NJ GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE for VP? Don’t let Mitt Romney choose a running mate with dirty Islamist ties

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER

JUST REPORTING THE NEWS FOLKS... YOU DECIDE ?

BNI has posted these stories in the past, but here is a good summary of Christie's repugnant, over- the-top support for Muslims with terrorist ties and whose loyalties are to Islam, not America, as well as his disparagement of those who oppose the recognition of sharia law by US Courts.

Daniel Pipes (H/T Frederic F)  A Quinnipiac poll in April showed Chris Christie the most popular potential Republican vice-presidential candidate, thanks to his budget cuts and standing up to government employee unions. But the governor of New Jersey has a problem, specifically an Islam problem, in the way of his possible ascent to higher office. We regret to report that, time and again, he has sided with Islamist forces against those safeguarding American security and civilization.

Some examples:

2008: When serving as U.S. attorney for New Jersey, Christie embraced and kissed Mohammed Qatanani, imam of the Islamic Center of Passaic County, and praised him as "a man of great goodwill."

He did this after Qatanani had publicly ranted against Jews and in support of funding Hamas, a U.S. government–designated terror organization, and on the eve of his deportation hearing for hiding an Israeli conviction for membership in Hamas. In addition, Christie designated a top aide, Assistant U.S. Attorney Charles McKenna, to testify as a character witness for Qatanani

2010: After Derek Fenton burned three pages of a Koran at a 9/11 memorial ceremony, his employer, New Jersey Transit, got Christie's approval to fire him.

Christie vocally endorsed Fenton's termination, even though this meant protecting Islam at the expense of Fenton's constitutional right to free speech, declaring, "I don't have any problem with him being fired." The American Civil Liberties Union successfully represented Fenton to get his job back.

2010: Christie voted 'present' on the issue of opposition to the Ground Zero Victory mosque

“My principles on this are two-fold. One, that we have to acknowledge, respect and give some measure of deference to the feelings of the family members who lost there loved ones there that day. But it would be wrong to so overreact to that, that we paint Islam with a brush of radical Muslim extremists that just want to kill Americans because we are Americans. But beyond that…I am not going to get into it..."

2011: Christie appointed an Islamist, Sohail

 CLICK BELOW TO READ MORE

VW Passat 78.5 MPG (Imperial gallon) 65.2 MPG US gallon in the Uk

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER

CAN'T BUY THIS IN THIS COUNTRY EVEN THOUGH IT'S MADE HERE ?  W.T.F. REALLY

FAKE PRESIDENT - I GUESS IT WILL SINK IN EVENTUALLY FOLKS ?

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER

SO WHAT DO WE DO NOW ?

MAYBE VOTE ? CAN'T IMPEACH - HE'S NOT A LEGAL PRESIDENT - HE IS AN IMPOSTER FOLKS - NEED'S A SET OF CUFF'S AND TAKEN TO THE NEAREST POLICE STATION.

INTRODUCTION TO FREE ZONE MUSLIN BROTHERHOOD SERIES

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR

INTRODUCTION TO THE FREE ZONE SERIES ON WFZR

About the Course

Have you ever asked yourself why, despite more than ten years of efforts –involving, among other things, the loss of thousands of lives in wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, well-over a trillion dollars spent, countless man-years wasted waiting in airport security lines and endless efforts to ensure that no offense is given to seemingly permanently aggrieved Muslim activists – are we no closer to victory in the so-called “war on terror” than we were on 9/11?
Thankfully, we have been able to kill some dangerous bad guys. The sad truth of the matter is that, by almost any other measure, the prospect of victory is becoming more remote by the day. And no one seems able to explain the reason.
In an effort to provide the missing answer, on April 24, the Center for Security Policy is making available via the Internet a new, free ten-part video course called “The Muslim Brotherhood in America: The Enemy Within.” This course connects the proverbial dots, drawing on a wealth of publicly available data and first-hand accounts to present a picture that has, for over a decade, been obscured, denied and suppressed:
America faces in addition to the threat of violent jihad another, even more toxic danger – a stealthy and pre-violent form of warfare aimed at destroying our constitutional form of democratic government and free society. The Muslim Brotherhood is the prime-mover behind this seditious campaign, which it calls “civilization jihad.”

