Tuesday, March 13, 2012


Posted by BH

Department Of Justice Wants Court To Keep Google/NSA Partnership Secret

Posted by BH


Department Of Justice Wants Court To Keep Google/NSA Partnership Secret 

Court hearing scheduled for next week in ongoing effort by privacy group to expose details of working relationship The Department of Justice will ask a federal court to uphold the secrecy that surrounds the working relationship between Google and the National Security Agency in a hearing that is scheduled for next week.

Department Of Justice Wants Court To Keep Google/NSA Partnership Secret  google nsa 665Privacy watchdog group The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) is returning to court once again in an effort to disclose more information regarding the widely publicized partnership between the spy agency and the search engine giant.
EPIC is suing to obtain documents that detail the relationship, and will appeal against the NSA’s so-called “Glomar” response, claiming it “could neither confirm nor deny” the existence of any information about its relations with Google, because “such a response would reveal information about NSA’s functions and activities.”
The NSA’s response stated that the agency “works with a broad range of commercial partners and research associations” in order to oversee the security of important information systems, but did not provide any further detail.
The issue rose to prominencein January 2010 following a highly sophisticated and targeted cyber attack on the corporate infrastructure of Google and some twenty other large US companies.
The attack was blamed on the Chinese government, prompting Google to embrace a collaboration with the federal agency in charge of global electronic surveillance.
Anonymous sources informed The Washington Post at the time that “the alliance is being designed to allow the two organizations to share critical information”, adding that the agreement will not allow the NSA access to users’ search details or e-mails.
The DOJ is backing NSA’s Glomar response, as The Legal Times reports:
DOJ’s legal team said that acknowledging whether NSA and Google formed a partnership from a cyber attack would illuminate whether the government “considered the alleged attack to be of consequence for critical U.S. government information systems.”
DOJ said media reports about the alleged Google partnership with NSA do not constitute official acknowledgement.
“If NSA determines that certain security vulnerabilities or malicious attacks pose a threat to U.S. government information systems, NSA may take action,” DOJ Civil Division lawyers wrote in a brief.
In its own opening brief, EPIC argues that records the NSA holds on the subject are not exempt from public disclosure under FOIA request.
“Communications from Google to the NSA do not implicate the agency’s functions and activities, and are therefore not exempt from disclosure.” the brief states.
“Further, some records responsive to EPIC’s FOIA Request concern NSA activities that may fall outside the scope of the agency’s authority. These records are not exempt from disclosure.” it continues.
EPIC believes that any burgeoning partnership between Google and the government spy force responsible for warrantless monitoring of Americans’ phone calls and e-mails in the wake of 9/11 raises significant privacy concerns.
“Google provides cloud-based services to consumers, not critical infrastructure services to the government,” EPIC attorney Marc Rotenberg said, noting that the group’s records request does not seek documents about NSA’s role to secure government computer networks.
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit will preside over the hearing, scheduled for March 20.
Google’s partnership with the intelligence network is not new. As we reported in late 2006, An ex-CIA agent Robert David Steele has claimed sources told him that CIA seed money helped get the company off the ground
Speaking to the Alex Jones Show, Steele elaborated on previous revelations by making it known that the CIA helped bankroll Google at its very inception. Steele named Google’s CIA point man as Dr. Rick Steinheiser, of the Office of Research and Development.
“I think Google took money from the CIA when it was poor and it was starting up and unfortunately our system right now floods money into spying and other illegal and largely unethical activities, and it doesn’t fund what I call the open source world,” said Steele, citing “trusted individuals” as his sources for the claim.
“They’ve been together for quite a while,” added Steele.
The NSA’s involvement with Google should be treated as highly suspect, given the agency’s track record and its blatant disregard for the Fourth Amendment.
set of documents obtained by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) in June 2007 revealed that US telco AT&T allowed the NSA to set up a ‘secret room’ in its offices to monitor internet traffic.
The discovering prompted a lawyer for an AT&T engineer to allege that “within two weeks of taking office, the Bush administration was planning a comprehensive effort of spying on Americans” That is BEFORE 9/11, before the nation was embroiled in the freedom stripping exercise commonly known as the “war on terror” had even begun.
In late 2007, reports circulated that the NSA had increasing control over SSL, now called Transport Layer Security, the cryptographic protocol that provides secure communications on the internet for web browsing, e-mail, instant messaging, and other data transfers.
In 2008, Google denied that it had any role in the NSA’s “terrorist” surveillance program, after first refusing to say if they have provided users private data to the federal government under the warrantless wiretapping initiative.
However, it is clear where Google’s interests lie given that the company is supplying the software, hardware and tech support to US intelligence agencies in the process of creating a vast closed source database for global spy networks to share information.
The government supply arm of Google has also reportedly entered into a number of other contracts, details of which it says it cannot share.
Google’s approach to privacy also came under scrutiny more recently when it was discovered that the company was essentially vacuuming up WiFi network data as it gathered images for its Streetview program.
Google insisted that the practice was a mistake, even though information published in January 2010 revealed that the data collection program was a very deliberate effort to assemble as much information as possible about U.S. residential and business WiFi networks.
Steve Watson is the London based writer and editor for Alex Jones’ Infowars.net, and Prisonplanet.com. He has a Masters Degree in International Relations from the School of Politics at The University of Nottingham in England.


