am really concerned about North Korea's appointment of the
"dear leader," Kim Jung Ill's youngest son to be the
new leader of North Korea -- a nuclear power!
After all, Kim Jung Un (pronounced Kim's young-un?)
had NO military experience whatsoever before
daddy made him a four-star general in the military. This
is a snot-nose twerp who has never accomplished anything in
his life that that would even come close to military
leadership: he hasn't even so much as led a cub scout troop,
let alone coached a sports team or commanded a military
platoon. So, setting that aside, next they make him the
"beloved leader" of the country. Terrific!!!
wait! I'm sorry. I just remembered that we did the
same thing here, We took a community organizer who has
never worn a uniform and made him Commander-in-Chief; a
guy who has never led anything more than an ACORN
demonstration and made him the leader of this country.
On January 12, 2012, Montgomery sent a
certified letter to Ronald C.
Machen, Jr., United States Attorney for the District of Columbia:
"RE: Request pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§3332 to inform the grand jury of whether President Barack Obama
may have violated Federal criminal law, my identity and your action or
By February 13, 2012, 40
days after filing the suit, the District Court Judge had not ruled on
any part of the Quo Warranto suit, so Montgomery filed a petition for
mandamus with the Circuit Court of Appeal.
March 7, 2012, that court ruled: “The district court’s delay in ruling on
the petition for writ of quo warranto is not so egregious or
unreasonable as to warrant the extraordinary remedy of mandamus.”
Montgomery filed a petition for rehearing with the United States
Court of Appeals for the District of Colubmia Circuit asking the full
court of appeals to consider whether allowing Barack to continue as
President is indeed a question deserving immediate judicial
Moving along down the road in the
farce called the federal judiciary system, on March 28, 2012,
Montgomery filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari with the U.S.
Supreme Court. You
can read that document here.
Act surprised! The lofty gods in the
black robes declined to expedite the petition. What does that mean? The
Quo Warranto statute was written expressly to remove a usurper from
office. All the judges involved in Montgomery's case know full damn
well this is the hottest issue in the country besides jobs, although
with the media and cable tv network anchors supporting the cover up,
one might get the impression it's no big deal.
An impostor who was never constitutionally eligible for the office of
president is trying to usurp the office a second time and he is being
aided by courts from administrative law judges to the highest court in
The U.S. Supreme Court said without saying it that the case won't be
decided until October, sending a clear message to the lower courts they
can sit on this while the putative president continues to sign bills
into law and pretends to be Commander in Chief. October - one month
before the pretend election.
<>Back in April of 2010, U.S.
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas told a U.S. House sub committee
the high court was evading the eligibilty issue; video
of his comments here.
The black robes in this country continue
to shame everything this nation was built upon: Courage, honesty,
integrity and decency. All of them from the State of Georgia, New
Jersey to the highest court in the land have tucked their manhood right
between their legs. They continue to promote the biggest fraud ever
perpetrated on the people of this country because they're cowards.
Because Obama/Soetoro wasn't eligible in
2008, he still isn't in 2012 and that, as all those judges know,
presents a constitutional crisis never before seen in this country.
Every bill Soetoro has signed into "law" is null and void. Every treaty
he's signed is null and void. Every action he's taken as alleged
Commander in Chief is null and void.
They would all rather shove such a
monstrous act of fraud down our throats than give us credit for dealing
with it in a rational and professional manner.
The outlaws in the U.S. Congress - ALL
of them - are equally guilty in allowing this fraud to continue because
they allowed it to happen by not challenging the electoral college vote
on January 9, 2009. The American people didn't even bother to hold them
accountable in 2010. They voted back in 86% of the same gutless cowards.
We the people are not going away and
neither is this issue. There are many challenges proceeding across the
country and Sheriff Joe Arpaio will be releasing even more damning
At some point, the criminal syndicate in
Washington, DC., won't be able to plug all the holes in the dam and
something will give. It will take only one state to deny Soetoro ballot
access and then it's all over.
Like many others, I believe Soetoro and
his handlers are running scared. We've had so many defeats by the
gutless cowards on the bench, but the court of public opinion is a
Did you know that the United States
government is using drones to kill innocent people in Pakistan? Did you
know that the Pakistani government has asked President Obama to stop it
and he won't? Did you know that Pakistan is a sovereign country that has
nuclear weapons and is an American ally?
week, the Obama administration not only acknowledged the use of the
drones; it also revealed that it has plans to increase the frequency and
ferocity of the attacks. White House counterterrorism adviser John O.