PART 1 - Muslim Brotherhood in America,: The Threat Doctrine of Shariah & the Muslim Brotherhood

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR

Part 1: The Threat Doctrine of Shariah & the Muslim Brotherhood

~~~

The first section of this briefing explains what shariah is according to the authorities and institutions of Islam and as promoted most aggressively by an organization called the Muslim Brotherhood.

Key Points of Part 1

• Shariah is a totalitarian, brutally repressive and supremacist doctrine.
• Shariah is principally about power, not faith.  Accordingly, adherence towards the political end of overthrowing the U.S. government is seditious and must be prosecuted, not protected religious practice.
• The Muslim Brotherhood is the prime-mover worldwide behind the effort to impose shariah everywhere, through stealthy means until such time as violence can be used to achieve the creation of a global caliphate to rule in accordance with shariah.
• The Brotherhood is not a non-violent group.  Rather, in most countries where it operates including the United States, it is in a pre-violent phase.

Discussion Topics for Part 1

1. Some Muslims believe that it is God’s will that they live under shariah and compel everybody else to do so.  If they argue that such beliefs are part of their religious practice, should they have the right under the U.S. Constitution to act on them?
2. Do you think shariah is consistent with the Constitution? If not, does it matter that some people would like to bring it here as long as they are not very numerous or successful?
3. If Muslim men wish to treat women in ways that reflect their inferiority with respect to their marital, property and other rights, should that be okay in the United States?
4. Can the United States safely “do business with” the Muslim Brotherhood?
5. Should the United States help the Muslim Brotherhood come to power or consolidate it in the Middle East?  How about elsewhere?
6. Would you like to live under shariah law?  What difference do you think it would make in your life?
7. Do you think we should take seriously those who say they seek to impose shariah worldwide?
8. Or would we be better served by trying to deny them the attention they seem to crave?
9. USE COMMENTS FOR DISCUSSION BELOW

PART 2 - Muslim Brotherhood in America, : 'Civilization Jihad' in America

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR

Part 2: The Brotherhood’s ‘Civilization Jihad’ in America

  ~~~

The Muslim Brotherhood’s strategy for realizing its mission of “destroying Western civilization from within” was described in an undated 1991 Muslim Brotherhood document entitled “Phases of the World Underground Movement Plan.” In this part, we investigate what they’re doing to implement it.

Key Points in Part 2

• According to the Muslim Brotherhood’s strategic plan, the group’s mission in America is a “civilization-jihadist process…a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within” by our hands and the hands of the believers “so that God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”
• A list of 29 Muslim-American groups was attached to that plan identifying them as “our organizations and organizations of our friends.”  Even today, 21 years later, most of the preeminent Muslim-American advocacy and public policy entities are on that list.
• The Muslim Brotherhood’s civilization jihad is being pursued through stealthy means involving the penetration and subversion of this country’s civil society and governing institutions.
• A central feature of the stealthy, pre-violent jihad is what the military calls “information dominance” – it helps the Muslim Brotherhood keep us ignorant of the true nature of the threat they pose and the progress they are making in bringing shariah to America.

Discussion Topics

1. Where does the term “civilization jihad” come from, and what is meant by it?
2. What evidence is there that the Muslim Brotherhood is associated with many prominent Muslim-American organizations – and what significance do you give to such associations?
3. Were you surprised to learn of the nature and advanced state of the Brotherhood’s stealthy jihadist techniques?
4. What is the significance of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation?
5. Characterize the nature and implications of the guidelines established by the Society of Professional Journalists in October 2011.
6. What is Shariah-Compliance Finance and what does its presence in our capital markets and government holdings imply for the civilization jihad’s objective of destroying us from within by our own hand?
7. Is shariah law being applied in U.S. courts?

  USE COMMENTS FOR DISCUSSION

PART 3 Muslim Brotherhood in America, : Influence Operations Against Conservatives & the GOP

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR

Part 3: Brotherhood Influence Operations Against ‘Policy Groups’: Conservatives & the GOP