Posted by BH
Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:30 PM




Gallup released their annual state-by-state presidential approval numbers yesterday, and the results should have 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue very worried. If President Obama carries only those states where he had a net positive approval rating in 2011 (e.g. Michigan where he is up 48 percent to 44 percent), Obama would lose the 2012 election to the Republican nominee 323 electoral votes to 215.
Gallup adds:
Overall, Obama averaged 44% job approval in his third year in office, down from 47% in his second year. His approval rating declined from 2010 to 2011 in most states, with Wyoming, Connecticut, and Maine showing a marginal increase, and Massachusetts, Wisconsin, Minnesota, New Jersey, Arizona, West Virginia, Michigan, and Georgia showing declines of less than a full percentage point. The greatest declines were in Hawaii, South Dakota, Nebraska, and New Mexico.

Saudi on Student Visa Was Arrested After ‘Threatening to Blow Up White House’

Posted by Bh

White House (AP Photo)
White House(CNSNews.com) - A Saudi Arabian national who entered the United States on a student visa was arrested in January after he threatened to blow up the White House, according to written and verbal testimony presented to Congress last week by two top officials of the Department of Homeland Security.
The revelation came in a hearing called on March 6 by the House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security to examine why a Moroccan national, Amine El Khalifi, had been able to remain in the United States for 13 years after his tourist visa expired before he was arrested last month for allegedly attempting to commit a suicide bombing at the U.S. Capitol.
At the March 6 hearing, DHS tried to highlight some of its successes in tracking down dangerous aliens who have been let into the United States.
“In January 2012, for example,” said Peter Edge, DHS’s deputy associate director for Immigration and Customs Enforcement investigations, “ICE special agents from our Washington, D.C., office arrested a Saudi Arabian national who was admitted as an F-1 nonimmigrant student and violated the term and condition of his admission.
“The individual,” said Edge, “was referred for investigation after his status was terminated in SEVIS [Student and Exchange Visitor Information System] for failure to maintain student status as well as for possessing several indicators of national security concerns, including threatening to blow up the White House and the Saudi Arabian cultural mission to the United States.”
SEVIS is an Internet-based system created by DHS to house information about people who come to the United States on student visas.
The story Edge told was repeated in written testimony that Edge submitted to the subcommittee in conjunction with John Cohen, DHS’s deputy counter-terrorism coordinator.
“More recently in January 2012, ICE Special Agents from the Washington, D.C. office arrested a Saudi Arabian national who was admitted as an F-1 nonimmigrant student and violated the terms and conditions of his admission,” said Edge and Cohens’ written testimony. “The individual was referred for investigation after his status was terminated in SEVIS for failure to maintain student status, as well as for possessing several indicators of national security concerns, including threatening to blow up the White House and the Saudi Arabian Cultural Mission to the United States.”
CNSNews.com asked ICE and the Department of Justice for additional information about the Saudi national who was arrested after threatening “to blow up the White House,” as this testimony revealed. Where was he supposed to be studying? What was he supposed to be studying? How long had he been in the United States? Has he, or will he be, charged with any crime?
The Department of Justice referred CNSNews.com to ICE for answers, and ICE was unable to provide any by the time this story was posted.
No one on the congressional committee asked Edge or Cohen any follow-questions about the Saudi who had been arrested.
Hani Hanjour, one of the 9-11 hijackers, was a Saudi Arabian national admitted to the U.S. on a student visa, according to the report of the 9-11 Commission.


