Saturday, May 5, 2012

THE PRESIDENT'S PRIVATE WAR BY JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO

Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER

     

Did you know that the United States government is using drones to kill innocent people in Pakistan? Did you know that the Pakistani government has asked President Obama to stop it and he won't? Did you know that Pakistan is a sovereign country that has nuclear weapons and is an American ally?
Last week, the Obama administration not only acknowledged the use of the drones; it also revealed that it has plans to increase the frequency and ferocity of the attacks. White House counterterrorism adviser John O. Brennan argued that these attacks are "in full accordance with the law" and are not likely to be stopped anytime soon.
Brennan declined to say how many people were killed or just where the killings took place or who is doing it. But we know that Obama has a morbid fascination with his plastic killing machines, and we know that these machines are among the favored tools of the CIA. We also know that if the president had been using the military to do this, he'd be legally compelled to reveal it to Congress and eventually to seek permission.
We know about the need to tell Congress and ask for permission because of the War Powers Act. This law, enacted in 1973 over President Nixon's veto, permits the president to use the military for 90 days before telling Congress and for 180 days before he needs congressional authorization. Obama must believe that he can bypass this law by using civilian CIA agents, rather than uniformed military, to do his killing.
The Constitution limits the presidential use of war powers to those necessary for an immediate defense of the United States or those exercised pursuant to a valid congressional declaration of war. In this case of Pakistan, the president has neither. And international law prohibits entering a sovereign country without its consent. But Brennan argued that the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), which Congress enacted in 2001 in the aftermath of 9/11 to enable President Bush to pursue the perpetrators of 9/11, is essentially carte blanche for any president to kill whomever he wants, and that the use of drones, rather than the military or rather than arresting those the government believes have conspired to harm us, is a "surgical" technique that safeguards the innocent.
Attorney General Eric Holder made a similar unconstitutional argument a few months ago when he stated in defense of the president's using drones to kill Americans in Yemen that the AUMF, plus the careful consideration that the White House gives to the dimensions of each killing and the culpability of each person killed, somehow satisfied the Constitution's requirements for due process.
What monstrous nonsense all this is. These killings 10,000 miles from here hardly constitute self-defense and are not in pursuit of a declaration of war. So, what has Congress done about this? Nothing. And what have the courts done about this? Nothing.
Prior to the president's ordering the killing of the New Mexico-born and unindicted and uncharged Anwar al-Awlaki, al-Awlaki's American father sued the president in federal district court and asked a judge to prevent the president from murdering his son in Yemen. After the judge dismissed the case, a CIA-fired drone killed al-Awlaki and his American companion and his 16-year-old American son.
In his three-plus years in office, Obama has launched 254 drones toward persons in Pakistan, and they collectively have killed 1,277 persons there. The New America Foundation, a Washington think tank that monitors the presidential use of drones in Pakistan, estimates that between 11 and 17 percent of the drone victims are innocent Pakistani civilians. So much for Brennan's surgical strikes. So much for Holder's due process.
The president is waging a private war against private persons -- even Americans -- whose deaths he obviously believes will keep America safe. But he is doing so without congressional authorization, in violation of the Constitution, and in a manner that jeopardizes our freedom.
Who will keep us safe from a president who wants to use drones here? How long will it be before local American governments -- 313 of which already possess drones -- use them to kill here because they are surgical and a substitute for due process? Can you imagine the outcry if Cuba or China launched drones at their dissidents in Florida or California and used Obama's behavior in Pakistan as a justification?
How long will it be before even the semblance of our Constitution is gone?

