Monday, August 29, 2016



By: Devvy
August 29, 2016
Who in this country doesn't want to see every child born be as healthy as possible and maintain good health for a lifetime? I wish it could be that way for every child on this planet.
The issue of harmful vaccines remains a huge issue in this country but gets very little media time other than the Internet. I covered this in depth in my book, Taking Politics Out Of Solutions, as well as the FDA (Federal Death Administration) because millions and millions of Americans don't know the truth. They are force fed propaganda by doctors, the media and politicians bribed with campaign donations.
Just like our war against those dangerous 'smart' meters on the homes of tens of millions of Americans. Go look at the money trail for your state rep and senator and you'll understand why they refuse to put the health of their constituents above big energy companies who don't give a damn about your health or your family.
Politicians in the dying State of California either too ignorant to understand the subject matter or who depend on bribes from the big pharmaceutical houses have backed parents into a corner with mandatory vaccines. I say DAMN them and those who vote them back into office for forcing harmful vaccines before a child can enter school.
Yes, I am passionate about this because I have spent countless hours doing research. If you haven't read my column, Polio Vaccine, Cancer and Dr. Mary's Monkey, please take the time to read it if truth is what you seek. All the research I've done by individuals who are top notch in the fields of medicine and science are written off as anti-government tin-foil hat nut cakes who want to endanger your child as if they are the reincarnation of Josef Mengele. Not only is that an insult to those dedicated Americans imminently qualified on the subject matter, it is simply the standard smear tactic used everyday in this country by media and professional politicians.
California passed a mandatory vaccines law which went straight to the courts by parents who do not want to see their child either die from a vaccine (Try the HPV vaccine that has killed so many young girls and maimed thousands) or suffer life long major health problems. That is not hyperbole. Government watch dog groups like Judicial Watch and individuals who do nothing but document real cases of harm by certain vaccines aren't making it all up.
"A federal judge refused Friday to block California's new vaccination law, which requires children in public and private schools to be inoculated against 10 contagious illnesses and eliminates an exemption based on their parents’ personal beliefs.
“Society has a compelling interest in fighting the spread of contagious diseases through mandatory vaccination of school-age children,” U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw of San Diego said in denying an injunction against enforcement of the law, sought by 17 parents and four antivaccine organizations.
"The right to freely practice one's religion, one of the rights invoked by opponents of the new law, “does not outweigh the state's interest in public health and safety,” Sabraw said.
"The law was prompted by a measles outbreak in 2014 that was traced to youngsters at Disneyland who hadn't been vaccinated. Implemented last month, the new measure makes California one of three states, along with West Virginia and Mississippi, to require all schoolchildren to be vaccinated against illnesses such as measles, mumps, tetanus and rubella, regardless of their parents’ religious or personal opposition. The only exceptions are for students with doctor-certified medical exemptions and for disabled students in individual education programs."
No equal protection under the law for those parents.
Ah, the famous measles outbreak from kiddies at Disneyland. More people die from the measles vaccine than it helps. Here's a second column of mine that covers both the Disneyland measles hysteria and more so I don't need to rehash it here. And, grand parents, please make it available to your grown children with kids. Vaccine Safety: Why Media and Politicians Lie
The article above regarding the judge's ruling also states: "While the law says that all children must be vaccinated, it requires parents to provide immunization records only when a student is entering kindergarten or the seventh grade. That means an elementary-school student with a previous parental exemption does not need to be vaccinated until the seventh grade, and students in the eighth grade or higher with a past exemption won't require any vaccinations."
