JUST REPORTING THE NEW'S FOLKS ? New PAC ADD comming out ?

MIGHTA, COULDA, SHOULDA SHOWED UP AT LEAST...CHECK YOUR SHOES FOR DO DO PRES ?

By Jerome R. Corsi
Georgia citizens today delivered sworn testimony to a court that Barack Obama is slam-dunk disqualified from having his name on the 2012 presidential ballot in the state, because his father never was a U.S. citizen, which prevents him from qualifying as a “natural-born citizen” as the U.S. Constitution requires for a president.

The historic hearing was the first time that a court has accepted arguments on the merits of the controversy over Obama’s status. His critics say he never met the constitutional requirements to occupy the Oval Office, and the states and Congress failed in their obligations to make sure only a qualified president is inaugurated. His supporters, meanwhile, argue he won the 2008 election and therefore was “vetted” by America.
Discover what the Constitution’s reference to “natural born citizen” means and whether Barack Obama qualifies, in the ebook version of “Where’s the REAL Birth Certificate?”
The hearing was before Judge Michael Malihi of the Georgia state Office of State Administrative Hearings. In Georgia, a state law requires “every candidate for federal” office who is certified by the state executive committees of a political party or who files a notice of candidacy “shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.”
State law also grants the secretary of state and any “elector who is eligible to vote for a candidate” in the state the authority to raise a challenge to a candidate’s qualifications, the judge determined.
Citizens bringing the complaints include David Farrar, Leah Lax, Thomas Malaren and Laurie Roth, represented by California attorney Orly Taitz, who has handled numerous cases concerning Obama’s eligibility; David Weldon represented by attorney Van R. Irion of Liberty Legal Foundation; and Carl Swensson and Kevin Richard Powell, represented by J. Mark Hatfield. Cody Judy is raising a challenge because he also wants to be on the ballot.
Several of the attorneys introduced passages from Obama’s own writings that Barack Obama Sr. was his father. They then introduced evidence that the man never was a U.S. citizen, that he was a citizen of Kenya at the time of junior’s birth and was therefore a subject of the United Kingdom.
His father’s citizenship, they said, precludes him from serving as president, since the Founders required that officer to be a “natural-born citizen,” not just a “citizen.”
The term is not defined in the Constitution, but evidence introduced included a passage from a 1975 Supreme Court opinion that states:”The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”
Weldon explained in his presentation that the 14th Amendment granting citizenship did not redefine Article 2, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, which includes the requirement for a president to be a “natural-born citizen.”
The attorney argued also that another later court case referenced citizenship in the dicta, not the central holding in the case, and thus was not controlling.
Many of Irion’s arguments were echoed by Hatfield, a strategy that at least one constitutional expert, Herb Titus, said was sound.
Titus taught constitutional law, common law, and other subjects for nearly 30 years at five different American Bar Association-approved law schools. From 1986 to 1993, he served as the founding dean of the College of Law and Government in Regent University in Virginia Beach, Va. Prior to his academic career, he served as a trial attorney and a special assistant United States attorney with the United States Department of Justice in Washington, D.C., and Kansas City, Mo.
He told WND the fact that Obama’s father was a Kenyan citizen should be sufficient.
“That is much stronger than the question of where he was born,” he said. “That alone is evidence. … They don’t need anything additional.”
Taitz argued multiple prongs of the case: that the birth certificate released by the White House is a forgery; that he probably has had several citizenships, such as when he was listed in Indonesia as an Indonesian citizen; and that he’s been known under the names Obama, Soetoro and Soebarkah.
She also had a private investigator, Susan Daniels, testify that it appears Obama is using a fraudulent Social Security number.
Documents and imaging expert Doug Vogt asserted the birth documentation released by the White House was a creation of a software program and not a scan of any original document. That would mean Obama’s documentation, despite what the White House released in April, is still under wraps.
Obama and his attorney boycotted the proceedings, issuing a letter to Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp that the judge was letting attorneys “run amok.” The statement came after Malihi refused to quash a subpoena for Obama’s testimony and his records, which effectively was ignored by the White House.
The judge is expected to review the evidence and make a recommendation to the state whether there is reason to be concerned about Obama’s name on the 2012 ballot.
He apparently will have no defense evidence, but Kemp had warned Obama about that.
Kemp said late last night in a response to a demand from Obama’s attorney that he simply order the hearing stopped.
“Anything you and your client place in the record in response to the challenge will be beneficial to my review of the initial decision; however, if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril.”