Posted by Bh


Posted by BH


Posted by BH

I thought you might find this interesting, -- maybe even SICKENING!
The National Association of Realtors is all over this and working to get it repealed, -- before it takes effect.  But, I am very pleased we aren't the only ones who know about this ploy to steal billions from unsuspecting homeowners.  How many realtors do you think will vote Democratic in 2012?
Did you know that if you sell your house after 2012 you will pay a 3.8% sales tax on it?  That's $3,800 on a $100,000 home, etc.  When did this happen?  It's in the health care bill, -- and it goes into effect in 2013.  Why 2013?  Could it be so that it doesn’t come to light until after the 2012 elections?  So, this is ‘change you can believe in’?
Under the new health care bill all real estate transactions will be subject to a 3.8% sales tax.
If you sell a $400,000 home, there will be a $15,200 tax.  This bill is set to screw the retiring generation, -- who often downsize their homes.  Does this make your November, 2012 vote more important?
Oh, you weren't aware that this was in the Obama Care bill?  Guess what; you aren't alone!  There are more than a few members of Congress that weren't aware of it either.

Is The Obama Regime Actually Threatening Members Of The Media

Posted by HS

GrassTopsUSA Masthead
Is The Obama Regime Actually Threatening Members Of The Media Over The Birth Certificate Controversy?
     Mike Zullo, the lead investigator for Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Cold Case Posse, just released a huge bombshell: “During our investigation, we actually were told [that media] had been threatened with FTC investigations. Commentators [had been] threatened with their jobs.” And according to WND.com, the "threats were so intimidating that some individuals quit their positions over safety concerns for their families."

     A legitimate and duly constituted law enforcement investigation, that obtained sworn affidavits and testimony from graphics experts, law enforcement experts and private citizens, has uncovered compelling evidence that the
"birth certificate" released by Team Obama is a computer-generated forgery and that the man who is presently occupying the Oval Office is potentially occupying that office as a result of FRAUD and FORGERY.

     AND NOW... it would appear that we can add RACKETEERING and CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY to the list of charges that must be investigated. If the American people could legitimately ask what a sitting President knew about a third-rate burglary attempt and when he knew about it, then the American people DESERVE to know what Barack Hussein Obama knows about attempts to threaten members of the media over his computer-generated "birth certificate."

     Enough is enough. If people are indeed being threatened with frivolous government
"investigations" ... if livelihoods are being placed in jeopardy... if people are leaving their positions out of concern for the safety of their loved ones, then
  Congress can no longer ignore this issue. Our elected officials can no longer stick their heads in the sand. Congress MUST finally investigate this constitutional crisis.


Posted by BH

headshotRich Lowry

For Attorney General Eric Holder, life must present a hellish vista of pervasive racist practices.
Wherever he goes, people are required to show identification. When cashing a check. When signing up for a library card. When boarding a plane. When entering certain office buildings. When checking into hotels. When (in the case of the youthful-looking) buying a beer or cigarettes, or entering a bar.
The tyranny of the photo ID is so all-encompassing that people can’t enter Holder’s own Justice Department without showing one.
Holder is outraged that in a nation where requests for photo ID are ubiquitous, more and more states are requiring that people show them when they vote. In a speech last year, Holder characterized these voter-ID laws as an assault on the voting rights that Congressman John Lewis — the hero of Edmund Pettus Bridge — fought for in the mid-1960s.

