Did you know that the United States
government is using drones to kill innocent people in Pakistan? Did you
know that the Pakistani government has asked President Obama to stop it
and he won't? Did you know that Pakistan is a sovereign country that has
nuclear weapons and is an American ally?
week, the Obama administration not only acknowledged the use of the
drones; it also revealed that it has plans to increase the frequency and
ferocity of the attacks. White House counterterrorism adviser John O.
Brennan argued that these attacks are "in full accordance with the law"
and are not likely to be stopped anytime soon.
declined to say how many people were killed or just where the killings
took place or who is doing it. But we know that Obama has a morbid
fascination with his plastic killing machines, and we know that these
machines are among the favored tools of the CIA. We also know that if
the president had been using the military to do this, he'd be legally
compelled to reveal it to Congress and eventually to seek permission.
know about the need to tell Congress and ask for permission because of
the War Powers Act. This law, enacted in 1973 over President Nixon's
veto, permits the president to use the military for 90 days before
telling Congress and for 180 days before he needs congressional
authorization. Obama must believe that he can bypass this law by using
civilian CIA agents, rather than uniformed military, to do his killing.
Constitution limits the presidential use of war powers to those
necessary for an immediate defense of the United States or those
exercised pursuant to a valid congressional declaration of war. In this
case of Pakistan, the president has neither. And international law
prohibits entering a sovereign country without its consent. But Brennan
argued that the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), which
Congress enacted in 2001 in the aftermath of 9/11 to enable President
Bush to pursue the perpetrators of 9/11, is essentially carte blanche
for any president to kill whomever he wants, and that the use of drones,
rather than the military or rather than arresting those the government
believes have conspired to harm us, is a "surgical" technique that
safeguards the innocent.
General Eric Holder made a similar unconstitutional argument a few
months ago when he stated in defense of the president's using drones to
kill Americans in Yemen that the AUMF, plus the careful
consideration that the White House gives to the dimensions of each
killing and the culpability of each person killed, somehow satisfied the
Constitution's requirements for due process.
monstrous nonsense all this is. These killings 10,000 miles from here
hardly constitute self-defense and are not in pursuit of a declaration
of war. So, what has Congress done about this? Nothing. And what have
the courts done about this? Nothing.
to the president's ordering the killing of the New Mexico-born and
unindicted and uncharged Anwar al-Awlaki, al-Awlaki's American father
sued the president in federal district court and asked a judge to
prevent the president from murdering his son in Yemen. After the judge
dismissed the case, a CIA-fired drone killed al-Awlaki and his American
companion and his 16-year-old American son.
his three-plus years in office, Obama has launched 254 drones toward
persons in Pakistan, and they collectively have killed 1,277 persons
there. The New America Foundation, a Washington think tank that monitors
the presidential use of drones in Pakistan, estimates that between 11
and 17 percent of the drone victims are innocent Pakistani civilians. So
much for Brennan's surgical strikes. So much for Holder's due process.
president is waging a private war against private persons -- even
Americans -- whose deaths he obviously believes will keep America safe.
But he is doing so without congressional authorization, in violation of
the Constitution, and in a manner that jeopardizes our freedom.
will keep us safe from a president who wants to use drones here? How
long will it be before local American governments -- 313 of which
already possess drones -- use them to kill here because they are
surgical and a substitute for due process? Can you imagine the outcry if
Cuba or China launched drones at their dissidents in Florida or
California and used Obama's behavior in Pakistan as a justification?
How long will it be before even the semblance of our Constitution is gone?
IN PLACE TO FIX 12 ELECTIONS FOR OBAMA/SOETORO
May 5, 2012 NewsWithViews.com
been writing about vote fraud since 1993. Few Americans became interested
in the cold reality that since the mid-1960s our elections have been rigged
until the 2000 presidential election and the farce known as 'hanging chads'.
As regular readers of my columns know I belong to no party; I left the
Republican Party in 1996 over vote fraud and the putrid world of dirty
politics where the truth didn't matter. It still doesn't to party hacks
whose only goal is to climb the political ladder of power.
Florida recount energized Democrats; the howling was heard from coast
to coast. Laughable when you consider the Democratic Party machine is
more famous for vote fraud than Republicans. Both sides engage in it and
that's a fact.
2004 presidential "election" was another farce. An illusion
to keep the herds believing their vote actually counted. It only counts
when those who count the ballots put it in the desired win column. In
2008, Richard Hayes Phillips book, Witness
To A Crime: A Citizens' Audit of an American Election, was published.
That book is an absolute condemnation of vote fraud in the State of Ohio.