WND reported earlier on the stunning decision from Malihi, who refused to quash the subpoena even after Obama outlined his defense strategy for such state-level challenges, which have erupted in half a dozen or more states already.
“Presidential electors and Congress, not the state of Georgia, hold the constitutional responsibility for determining the qualifications of presidential candidates,” Obama’s lawyer argued. “The election of President Obama by the presidential electors, confirmed by Congress, makes the documents and testimony sought by plaintiff irrelevant.”
But the judge thought otherwise.
“Defendant argues that ‘if enforced, [the subpoena] requires him to interrupt duties as president of the United States’ to attend a hearing in Atlanta, Georgia. However, defendant fails to provide any legal authority to support his motion to quash the subpoena to attend,” he wrote in his order.
“Defendant’s motion suggests that no president should be compelled to attend a court hearing. This may be correct. But defendant has failed to enlighten the court with any legal authority,” the judge continued.
“Specifically, defendant has failed to cite to any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is ‘unreasonable or oppressive, or that the testimony … [is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party’s preparation or presentation at the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced,’” the judge said.
Jablonski also had argued that the state should mind its own business.
“The sovereignty of the state of Georgia does not extend beyond the limits of the State. … Since the sovereignty of the state does not extend beyond its territorial limits, an administrative subpoena has no effect,” the filing argued.
The image released by the White House in April:

Obama long-form birth certificate released April 27 by the White House

Titus said, “‘Natural born citizen’ in relation to the office of president, and whether someone is eligible, was in the Constitution from the very beginning. Another way of putting it; there is a law of the nature of citizenship. If you are a natural born citizen, you are a citizen according to the law of nature, not according to any positive statement in a Constitution or in a statute, but because of the very nature of your birth and the very nature of nations.”
If you “go back and look at what the law of nature would be or would require … that’s precisely what a natural born citizen is …. is one who is born to a father and mother each of whom is a citizen of the U.S. or whatever other country,” he said.
“Now what we’ve learned from the Hawaii birth certificate is that Mr. Obama’s father was not a citizen of the United States. His mother was, but he doesn’t qualify as a natural born citizen for the office of president.”

Cartoons Jan 25

Professor Terry Lovell on NO SHOW IN GEORGIA ?

NO SHOW on Georgia Court Appearence of Obama and his Lawyer with Birth Certificate ?