Back then, blacks in the South had to fear for their safety if they showed up at the courthouse to try to register to vote. Now, states are merely asking everyone, regardless of race, to show identification that is readily available to all, regardless of race.
That Holder can equate the fight against voter ID to the struggles of the 1960s demonstrates a moral obtuseness insulting to the memory of the civil-rights pioneers. His Justice Department is now blocking a new voter-ID law in Texas, after doing the same to a South Carolina law. It argues that the Texas statute will disproportionally affect poor Latinos and therefore violate the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
Why would the yokels in Texas do something so outrageous as ask that people prove who they are at polling places? It is obviously a basic check against fraud. Requiring an ID to vote was one of the proposals in 2005 of the commission on federal election reform, chaired by Jimmy Carter and James Baker, neither of whom had previously been noted for his hostility to minorities or the poor.
Analyzing Texas data, the Justice Department contends that anywhere from 6 percent to 10 percent of Hispanic registered voters don’t have ID. It piles up a parade of horribles — no cars, great distances, inconvenient hours — for why such potential voters can’t get to an office to acquire one, even though the state’s Department of Public Safety will issue election identification certificates for free.
The experience of other states with voter-ID laws suggests that minorities are not the hapless victims that Holder’s Justice Department portrays them as. Hans von Spakovsky of The Heritage Foundation points out that black turnout increased in Georgia in 2008, the first election under a voter-ID law, more than it did in Mississippi, which didn’t have such a law. A study by the University of Delaware and the University of Nebraska-Lincoln concluded that “concerns about voter-identification laws affecting turnout are much ado about nothing.”
Before his next speech, Holder should bone up on the Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision in 2008 upholding Indiana’s voter-ID law. The liberal Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the majority opinion. The court held that “there is no question about the legitimacy or importance of the state’s interest in counting only the votes of eligible voters,” and “we cannot conclude that the statute imposes ‘excessively burdensome requirements’ on any class of voters.”
The decision cited the finding of a district judge that plaintiffs had “not introduced evidence of a single, individual Indiana resident who will be unable to vote as a result of the law.” Presumably, if the Indiana law had represented the recrudescence of Jim Crow, the nation’s highest court would have noticed.
Not that any of this matters to Attorney General Holder. Just as the administration is manufacturing a “war on women,” he wants to manufacture a “war on voting rights.” It is the same MO of fevered rhetoric and distortions in the service of the same end of motivating key voting blocs. Holder’s tenure as the government’s top lawyer is an ongoing disgrace.


