Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR
FORGERYGATE:
DEMAND A SPECIAL COUNSEL APPOINTMENT
By:
Devvy
April 16, 2012
NewsWithViews.com
Barack
Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro aka Barry Dunham aka Barack Dunham - all
known aliases of the occupant in the White House. I will refer to him
as Barry Soetoro since that appears to be the last known legal name of
the mystery man.
Over
the past four years I have followed every case filed, read every brief
submitted and a million words on the constitutional meaning of 'natural
born citizen'. Only those in denial or whose ideological agenda depends
on Barry staying in office refuse to acknowledge that Soetoro was born
with dual citizenship. He was ineligible in 2008 and he's still ineligible
in 2012.
In the
only oral arguments to actually take place out in Georgia, the end result
has been the same. Two weeks ago, the Georgia Supreme Court checked their
manhood at the door and ruled against all the plaintiffs. Those judges
followed the cowardly path taken by Judge Mahili in his original decision
to allow Barry on the Georgia ballot despite the undeniable legal facts
presented by plaintiffs during the original hearings. However, what the
Georgia Supreme Court did was even more reprehensible according to Van
Irion, Liberty Legal Foundation, who represented David Welden:
"Both
LLF and Georgia Representative Mark Hatfield pointed out to the Court
the date on which the Secretary of State planned to certify the election.
Yet the Court sat on our filings for seven days, then ruled on the day
certification had been planned. If we had been given one or two days
we could have filed an emergency motion with the U.S. Supreme Court.
Currently the Justice assigned to review such motions from Georgia is
the most Constitutional originalist, Justice Clarence Thomas. I'm sure
that the Georgia Supreme Court is aware that Justice Thomas would have
been our next step, had we had time to file another motion. The Georgia
Court ensured that such review was not possible by waiting until the
last day to rule before our motion became moot. It is possible that
this timing was nothing more than a busy court not being able to rule
faster, but after what we have seen in Georgia, do you believe that?
Even if that is true, what does it say about this Court's level of respect
for the importance of this case? The Court didn't even bother to spell
our client's name correctly! I believe that this latest ruling proves
that Georgia law does not apply to the powerful."
As I
have written in many columns, Barry cannot be impeached. He usurped the
office of the presidency. The only legal method to remove him is through
the Quo Warranto statute. A proper QW was filed on January 3, 2012, by
presidential candidate, Montgomery Blair Sibley. He filed a Certified
Petition for Writs Quo Warranto and Mandamus in the United States District
Court for the District of Columbia, the proper legal forum. The judge,
Amy Jackson Berman, apparently doesn't have the courage to address this
issue because she has refused to respond.
Forty
days after Sibley's filing, the District Court Judge had not ruled on
any part of the suit, so he filed a petition for mandamus with the Circuit
Court of Appeal. The Appeals Court then ruled: “The district court's
delay in ruling on the petition for writ of quo warranto is not so egregious
or unreasonable as to warrant the extraordinary remedy of mandamus.”
Sibley then filed with the U.S. Supreme Court: "On April 20, the
U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether to fast-track the determination
of Obama's constitutional eligibility to be President."
Unfortunately,
a new effort is underway and being heavily promoted by popular talk show
hosts like Alex Jones. 'Impeach 2012' is a project by Sean Stone, son
of movie producer, Oliver Stone. Another wasted effort by someone who,
while his intentions may be from the heart, apparently has zero understanding
of the constitutional problem of impeaching someone who never held the
office. THAT is the meat of the legal issue. Alex Jones has had Dr. Edwin
Vieria on his show several times and I believe he respects Edwin's undisputed
status as an expert on constitutional issues. Edwin
addressed this issue back in 2008:
"Seventh,
if Obama does become an usurper posturing as “the President,”
Congress cannot even impeach him because, not being the actual President,
he cannot be “removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction
of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” (see
Article II, Section 4). In that case, some other public officials would
have to arrest him—with physical force, if he would not go along
quietly—in order to prevent him from continuing his imposture. Obviously,
this could possibly lead to armed conflicts within the General Government
itself, or among the States and the people.
"Eighth,
even did something approaching civil war not eventuate from Obama’s
hypothetical usurpation, if the Establishment allowed Obama to pretend
to be “the President,” and the people acquiesced in that charade,
just about everything that was done during his faux “tenure in office”
by anyone connected with the Executive Branch of the General Government,
and quite a bit done by the Legislative Branch and perhaps the Judicial
Branch as well, would be arguably illegitimate and subject to being overturned
when a constitutional President was finally installed in office. The potential
for chaos, both domestically and internationally, arising out of this
systemic uncertainty is breathtaking.
"The
underlying problem will not be obviated if Obama, his partisans in the
Democratic Party, and his cheerleaders and cover-up artists in the big
media simply stonewall the issue of his (non) citizenship and contrive
for him to win the Presidential election. The cat is already out of the
bag and running all over the Internet. If he continues to dodge the issue,
Obama will be dogged with this question every day of his purported “Presidency.”
I can't
tell you how many emails I've received over the past few years from "patriots"
who say they don't care whether or not he can't be impeached from a constitutional
prospective, "we" have to impeach him anyway to get him out
of office!
That
position is no different than those we battle against who care nothing
for the U.S. Constitution regarding Barry and his ineligibility. Two wrongs
do not make a right. Don't people get it yet? Don't they understand if
you play the game by their rules you will lose every time?
There
will be no impeachment by the Outlaw Congress. Fact challenged, U.S. Rep.