The question is this: Is Michael Jablonski THIS stupid? Rumors have it that Obama Defense Attorney Michael Jablonski is putting his license to practice law in Georgia in jeopardy over his handling of President Obama's defense in the ballot challenge to his eligibility under Georgia law. PV Provides The Legal Oath Attorneys Must Swear To To Practice Law in Georgia: " I,_________________,  swear that I will truly and honestly, justly and uprightly conduct myself as a member of this learned profession and in accordance with the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct,  as an attorney and counselor and that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Georgia. So help me God.” Source: http://www.gabar.org/public/pdf/2004_lawdaypacket.pdf What is Jablonski doing that could be in violation of his oath?  Two things, actually: 1) His advice to his Client, President Obama, is that Obama can ignore Administrative Law Judge Malihi's order to appear in court today (January 26th) with proof of his being a natural-born citizen. 2) If Jablonski himself fails to appear in the court as the legal counsel for Obama, he could be held in contempt of court, as well as be found in violation of his Oath to "...honestly, justly and uprightly conduct myself as a member of this learned profession and in accordance with the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct." In a letter Jablonski sent to Secretary of State Brian Kemp on 1/25/2012, Jablonski closes his typical "baffle-them-with-bullshit-threats" letter with the following statement:  "We await your taking the requested action, and as we do so, we will, of course, suspend further participation in these proceedings, including the hearing scheduled for January 26." PV Sez: By the way, Folks...keep in mind that the Georgia law being used here to challenge Obama's qualifications was written by Georgia Democrats long before 2003.  So, this law that is being used for this case is their law that their Democrat legislators wrote and passed a long, long time ago. SO, perhaps the legal community of Georgia should speak-up a little here and answer the question as to whether it is in accordance with the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct for a practicing attorney to ignore a judge's order to appear in a Georgia court? Secretary of State Brian Kemp answered Jablonski's letter with this letter issued a few hours after Jablonski delivered his letter to the SoS: Click Here. PV finds it quite interesting how Kemp closed his letter to Jablonski: "Anything you and your client place in the record in response to the challenge will be beneficial to my review of the initial decision; however, if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril." In short, the "peril" Kemp refers to here is the "peril" of a) ignoring a judge's order, and b) failing to provide some documentation to the Administrative Law Court from Obama. Contrary to what the yahoo-administrator over on a pseudo-Republican-run Georgia blog thinks, this case is being processed according to the Rule of Law, not the "Rule of Politics." If Blogger Charlie Harper had his way, the judge should become an "activist judge" and ignore the color of Georgia law.  According to Harper's line of reasoning, judges should first examine whether a case may become an "embarrassment" to the state before proceeding with the legal issues of any case. Too bad Mr. Harper's brain has simply melted into a morass of complete stupidity of late. What is The Political Vine? The Political Vine was established on July 24, 2000 and is based in Georgia. We have gone though many incarnations, first as only an e-mail newsletter, then a Website, and now a Blog with an e-mail sent out to a list of about 5000 people.   All material is produced by Georgia Republican activists whose agenda is to deliver facts, information, humor, opinion and rumors in a satirical/sarcastic environment.   If you are receiving this issue of the Vine via a FWD from one of your friends, you should sign-up for your very own via the link below. Simply Click and when the form pops-up, enter your email address and hit the "JOIN" button.  You will receive a confirm-request email that you will need to respond to in order to get on the list.

First Video from Burns and Poe. FUN VIDEO

Find more videos like this on BigDawg Music Mafia

Judge Andrew Napolitano Natural rights Patriot Act - SHOWN IN 3 PARTS.

AND YOU THOUGHT IT COULDN'T GET STRANGER.. READ THIS ?

AND JUST BEFORE BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA RAN FOR U.S. SENATE?

by Sharon Rondeau

First page of incident report involving Bari Shabazz in Hawaii in 1982 which was amended to "nolle prosequi" in 2003, 21 years after his alleged death

(Nov. 9, 2011) — In a posting dated November 7, 2011, Atty. Mario Apuzzo reported that the criminal record of a Bari Shabazz, who apparently failed to appear in court following a car accident in Hawaii in 1982, was changed 21 years later to indicate that the charge of driving without a valid license would not be prosecuted and that the judgment had been “satisfied.”

Shabazz’s death is reported to have been recorded in the Social Security Administration’s database as having occurred in August 1994.  Why would a prosecutor in Hawaii ask a judge to expunge a criminal record of someone who had been deceased for more than two decades?  How could its validity have been contested so many years after the event which it chronicled?

It appears another change was made in 2005 to the record indicating that there was no money owed to the court in the form of fines or fees.

What motivation would a prosecutor have to raise the issue 21 years after the fact?  How could a judge have even prosecuted a deceased man?

But was Shabazz dead, or simply renamed?  Is Bari Shabazz’s middle initial “M”?

The Terrible Truth blog contends that Bari M. Shabazz is the original identity of Barack Hussein Obama II, that he is a fugitive from justice, and that he was born in New York City on October 28, 1959.  Author Martha Trowbridge states that Shabazz’s father was Malcolm X, the black civil rights leader who had initially preached that white men were “blue-eyed devils.”

If Shabazz became Obama, was the Hawaii bench warrant nullified in 2003 because Obama planned to run for the U.S. Senate from the state of Illinois in 2004?  Was Obama fearful that someone could unravel a secret past?

And was the additional altering of the record in 2005 made in preparation for Obama’s run for the White House rumored as early as 2006?  Were the alterations made just in case someone perceived a connection between Shabazz and Obama?

Is there a connection?

Are there connections among Barack Obama Sr., Malcolm X, Nikita Kruschev and Fidel Castro?