Ignoring Islamo-Fascism at our Peril

Posted by BH

In early November 2009 Americans were shocked to learn that an Army psychiatrist, Major Nidal Malik Hasan, had shot and killed twelve soldiers at Fort Hood, Texas, and wounded thirty-one others. Because of the unrelenting political correctness prevailing in the Army and other services, all the signs that Hasan was a ticking time bomb were ignored.
Hasan was known to be a Muslim, had exhibited signs of a growing fanaticism, occasionally showed up in the post exchange dressed in Arab garb, and as it turned out later, was being mentored by Yemen’s al Qaeda leader, Anwar al-Awlaki , an American citizen who was later killed by a drone strike. As Hasan stood before the soldiers, firing at them, he yelled “Allah Akbar.”
This and other attacks, planned, failed, and thwarted occurred before and since 9/11; an attack that stunned Americans, all contribute to the worldwide terrorism intended to bring about the domination of Islam. Not only has the memory faded, but in 2009 the Obama administration did away with the earlier description of “a war on terrorism”, it ordered the Pentagon to replace it with “overseas contingency operations.”
The administration’s magical thinking about the Islamo-fascist threat makes one wonder why it has a Department of Homeland Security.
When it became known that the New York City Police Department was training its force to be especially watchful for any signs of terrorist attacks and was paying close attention to the mosques in the city and across the river in New Jersey, there was an outcry that totally ignored the threat. Initially they were rebuked by the Governor of New Jersey, a state where the 1993 attack on the Twin Towers was planned. One of the conspirators arrested lived in my hometown!
A report by the NYPD notes that Newark police officers worked closely “at all times” with their New York City counterparts. Much of the criticism of the NYPD’s program has been due to its success!
In a new book by Peter Feaman, “The Next Nightmare: How Political Correctness Will Destroy America” ($14.99, Dunham Books, softcover), a trial lawyer with thirty years’ experience, warns against the way Americans are leaving themselves vulnerable to future attacks. “Intolerance of Christianity and Judaism, and violence against infidels, is preached weekly in mosques across the United States.”
A great deal of the problem is that Americans believe that Islam is a “religion.” Historically, it has been a cult of conquest that merges its belief system with a political agenda in which Sharia law is intended to be imposed throughout the world. Its early, swift spread was based on terror and warfare.
No other “religion” preaches death to believers of other faiths. No other “religion” demands that apostates who convert be sentenced to death. No other “religion” resorts to intimidation on the scale of Islam. It is fascism masquerading as religion.
“At the end of World War II,” notes Feaman, “there were about fifty mosques located in the United States. Today there are more than 1,300—and the number grows monthly.” Much of the funding comes from Saudi Arabia for Sunni mosques and Iran for Shiite mosques.
There are moderate Muslims seeking reform within Islam and there are Muslims who are loyal Americans. They are, however, vastly outnumbered by those with very bad intentions.
The NYPD program aimed at monitoring mosques is critical to thwart future attacks. “The six men of the al Qaeda sleeper cell in Lackawanna, New York—who were arrested by the FBI in 2001 for attending an al Qaeda terrorist training camp in Afghanistan—all belonged to the same Lackawanna mosque.”
“In Florida’s Dade and Broward Counties, an imam and his two sons were arrested on May 14, 2011, charged with funneling money to the Pakistani Taliban…”
“A Sunni mosque in suburban Beaverton, Oregon was the meeting ground for six members indicted by federal authorities in 2002 for conspiring to provide aid to the Taliban and al Qaeda terrorists.”
The Al-Farooq mosque in Brooklyn has been in the public spotlight for more than ten years as a hotbed of Islamic radicalism, sedition, and treason. The imam there, Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman, was convicted in 1995 of conspiracy to bomb New York City landmarks.”
Islamo-fascism is spreading everywhere, but especially in Europe where many acts of terrorism have occurred. By 2050, Muslims will be in control of most European nations by sheer weight of numbers. The “Arab spring” is rapidly becoming the means by which Islamists are gaining control throughout those nations that overthrew their mostly secular dictators.
If we don’t want a repeat of the Fort Hood murders—labeled “workplace violence” by the Obama administration—if we don’t want another Times Square car bomb that mercifully was disarmed, if we want to be protected against future attacks, we must rid ourselves of the political correctness that will get us killed.
The notion that the New York City Police Department would come under fire for acting preemptively to prevent further attacks in the city is beyond absurd. It is suicidal.


Posted by BH

Law enforcement officials across the US have been left baffled by a crime wave targeting an unlikely item -- Tide laundry detergent.
Theft of Tide detergent has become so rampant that some cities are setting up special task forces to stop it and retailers like CVS are taking special security precautions to lock down the liquid.
One Tide thief in West St. Paul, Minn., stole $25,000 of the product over 15 months before he was arrested last year.
"That was unique that he stole so much soap," said West St. Paul Police Chief Bud Shaver.
"The name brand is [all] Tide. Amazing, huh?"
Tide has become a form of currency on the streets. The retail price is steadily high -- roughly $10 to $20 a bottle -- and it's a staple in households across socioeconomic classes.
Tide can go for $5 to $10 a bottle on the black market, authorities say, and some thieves even resell it to stores.
"There's no serial numbers and it's impossible to track," said Detective Larry Patterson of the Somerset, Ky., Police Department, where authorities have seen a huge spike in Tide theft. "It's the item to steal."

Major Ed Dames on the Coast to Coast AM Radio Show with George Norry this Thursday Mar 15

Posted by BH


Don't miss Major Ed Dames on the Coast to Coast AM with George Norry this Thursday Mar 15 Check your local listing for the Coast to Coast show Late night in your area.

