according to separate FBI files obtained by JW as part of a probe into the Jarrett family’s Communist ties.
For a period of time Vernon Jarrett appeared on the FBI’s Security Index and was considered a potential Communist saboteur who was to be arrested in the event of a conflict with the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR).
His FBI file reveals that he was assigned to write propaganda for a Communist Party front group in Chicago that would “disseminate the Communist Party line among…the middle class.” (read more)
We shared this originally in 2011 – Long before people were paying close attention: You’ll never get a clue what’s being done to, and within, this country from the complicit “mainstream” media. But a KGB expert who defected to the good guys was explaining it for us back in the 80s. Yuri Bezmenov tried to warn us:
Stage One: Demoralization – Elimination of America Exceptionalism, fundamental change of national identity, structural deconstruction of foundational principles, elimination of religion. Embedding a new societal design upon the psyche of generations through ideological academia. Peer pressure by elites upon academics and society to convince that prior values were inherently flawed, racist, prejudiced etc. National identity is diluted with aspersions toward historical references. National history is re-written, re-defined, and molded to fit the new intended behavioral model and create the new values.

Stage Two: Destabilization Creation of economic, financial, and national security crisis. Also includes social crisis and breakdown of previous self-evident restrictions on moral behavior. Cloward Piven approach to overloading the system, ie more takers than producers. The crisis produces benevolent leaders who will promise to deliver “things” (Hope and Change) to meet people’s needs through Social and Economic Justice. False illusions that the situation is under control if certain strategic directions are followed (Bailouts, Stimulus, Jobs Bills, Regulations of industry, Unconstitutional Power Grabs, Dismissal of Historical Laws, Changes in legislative processes, Changes in checks and balances of power etc).
Stage Three: Crisis (becomes accepted) The uncomfortable feelings of change including losses of freedom are absorbed and accepted. Lost national identity becomes accepted as the norm within the new societal model. A period of national rebranding transition where people are so overwhelmed by the change they become numb and begin to accept a ‘new normal’. This period of normalization lasts indefinitely as the progression is continually advanced and acceptance takes place in small controlled doses. (New limits on behavior, Regulations, TSA Patdowns, Intrusions into privacy, Controls into daily life) These things begin to be accepted as “just the way it is now”..
Stage Four: Communist Normalization Unlike the period of “Crisis” the people who helped orchestrate the change are now no longer needed. The new overarching centralized governmental model begins to take control. Leftist usurpers who initially thought they were going to be part of the new power structure begin to realize they were used and manipulated and they themselves become the new enemy. Because they have first hand knowledge of the agenda they are the primary target for elimination. They may simply be disregarded, obfuscated, thrown out, or they may be collected, imprisoned, or worse killed. There is no longer room for dissention. Dissent is only possible within the free system that has now been deconstructed. Therefore the leftist purpose is served once the destabilization is complete. Totalitarian Government takes control…

THE TRUMP SYNDRONE VIDEO BY WILD BILL FOR AMERICA

WH

One man, speaking truth has panicked the entire Washington DC political cartel.

DHS’s New 40 Million Dollar Agency to Counter…What?

WH

We should expect to see members of the Muslim Brotherhood and other terrorist linked groups aiding the Obama administration in a newly proposed 40 million dollar agency within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). After all, they were invited to the Countering Violent Extremism Summit held at the White House in February of this year.
An irritating fact is that Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Tx., Chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security, just allowed the Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) Act of 2015, to be delivered out of the committee by a vote.  Why is this bill, that proposes the new DHS agency, being given the thumbs-up by a Republican? Is the majority of our Republican leadership spineless?…That is a rhetorical question.
I believe the American people are sick and tired of political speak, and compromise. There seems to be a hunger and thirst for simply saying it like it is. I would also suggest that’s why Trump has such high approval ratings.
So, why not call the bill, Countering the Jihadi Movement in America of 2015? For anyone paying half attention to the carnage, in the wake of foreign-grown or home-grown terrorism for the past thirty some years towards Americans, it would make perfect sense.
Having terrorists attacks, almost weekly,  in our country would seem to be something that Homeland Security should definitely counter. Yet, even after the Chattanooga terrorist attack that killed five of our servicemen, we are going to concentrate our DHS strength toward Countering Violent Extremism. In other words, the DHS will now start to crackdown on the very dangerous people, like “right-wingers”,  as well as anyone who proclaims to be patriotic, possibly own a Confederate flag, or the worst, an”Islamophobe”.
The more likely groups to be giving this kind of direction as to where the DHS should target their efforts are ones in fact linked with terrorism themselves. Talk about a self-defeating act. This would be akin to directing the Big Bad Wolf to babysit Little Red Riding Hood.
Members of the Islamic Society of Boston, which was the Tsarnev’s mosque, and groups like Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC), from Los Angeles, were involved in the summit at The White House.
MPAC has been working with the government to rid our national security’s lexicon of any hot-button, or offensive words to Muslims. Words like Jihad, Islam, Muslim Brotherhood and others are not allowed in FBI reports, for example. If the forbidden terms are used, they are rejected. There have been freedom-loving, patriotic members of the FBI who have been penalized for reporting the truth.
According to  Daniel Horowitz in The Conservative Review,
“In his must-read magnum opus Catastrophic Failure, former intelligence officer Stephen Coughlin presents in painstaking detail how these subversive Islamic groups have succeeded in censoring all mention of Islamic terror from the federal government’s lexicon.
image: https://www.conservativereview.com/~/media/Images/Conservative-Review/Article-Images/July-2015/CVE-agenda-chart.png?h=464&w=678&la=en&hash=7DC27001A90858384F97D31969CED1C693103B4A
Not surprisingly, more recent intelligence reports and terror threat assessments have not mentioned the word Islam even once – just like the McCaul bill.”
It is past time our legislators addressed the issue of Islamic terrorism on our soil. Instead of those linked with terrorism, we need men and women who are experts in the Islamic doctrine to lead our DHS.
As is routine when dealing with critical issues, Obama and his cohorts not only continue to misdiagnose the problem, but prescribe a deadly dose of medicine for the cure.

Read more at http://theblacksphere.net/2015/07/dhss-new-40-million-dollar-agency-counter/
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...