MECHANISM IN PLACE TO FIX 12 ELECTIONS FOR OBAMA/SOETORO BY DEVVY

Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR




MECHANISM IN PLACE TO FIX 12 ELECTIONS FOR OBAMA/SOETORO


By: Devvy
May 5, 2012
NewsWithViews.com
I have been writing about vote fraud since 1993. Few Americans became interested in the cold reality that since the mid-1960s our elections have been rigged until the 2000 presidential election and the farce known as 'hanging chads'. As regular readers of my columns know I belong to no party; I left the Republican Party in 1996 over vote fraud and the putrid world of dirty politics where the truth didn't matter. It still doesn't to party hacks whose only goal is to climb the political ladder of power.
The Florida recount energized Democrats; the howling was heard from coast to coast. Laughable when you consider the Democratic Party machine is more famous for vote fraud than Republicans. Both sides engage in it and that's a fact.
The 2004 presidential "election" was another farce. An illusion to keep the herds believing their vote actually counted. It only counts when those who count the ballots put it in the desired win column. In 2008, Richard Hayes Phillips book, Witness To A Crime: A Citizens' Audit of an American Election, was published. That book is an absolute condemnation of vote fraud in the State of Ohio. Phillips, who I interviewed when I had my radio show, examined 126,00 ballots, 127 poll books and 141 voter signature books from 18 counties: "Thousands of ballots in heavily Democratic precincts were pre-punched for third-party candidates. Voting machines were rigged, tabulators were rigged, ballot boxes were stuffed, ballots were altered, ballots were sorted according to candidate, and ballots were destroyed." 
CLICK BELOW TO READ MORE

Friday, May 4, 2012

OVAL 3 MAY 3 2012

Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER

Dictator Obama Issues New Anti-American Decrees

In his latest display of his full USA federal government dictatorship over both the American people and the former co-branches of government, Dictator Obama is warning the Supreme Court to either rule in his favor or face severe consequences.

Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER
BY:  Sher Zieve
Fox News’ Martha McCallum advised Thursday that the Obama Administration has been quietly sending missives to the Supreme Court threatening that if it doesn’t rule in his favor on ObamaCare, Medicare will face disruption and “chaos.”  Therefore, if SCOTUS rules in favor of the US Constitution, Obama & Co will begin its campaign to either destroy Medicare or make those on it suffer greatly.   The Obama syndicate is said to be threatening to hold off Medicare payments to doctors and hospitals if SCOTUS does not comply with Obama’s demands and submit to him.
As an additional example of Obama’s illegal and (I believe) highly treasonous behaviors, on 1 May and 2 May Obama issued two additional unconstitutional and illegal Executive Orders.  The first E.O., issued 1 May 2012, makes the USA subject to “international regulations” as opposed to looking to and following the US Constitution.   Also, with this new E.O., the US FDA will now be able to be bypassed by International committees–thus, replacing the FDA with any international group which may be chosen.  In essence, Obama is quickly eliminating US Sovereignty and selling the USA to the international “community.”
The second E.O. issued in 2 days was signed by Obama on 2 May 2012.  This E.O. instructs the USA to bow to international regulations instead of the US Constitution and Businessweek reports:  “Obama’s order provides a framework to organize scattered efforts to promote international regulatory cooperation, the chamber’s top global regulatory official said today.
“Today’s executive order marks a paradigm shift for U.S. regulators by directing them to take the international implications of their work into account in a consistent and comprehensive way,” Sean Heather, vice president of the chamber’s Center for Global Regulatory Cooperation, said in an e-mailed statement.”  This also brings the USA closer to becoming a “North American Union” and–also–eliminating its sovereignty–in toto.
Suffice it to say, no one in Congress has issued even the proverbial “peep” over either of these illegal “orders.”  Do the American people really want to continue to live under this blatant tyranny?
The second question is “Will the Supreme Court of the United States of America bow to Obama and give up its co-equal status to the dictator as the US Congress has already done?”  If so,  perhaps its time for We-the-People to recruit the Honduran Supreme Court who, along with their military, ousted its then President Manuel Zelaya who had become a dictator.  Oppression under the Obama syndicate becomes worse each and every day, folks.  Will we ever choose to go back to the sunshine?
“And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?”
- Revelation 13:4
Obama Signs Order Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation:
at raps.org
New Obama Executive Order Pushes Us Closer To A North American Union:
at infowars.com
Obama Order Urges Rule Review to Boost U.S. Company Trade:
at businessweek.com
Honduran Military Coup Ousts Leftist President Manuel Zelaya:
at ronpaulforums.com

Sher Zieve is an author and political commentator. Zieve’s op-ed columns are widely carried by multiple internet journals and sites, and she also writes hard news.
Her columns have also appeared in The Oregon Herald, Dallas Times, Sacramento Sun, in international news publications, and on multiple university websites. Sher is also a guest on multiple national radio shows.
Sher can be reached at Sher_Zieve@yahoo.com.
Graphics added by Gulag Bound

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

NJ GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE for VP? Don’t let Mitt Romney choose a running mate with dirty Islamist ties

Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER
JUST REPORTING THE NEWS FOLKS... YOU DECIDE ?