“Malik” is the name of the eldest son of Barack Obama Sr. as well as Bari Shabazz’s middle name.  Malik Obama was Barack Hussein Obama’s best man at his wedding.  Malik has stated that Obama was also best man at his wedding, but does not say which one, as Malik is a polygamist.

Malcolm X had been known as “Detroit Red” during his youth.  Did the clothing worn by the Obama family on Election Night 2008 signify a connection to that nickname?  Malcolm admitted to using various identities, including “Shabazz.”

Malcolm X visited Elijah Muhammad, founder of the Nation of Islam, in Chicago after his release from prison in 1952, and Muhammad became Malcolm’s mentor.  Today, Louis Farrakhan, leader of the Nation of Islam and rejuvenator of the Fruit of Islam, the security wing of the NOI, lives in Obama’s Chicago neighborhood. There is a connection among Farrakhan, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, and Obama.  Farrakhan and Wright had traveled to visit the recently-assassinated Muomaar Qaddafi of Libya in 1984.  Following Qaddafi’s death, early indications were that the rebels could instituteSharia law as the foundation of an interim government.

Why did Obama choose that neighborhood to raise his young family?

Malcolm X’s family has accused Louis Farrakhan of plotting the assassination of their father, and one of the daughters was arrested in 1995 for allegedly plotting to kill Farrakhan.  Is Farrakhan “just a guy in the neighborhood” for Obama?

Percy Sutton was “a family friend” and attorney to Malcolm X, and he recommended that Harvard Law School accept Obama as a student because he was “brilliant.”

It is reported that Barack Obama Sr.’s education at the University of Hawaii was funded partly by the Laubach Literacy Institute.  A supporter of the Institute was Elizabeth Mooney Kirk, who is described as a “friend” of Malcolm X.

Kenyan politician Tom Mboya was acquainted with Barack Obama Sr., and Elizabeth Mooney Kirk knew both men.

One writer states that Barack Obama Sr.’s paternity of Obama “is probably false.”

Could this be why Obama has never released his school records, medical records, or any verifiable documentation about himself?  Does it explain why the two images he has released as “birth certificates” were immediately labeled forgeries?  Would it explain why Obama’s social security number was issued from a state in which he never resided, worked or attended school?

How did Obama accomplish election to public office without at least a certified copy of his original birth certificate?  How was he deemed to be eligible for the offices he sought and free of a criminal past?

Sheriff Joe Arpaio pledged to investigate Obama’s background and recently stated that he has information which would be a “shock” to the American people.  Will that shock come from the revelation of identity theft, election fraud, and a criminal past on the part of the putative president who had touted the message of “hope and change” so loudly during the 2008 presidential campaign?

Is there really no such person as Barack Hussein Obama II?  Were members of the Kenyan Parliamentlying when they asserted that Obama was born in their country rather than the United States?  Were the African newspapers incorrect when they stated that Obama had been born in Kenya?

What about the document which Lucas Smith stated he obtained from the Coast Provincial Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya which bears the name “Barack Hussein Obama II?”  Copies of the document, along with personalized letters, were mailed during the summer of 2010 to every member of the 111th Congress, yet they all state that Obama was born in Hawaii.  What proof exists that he was?  The hospital which Obama has identified as “the place of my birth” refuses to discuss it.

How can a person without a past become the President of the United States and command its military forces?

© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.

The Pope and Obama

The Pope and Obama are on the same stage in Yankee
Stadium in front of a
huge crowd.
The Pope leans towards Mr. Obama and
says, "Do you know that with one
little
wave of my hand, I can
make
every person in this crowd go wild with joy? This joy will not be a
momentary
display, but will go
deep into their hearts and they'll forever speak of this
day and rejoice!"
Obama replies, "I seriously doubt that! With one little
wave of your hand?
Show me!"
So, the Pope backhanded him and knocked
him off the stage!
AND THE CROWD ROARED AND CHEERED WILDLY and there was
happiness throughout
the land!
Kinda brings a tear to your eye,
doesn't it? 

Jan 25th Insider... A New Insider Interview... Read This called CALAFORNIA ?