This last week has created a firestorm of news and scientific reports regarding the possibility of massive solar flares hitting the Earth within the next 5-25 years! Over the last several years many remained skeptical but it was Military Intelligence Officer, Major Ed Dames (U.S. Army ret.) that revealed the U.S. government has known about this all through the classified Remote Viewing program! It’s time to find out the truth and what Remote Viewers have known was coming all along

General Boykin discusses Panetta, ‘Kony 2012′ on radio with Glen Beck

Posted by BH


General Boykin discusses Panetta, ‘Kony 2012′ on radio

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta’s admission he seeks international permission ahead of Congressional approval shocked a lot of Americans. Glenn talked with General (Ret) Jerry Boykin on radio today about that and the Joseph Kony story, which has caught fire on the internet.
“People in Uganda are upset about this, too,” Boykin said. “You know, this guy has been obscure, at best, since 2006, but if you want to help (Uganda), help with the nongovernment organizations that are actually doing good charitable work here, that are building orphanages and taking care of the people, rather than contributing to something like this for an issue that really has not been a major factor in the last six years.”
“If we were to kill Joseph Kony, does that put an end to the LRA? Is there nobody that picks up the torch for him, where he left off? I mean, is that the end of it?” Pat asked.
“Well, did the killing of Osama bin Laden put an end to Al Qaeda?” Boykin responded.
Boykin continued, “The question is: What’s the U.S. interest in this? And, no. If we wanted to kill Joseph Kony, I can just about assure you that we could kill Joseph Kony. That would be a relatively straightforward operation, in cooperation with the intelligence community.”

O'Reilly: I'm too busy to report on Obama eligibility Bill says Sheriff Joe found no 'hard evidence' to support suspicions

Posted by BH


Responding to a viewer question about why he’s been silent on a just-completed six-month law enforcement investigation into Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility, top Fox News anchorman Bill O’Reilly replied on video, saying: 1) there’s no hard evidence Obama isn’t eligible; 2) Hawaii newspaper ads proved Obama was born there; and 3) he’s just too busy to look into it anyway. The statements from O’Reilly came in a “Backstage Conversation” piece for premium members of his website posted on YouTube, producing a flood of venom directed at both O’Reilly and Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Ariz.

Michelle Obama Goes Beserk Over Birth Certificate Findings

Posted by BH


Michelle Obama Goes Beserk Over Birth Certificate Findings

(ACN Staff)  When Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Cold Case Posse released its findings and announced that there is "probable cause" to believe that the "birth certificate" released by Team Obama in April is a "computer generated forgery," the liberal media yawned, but allegations are now surfacing that at least one person in the White House, namely First Lady Michelle Obama, is frantic and in a beserk frenzy over the Cold Case Posse's findings.

According to a report released by the supermarket tabloid, The Globe, Michele Obama "went beserk when she learned the results of the investigation."  According to an inside source: "Michelle stormed into the Oval Office and blasted" Obama for not knocking down the scandal long ago.  The report goes on to state that while she is furious with Arpaio, she is "even more burned up at Barack" and the incident has "thrown their marriage into chaos."

Of course, insiders have long speculated that the marriage has been in chaos for quite some time.  As reported back in December, allegations also surfaced that
Michelle Obama is having a secret affair with an unnamed Secret Service agent; and accusations by Larry Sinclair that he smoked crack cocaine and had an affair with Barack Obama in the back of a limo, some years back, refuse to go away.

Understandably, the media does not typically report on unsubstantiated claims from anonymous sources, but that standard has become fuzzy as of late.  We all remember the media feeding frenzy over unsubstantiated allegations against businessman Herman Cain, which literally sank his candidacy, and the reluctance of the media
to report any credible claims that bolstered the contention that Cain was innocent of the unsubstantiated charges. 

Why is the liberal media refusing to even investigate these claims?  Where is Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly and the rest of the conservative media? Such inconsistent standards of reporting leave the question open: will the media pursue, or even bother to investigate what should be the story of the century? 

Unsubstantiated claims are one thing.  Cold hard evidence is another and it should go without saying that the findings of the Cold Case Posse should be a game changer.

legitimate and duly constituted law enforcement investigation, that obtained sworn affidavits and testimony from graphics experts, law enforcement experts and private citizens, has uncovered compelling evidence that the "birth certificate" released by Team Obama is a computer generated forgery and that the man who is presently occupying the Oval Office is potentially occupying that office as a result of fraud and forgery.