Too many parents have emailed me over the years who deeply regret caving in and allowing their children to get vaccinated with anything other than the basics like for my family: small pox, polio and DPT: diphtheria, pertussis (whooping cough), and tetanus. No measles vaccine. My daughter received only those; she was born in 1975. Yep, we all got the measles and stayed home from school. Once it was over, back to school and no dangerous cocktail injected into our bodies. Those parents aforementioned all have children with either autism or chronic ailments like respiratory problems.
Parents can home school in California to escape the state using their child(ren) as guinea pigs but most either cannot afford to have the mom stay at home or either parent doesn't feel they have enough schooling themselves to be able to teach their children. Let me tell you there are fabulous home schooling groups and organizations all across this country that can and will help parents with the process and curriculum. Yes, it means giving up leisure and fun times but your child's health is paramount over anything else.
As soon as that sickening bill was signed into law by former cocaine sniffing governor, Jerry Brown, two couples and one single mother sent me email: That's it, they moving out of California. One husband is selling their business and the other two are simply quitting their jobs as soon as their plan to relocate is firm. None of them can afford to home school so they are leaving. Not because they want children to die from diseases but because they have taken the time to study the research that is as solid as Mt. Kilimanjaro. Obviously, not every parent in California can do that and are faced with a terrible, terrible dilemma.
As with so many other issues so damaging to our country and citizens, it all begins with rotten politicians who think they know more than you. Career politicians bought and paid for by special interest groups for everything from 'smart' meters to fluoride to vaccines. What's so tragic is those scoundrels continue to get reelected because the people don't know the truth. Just like the misapplication of the federal income tax, Fukushima and so many other issues.
But, when enough people do know the truth, then the heat becomes so hot those rotten miscreants in state houses can be thrown out of office. In my two columns above is a plethora of sources for research. If you haven't seen the documentary, VAXXED: From Cover Up to Catastrophe, I highly recommend (and I receive no compensation for recommending it) you see it. If you read my Dr. Mary's Monkey column, you know what I'm talking about. A vaccine that 'coincidentally' saw an epidemic follow: cancer.
Theaters around the country are still showing VAXXED. If money is an issue, split the cost between friends for the DVD which finally comes out Sept. 13. MARK it on your calendar. You can also purchase it as a digital stream on your computer. If you do get the DVD, watch it and then hold a 'watch party' with not just family and friends, but invite your pastor, minister or priest if you personally know them. If you do know a member of your state legislature, invite that person.
Ask your pediatrician to watch the DVD. Now, I can tell you the first thing 90% of them will say is vaccines are safe, I don't need to watch it and so forth. Try this that was so effective with my Why A Bankrupt America booklet. Ask your pediatrician to watch the DVD because you would like their qualified opinion on the content. Dr. Smith, I trust you with my child's health so could you please watch this and tell me where the producers, doctors and scientists are wrong along with the research? That way you are not putting your pediatrician on the spot to call you a conspiracy nut. You're asking for their medical opinion. It's so important to start the dialogue off where the doctor doesn't become defensive. Click here for 'how to watch'.
Share my two columns cited above with everyone on your lists and social media. Drench this country with the truth: Some vaccines are safe but too many are not. The result has been heartbreaking. If you do skip my two columns cited above, this is one of the links:

"GAPS Nutritional Program: How a Physician Cured Her Son's Autism. "Dr. Campbell is a medical doctor with a postgraduate degree in neurology. She worked as a neurologist and a neurosurgeon for several years before starting a family." Think she is a conspiracy nut who doesn't know what she's talking about?
Prohibition ended because a large segment of people didn't want it, refused to follow the law and crime became so deadly, it finally ended. Unfortunately, the vaccine issue is being enforced by denying your child the right to an education. Well, what passes for an education these days in the government's indoctrination centers they call public schools. The only way to stop this on-going tragedy is mass education and it takes each of us to get the job done. Then you take on your state capitol like a tsunami.
[Devvy's hot new book, Taking Politics Out of Solutions is now available. The most important issues destroying America are presented along with constitutional solutions neither the Republicans or Democrats will pursue. Get your copy now. Excellent discounts for 2 or more books, or bulk orders.]
© 2016 - and Devvy - All Rights Reserved

Palm Beach: Supervisor of Elections Held Secret Meetings with Muslims, Dems on Terror Mosque Voting Location IN BOCA RATON,


Susan Bucher, Supervisor of Elections of Palm Beach County, Florida
An update on this post. via: The United West: Boca Raton Mosque – Too Extreme for Palm Beach Voting Location
In the midst of this controversy it was discovered that in early 2016, Susan Bucher, Supervisor of Elections of Palm Beach Co., FL in collaboration with ICBR President Bassem Alhalabi selected the Islamic Center of Boca Raton as a polling center for the upcoming 2016 presidential election.
However, public outcry forced Bucher to select an alternative voting location for the upcoming 2016 election season.
As the public outcry led to media coverage, Bucher and AlHalabi organized a meeting on July 19 that was held at the ICBR.  In attendance were a cross-section of liberal and progressive political leaders that included ACLU of Florida President Mark Schneider, J-Street Regional Director Scott Brockman, Emerge USA/FL chairman Suhail Nanji, Chairman, Boca Raton City Councilman Jeremy Rodgers and American Muslim Democratic Caucus regional director Kashif Mohammad.
The purpose of the meeting was to insure that the ICBR would be a voting location in a future election cycle in Palm Beach Co. if Bucher is reelected in 2016.
The ICBR, a well-known Islamic extremist mosque, has promoted organizations calling for the “Killing of Jews” and has informed its members on “How Can I Train Myself for Jihad.” presents incontrovertible evidence of the ICBR’s Jihadist support, Jew Hatred, and radical Islamic ties in the following exposé titled, “BUSTED: Boca Raton Mosque, too extreme for Palm Beach Voting location!”

Contact information:
Susan Bucher, Supervisor of Elections
240 South Military Trail
West Palm Beach, FL 33415

Sunday, August 28, 2016



VIDEO: Just in time for hunting season. Get your ISIS hunting permit today! by Thomas Madison


maxresdefault (6)The weather is cooling, fall is approaching, and naturally thoughts turn to hunting and bagging your favorite game.
In this episode of The ISIS Hunting Show we demonstrate the penetration sensitive, high explosive, anti-personnel goat AKA the IEG decoy.
Don’t forget, you can only tag 50 a day.

The Truth Behind the Zika Virus


Hillary Clinton Promises To Shut Down ‘Conspiracy Theory’ Websites

by Baxter Dmitry
These wild claims by Clinton echo her attempt to distract voters from the contents of the WikiLeaks DNC email release by blaming the hack on Putin and Russia – a claim that even the FBI declared had no evidence to back it up. Hillary Clinton has promised to shut down alternative news websites and anything the establishment view as a Freedom of speech and freedom of the press will be resigned to history under a Hillary Clinton presidency, as the Democratic nominee threatens to shut down alternative news websites and anything the establishment view as a “conspiracy theory” if she is elected President of the United States. In a speech in Reno on Thursday, Hillary Clinton claimed that Donald Trump was embracing “dark conspiracy theories” before going on a conspiracy theory-obsessed rant in which she attacked Alex Jones and Infowars, and then claimed that Vladimir Putin was the all-powerful mastermind behind the alternative media movement.
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said the U.S. intelligence community is not ready to “make the call on attribution.

U.S. Intelligence hasn’t decided if Russia is to blame. The Obama White House haven’t pointed the finger at Russia. However the lack of evidence against Russia hasn’t stopped Hillary Clinton pointing the finger and attempting to blame boogeyman Putin for every difficulty she has faced – and every honest investigation by the alternative media that reveals damning evidence against her.
So who is really peddling dark conspiracy theories,” Trump or Clinton?
There is no wonder Hillary wants to shut down the alternative media. It is the last remaining bastion of investigative journalism. Hillary is so terrified of investigative journalists that she hasn’t held a press conference in over 260 days – an unprecedented period for a presidential nominee.
Hillary Clinton’s preferred method of dealing with the media – as revealed in the WikiLeaks hacked emails – is to have DNC staffers contact mainstream news outlets and correct their copy, change their headlines, and drop stories she doesn’t like. The mainstream media is wedged deep in the pocket of corporate interests, and Hillary is the hand that squeezes.
Alternative media won’t play ball with the DNC like this. Along with WikiLeaks, the alternative media are the last remaining opposition voice, and Clinton is on record vowing to destroy them all.
Dismantling of Opposition
Hillary’s campaign has gone into overdrive against the alternative media, sending a threatening email to fundraisers saying that independent conservative news outlet Breitbart News has “no right to exist,” and hinting that they were making plans to shut it down forever once Hillary is elected.
So much for freedom of speech and freedom of the press. Whether you agree with what these alternative media outlets say or not should be irrelevant. Their right to exist must be defended to the death.
Breitbart is something different, she says. “They make Fox News look like a Democratic Party pamphlet. They’re a different breed altogether — not just conservative but radical, bigoted, anti-Muslim, anti-Semitic conspiracy peddlers who never have been and never should be anywhere near the levers of power in this country.”
One of the goals of Clinton’s campaign, Reynolds says, is to ensure Breitbart and other outlets Clinton disapproves of, are destroyed.
It goes without saying that we have to beat these people. But I want to beat them so decisively that their kind never rises again,” she says.