 

~~~

With this grounding in the nature of shariah, the goals and activities of the Muslim Brotherhood to impose it worldwide and an introduction to the latter’s civilization jihad against the United States, let’s take a closer look at one of the Ikhwan’s most successful influence operations: its penetration and manipulation of the Republican Party and the conservative movement in America.

Key Points in Part 3

• Starting with the Clinton Administration, a top Muslim Brotherhood operative – Abdurahman Alamoudi – succeeded in penetrating the top reaches of the U.S. government.  He was, among other things, given the responsibility for recruiting, training and credentialing chaplains for the U.S. military and prison system.
• In 1998, Alamoudi launched what amounted to a Muslim Brotherhood front organization, the Islamic Free Market Institute, for the purpose of achieving comparable access to and influence with the Republicans and conservatives.
• He was enabled in this by the front organization’s founding chairman: anti-tax activist Grover Norquist.
• In addition to al Qaeda financier Alamoudi, Norquist helped mainstream in the Bush campaign and/or administration five other Muslims with extensive ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.  They were: the Islamic Institute’s Khalid Saffuri, CAIR’s Nihad Awad, Palestinian Jihad’s Sami al-Arian, the Fiqh Council’s Muzzamil Siddiqi and Suhail Khan, a former staffer for Rep. Tom Campbell of California.
• The opportunity thus afforded to these influence operators had a pronounced and deleterious impact on the U.S. government’s characterization of and policies and strategies towards the so-called “War on Terror.”

Discussion Topics

1. Should we be concerned that chaplains in the U.S. military and prison system have been recruited, trained and credentialed, initially by Abdurahman Alamoudi and subsequently by the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), its subsidiaries and operatives?  If so, why?
2. Why do you think Grover Norquist became involved with Alamoudi in launching the Islamic Free Market Institute?
3. If four federal judges have found that there were grounds to list the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and ISNA as unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land Foundation Hamas money-laundering trial, should the U.S. government still be using them as interlocutors with the Muslim community?
4. Do you think the access afforded individuals with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood had an impact on Bush administration characterization of and policy with respect to the war unleashed on 9/11?
5. Should anybody be held accountable for affording two individuals subsequently convicted of terrorism-related crimes – Alamoudi and Sami al-Arian – access to Candidate George W. Bush and, subsequently, to his administration?
6. Should the United States be able to use so-called “secret evidence” to deport illegal aliens while safeguarding classified information and the sources and methods by which it is obtained?

USE COMMENTS FOR DISCUSSION

PART 4 - Muslim Brotherhood in America, : Suhail Khan, A Case Study in Influence Operations

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR

Part 4: Suhail Khan, A Case Study in Influence Operations

~~~

If we are to understand the full nature of the threat posed by the likes of Suhail Khan, we need to examine the Khan case study in closer detail. We’ll explore both Khan’s extensive ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and those he has cultivated in his own right for decades, including what he’s said in public about those ties. Then, we’ll take stock of the real service he has performed for the Islamist cause, both in the past and ongoing.

Key Points in Part 4

• Suhail Khan was one of the Muslim political activists with longstanding personal and professional ties to the Brotherhood who gained access to the Bush 2000 campaign and served in the George W. Bush administration, thanks to the patronage of Grover Norquist.
• In his capacity as the de facto Muslim gatekeeper in the Office of Public Liaison under senior Bush advisor Karl Rove and then as an assistant in the personal office of the Secretary of Transportation, Khan had, at a minimum, an opportunity to facilitate the penetration of other Islamists.
• Both during his time in government service and subsequently, Khan has been deeply engaged in agendas championed by the Muslim Brotherhood and its friends.
• He has been caught repeatedly engaging in taqiyya – lying for the faith.
• The fact that Suhail Khan received a security clearance during his time in government is an indictment of the clearance process, not evidence that his background is problem-free.

 Discussion Topics

1. Suhail Khan has deep family and personal ties to some of the most important Muslim-American organizations in America.  Do you find persuasive his denials that those groups are associated with the Muslim Brotherhood or that it is even present in the United States?
2. Should we be concerned that Suhail Khan in a 1999 address to a Muslim Brotherhood audience extolled Muslims’ “love of death more than our oppressors love life” and his declaration that he had “dedicated his life to the ummah”?
3. If Suhail Khan is, in fact, a Muslim Brotherhood operative, should we be concerned that he worked in the Bush White House and Transportation Department?
4. If Suhail Khan received a security clearance, shouldn’t that allay any concerns about his service in such roles?
5. Describe the difference between being a Muslim activist and being a Muslim political activist, and how does Suhail Khan fulfill these qualifications?
6. If Suhail Khan is, indeed, a Muslim Brotherhood operative, should it be of concern that he is a lobbyist in Washington for a major American company, Microsoft?
7. Should the United States remove “impediments to zakat,” as Suhail Khan wants, if the practical effect would be to remove legal barriers currently in place to material support for terror?
8. Isn’t “interfaith dialogue” of the kind promoted by Suhail Khan with his trip for government officials and prominent Muslim figures to Auschwitz a good thing?