A longtime Wall Street Insider details the still very much alive and kicking Shorebank, the growing Solyndra scandal, and the globalization goals of the Obama White Hous

UM:  You indicated three specific things you wanted to discuss today – my “homework” as you called it regarding the walk around 19th and G in Washington DC, my recent interview with -Name Deleted- , and what you called the dismantling of the United States’ economy and military.  Is that accurate?

WSI:  Yes – that is correct.  Did you enjoy the visit to D.C.?  The hotel?

UM:  It was…yes…thank you.  The hotelwas quite nice.

WSI:  And the walk?  19th and G?

Read more in News

« Republican Leaders Boehner and Cantor Ignore Calls for Eric Holder’s Resignation

Barack Obama Steals From Barack Obama Who Stole From Barack Obama… (Video) »

UM:  Not so much.

WSI:  So much?

UM:  Maybe I was expecting…more…your tone was pretty ominous when you told me I needed to go take a look.  So…perhaps my expectations were a bit unrealistic.

WSI:  Ah…you were expecting…something else?

UM:  Yeah – sure.  Like I said…your tone was rather…dramatic.

WSI:  And you didn’t find the environment there equally dramatic?

UM: No.

The buildings – the IMF, the World Bank…they were impressive.  No doubt.  Massive-massive buildings.

WSI:  Massive – yes.  And you don’t even get it all from the street you know.

UM:  No?

WSI:  Nearly a third of it is underground I believe.  Was told that some time ago…

In fact, if I recall, if you take the square footage of the World Bank and both IMF buildings…they are larger than the White House, the Capitol building, the State Department, and the Treasury buildings combined.

UM:  Really? That doesn’t seem possible.

WSI:  It does give one pause, does it not?  Why those two entities – which are in fact simply different appendages from a shared entity…why…or how, the IMF and World Bank dwarf those symbols of the American Republic.  And the proximity upon which  they loom just down the road from the cradle of this nation’s democracy.  Those buildings represent an entire nation within a nation if you will…and a clear and quite present danger to the unique and critical ideal  of a self-sustaining Unites States.  An ideal that has been systematically bargained away and given over to the vultures of globalism.

UM:  That’s a mouthful.

WSI:  That is the cold hard truth of it.  And so it has been marching to that end for decades, and now it would appear the current president and those who comprise his administration and support system, are the final harbingers of that very certain reality.  If you did not grasp the enormity of that reality as you stood under the face of those buildings – those massive and never sleeping soldiers of globalization…I perhaps thought too much of your abilities.  Perhaps if you were to look into the timing of the IMF’s gold activities – and the accompanying Federal Reserve’s manipulations of the dollar…

(Pause)

Did you…take a look on the other side as I suggested.  The area that bookends 19th and G – with the White House almost directly in between?

UM:  I assumed you meant the Treasury building.

WSI:  Assumed?  So you…did not investigate that area as well?

UM:  No.

WSI: (Sighs)  Ah…so I did overestimate your abilities.  Or underestimated your ignorance.  That is my error.

UM:  I wasn’t aware – you didn’t make it clear I needed to—-

WSI:  (Interrupts) —Didn’t “make it clear”?  That is an excuse.  Excuses are what has brought this situation to it’s now near inevitable conclusion.  Don’t talk to me of “making it clear” – you were given an opportunity to see for yourself.  You failed to do so.

UM: Fine.  I failed.  How about you explain what I would have seen if I had went to that area…the bookend of 19th and G.  Perhaps I would have been just as underwhelmed as the IMF and World Bank buildings left me.

WSI:  How anyone can say they looked into such buildings…the thousands upon thousands of people inside of them…the security measures alone for the IMF…though perhaps you didn’t even bother to push it that far…no…you simply walked on.  As is the way with youthful indifference.  As is the way with those who would once again vote for President Obama.  The utter indifference that is the downfall of this gift.

UM: Gift?

WSI:  Yes – GIFT.   America.  It is a gift – one from God.  A divine gift to the world…and one that is now being rebuked.  Utterly shameful.  We will reap what we sow.

UM:  Back to the bookend – what did you want me to see?

WSI:  What you or anyone who simply takes a bit of time to discover…you have written on the very subject!  You write these things…then you move on.  Others read them…then they too move on.  So few take the time to then watch and learn…it all gets so…so dumbed down by too little time taken to comprehend what is right there in front of our noses!  Every time a nation undergoes a collapse…every time we then look back and pass judgement on how those involved could not see…all of the clues were there and yet they could not see.  But now…now we are the ones who choose not to see.  Or hear…because we have long ago forgotten how to listen.