BNI has posted these stories in the past, but here is a good summary of Christie's repugnant, over- the-top support for Muslims with terrorist ties and whose loyalties are to Islam, not America, as well as his disparagement of those who oppose the recognition of sharia law by US Courts.

Daniel Pipes (H/T Frederic F)  A Quinnipiac poll in April showed Chris Christie the most popular potential Republican vice-presidential candidate, thanks to his budget cuts and standing up to government employee unions. But the governor of New Jersey has a problem, specifically an Islam problem, in the way of his possible ascent to higher office. We regret to report that, time and again, he has sided with Islamist forces against those safeguarding American security and civilization.
Some examples:

2008: When serving as U.S. attorney for New Jersey, Christie embraced and kissed Mohammed Qatanani, imam of the Islamic Center of Passaic County, and praised him as "a man of great goodwill."

He did this after Qatanani had publicly ranted against Jews and in support of funding Hamas, a U.S. government–designated terror organization, and on the eve of his deportation hearing for hiding an Israeli conviction for membership in Hamas. In addition, Christie designated a top aide, Assistant U.S. Attorney Charles McKenna, to testify as a character witness for Qatanani

2010: After Derek Fenton burned three pages of a Koran at a 9/11 memorial ceremony, his employer, New Jersey Transit, got Christie's approval to fire him.

Christie vocally endorsed Fenton's termination, even though this meant protecting Islam at the expense of Fenton's constitutional right to free speech, declaring, "I don't have any problem with him being fired." The American Civil Liberties Union successfully represented Fenton to get his job back.

2010: Christie voted 'present' on the issue of opposition to the Ground Zero Victory mosque

“My principles on this are two-fold. One, that we have to acknowledge, respect and give some measure of deference to the feelings of the family members who lost there loved ones there that day. But it would be wrong to so overreact to that, that we paint Islam with a brush of radical Muslim extremists that just want to kill Americans because we are Americans. But beyond that…I am not going to get into it..."

2011: Christie appointed an Islamist, Sohail

 CLICK BELOW TO READ MORE

VW Passat 78.5 MPG (Imperial gallon) 65.2 MPG US gallon in the Uk

Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER
CAN'T BUY THIS IN THIS COUNTRY EVEN THOUGH IT'S MADE HERE ?  W.T.F. REALLY

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

FAKE PRESIDENT - I GUESS IT WILL SINK IN EVENTUALLY FOLKS ?

Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER
SO WHAT DO WE DO NOW ?
MAYBE VOTE ? CAN'T IMPEACH - HE'S NOT A LEGAL PRESIDENT - HE IS AN IMPOSTER FOLKS - NEED'S A SET OF CUFF'S AND TAKEN TO THE NEAREST POLICE STATION.

Monday, April 30, 2012

INTRODUCTION TO FREE ZONE MUSLIN BROTHERHOOD SERIES

Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR
INTRODUCTION TO THE FREE ZONE SERIES ON WFZR







Have you ever asked yourself why, despite more than ten years of efforts –involving, among other things, the loss of thousands of lives in wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, well-over a trillion dollars spent, countless man-years wasted waiting in airport security lines and endless efforts to ensure that no offense is given to seemingly permanently aggrieved Muslim activists – are we no closer to victory in the so-called “war on terror” than we were on 9/11?
Thankfully, we have been able to kill some dangerous bad guys. The sad truth of the matter is that, by almost any other measure, the prospect of victory is becoming more remote by the day. And no one seems able to explain the reason.
In an effort to provide the missing answer, on April 24, the Center for Security Policy is making available via the Internet a new, free ten-part video course called “The Muslim Brotherhood in America: The Enemy Within.” This course connects the proverbial dots, drawing on a wealth of publicly available data and first-hand accounts to present a picture that has, for over a decade, been obscured, denied and suppressed:
America faces in addition to the threat of violent jihad another, even more toxic danger – a stealthy and pre-violent form of warfare aimed at destroying our constitutional form of democratic government and free society. The Muslim Brotherhood is the prime-mover behind this seditious campaign, which it calls “civilization jihad.”