 USE COMMENTS FOR DISCUSSION

PART 5 Muslim Brotherhood in America, : The Organizations Islamists Are Using to Subvert the Right

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR

Part 5: The Organizations Islamists Are Using to Subvert the Right

  ~~~

The next part of this briefing offers some illustrative examples of the myriad ways in which Norquist and his team are still very actively and purposefully promoting the Islamist agenda — with considerable, and toxic, effect.

Key Points in Part 5

• With the sponsorship and assistance of Grover Norquist, a variety of organizations ostensibly on the Right have been – and are continuing to be – put at the service of Islamists.  These include:
• Americans for Tax Reform (ATR)
• Islamic Free Market Institute (II)
• The ‘Center-Right’ Coalition (the ‘Wednesday Meeting’)
• The Conservative Inclusion Coalition
• The Center-Right Coalition “franchises” and sponsored meetings around the country
• The American Conservative Defense Alliance (ACDA)
• Norquist has lent his conservative political credentials to Red-Green coalitions made up of radical and other leftists and Muslim Brotherhood front groups with whom they routinely make common cause to the detriment of U.S. security, constitutional freedoms and other interests.
• Norquist has even worked on behalf of the Islamic Republic of Iran through one such Leftist-Islamist group, the Coalition for a New American Policy for Iran, founded in his offices.

Discussion Topics

1. What is your reaction to Paul Weyrich’s statement that “It’s very possible some of the Muslims want to establish a fifth column in this country”?
2. What do you think of the idea that the U.S. Constitution as the “supreme law of the land” is outdated and that we should allow foreign laws – including, but not limited to, shariah – to be used to adjudicate disputes in our courts?  Should that be the case even in circumstances where doing so would deny American citizens constitutional rights?
3. Should we be concerned that Grover Norquist continues to build infrastructure and utilize it to advance agendas that are favored by the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamists?
4. Does it serve American interests to decline to aid opposition elements in Iran, to resist sanctions on the regime and foreclose the option of military action to prevent an Iranian nuclear weapon?
5. Are you concerned about coalitions involving radical leftists and Islamists?  What do you make of a prominent conservative consorting with, in some cases founding and otherwise promoting their agendas?

 USE COMMENTS FOR DISCUSSION

PART 6 Muslim Brotherhood in America, : Electing Islamist Republicans

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR

Part 6: Electing Islamist Republicans

~~~

In this part, we consider how several individuals with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood or other Islamists have been groomed to run for office as Republicans. The careers of Grover Norqust proteges Kamal Nawash, Faisal Gill, and Imad ‘David’ Ramadan are given close scrutiny.

Key Points in Part 6

• Grover Norquist has helped a number of Muslim-American organizations and individuals associated with the Muslim Brotherhood adopt the coloration of conservatives and Republicans.
• At one point, one of the founders of a group styling itself Muslims for America described how Norquist’s Americans for Tax Reform was “looking for Muslim leaders, state-by-state, to participate within their monthly meetings, which also serve as political hotbeds for creating relations with top political leaders and Muslims.”
• The Course examines the backgrounds and records to date of three such Islamists.  Two of them, Kamal Nawash and Faisal Gill, failed to achieve electoral success, due in part to untimely revelations of their ties to convicted terrorist Abdurahman Alamoudi.  A third Norquist-backed Muslim candidate, Imad “David” Ramadan, however, was elected to the Virginia House of Delegates in November 2011 by a 50-vote margin.
• The key to Ramadan’s success seems to have been not only Norquist’s mentoring and networking but extensive and generous campaign donations he made with funds generated offshore but of unknown provenance to GOP politicians and organizations, a number of whom dutifully endorsed the candidate – ignoring or dismissing evidence of his problematic past and Islamist ties.

Discussion Topics

1. Is it fair, let alone prudent, to judge people by the company they keep?  At what point should a line be drawn on “guilt by association”?
2. Specifically, should people with associated with the Muslim Brotherhood, shariah and/or Islamist agendas be encouraged to run for public office in the United States?
3. Should Republican leaders be concerned that they expose themselves to political liabilities if they endorse candidates that have such associations?
4. Is it “racist,” “bigoted” or “Islamophobic” to probe a Muslim candidate’s history of family ties to Lebanese intelligence, the sources of his personal wealth or the extensive uses of such wealth to secure access to and endorsements from prominent political figures?
5. Do you agree with former Department of Homeland Security Inspector General Clark Ervin who asked, “Should anyone even remotely connected to terrorism be employed by Homeland Security in any capacity, especially the ultrasensitive area of intelligence and infrastructure protection?”
 