I thought you were one to listen.

It appears I was wrong.

UM:  I apologize – that’s not true.  I misunderstood you – that’s not the same thing.

WSI:  Again…an excuse.

UM:  What was there you wanted me to see?  I wrote about it before?

WSI:  Yes – you did.  Everything you have written on I have followed – to the smallest detail, even your readers’ comments…knowing you are being given clues, are being led in a very specific direction…everything.  To do anything less would have been disrespectful of you.  I would not do that.  Have not done it.

But…perhaps I could have been more…clear in my direction.  Perhaps.

UM:  What did I – what did I miss?  What was it you wanted me to see?

WSI:  Do you recall Shorebank?  That quickly forgotten scandal tied to this administration…to the Democratic Party?

UM:  Yes…the failed bank.  It was the front for the Cap and Trade thing right?  Al Gore, Obama, the Clintons – they all had ties to it.  I remember.  Obama – President Obama…he was trying to give it a bailout but the political pressure was too much – he eventually had to let it fail.

WSI:  No – he did not.  That bank…that institution did not fail.

UM:  Yes it did – I read the coverage.  Shorebank failed.  It collapsed.  It was all over the news.

WSI:  You are right – they reported on its failure.  Just as they were supposed to do.

But Shorebank did not fail…it still exists.  Same people.  Same agenda.  If you had gone where I had suggested…you would have seen its proximity to the White House – how it bookends both the IMF and the World Bank.

UM: Shorebank?

WSI:  Yes.

The Solyndra scandal…I told you it represents but a fraction of the kind of corruption inherent within the Obama stimulus package.  Entities such as Shorebank, Solyndra, the pension funds…they are nothing more than multi-billion dollar fronts for this agenda.  And many hands for many years, from both political parties – but certainly more so from the Democrats and their supporters, have been dipping into that cookie jar.  It is that corruption that is far more damaging to the administration than even Fast and Furious, for such corruption is now so long standing it is institutional.  And you, perhaps unknowingly…but I am certain you were being led to that place…you touched on that very thing with your most recent interview with -Name Deleted- .

The demise of that operative.  The theft of the campaign finances.  The strong link between President Obama and the California Attorney General and then of course, the subsequent link to the Department of Justice…all appendages from the same host.  For those who take the time to look.  You unfortunately…have not.  Not fully.

UM:  First let’s get back to Shorebank.  You’re wrong on that.  I can pull up a hundred stories about its collapse.

WSI:  Yes – I am certain you can.

UM:  So?

WSI:  So – that is what was intended.  Can a person change their name and still exist? And are they not still the same person?

UM:  Yeah – of course.

WSI:  There is your answer.

UM:  Shorebank changed its name?

WSI:  Exactly.  Simple.  And I know you have readers who are likely already aware of that fact – they know. But you unfortunately…you simply marched on after being told Shorebank was no more.

UM:  So what’s the new name?

WSI:  U.P.B – Urban Partnership Bank…just another community activist sounding entity.  The kind that is so familiar to this administration.  The name change was reported on…just not nearly to the degree that the “collapse” of Shorebank was. And so…Shorebank lives on – simply having changed its name.

UM:  How so?  The money…the investments—

WSI: (interrupts) —The investments were quickly assembled – and directly by the Obama administration. Look over the list of investors – that information is easily available to you as well.  Institutions that had received tax payer funded bailouts were pushed to invest in the re-born version of Shorebank.  That is what the bailout and the stimulus provided the federal government – the regulatory authority to tell these institutions what to do.  And so they did.  Hundreds of millions of dollars – bailout funds…the people’s money…hundreds of millions spent to prop Shorebank back onto its feet and continue on its way.

And the very same staff remained.  The very same individuals who ran Shorebank and who worked so closely with Democrats and the globalization architects…those very same individuals now run U.P.B.   Shorebank then did not collapse.  She is the very same woman at the dance doing no more than wearing a different dress.  And you, like so many others who pretend to pay attention…you were fooled.