PART 1 - Muslim Brotherhood in America,: The Threat Doctrine of Shariah & the Muslim Brotherhood

Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR

Part 1: The Threat Doctrine of Shariah & the Muslim Brotherhood

~~~
The first section of this briefing explains what shariah is according to the authorities and institutions of Islam and as promoted most aggressively by an organization called the Muslim Brotherhood.

Key Points of Part 1

  • Shariah is a totalitarian, brutally repressive and supremacist doctrine.
  • Shariah is principally about power, not faith.  Accordingly, adherence towards the political end of overthrowing the U.S. government is seditious and must be prosecuted, not protected religious practice.
  • The Muslim Brotherhood is the prime-mover worldwide behind the effort to impose shariah everywhere, through stealthy means until such time as violence can be used to achieve the creation of a global caliphate to rule in accordance with shariah.
  • The Brotherhood is not a non-violent group.  Rather, in most countries where it operates including the United States, it is in a pre-violent phase.

Discussion Topics for Part 1

  1. Some Muslims believe that it is God’s will that they live under shariah and compel everybody else to do so.  If they argue that such beliefs are part of their religious practice, should they have the right under the U.S. Constitution to act on them?
  2. Do you think shariah is consistent with the Constitution? If not, does it matter that some people would like to bring it here as long as they are not very numerous or successful?
  3. If Muslim men wish to treat women in ways that reflect their inferiority with respect to their marital, property and other rights, should that be okay in the United States?
  4. Can the United States safely “do business with” the Muslim Brotherhood?
  5. Should the United States help the Muslim Brotherhood come to power or consolidate it in the Middle East?  How about elsewhere?
  6. Would you like to live under shariah law?  What difference do you think it would make in your life?
  7. Do you think we should take seriously those who say they seek to impose shariah worldwide?
  8. Or would we be better served by trying to deny them the attention they seem to crave?
  9. USE COMMENTS FOR DISCUSSION BELOW

PART 2 - Muslim Brotherhood in America, : 'Civilization Jihad' in America

Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR





Part 2: The Brotherhood’s ‘Civilization Jihad’ in America

  ~~~

The Muslim Brotherhood’s strategy for realizing its mission of “destroying Western civilization from within” was described in an undated 1991 Muslim Brotherhood document entitled “Phases of the World Underground Movement Plan.” In this part, we investigate what they’re doing to implement it.

Key Points in Part 2

  • According to the Muslim Brotherhood’s strategic plan, the group’s mission in America is a “civilization-jihadist process…a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within” by our hands and the hands of the believers “so that God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”
  • A list of 29 Muslim-American groups was attached to that plan identifying them as “our organizations and organizations of our friends.”  Even today, 21 years later, most of the preeminent Muslim-American advocacy and public policy entities are on that list.
  • The Muslim Brotherhood’s civilization jihad is being pursued through stealthy means involving the penetration and subversion of this country’s civil society and governing institutions.
  • A central feature of the stealthy, pre-violent jihad is what the military calls “information dominance” – it helps the Muslim Brotherhood keep us ignorant of the true nature of the threat they pose and the progress they are making in bringing shariah to America.

Discussion Topics

  1. Where does the term “civilization jihad” come from, and what is meant by it?
  2. What evidence is there that the Muslim Brotherhood is associated with many prominent Muslim-American organizations – and what significance do you give to such associations?
  3. Were you surprised to learn of the nature and advanced state of the Brotherhood’s stealthy jihadist techniques?
  4. What is the significance of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation?
  5. Characterize the nature and implications of the guidelines established by the Society of Professional Journalists in October 2011.
  6. What is Shariah-Compliance Finance and what does its presence in our capital markets and government holdings imply for the civilization jihad’s objective of destroying us from within by our own hand?
  7. Is shariah law being applied in U.S. courts?

  USE COMMENTS FOR DISCUSSION

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...