Brand name drugs account for just 10% of prescriptions, but majority of spending, by: Daniel Barker


Brand name drugs
(NaturalNews) The spiraling cost of prescription medications has become a hot news topic again since Big Pharma drug maker Mylan recently hiked the price of its EpiPen allergy injection treatment by more than 400 percent.

This latest price-gouging move by an already highly profitable pharmaceutical company has drawn sharp criticism and raised questions regarding the high cost of drugs in America. This is a system that allows greedy drug makers to take advantage of sick people who often can barely afford their medications in the first place – not to mention keeping up with triple digit percentage price hikes.

On August 23, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) published a "special communication" exploring "the origins and effects of high drug prices in the US market," and "policy option" measures that could be implemented to address the issue.

Americans spend more than double the average on drugs compared to other developed nations

The authors of the paper noted that Americans spend more on drugs than any other country – an average per capita spend of $858, which is more than double the average amount of 19 other industrialized nations.

They also pointed out the fact that brand name pharmaceuticals account for only 10 percent of drugs prescribed, but rake in 72 percent of the total amount spent.

The main reasons for this imbalance, they concluded, are government policies that protect drug companies against competition, effectively granting monopolies to Big Pharma companies like Mylan and others – such as Turing Pharmaceuticals, which notoriously raised the price of a cancer and AIDS drug more than 5,000 percent immediately after purchasing the rights to sell it.

From the JAMA report:

"The most important factor that allows manufacturers to set high drug prices is market exclusivity, protected by monopoly rights awarded upon Food and Drug Administration approval and by patents. The availability of generic drugs after this exclusivity period is the main means of reducing prices in the United States, but access to them may be delayed by numerous business and legal strategies."

Another factor, according to the report, is that physicians often prescribe higher-priced drugs when cheaper alternatives are available. They point out that doctors are often unaware of the price differences due to the "separate roles of patients, prescribers, and payers."

"This separation has traditionally insulated physicians from knowing about drug prices or considering those prices in their clinical decision making and can similarly remove many patients with good drug coverage from considering the price of the medications they 'purchase.'"

The authors recommend several strategies for combating the problem. These include revising patent exclusivity policy, ensuring wider generic drug availability, providing price negotiation options for governmental payers, "generating more evidence about comparative cost-effectiveness of therapeutic alternatives," and actively educating doctors and consumers about such choices.

Mainstream medicine is about profits, not cures

Of course, these recommendations are coming from within the mainstream medical establishment, and although they may be effective in providing some relief to consumers, they don't address what many alternative health practitioners view as a broken and corrupt system that is essentially rotten to its core.

The medical establishment as it now exists is fundamentally based on prescribing often dangerous and ineffective (not to mention outrageously expensive) drugs that make billions for Big Pharma interests, and has little or no interest in promoting actual good health.

The allopathic approach ignores the fact that natural, plant-based treatments are far more effective than pharmaceuticals, and that proper diet and lifestyle are the keys to the prevention of disease.

Big Pharma spends millions of dollars each year lobbying to protect its interests – a current example is the $70 million already being spent by drug companies to defeat California's Drug Price Relief Act initiative, which will be on the ballot in November.

Before the November vote, drug industry spending towards killing the initiative is expected to exceed $100 million.

Meanwhile, federal regulatory agencies, staffed by pharmaceutical industry insiders, are doing all they can to suppress alternative medicine by making it difficult – and sometimes outright illegal – to market inexpensive, natural plant-based remedies and dietary supplements.

So tell me: What's really wrong with this picture?


DHS Scrubs Nearly 1,000 Potential Terrorists from Terrorist Database


Obama’s priority was to ensure that the “civil rights of suspected terrorists” were protected by REMOVING them from the Terror Watch List and Terrorist Screening Database– instead of protecting U.S. citizens from threats both foreign and domestic.
Thanks to Senator Charles Grassley who released internal DHS emails, it became apparent that there was actually a “terrorist ‘hands off’ list” of individuals with potential links to terrorist groups already on U.S. soil– that law enforcement could not investigate.
Judicial Watch sued DHS on February, 2015, which resulted in the DHS releasing 183 pages of documents that evidence the “law enforcement agency” tasked with protecting Americans from terrorist threats– literally deleted data about 1,000 people from the “Terrorist Screening Database”– in order to protect “the civil rights of suspected Islamic terrorist groups.”