USE COMMENTS FOR THE DISCUSSION PLEASE

PART 7 Muslim Brotherhood in America, : Advancing the Islamists' Agendas

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR

Part 7: Advancing the Islamists’ Agendas

 ~~~

Building infrastructure and running candidates helps with the third part of Grover Norquist’s ongoing Islamist influence operation: advancing the agendas of the civilization jihadists or, at a minimum, promoting agendas that serve the Islamists’ interests. In this part, we take a look at some of those initiatives, including opposition a host of policies that keep America safe.

Key Points in Part 7

• Before, during and after the Bush ’43 administration, Grover Norquist has been associated with and often played a leading role in promoting various agenda items favored by the Muslim Brotherhood, Iran and other Islamists.  These have included:
• Endorsing political and legislative initiatives
• Attacking critics of shariah
• Opposing ‘American Laws for American Courts’
• Helping the Iranian regime
• Making common cause with the ‘Red-Green axis’
• Using his anti-tax campaigner’s access to open doors for the Muslim Brotherhood
• Norquist’s activities fit the profile of a classic influence operation involving:
• The recruiting of ‘Agents of Influence’ and ‘Useful Idiots’
• Employing such individuals to insinuate trusted personnel
• Burrowing into various targeted institutions and communities through friendships and alliances
• Credentialing Islamist operatives as members and, if possible, as leaders of such institutions and communities
• Using such leadership platforms and positions of influence “inside the wire” to fracture and isolate the targeted community

Discussion Topics

1. Should law enforcement agencies be able to use for the purpose of preventing terrorism the sorts of surveillance and investigative tools authorized for counter-drug and other efforts to counter illegal activity?  As this is the principal purpose – and involves the most controversial elements – of the Patriot Act, do you support it?
2. Should shariah-adherent Muslims be allowed to build a mosque and “cultural center” adjacent to Ground Zero?
3. Is it advisable, under present and foreseeable circumstances, to reduce dramatically the size and capabilities of the U.S. military or to leave America’s borders insecure?
4. Should the United States distance itself from Israel and pursue engagement with the Iranian regime?
5. Knowing what you do about the policies promoted by Grover Norquist – opposition to the Patriot Act, favoring the Ground Zero mosque, sharply reducing the defense budget, hostility towards Israel and promoting the Iranian regime’s party line – are you concerned that he is, according to “60 Minutes,” “the most powerful conservative man in Washington”?
6. Do you find persuasive the evidence provided that Grover Norquist has been and is now running a classic influence operation against the Republican Party, conservative movement and U.S. government?

USE COMMENTS FOR THE DISCUSSION PLEASE

PART 8 Muslim Brotherhood in America, : Team Obama & the Islamists

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR

Part 8: Team Obama & the Islamists

The Obama administration has greatly exacerbated the penetration of the U.S. government achieved during the George W. Bush administration. This part of the course will concentrate on illustrative examples of Muslim Brotherhood-associated individuals who have been allowed access to – and, in some cases, given positions In the Obama administration. This part is a case study of Rashad Hussain, Huma Abedin, Daliah Mogahed, Kifa Mustapha, Momamed Elibiary, and Mohamed Magid. As we will see, taken together, such people and policy initiatives have advanced considerably the Muslim Brotherhood’s civilization jihad against the United States, here at home and overseas.

Key Findings in Part 8

• The precedents, personnel and policies promoted during the George W. Bush administration have metastasized dramatically under his successor.
• Some individuals with close personal and professional ties to the Muslim Brotherhood have been appointed to senior and influential positions in the Obama administration.  Others have been given access in more informal advisory roles.
• Six of this Islamist cohort are profiled in the course: Special Envoy to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation Rashad Hussein; Deputy Chief of Staff to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Huma Abedein; Presidential advisor Dalia Mogahed; FBI Citizen’s Academy graduate Kifah Mustafa; Homeland Security Advisory Committee Member Mohamed Elibiary and Homeland Security Countering Violent Extremism Working Group Member Mohamed Magid.
• Such individuals have clearly had an impact on U.S. policy under President Obama in ways that advance the Muslim Brotherhood’s civilization jihad and the efforts of other Islamists to compel our submission to shariah.

Discussion Topics

1. What is a hafiz of the Quran and what are the implications of one serving in a senior position in the U.S. government?
2. Should the fact that an individual has family members in prominent positions with Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated organization preclude them from serving in the U.S. government?
3. Can shariah-adherent Muslims honestly swear to “uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic”?  Is it realistic to expect them to fulfill that oath?
4. What are the implications of the President of the United States taking advice from a woman who believes “The majority of women around the world associate gender justice, or justice for women, with sharia compliance”?
5. Should individuals identified as unindicted co-conspirators in terrorism financing be precluded from participating in such community outreach initiatives as the FBI’s “citizen academies”?
6. Should a Muslim member of the Department of Homeland Security’s Advisory Committee who has been given a security clearance be held to the same standards for safeguarding classified information as others with such access?
7. Should membership in and leadership of the largest Muslim Brotherhood front in the United States – the Islamic Society of North America – disqualify someone from serving in official or advisory capacities in the federal or any state government?

USE COMMENTS FOR THE DISCUSSION PLEASE

Part 9 Muslim Brotherhood in America, Part 9: Team Obama & the Islamist Agenda

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR

Part 9: Team Obama & the Islamist Agenda

 ~~~

In the closing days of the 2008 presidential campaign, Democratic candidate Barack Obama declared that he was poised to begin “fundamentally transforming the United States of America.” He has certainly done so with respect to policies favored by Islamists. This part is a two-hour deep drill-down into the disastrous policies of the Obama White House, its State Department, Defense Department, Justice Department, Department of Homeland Security, and more.