Brennan argued that these attacks are "in full accordance with the law"
and are not likely to be stopped anytime soon.
declined to say how many people were killed or just where the killings
took place or who is doing it. But we know that Obama has a morbid
fascination with his plastic killing machines, and we know that these
machines are among the favored tools of the CIA. We also know that if
the president had been using the military to do this, he'd be legally
compelled to reveal it to Congress and eventually to seek permission.
know about the need to tell Congress and ask for permission because of
the War Powers Act. This law, enacted in 1973 over President Nixon's
veto, permits the president to use the military for 90 days before
telling Congress and for 180 days before he needs congressional
authorization. Obama must believe that he can bypass this law by using
civilian CIA agents, rather than uniformed military, to do his killing.
Constitution limits the presidential use of war powers to those
necessary for an immediate defense of the United States or those
exercised pursuant to a valid congressional declaration of war. In this
case of Pakistan, the president has neither. And international law
prohibits entering a sovereign country without its consent. But Brennan
argued that the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), which
Congress enacted in 2001 in the aftermath of 9/11 to enable President
Bush to pursue the perpetrators of 9/11, is essentially carte blanche
for any president to kill whomever he wants, and that the use of drones,
rather than the military or rather than arresting those the government
believes have conspired to harm us, is a "surgical" technique that
safeguards the innocent.
General Eric Holder made a similar unconstitutional argument a few
months ago when he stated in defense of the president's using drones to
kill Americans in Yemen that the AUMF, plus the careful
consideration that the White House gives to the dimensions of each
killing and the culpability of each person killed, somehow satisfied the
Constitution's requirements for due process.
monstrous nonsense all this is. These killings 10,000 miles from here
hardly constitute self-defense and are not in pursuit of a declaration
of war. So, what has Congress done about this? Nothing. And what have
the courts done about this? Nothing.
to the president's ordering the killing of the New Mexico-born and
unindicted and uncharged Anwar al-Awlaki, al-Awlaki's American father
sued the president in federal district court and asked a judge to
prevent the president from murdering his son in Yemen. After the judge
dismissed the case, a CIA-fired drone killed al-Awlaki and his American
companion and his 16-year-old American son.
his three-plus years in office, Obama has launched 254 drones toward
persons in Pakistan, and they collectively have killed 1,277 persons
there. The New America Foundation, a Washington think tank that monitors
the presidential use of drones in Pakistan, estimates that between 11
and 17 percent of the drone victims are innocent Pakistani civilians. So
much for Brennan's surgical strikes. So much for Holder's due process.
president is waging a private war against private persons -- even
Americans -- whose deaths he obviously believes will keep America safe.
But he is doing so without congressional authorization, in violation of
the Constitution, and in a manner that jeopardizes our freedom.
will keep us safe from a president who wants to use drones here? How
long will it be before local American governments -- 313 of which
already possess drones -- use them to kill here because they are
surgical and a substitute for due process? Can you imagine the outcry if
Cuba or China launched drones at their dissidents in Florida or
California and used Obama's behavior in Pakistan as a justification?
How long will it be before even the semblance of our Constitution is gone?
IN PLACE TO FIX 12 ELECTIONS FOR OBAMA/SOETORO
May 5, 2012 NewsWithViews.com
been writing about vote fraud since 1993. Few Americans became interested
in the cold reality that since the mid-1960s our elections have been rigged
until the 2000 presidential election and the farce known as 'hanging chads'.
As regular readers of my columns know I belong to no party; I left the
Republican Party in 1996 over vote fraud and the putrid world of dirty
politics where the truth didn't matter. It still doesn't to party hacks
whose only goal is to climb the political ladder of power.
Florida recount energized Democrats; the howling was heard from coast
to coast. Laughable when you consider the Democratic Party machine is
more famous for vote fraud than Republicans. Both sides engage in it and
that's a fact.
2004 presidential "election" was another farce. An illusion
to keep the herds believing their vote actually counted. It only counts
when those who count the ballots put it in the desired win column. In
2008, Richard Hayes Phillips book, Witness
To A Crime: A Citizens' Audit of an American Election, was published.
That book is an absolute condemnation of vote fraud in the State of Ohio.
Phillips, who I interviewed when I had my radio show, examined 126,00
ballots, 127 poll books and 141 voter signature books from 18 counties:
"Thousands of ballots in heavily Democratic precincts were pre-punched
for third-party candidates. Voting machines were rigged, tabulators were
rigged, ballot boxes were stuffed, ballots were altered, ballots were
sorted according to candidate, and ballots were destroyed."
his latest display of his full USA federal government dictatorship over
both the American people and the former co-branches of government,
Dictator Obama is warning the Supreme Court to either rule in his favor
or face severe consequences.
Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER
Fox News’ Martha McCallum advised Thursday that the Obama
Administration has been quietly sending missives to the Supreme Court
threatening that if it doesn’t rule in his favor on ObamaCare, Medicare
will face disruption and “chaos.” Therefore, if SCOTUS rules in favor
of the US Constitution, Obama & Co will begin its campaign to either
destroy Medicare or make those on it suffer greatly. The Obama
syndicate is said to be threatening to hold off Medicare payments to
doctors and hospitals if SCOTUS does not comply with Obama’s demands and
submit to him.
As an additional example of Obama’s illegal and (I believe) highly
treasonous behaviors, on 1 May and 2 May Obama issued two additional
unconstitutional and illegal Executive Orders. The first E.O., issued 1
May 2012, makes the USA subject to “international regulations” as
opposed to looking to and following the US Constitution. Also, with
this new E.O., the US FDA will now be able to be bypassed by
International committees–thus, replacing the FDA with any international
group which may be chosen. In essence, Obama is quickly eliminating US
Sovereignty and selling the USA to the international “community.”
The second E.O. issued in 2 days was signed by Obama on 2 May 2012.
This E.O. instructs the USA to bow to international regulations instead
of the US Constitution and Businessweek reports: “Obama’s order
provides a framework to organize scattered efforts to promote
international regulatory cooperation, the chamber’s top global
regulatory official said today.
“Today’s executive order marks a paradigm shift for U.S. regulators
by directing them to take the international implications of their work
into account in a consistent and comprehensive way,” Sean Heather, vice
president of the chamber’s Center for Global Regulatory Cooperation,
said in an e-mailed statement.” This also brings the USA closer to
becoming a “North American Union” and–also–eliminating its
Suffice it to say, no one in Congress has issued even the proverbial
“peep” over either of these illegal “orders.” Do the American people
really want to continue to live under this blatant tyranny?
The second question is “Will the Supreme Court of the United States
of America bow to Obama and give up its co-equal status to the dictator
as the US Congress has already done?” If so, perhaps its time for
We-the-People to recruit the Honduran Supreme Court who, along with
their military, ousted its then President Manuel Zelaya who had become a
dictator. Oppression under the Obama syndicate becomes worse each and
every day, folks. Will we ever choose to go back to the sunshine?
“And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and
they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is
able to make war with him?” - Revelation 13:4
Obama Signs Order Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation: at raps.org
New Obama Executive Order Pushes Us Closer To A North American Union: at infowars.com
Zieve is an author and political commentator. Zieve’s op-ed columns are
widely carried by multiple internet journals and sites, and she also
writes hard news.
Her columns have also appeared in The Oregon Herald, Dallas Times,
Sacramento Sun, in international news publications, and on multiple
university websites. Sher is also a guest on multiple national radio
has posted these stories in the past, but here is a good summary of
Christie's repugnant, over- the-top support for Muslims with terrorist
ties and whose loyalties are to Islam, not America, as well as his
disparagement of those who oppose the recognition of sharia law by US
Daniel Pipes (H/T Frederic F) A Quinnipiac poll in
April showed Chris Christie the most popular potential Republican
vice-presidential candidate, thanks to his budget cuts and standing up
to government employee unions. But the governor of New Jersey has a
problem, specifically an Islam problem, in the way of his possible
ascent to higher office. We regret to report that, time and again, he has sided with Islamist forces against those safeguarding American security and civilization.
2008: When serving as U.S. attorney for New Jersey, Christie embraced and kissed Mohammed Qatanani, imam of the Islamic Center of Passaic County, and praised him as "a man of great goodwill."
He did this after Qatanani had publicly ranted against
Jews and in support of funding Hamas, a U.S. government–designated
terror organization, and on the eve of his deportation hearing for
hiding an Israeli conviction for membership in Hamas. In addition,
Christie designated a top aide, Assistant U.S. Attorney Charles McKenna,
to testify as a character witness for Qatanani
2010: After Derek Fenton burned
three pages of a Koran at a 9/11 memorial ceremony, his employer, New
Jersey Transit, got Christie's approval to fire him.
Christie vocally endorsed Fenton's
termination, even though this meant protecting Islam at the expense of
Fenton's constitutional right to free speech, declaring, "I don't have
any problem with him being fired." The American Civil Liberties Union
successfully represented Fenton to get his job back.
2010: Christie voted 'present' on the issue of opposition to the Ground Zero Victory mosque
principles on this are two-fold. One, that we have to acknowledge,
respect and give some measure of deference to the feelings of the family
members who lost there loved ones there that day. But it would be wrong
to so overreact to that, that we paint Islam with a brush of radical
Muslim extremists that just want to kill Americans because we are
Americans. But beyond that…I am not going to get into it..."