And are you aware of the motto that was Shorebank – that is still the unspoken motto of U.P.B. ?

UM:  No.

WSI:  “Building an inclusive global financial system”

Globalization…the consequential decrease of the United States in favor of…for lack of a better term…a one-world centralized system.  The IMF and it’s ugly and more clumsy cousin, the World Bank – that entity is working overtime now to see that dream a reality.  And no administration in my own lifetime has been so keen to make it happen.  President Obama is…of this I am quite certain…as devoted a globalist as has ever occupied the White House.

The Federal Reserve, working in conjunction with Treasury, has created the false floor that is the American economy.  Perhaps the illusion will play out for another year. or five, maybe even ten…but the time will come…you will be alive for it…perhaps even I will…when the illusion will reveal itself and the collapse will result.  And within that vacuum will come the move for aggressive and outright globalization.

President Barack Obama has been closely tied to Shorebank for far longer than most realize – nearly twenty years.  Is it so much to imagine then that his rise to power…an oddly meteoric rise mind you…is it so much to think that perhaps then there are those within the move for globalization that have been the unknown hand behind this untested and inexperienced man’s ability to be elected President of the United States?

UM:  A conspiracy?

WSI: No – a simple investment.  President Obama is nothing more than an investment with the expectation of return.  Nothing more.  What is politics – those who finance politics…but a system of investment?  So too is the Obama presidency.

What makes this different though, is that the return on investment this time is the collapse of the American economy and its subsequent replacement within the larger globalization movement.

Shorebank lives on – an entity whose motto is “Building an inclusive global financial system”.

And do you know of the four primary offices of Shorebank International?  Their specific locations?  How that information alone is the roadmap of where the Obama administration intends to take the United States?

UM:  The locations?  No.

WSI:  You have Washington D.C. of course.  And Chicago – from where President Obama began his political rise to power.  Where he has been united with Shorebank for nearly 20 years.

D.C. – Chicago…and then London.  The European Union hub if you will.

And then…Islamabad.

UM:  Islamabad?  Shoreline Bank?

WSI:  Yes.  You can look it up – the information is there to find easily enough.  A rather odd location perhaps?  Then again…perhaps not.

And that story of the campaign fund theft – your last interview…

UM:  Yes?

WSI:  Do you know the bank who held those funds?

UM:  I believe I read it – but I don’t remember the name right now.  Not off the top of my head.

WSI:  Again – that is lazy.  You must learn to recall such details.

UM:  Fine – just…just go ahead with your point.

WSI:  That was First California Bank…that is the institution that held the funds that were stolen.  Millions. From the Senator whose operative was found dead.  The Senator who crossed the labor unions.  You recall my warnings about the labor unions in all of this?

UM:  Yes.

WSI:  That bank – First California…are you aware they received bailout funds?  Approximately $25 million I believe.  It was in essence controlled then by the Obama administration.

Are you even aware that one out of every four or five dollars contributed to Barack Obama in 2008 came from California?  Does that not perhaps fit into your recent coverage regarding the now deceased operative?

And where will you find the location of Solyndra?

UM: California.

WSI:  And where will you find the single largest donor to the Obama campaign in 2008?

UM: California

WSI: And the political operative -Name Deleted- told you about?  The one found dead?

UM: California

(Pause)

UM:  Can I ask you a quick question?

WSI:  Certainly.

UM:  Did you attend the Clinton innauguration?  The first one?

WSI:  I have personally attended…on some level… every presidential innauguration since 1977.

Every one.

Why do you ask?

UM:  Just trying to be…less ignorant.

If you are able, will you attend the next inauguration if Barack Obama is re-elected in 2012?

WSI:  No…

(Long pause)

But that is not what I wish to discuss with you now.

Let me tell you of my world…a life’s work, ensuring the always-present security of the United States, and this administration and its supporters’ seeming clear intention of dismantling that security .

For once our economy falls, (raises index finger)… then the Chinese jackboot will soon follow.  The attempted slashing of our military, the destruction of our manufacturing and natural resources base…the speed at which it is all happening now…

…let me explain exactly what is being done.

______________________

PART TWO COMING SOON:  “China and Barack Obama’s Willfull Destruction of the American Military”