Phillips, who I interviewed when I had my radio show, examined 126,00
ballots, 127 poll books and 141 voter signature books from 18 counties:
"Thousands of ballots in heavily Democratic precincts were pre-punched
for third-party candidates. Voting machines were rigged, tabulators were
rigged, ballot boxes were stuffed, ballots were altered, ballots were
sorted according to candidate, and ballots were destroyed."
his latest display of his full USA federal government dictatorship over
both the American people and the former co-branches of government,
Dictator Obama is warning the Supreme Court to either rule in his favor
or face severe consequences.
Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER
Fox News’ Martha McCallum advised Thursday that the Obama
Administration has been quietly sending missives to the Supreme Court
threatening that if it doesn’t rule in his favor on ObamaCare, Medicare
will face disruption and “chaos.” Therefore, if SCOTUS rules in favor
of the US Constitution, Obama & Co will begin its campaign to either
destroy Medicare or make those on it suffer greatly. The Obama
syndicate is said to be threatening to hold off Medicare payments to
doctors and hospitals if SCOTUS does not comply with Obama’s demands and
submit to him.
As an additional example of Obama’s illegal and (I believe) highly
treasonous behaviors, on 1 May and 2 May Obama issued two additional
unconstitutional and illegal Executive Orders. The first E.O., issued 1
May 2012, makes the USA subject to “international regulations” as
opposed to looking to and following the US Constitution. Also, with
this new E.O., the US FDA will now be able to be bypassed by
International committees–thus, replacing the FDA with any international
group which may be chosen. In essence, Obama is quickly eliminating US
Sovereignty and selling the USA to the international “community.”
The second E.O. issued in 2 days was signed by Obama on 2 May 2012.
This E.O. instructs the USA to bow to international regulations instead
of the US Constitution and Businessweek reports: “Obama’s order
provides a framework to organize scattered efforts to promote
international regulatory cooperation, the chamber’s top global
regulatory official said today.
“Today’s executive order marks a paradigm shift for U.S. regulators
by directing them to take the international implications of their work
into account in a consistent and comprehensive way,” Sean Heather, vice
president of the chamber’s Center for Global Regulatory Cooperation,
said in an e-mailed statement.” This also brings the USA closer to
becoming a “North American Union” and–also–eliminating its
Suffice it to say, no one in Congress has issued even the proverbial
“peep” over either of these illegal “orders.” Do the American people
really want to continue to live under this blatant tyranny?
The second question is “Will the Supreme Court of the United States
of America bow to Obama and give up its co-equal status to the dictator
as the US Congress has already done?” If so, perhaps its time for
We-the-People to recruit the Honduran Supreme Court who, along with
their military, ousted its then President Manuel Zelaya who had become a
dictator. Oppression under the Obama syndicate becomes worse each and
every day, folks. Will we ever choose to go back to the sunshine?
“And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and
they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is
able to make war with him?” - Revelation 13:4
Obama Signs Order Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation: at raps.org
New Obama Executive Order Pushes Us Closer To A North American Union: at infowars.com
Zieve is an author and political commentator. Zieve’s op-ed columns are
widely carried by multiple internet journals and sites, and she also
writes hard news.
Her columns have also appeared in The Oregon Herald, Dallas Times,
Sacramento Sun, in international news publications, and on multiple
university websites. Sher is also a guest on multiple national radio
has posted these stories in the past, but here is a good summary of
Christie's repugnant, over- the-top support for Muslims with terrorist
ties and whose loyalties are to Islam, not America, as well as his
disparagement of those who oppose the recognition of sharia law by US
Daniel Pipes (H/T Frederic F) A Quinnipiac poll in
April showed Chris Christie the most popular potential Republican
vice-presidential candidate, thanks to his budget cuts and standing up
to government employee unions. But the governor of New Jersey has a
problem, specifically an Islam problem, in the way of his possible
ascent to higher office. We regret to report that, time and again, he has sided with Islamist forces against those safeguarding American security and civilization.
2008: When serving as U.S. attorney for New Jersey, Christie embraced and kissed Mohammed Qatanani, imam of the Islamic Center of Passaic County, and praised him as "a man of great goodwill."
He did this after Qatanani had publicly ranted against
Jews and in support of funding Hamas, a U.S. government–designated
terror organization, and on the eve of his deportation hearing for
hiding an Israeli conviction for membership in Hamas. In addition,
Christie designated a top aide, Assistant U.S. Attorney Charles McKenna,
to testify as a character witness for Qatanani
2010: After Derek Fenton burned
three pages of a Koran at a 9/11 memorial ceremony, his employer, New
Jersey Transit, got Christie's approval to fire him.
Christie vocally endorsed Fenton's
termination, even though this meant protecting Islam at the expense of
Fenton's constitutional right to free speech, declaring, "I don't have
any problem with him being fired." The American Civil Liberties Union
successfully represented Fenton to get his job back.