While the liberal media is doing everything in its power to ignore the findings of Arpaio's Cold Case Posse, Obama can't ignore the findings; and if Mike Zullo, the lead investigator for Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Cold Case Posse, is correct, not only is Team Obama not ignoring the findings, but the media's see-no-evil attitude may not simply be the result of liberal bias.

Zullo just released another huge bombshell: “During our investigation, we actually were told [that media] had been threatened with FTC investigations. Commentators [had been] threatened with their jobs” and the "threats were so intimidating that some individuals quit their positions over safety concerns for their families."

Author Jerome Corsi added more fuel to this growing fire when he recently stated: "Testimony is being developed that the White House is intimidating, in a systematic way, the mainstream media and if any broadcasters dare go into this birther story, they're going to risk FCC investigations... people are going to have careers ruined... thrown off the air."

Obviously, there is more going on than meets the eye and hopefully, more information will be forthcoming. Corsi claims that the evidence that the Cold Case Posse presented at the press conference was just  "the tip of the iceberg" and he adds: "There are very deep and important revelations that are being worked on and they are systematically coming out in the next few weeks."

Once again, we are left to ask, where is the liberal media? Why is the reporting on such shocking allegations only coming from the supermarket tabloids? Why is Obama not being properly vetted and will the media eventually catch up to the tabloids and investigate these pile of stories that could sink the Obama presidency? 

Only time will tell... Developing.

Monday, March 12, 2012

Sheriff Joe on Obama Investigation: Worse Than Watergate; Biggest Media Blackout in History

Posted by BH
by Mark Gillar

Monday, March 12, 2012

Sheriff Joe on Obama Investigation: Worse Than Watergate; Biggest Media Blackout in History

Image: Ralph Freso/AP
Sheriff Joe Arpaio on Obama Investigation: Ten Times Worse 
Than Watergate; Biggest Media Blackout in History
Mark Gillar @ Tea Party Power Hour

Sheriff Joe discusses his investigation into Obama's birth certificate and selective service card. - VIDEO HERE & HERE



ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

"The Obama Embarrassment"




Collapse Coming–Not Recovery

12 March 2012 
By Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com 
The way the latest unemployment numbers were reported by the mainstream media (MSM), you would think the Great Recession was over and the United States was solidly on the road to recovery.  The Associated Press reported the numbers by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) with a story that said, “The United States added 227,000 jobs in February, the latest display of the breadth and strength of the economic recovery. The country has put together the most impressive three months of job growth since before the Great Recession.  The unemployment rate stayed at 8.3 percent. It was the first time in six months it didn’t fall, and that was because a half-million Americans started looking for work.”  (Click here for the complete AP story.)    I don’t see how the MSM can say this one number is “the latest display of the breadth and strength of the economic recovery.”   
Cyclical and structural unemployment are gripping the nation.   Certain jobs are gone forever or, at the very least, for a very long time.  Maybe that’s why millions of people have given up even looking for work.  Forbes.com reported, just a few weeks ago, millions have stopped looking for work, and the government has stopped counting them.  The report said, “In the latest, much celebrated, unemployment report, the labor force participation rate had plummeted to 63.7%, the most rapid decline in U.S. history.  That means that under President Obama nearly 5 million Americans have fled the workforce in hopeless despair.  The trick is that when those 5 million are not counted as in the work force, they are not counted as unemployed either.  They may desperately need and want jobs.  They may be in poverty, as many undoubtedly are, with America suffering today more people in poverty than in the entire half century the Census Bureau has been counting poverty.  But they are not even counted in that 8.3% unemployment rate that Obama and his media cheerleaders were so tirelessly celebrating last week.” 

Quote ?