Key Findings in Part 9

• The conduct of seven key federal agencies suggests the considerable success of the Muslim Brotherhood in destroying us from within by our own hands – starting with the policies and directives emanating from the Oval Office and elsewhere in the White House complex.

• Examples of such evidence include:
  • White House:  Promulgating a self-defeating “National Strategy for Empowering Local Partners to Prevent Violent Extremism in the United States” that effectively guarantees Muslim Brotherhood fronts a say, if not a veto, on policy and its implementation
  • Director of National Intelligence:  Characterizing the Muslim Brotherhood as a “largely secular group” that has “eschewed violence” and has “no overarching agenda, at least internationally”
  • State Department:  Granting unconditional and in one lump-sum payment $1.5 billion to the Muslim Brotherhood-controlled government in Egypt
  • Justice Department:  Purging FBI and other training materials about “countering violent extremism” that Muslim Brothers and their leftist allies deem “offensive”
  • Defense Department:  Pursuing a Counter-Insurgency (COIN) Strategy whose central premise and rules of engagement have, in practice, translated into submission to shariah and the enemies information dominance
  • Homeland Security:  Allowing deep penetration by Muslim Brotherhood operatives to translate into lexicons, strategies and guidelines that are seriously defective and doomed to fail
  • NASA: Implementing presidential guidance that established the Administrator’s “foremost” priority as “making Muslim nations feel good about their historic contribution to science…and math and engineering.”

Discussion Topics

1. What do you think Candidate Barack Obama meant when he declared he would “fundamentally transform the United States of America” during his presidency?
2. Why is the term “countering violent extremism” being used?  Are there more accurate ways to describe the threat we face?
3. Do you think the characterization of the Muslim Brotherhood given Congress by the Director of National Intelligence in February 2011 – namely, that it is a “largely secular” organization, that has “eschewed violence” and “repudiated al Qaeda” and has “no overarching agenda, at least internationally” – is shaping U.S. policy toward that organization, here and abroad?
4. What is the “Istanbul Process” and what do you make of it?  Is it a threat to our First Amendment freedoms?
5. Should federal agencies be giving Muslim “community leaders” veto power or even key advisory roles in the selection of trainers and the content of training materials for “countering violent extremism”?
6. Is the Defense Department’s counter-insurgency (COIN) strategy – at least as it is currently being implemented in Afghanistan – susceptible to misperception by the enemy as submissive?  If so, what are the implications of such a perception taking hold there?
7. Should the Department of Homeland Security’s Countering Violent Extremism Working Group include any, let alone a significant number, of shariah-adherent Muslims or other Islamist-sympathizers?
8. Do you believe NASA administrator’s “foremost” responsibility should be to “engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science … and math and engineering”?  Why do you think the President would say it is?

USE COMMENTS FOR THE DISCUSSION PLEASE

PART 10 Muslim Brotherhood in America, : What's To Be Done?