2010: Christie voted 'present' on the issue of opposition to the Ground Zero Victory mosque
principles on this are two-fold. One, that we have to acknowledge,
respect and give some measure of deference to the feelings of the family
members who lost there loved ones there that day. But it would be wrong
to so overreact to that, that we paint Islam with a brush of radical
Muslim extremists that just want to kill Americans because we are
Americans. But beyond that…I am not going to get into it..."
you ever asked yourself why, despite more than ten years of efforts
–involving, among other things, the loss of thousands of lives in wars
in Iraq and Afghanistan, well-over a trillion dollars spent, countless
man-years wasted waiting in airport security lines and endless efforts
to ensure that no offense is given to seemingly permanently aggrieved
Muslim activists – are we no closer to victory in the so-called “war on
terror” than we were on 9/11? Thankfully, we have been able to kill some dangerous bad guys.
The sad truth of the matter is that, by almost any other measure, the
prospect of victory is becoming more remote by the day. And no one seems
able to explain the reason. In an effort to provide the missing answer, on April 24, the
Center for Security Policy is making available via the Internet a new,
free ten-part video course called “The Muslim Brotherhood in America:
The Enemy Within.” This course connects the proverbial dots, drawing on a
wealth of publicly available data and first-hand accounts to present a
picture that has, for over a decade, been obscured, denied and
suppressed: America faces in addition to the threat of violent jihad
another, even more toxic danger – a stealthy and pre-violent form of
warfare aimed at destroying our constitutional form of democratic
government and free society. The Muslim Brotherhood is the prime-mover
behind this seditious campaign, which it calls “civilization jihad.”
Part 1: The Threat Doctrine of Shariah & the Muslim Brotherhood
The first section of this briefing explains what shariah is according
to the authorities and institutions of Islam and as promoted most
aggressively by an organization called the Muslim Brotherhood.
Key Points of Part 1
Shariah is a totalitarian, brutally repressive and supremacist doctrine.
Shariah is principally about power, not faith.
Accordingly, adherence towards the political end of overthrowing the
U.S. government is seditious and must be prosecuted, not protected religious practice.
The Muslim Brotherhood is the prime-mover worldwide behind the
effort to impose shariah everywhere, through stealthy means until such
time as violence can be used to achieve the creation of a global
caliphate to rule in accordance with shariah.
The Brotherhood is not a non-violent group. Rather, in most countries where it operates including the United States, it is in a pre-violent phase.
Discussion Topics for Part 1
Some Muslims believe that it is God’s will that they live under
shariah and compel everybody else to do so. If they argue that such
beliefs are part of their religious practice, should they have the right
under the U.S. Constitution to act on them?
Do you think shariah is consistent with the Constitution? If not,
does it matter that some people would like to bring it here as long as
they are not very numerous or successful?
If Muslim men wish to treat women in ways that reflect their
inferiority with respect to their marital, property and other rights,
should that be okay in the United States?
Can the United States safely “do business with” the Muslim Brotherhood?
Should the United States help the Muslim Brotherhood come to power or consolidate it in the Middle East? How about elsewhere?
Would you like to live under shariah law? What difference do you think it would make in your life?
Do you think we should take seriously those who say they seek to impose shariah worldwide?
Or would we be better served by trying to deny them the attention they seem to crave?
Part 2: The Brotherhood’s ‘Civilization Jihad’ in America
The Muslim Brotherhood’s strategy for realizing its mission of
“destroying Western civilization from within” was described in an
undated 1991 Muslim Brotherhood document entitled “Phases of the World
Underground Movement Plan.” In this part, we investigate what they’re
doing to implement it.
Key Points in Part 2
According to the Muslim Brotherhood’s strategic plan, the group’s
mission in America is a “civilization-jihadist process…a kind of grand
jihad in eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within” by
our handsand the hands of the believers “so that God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”
A list of 29 Muslim-American groups was attached to that plan
identifying them as “our organizations and organizations of our
friends.” Even today, 21 years later, most of the preeminent
Muslim-American advocacy and public policy entities are on that list.
The Muslim Brotherhood’s civilization jihad is being pursued through
stealthy means involving the penetration and subversion of this
country’s civil society and governing institutions.
A central feature of the stealthy, pre-violent jihad is what the
military calls “information dominance” – it helps the Muslim Brotherhood
keep us ignorant of the true nature of the threat they pose and the
progress they are making in bringing shariah to America.
Where does the term “civilization jihad” come from, and what is meant by it?
What evidence is there that the Muslim Brotherhood is associated
with many prominent Muslim-American organizations – and what
significance do you give to such associations?
Were you surprised to learn of the nature and advanced state of the Brotherhood’s stealthy jihadist techniques?
What is the significance of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation?
Characterize the nature and implications of the guidelines
established by the Society of Professional Journalists in October 2011.
What is Shariah-Compliance Finance and what does its presence in our
capital markets and government holdings imply for the civilization
jihad’s objective of destroying us from within by our own hand?