Where We Create & Share Music, Talk Radio Shows, Conservative
Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER
JUST REPORTING THE NEWS FOLKS... YOU DECIDE ?
BNI has posted these stories in the past, but here is a good summary of Christie's repugnant, over- the-top support for Muslims with terrorist ties and whose loyalties are to Islam, not America, as well as his disparagement of those who oppose the recognition of sharia law by US Courts.
Daniel Pipes (H/T Frederic F) A Quinnipiac poll in
April showed Chris Christie the most popular potential Republican
vice-presidential candidate, thanks to his budget cuts and standing up
to government employee unions. But the governor of New Jersey has a
problem, specifically an Islam problem, in the way of his possible
ascent to higher office. We regret to report that, time and again, he has sided with Islamist forces against those safeguarding American security and civilization.
Some examples:
2008: When serving as U.S. attorney for New Jersey, Christie embraced and kissed Mohammed Qatanani, imam of the Islamic Center of Passaic County, and praised him as "a man of great goodwill."
He did this after Qatanani had publicly ranted against
Jews and in support of funding Hamas, a U.S. government–designated
terror organization, and on the eve of his deportation hearing for
hiding an Israeli conviction for membership in Hamas. In addition,
Christie designated a top aide, Assistant U.S. Attorney Charles McKenna,
to testify as a character witness for Qatanani
2010: After Derek Fenton burned three pages of a Koran at a 9/11 memorial ceremony, his employer, New Jersey Transit, got Christie's approval to fire him.
Christie vocally endorsed Fenton's
termination, even though this meant protecting Islam at the expense of
Fenton's constitutional right to free speech, declaring, "I don't have
any problem with him being fired." The American Civil Liberties Union
successfully represented Fenton to get his job back.
2010: Christie voted 'present' on the issue of opposition to the Ground Zero Victory mosque
“My
principles on this are two-fold. One, that we have to acknowledge,
respect and give some measure of deference to the feelings of the family
members who lost there loved ones there that day. But it would be wrong
to so overreact to that, that we paint Islam with a brush of radical
Muslim extremists that just want to kill Americans because we are
Americans. But beyond that…I am not going to get into it..."
2011: Christie appointed an Islamist, Sohail
CLICK BELOW TO READ MORE
Mohammed, to the New Jersey state superior court.
Mohammed's record includes serving as general counsel to the American Muslim Union (which
has stated that a "Zionist Commando Orchestrated The 9-11 Terrorist
Attacks"), acting as spokesman for Muslim prisoners who went on a hunger
strike due to being jailed during Ramadan, defending Palestinian Islamic Jihad operative Sami Al-Arian (whose
indictment, Mohammed said, was "nothing but a witch-hunt"), and helping
Qatanani's legal defense. Mohammed is not a lawyer for Islamists but
one of them.
When
members of New Jersey's Senate Judiciary Committee asked Mohammed
appropriately tough questions about his enthusiasm for Islam's archaic
law code, the Shari'a, Christie ridiculed the
lawmakers: "Shari'a law has nothing to do with this [appointment of
Mohammed] at all. It's crazy. It's crazy. … So, this Shari'a law
business is crap. It's just crazy. And I'm tired of dealing with the
crazies. I mean, you know, it's just unnecessary to be accusing this guy
of things just because of his religious background." Delighted by this
outburst, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) thanked and applauded Christie.
"Shari'a law has nothing to do with this [appointment of Mohammed] at all. It's crazy. It's crazy. … So, this Shari'a law business is crap. It's just crazy. And I'm tired of dealing with the crazies. I mean, you know, it's just unnecessary to be accusing this guy of things just because of his religious background." Delighted by this outburst, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) thanked and applauded Christie.
Sohail
Mohammed, an immigration lawyer who represented detainees caught in the
post-Sept. 11 furor, watches the Fox series ‘24’ at his office in
Clifton, N.J. “Somewhere, some lunatic out there watching this will do
something to an innocent American Muslim because he believes what he saw
on TV,” Mohammed said.
2012: Revelations that the New York Police Department had conducted surveillance of Islamists in the New Jersey towns of Newark and New Brunswick prompted not gratitude but outrage from Christie, who termed the action arrogant and paranoid while mocking NYPD Commissioner Raymond Kelly as "all knowing, all seeing."
In
short, Christie has hugged a terrorist organization member, abridged
free-speech rights, scorned concern over Islamization, and opposed law
enforcement counterterrorism efforts. Whenever an issue
touching on Islam arises, Christie takes the Islamist side against
those—the DHS, state senators, the NYPD, even the ACLU—who worry about
lawful Islamism eroding the fabric of American life.
Even notorious liberal Mayor Michael Bloomberg supports NYPD Commissioner Ray Kelly's counter terrorism policies
Two
factors render this pattern especially curious: First, soft-on-Islamism
policies are common among Democrats but rare among Republicans (Grover Norquist being the major exception). Second, Christie has an ostentatiously pro-Israel stance, as reflected by his speeches and his recent "Jersey to Jerusalem" trip;
this makes him unusual, for pro-Israel views typically go hand-in-hand
with concern about Shari'a. How does one reconcile the Christie
contradiction?
It could be that, other than fiscally, he is not a conservative but a moderate. It could be ego: the governor is just more brilliant than the rest of us. Or, as several analysts suggest,
it could be cynical double pandering: Muslims get what they want most
and Zionists what they want most, with each party ignoring what Christie
does for the other. Interestingly, Senator Joseph Lieberman of
Connecticut pursued this double track policy (soft on Islamism, staunch
on Israel) and became the Democrats' VP candidate in 2000.
Whatever
the reason, we conclude that Chris Christie lacks the moral compass,
gravitas, and integrity needed to serve as vice-president of the United
States.
Perhaps Christie should be Barack Obama's running mate?
RELATED STORIES/VIDEOS:
No comments:
Post a Comment