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR

Part 10: What’s to be Done?

~~~

How to defeat the most serious and imminent of such dangers in our time: the Islamist doctrine of shariah and the efforts of its adherents to impose it world-wide, on Muslims and non-Muslims alike, through violent means or by stealth.

Key Findings in Part 10

• Every effort must be made to defeat the most serious and imminent of ideological danger in our time: the Islamist doctrine of shariah and the efforts of its adherents to impose it worldwide, on Muslims and non-Muslims alike, through violent means or by stealth.
• This can be accomplished through concerted action at three levels:
  • Individual initiatives
  • Organized efforts by groups
  • National action
• Illustrative examples of each include:
  • Individual initiatives: Becoming knowledgeable about the threat from shariah and the Muslim Brotherhood who seek to bring it here and trained in how best to counter such a threat
  • Organized efforts:  Supporting state-level legislation to prevent foreign laws like shariah that violate constitutional rights from being practiced in the state’s courts
  • National action:  Designating the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization and terminating all outreach to and support of this group and its various fronts, both here and abroad.

Discussion Topics

1. Do you think America should be kept free of seditious shariah?
2. Are you willing to help?
3. Have you identified an area of this counter-jihad that you feel particularly strongly about?
4. Do you have skill sets that would enable you to be especially effective in one facet or another of the effort to counter shariah in this country?
5. Do you know of others who feel the same way or could be helpful?
6. Are there improvements you would make to this course that would make it more impactful for people like you?
7. What are your next steps in terms of becoming more knowledgeable, trained and engaged in the War for the Free World?

USE COMMENTS FOR THE DISCUSSION PLEASE

FOLLOW AMERICANS - WE IS IN A WORLD OF S**t

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR

WORLD OF SHIT WE ARE IN ? WATCH THIS

OBAMA EPA TO CRUCIFY HIS ENEMY'S

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR

By Kevin DeAnna

Sen. James Inhofe is calling for an investigation into a top Environmental Protection Agency administrator who confessed that his “philosophy of enforcement” was to “crucify” and “make examples of” energy companies.

And an author of a book on such behavior, Eco-Tyranny: How the Left’s Green Agenda will Dismantle America,” says it’s just too much.

Region VI Administrator Al Armendariz has apologized for his remarks, but meteorologist and author Brian Sussman points out that this is only the surface of a much deeper problem with the federal bureaucracy.

In an exclusive interview with WND, Sussman asked, “Would the EPA official have apologized for his contemptuous crucifixion declaration if he had not been caught on tape? Of course not. His statement is a perfect representation of eco-tyranny.”

In his explosive new book of that title, Sussman details how what he calls “green authoritarianism” was inevitable from the beginning. He explains that Richard Nixon, who “wanted to be liked,” according to one of his well-known former advisers, created the Environmental Protection Agency as an olive branch to the hard left. As Sussman jokes, “Needless to say, it was not returned.”

According to Sussman, the EPA and the legislation that empowered it, notably the Clean Air Act, “[were] flatly unconstitutional.” Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution gives the federal government the power “to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes.”

But Sussman notes that “somehow this turned into the ability for Congress to regulate the conduct of individual businesses, the output of specific industrial processes, and the makeup of the atmosphere itself. And as we’ve seen, they can’t wait to shut down businesses they don’t like.”

“Eco-Tyranny” also exposes what Sussman calls the Obama administration’s “war” on oil and gas production. He notes that the Obama administration imposed a moratorium on drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, costing an estimated 137,000 jobs and $400 million to the state of Louisiana.

Furthermore, Obama also suspended exploratory drilling in Alaska, with his Department of Interior stonewalling any applications.

Secretary of Interior Ken Salazar also shut down efforts to harness shale oil in the Mountain West.

See the Armendariz rant:  PLEASE NOTICE THAT THE BELOW VIDEO HAS BEEN REMOVED.. WONDER WHY ?

~~~

The result, Sussman charges, “is a deliberate effort to keep our country dependent on oil imports from the hostile nations of OPEC (Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries). If our president would simply unleash American industry, OPEC would soil their tunics.”

CLICK BELOW TO READ MORE

Subject: disturbing: Not in MSN anywhere ?

Posted by Bh

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR

Subject: disturbing - IS THIS A WORLD PROBLEM ? NOT TELLING US IN AMERICA 
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 19:16:05 -0700 

Russia Stunned After Japanese Plan to Evacuate 40 Million Revealed

By The European Union Times

  A new report circulating in the Kremlin today prepared by the Foreign Ministry on the planned re-opening of talks with Japan over the disputed Kuril Islands during the next fortnight states that Russian diplomats were “stunned” after being told by their Japanese counterparts that upwards of 40 million of their peoples were in “extreme danger” of life threatening radiation poisoning and could very well likely be faced with forced evacuations away from their countries eastern most located cities… including the world’s largest one, Tokyo.

The Kuril Islands are located in Russia's Sakhalin Oblast region and stretch approximately 1,300 km (810 miles) northeast from Hokkaido-, Japan, to Kamchatka, Russia, separating the Sea of Okhotsk from the North Pacific Ocean. There are 56 islands and many more minor rocks. It consists of Greater Kuril Ridge and Lesser Kuril Ridge, all of which were captured by Soviet Forces in the closing days of World War II from the Japanese.

The “extreme danger” facing tens of millions of the Japanese peoples is the result of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster that was a series of equipment failures, nuclear meltdowns, and releases of radioactive materials at the Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant, following the To-hoku earthquake and tsunami on 11 March 2011.

According to this report, Japanese diplomats have signaled to their Russian counterparts that the returning of the Kuril Islands to Japan is “critical” as they have no other place to resettle so many people that would, in essence, become the largest migration of human beings since the 1930’s when Soviet leader Stalin forced tens of millions to resettle Russia’s far eastern regions.

CLICK BELOW TO READ MORE

Listen Now! » Michelle Obama ain’t gonna let nobody turn her around (hopefully)

Posted by bh

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR AND GBTV

In a recent interview Michelle Obama revealed a fantasy of hers, and it just so happens this very same fantasy is shared by millions and millions and millions of Americans. In fact, Glenn has the exact same fantasy. Many accuse him of bashing the Obama’s for no reason, but that’s not the case. “When they’re right, they’re right,” Glenn explained. “On this particular thing, I think we can unite.”