Walter B. Jones Jr., [R-NC] has
introduced a resolution to impeach for high crimes and misdemeanors
except that as a usurper, Soetoro never had legal authority to act as
Commander-in-Chief.
The
Republicans know such a resolution will go no where. It was introduced
March 7, 2012, and has a grand total of 2 co-sponsors. As Bush was to
Pelosi, Barry is to the GOP for the 2012 elections. The deal makers in
the Outlaw Congress are fully aware that we the people know they are responsible
for allowing the electoral college vote to proceed on January 9, 2009,
installing an impostor president in the White House. Jones' resolution
is simply throwing scraps to the peasants to appease. Keep them herded
in the wrong direction which protects the gross negligence by every incumbent
on January 9, 2009.
Those
who continue to spend time and money on an impeachment are working for
the wrong side whether they know it or not. If Soetoro's "presidency"
is allowed to stand as legitimate, again, it will set one of the worst
legal precedents in the history of this country. I hope that people like
Alex Jones will stop promoting that effort.
While
Sheriff Joe's Cold Posse continues their investigation, is there any other
legal method to remove Barry from the White House? You can't say remove
him from office since he was never eligible to run in 2008. Because Barry
was never eligible to be on the ballot in any state, no one had the right
to vote for him in 2008.
There's
no question Soetoro's Selective Service Registration Card is a forgery.
I don't believe there's doubt any longer he has been using someone else's
social security number. The birth certificate he has presented to the
world is a forgery. But, how do we legally deal with it as we wait to
see what the U.S. Supreme Court decides on April 20, 2012, and beyond?
By demanding
a special prosecutor be appointed to deal with only one issue:
The forged birth certificate. The role of a special counsel is to investigate
wrong doing by the Executive Branch. Barry Soetoro released a forged document
in his "official" capacity on April 27, 2011. He "owns
it" now and for that alone, a special counsel could be appointed.
Why
not include the forged Selective Service (SS) card and use of someone
else's social security number (SSN) to a special counsel? Because the
SS card forgery was committed before he was "elected". I'm not
a lawyer, so I can't say whether or not Barry can still be indicted and
prosecuted under federal law for forging his SS registration form. The
statute of limitations might have already run.
As for
using someone else's SSN, Soetoro can weasel out of that one by saying
his deceased mother applied for the number while he was a minor and he
never had reason to question it. (Smirk)
Second,
and I didn't believe it until I read the cases, courts have now given
the green light in promoting identify theft. In 2010, the Colorado Supreme
Court ruled that a man who used his real name but someone else's Social
Security number to obtain a car loan was not guilty of "criminal
impersonation," overturning convictions by lower courts. That followed
a ruling the prior year by the U.S. Supreme Court, quote: "A Mexican
man who gave a false SSN to get a job at an Illinois steel plant could
not be convicted under federal identity theft laws because he did not
knowingly use another person's identifying number. The ruling overturned
an opinion by a federal appeals court in St. Louis -- and contradicted
earlier findings by circuit courts in the Southeast, upper Midwest and
the Gulf states."
Oh,
that's right. That thief used someone else's SSN to get a job, but didn't
commit a crime because he "did not knowingly use another person's
identifying number". Well, just whose number did that thief think
he was using since it wasn't his own? Those judges should be thrown off
the bench for literally opening the door for more identity theft ruining
people's lives.
Soetoro
can be indicted and prosecuted after he leaves "office" for
carrying out a "scheme to defraud" the public via his "dishonest
services"; United States v. Frega, 179 F.3d 793 (9th Cir.
1999). He most certainly can be indicted, and hopefully convicted, under
the wire fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. §1343. That is not idle
speculation. The impostor president, knowing he was ineligible, solicited
campaign funds via television, radio and the Internet to the tune of about
$700 million dollars. Those charges alone, if convicted, would put him
in federal prison for a long time.
The
House Judiciary Committee has the power and authority to demand a special
counsel. The conundrum is not an easy one to overcome. Current law allows
the U.S. Attorney General to appoint a special counsel. The thoroughly
corrupt, Eric Holder, will never appoint one to investigate the putative
president's deliberate release of a forged document. A forged document
that allegedly reinforces his eligibility. The House Judiciary Committee
could take the extraordinary step of going to the U.S. District Court
in Washington, DC and demand a special counsel be appointed.
If Rep.
Jones feels so strongly about impeachment, perhaps some of his
constituents can educate him on why that cannot and will not happen
and to support appointment of a special counsel. To not support such an
appointment will speak volumes.If the
millions of Americans who are putting their efforts towards impeachment
would flood the House Judiciary Committee with letters demanding a special counsel, it would
raise the stakes to a new level. It would also make Barry's situation
so untenable he "resigns" or his handlers force him to leave;
we know how issues "grow legs". The question of why would Barry
use a forged birth certificate raises the one legal issue for which he
can be removed from the White House: his dual citizenship at birth, not
where he was born. A special counsel would be forced to address that issue.
It's called motive.
At this
time we don't know what Sheriff Joe will do with his final investigation
as far as a legal enforcement body. But, every member of the U.S. House
of Representatives is up for reelection this November. Remind members
of the Judiciary Committee and your incumbent that if they don't stand
up for the U.S. Constitution now, look for a new job. Hit your incumbent
at every town hall meeting, every fund raiser and any where else he/she
appears. Republicans desperately want this to go away, but we the people
can show them it isn't and we will not stop until Barry Soetoro aka Barack
Obama is brought to justice for his crimes.
Links:
Where We Create & Share Music, Talk Radio Shows, Conservative