The “massive ‘hands off’ list” removed data from the terrorist watch list, which Judicial Watch argues, “could have helped prevent the San Bernardino terrorist attack.”

The lawsuit Judicial Watch filed (Judicial Watch v U.S. Department of Homeland Security (No. 1:15-cv-00222)) centered on:
  1. A copy of the [Department of Homeland Security] Office of Inspector General report regarding, concerning, or related to a “hands off list” purportedly maintained by [Department of Homeland Security], US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and/or US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) used to allow certain individuals to enter the United States, who had previously been denied entry to the United States or been made to undergo secondary screening by CBP based on suspicion of terrorism ties.
  1. Any and all records of communication to or from [Department of Homeland Security] Inspector General Charles Edwards from May 31, 2014 regarding the aforementioned OIG report.
Worse still– a September 25, 2013 DHS Inspector General memorandum reveals that the DHS Privacy Office and DHS Office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties “determined that individuals could only be ‘watchlisted’ based on an association with a known or suspected terrorist already ‘watchlisted’… not based on their affiliation with [REDACTED] (or any other [REDACTED] organization.”

The Inspector General’s report reveals that DHS was “forced to ‘modify’ nearly 1,000 terror suspect entries.”

Grassley’s released emails indicated that an unnamed individual, believed to be a member of the Muslim Brotherhood and close associate of Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, appeared to be on this list.

In a letter Grassley quoted an email exchange between an Immigration and Customs Enforcement official and a Customs and Border Protection official:
“I’m puzzled how someone could be a member of the Muslim Brotherhood and unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation trial, be an associate of [Redacted], say that the US is staging car bombings in Iraq and that [it] is ok for men to beat their wives, question who was behind the 9/11 attacks, and be afforded the luxury of a visitor visa and de-watchlisted.”
This comes of course, after the previous DHS IG left his post after numerous allegations of altering reports to avoid embarrassment for Obama.

According to Breitbart News, after the San Bernardino terrorist attack, entries “regarding suspicious and terror-related activity were removed from an agency watch list as the result of political pressure after the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing.”
“They came into the National Targeting Center, either physically or through emails and correspondence, and said that we could not develop cases based on association with Tablighi Jamaat [a Muslim religious organization with which the San Bernardino terrorists were reportedly affiliated], and/or any Islamic group.”

One heroic whistle blower of the DHS’s treasonous acts is retired DHS agent, Philip Haney, whose new book was released this year:

Is it any wonder, when the Muslim Brotherhood has been entrenched in the U.S. government for years?

Article posted with permission from Bethany Blankley.

Ark Midnight #12 -, Amerigeddon & survival under martial law -, What you need to know., with Host John B. Wells,


Trending Conservative Blabber Stories, with the most social media shares,

Friday, August 26, 2016

After 62 years, couple forced to live apart

Wolf and Anita Gottschalk have been married for 62 years.
Wolf and Anita Gottschalk have been married for 62 years.
A lot of people have suddenly discovered grit in their eyes after seeing a photo of an elderly Canadian couple crying as they say goodbye to each other.
Granddaughter Ashley Bartyik shared the photo to highlight the plight of Wolf and Anita Gottschalk, who have spent the last eight months living in separate care homes against their will after 62 years of marriage, the CBC reports.
"They cry every time they see each other, and it is heartbreaking," Bartyik writes in a Facebook post, pleading for the Fraser Health authority in Surrey, British Columbia, to reunite the couple before 83-year-old Wolf's dementia worsens and his memory of Anita, 81, fades.
He was moved to a different home in January because he needs a higher level of care. The couple now live about 30 minutes apart and relatives try to make sure they see each other every couple of days.
Bartyik says her grandmother is "just begging anyone that can help her get her husband back"—and after 62 years together, they "deserve to spend their last moments in the same building." "This is a heartbreaking situation for the family, and it's quite upsetting for us as well," a spokeswoman for Fraser Health tells CNN.
"We are committed to reuniting the couple and we hope to do so within the next few weeks." (Cops who checked up on this elderly couple in Italy ended up performing an act of kindness.)
This article originally appeared on Newser: After 62 Years, Couple Forced to Live Apart
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...