Here is what the First Lady said her fantasy was:

“One fantasy I have, and the Secret Service, they keep looking at me, because they think I might actually do it, is to walk right out the front door and just keep walkin’.”

“What an amazing coincidence!” Pat said, “That’s the exact same fantasy we all have!”

Glenn liked Michelle Obama’s fantasy so much, in fact, that he devoted a song to her this morning… “Ain’t Gonna Let Nobody Turn Me Around,” which, ironically, is by The Roots, the same band that played a much less flattering song for Michele Bachmann on Jimmy Fallon’s show.

“Walk out that door and don’t come back,” Pat said while the song played.

“You stick to your principles. You just keep on walking,” Glenn joked

Obama slow jams the news

Posted by Bh

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR AND GBTV

Obama’s shocking ties to the Muslim Brotherhood

Posted by Bh

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR AND GBTV

Glenn talked on radio today about GBTV’s stunning documentary Rumors of War III: Target U.S. and how it showed the administration’s shocking ties to the radical Muslim Brotherhood. They are trying to recreate the Arab Spring here in the U.S. & with our (and Europe’s) economy on edge it won’t take much to push us over the cliff. In the clip above from radio, Glenn explains what you can find in the documentary and the dangerous ties between radicals in the White House and radicals in the Muslim Brotherhood. The evidence will shock you!

Issa, Chaffetz confirm contempt plans for Holder over Fast and Furious

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR AND FOX NEWS

~~~

House GOP leaders said Friday they are pursuing a plan to hold Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. and the Justice Department in contempt for “stonewalling” them over information regarding the administration’s failed Fast and Furious gun-tracking program.

GOP Rep. Darrell Issa confirmed to Fox News that House Speaker John Boehner gave him and others on his House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform the authority to drafted a contempt of Congress resolution.
“We have a few other options (but) to a great extent we’ve been stonewalled by the Justice Department,” said Issa, R-Calif.
The news of the document and the extended meeting in Boehner’s office was reported first by The Los Angeles Times.
“We have issued a subpoena,” Utah GOP Rep. Jason Chaffetz, a member of the oversight committee, said earlier on Fox News. “We have bent over backwards to be patient and take time. (Holder) is

CLICK BELOW TO READ MORE

Israel developing UAV'S - NEW NEW NEW ?

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR

http://www.israeldefense.com/?CategoryID=483&ArticleID=1201 

Is Israel developing UAV cargo carriers and platforms that can stay aloft a week at a time? Are there new UAVs powered by solar energy and fuel cells? Will intelligence gathering UAVs shrink to miniature sizes?

Arie Egozi 

25/4/2012

• 
• 
  
• 
• 
  

 

Will Israel's next generation of UAVs be cargo carriers, solar Ebergy powered, or so tiny they'll be undetectable? The answer to these questions is yes! At least that's the direction Israel is taking—a world leader in unmanned aerial vehicles.

According to Israeli Air Force (IAF) statistics, UAVs carry out almost half of today's missions and major military campaigns (such as Operation Defensive Shield in January 2009), and intelligence gathering is one of the most developed activities Israeli UAVs perform. For example, Elbit Systems' Skylark-2, which became operational in late 2011, is now deployed in the south. The system is part of intelligence efforts to intercept attacks from the Sinai Peninsula.

Elbit is also working on a joint project with companies in England on advanced intelligence UAVs that are part of the British Army's Watchkeeper Project. The British based their model on Elbit's Hermes-450—a model that the IAF also use.

The IAF introduced Elbit's larger UAV, the Hermes-900, at the same time Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) released their Heron-class UAV. Inter-company competition is a positive phenomenon and motivates companies to produce superior products. However, sometimes, redundancy between models happens.

Armed (hunter-killer) UAVs are another area countries are focusing on, especially the US, as they use this model for combat in Afghanistan. According to foreign sources, the IAF also employ armed UAVs in Gaza (though Israel never acknowledged these reports). At the 2011 DSEi Exhibition (Defense and Security Equipment International) in London, Thales Group displayed a model of a missile-armed UAV (Elbit and Thales Group are partners in the Watchkeeper Project).

Given the direction of R&D, armed UAVs seem to be the next big thing. Several companies are adapting weapons systems and munitions to suit their UAVs. Sending a robotic vehicle into the air with lethal weapon systems is nothing short of a quantum leap in technological sophistication.

Stinging Insects

CLICK BELOW TO READ MORE AND PICTURES AND STORIES