Posted by Bh from DH

"Capitalism is the unequal 
distribution of wealth. 
Communism is the equal 
distribution of poverty "

Winston Churchill




Posted by BH


Posted by BH

A majority of Americans disapprove of the way President Barack Obama is handling the economy -- with a record number who "disapprove strongly" -- amid soaring gas prices and an uncertain fiscal future, a new Washington Post-ABC News survey out Monday found.
The  poll found that 50 percent of those surveyed strongly disapprove of Obama's economic performance -- the highest in the poll's history. A total of 59 percent gave the president negative marks on the economy.
With rising gas prices hitting Americans at the pump, 65 percent said they found Obama's handling of the issue unsatisfactory. Of that number, 52 percent were said to "disapprove strongly" and only 14 percent "approve strongly" of Obama's performance on gas prices.
However, it appeared that the responses could have been based in part on political ideology, with Democrats less likely than Republicans to say that gas prices have taken a toll on their families, the study found.
The president also fared poorly on other issues. Sixty-three percent of Americans gave him negative marks on the country's budget deficit, while just 16 percent strongly approved of his work in that area. Asked about the White House's energy policy, 48 percent disapproved with Obama's performance.
Obama's handling of foreign policy, and specifically the war in Afghanistan, was almost evenly split between those who approved and disapproved -- 46 percent approved while 47 percent disapproved.
Regarding the president's overall job performance, 50 percent said they were unhappy with Obama and 39 percent strongly disapproved of his performance, while just 28 percent strongly agreed that he was doing a good job.
Asked who they would vote for if the presidential election were held today, 47 percent said they would vote for Obama if his opponent was former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney -- but he would not be re-elected as 49 percent threw their support behind Romney.
Pitted against former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, Obama received 49 percent to Santorum's 46 percent.
The telephone survey -- conducted from Wednesday to Saturday among 1,003 adults nationwide -- came as the Labor Department's employment report Friday showed that the US economy added 227,000 jobs in February, continuing an upward trend.
The survey had a margin of error of four percentage points.
Click here for more on this story from The Washington Post.

What Happened to the Health-Care Law, Massive Debt?

Posted by BH


Posted by BH

  author-image by Chuck Norris

Obama_12President Barack Obama’s energy plan involves radically increasing gas prices to the European rate of $9-10 a gallon. And he’s well on his way by more than doubling prices at the pump since entering office in January 2009, when gasoline was only $1.79 per gallon. Here’s how he schemes to double prices again in his second term, with you footing the bill. We’re all being gouged at the pumps.
And the reason for soaring gas prices?
According to President Obama, it’s not because of anything he has done: including devaluing the dollar via his disastrous economic decisions, closing federal lands for oil production opened by his predecessor, passing cap-and-trade legislation in the middle of the worst economy since the Great Depression, or refusing to stand strong against the regime in Iran, which controls 20 percent of all global oil supply via the Strait of Hormuz.
President Obama would do well to take the advice of former Sen. Obama, who said in 2006 about possible $3 a gallon gas: “The time for excuses is over.”
Last week in Part 1, I began to detail how President Obama’s dreadful economic strategies and initiatives, as well as global relations (or lack thereof), have contributed to higher gas prices – and that his administration continues to play duck-n-dodge when it comes to any mea culpas for our fuel fiasco.
To add injury to insult, President Obama has appointed some petroleum-pillaging politicians, like Secretary of the Department of Energy Stephen Chu, who, according to the Wall Street Journal, said in 2008 that in order to wean Americans off gasoline, they should punitively pay at the pump: “Somehow we have to figure out how to boost the price of gasoline to the levels in Europe.”
And just two weeks ago, as reported by Politico, Chu again told Congress that Obama’s Department of Energy “isn’t working to lower gasoline prices directly,” but “is working to promote alternatives such as biofuels and electric vehicles.”
When Rep. Alan Nunnelee, R-Miss., specifically asked Chu if the Obama administration’s goal was to lower gas prices, he emphatically replied, “No.” (Out of the horse’s mouth!)
But I suppose the views of Obama-appointed officials like Chu don’t have any bearing on soaring gas prices either, right?
Washington and Wall Street prognosticators are now pondering, “Will higher gas prices derail the economic recovery?”
Their answer? “Not yet.”
(That’s comforting, isn’t it?)
Just two weeks ago, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke also confessed to Congress in his semi-annual report that the job market was “far from normal” and that rising gasoline prices will likely push up inflation and reduce consumers’ purchasing power.
According to Carl Riccadonna, a senior economist at Deutsche Bank, “the rule of 

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...