Posted by Robert Bassett
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR
|
Where We Create & Share Music, Talk Radio Shows, Conservative
News & Cartoons for Our Subscribers, Viewers, Other Artists
& the General Public. (WFZR Radio / TV Coming Soon)
Sunday, June 3, 2012
THE CREATOR'S CAMEL
VENZUELA'S CHAVEZ BANS PUBLIC OWNERSHIP OF FIREARMS
Posted By Woody Pendleton
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR
Venezuela’s Chavez Bans Gun Ownership and Firearms Sales’
June 3, 2012, 1:01 pm By Leave
a Comment
The warning for America from the land of Venezuela, a focus of Barack
Obama’s friend Bill Ayers and his devious little charge, Chesa Boudin: Hugo
Chavez was able to become Venezuela’s Marxofascist dictator while it was
permissible to own firearms and now he can do this.
From Jim Kouri, Law Enforcement Examiner:
In a move sure to make the American gun-control lobby green with envy and Second Amendment advocates wary, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez’s new gun law, which totally bans the commercial sale of firearms and ammunition to civilians, went into effect on Friday, June 1, a police source in Washington, D.C. told the Law Enforcement Examiner.
Until this ban became law, anyone in that South American country with a gun license could purchase firearms and ammunition from privately owned gun shops or sporting goods stores.With Chavez’s new gun-control law, only the Venezuelan army, police officials and certain groups such as security and private detective firms are allowed to buy firearms, and then only from state-owned weapons manufacturers and importers.continues
Obama & Chavez at Trinidad Summit, 2009, source
unknown, possibly AP
CHUCK NORRIS ENTERS POLITICAL RING
Posted By Woody Pendleton
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR
WND EXCLUSIVE
Chuck Norris enters 2012 political ring
America's favorite tough guy fed-up with ongoing mayhem
by Joe KovacsEmail | Archive
Norris himself is not seeking office, but he’s throwing his name and weight
behind Walker.
“There’s one primary reason that Clinton came out to Wisconsin to engage in
the battle to recall Gov. Walker,” he explained.
“Democrats, liberals and progressives like him know that as Wisconsin goes on
Tuesday, so possibly goes the nation in November. They fear that a win for Gov.
Walker will contribute to conservative momentum that will ultimately lead to
President Obama’s defeat in his campaign for re-election. And they’re right.“While the fight for conservatives doesn’t start and stop in Wisconsin, it’s an OK Corral of sorts for Democrats and liberals. When their groundless recall of Gov. Walker is shot down, a potent statement will be sent across our land about the type of government We the People want.
“Walker’s recall is not just about Wisconsin; it is about national reform.
It’s about living within our means. It’s about taking back our republic. It is
about saving our nation and posterity, one election and state at a time.”
Norris says Walker has consistently and adamantly opposed big government and
special interest solutions to fix Wisconsin.He writes Wisconsin’s economy is stronger and more fiscally solvent because of Gov. Walker’s leadership, and points out a new Marquette University Law School poll revealed that citizens – 50 percent to 43 percent – believed Walker would do a better job with the economy than his opponent, Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett.
“On Day One in office,” says Norris, “Gov. Walker began to implement a comprehensive Emergency Jobs Plan. As his website explains, he and the Wisconsin Legislature passed measures that included, but were not limited to:
- cutting taxes on small businesses
- curbing frivolous lawsuits that drove costs up
- eliminating the state tax on health savings accounts
- reforming the Department of Commerce into a true economic development agency
- immediately convening a waste, fraud and abuse commission that was intent on curtailing wasteful spending at all levels of state government.”
Norris, who actively pushed former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee during the
2008 presidential cycle, says Walker is not a RINO, or “Republican in name
only:”
“He walks his conservative talk. He refuses special interests. He opposes
accumulating debt and raising deficits. He cuts excess spending. And he stands
for issues that are important to every conservative, Constitution- and
freedom-loving patriot.”
Norris is perhaps best-known for his roles in TV’s “Walker, Texas
Ranger” and the “Missing in Action” film series.Read Chuck Norris’ full column here.
CIVIL RIGHTS ADVOCATES TRYING TO "SHOOT DOWN "DRONES
Posted By Woody Pendleton
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR
Civil rights advocates trying to 'shoot down' drones
Governor warned: U.S. is 'not a battlefield, and citizens are not insurgents'
by 
“A rapid adoption of drone technology before properly vetting the safety,
privacy and civil liberties issues involved would be a disaster,” said John W.
Whitehead, founder of the Rutherford
Institute, in a letter to Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell today.
The governor said the abilities that made drones effective on a battlefield also would make them effective in America.
“What the Commonwealth needs are government leaders who understand that their primary duty is protecting the constitutional rights of its citizens,” Whitehead said in his letter. “These drones – aerial, robotic threats to privacy and security – are being unleashed on the American populace before any real protocols to protect our privacy rights have been put in place.”
WND recently reported the federal government is moving quickly to open the skies over America to drones for commercial and government purposes. Veteran Washington Post and Fox News commentator Charles Krauthammer is forecasting “rifles aimed at the sky all across America.”
See what “ONE NATION UNDER SURVEILLANCE” really means.
The comments from Krauthammer, who won the Pulitzer Prize for commentary in 1987 after serving as a speechwriter for Vice President Walter Mondale and then beginning his journalism career at The New Republic, were on the Fox News Channel’s “Special Report” with Bret Baier.
“I would predict, I’m not encouraging, but I predict the first guy who uses a Second Amendment weapon to bring a drone down that’s been hovering over his house is going to be a folk hero in this country,” Krauthammer said.
The conversation arose as the federal government announced it is beginning to
allow public safety agencies to fly unmanned aircraft – drones – with fewer and
fewer restrictions.
According
to a report from Bloomberg, police, fire and other government agencies now
are being allowed to fly drones weighing as much as 25 pounds without special
approvals previously needed.
The Federal Aviation Administration said on its website that the move was an
interim step until the agency finishes rules that will open the door for
commercial and government operation of drones.Congress has adopted the position of encouraging more drone flights, with the “goal of adapting technology used by the military in Iraq and Afghanistan.”
But Whitehead’s
letter said the beneficial uses for drones easily could be overshadowed by
the possibility that “law enforcement agencies will find a whole host of clever
and innovative ways to use drones to invade our daily lives and wreak havoc on
our freedoms, not the least of which will be traffic enforcement and crowd
control.”
He said while drones can help spot forest fires, aid in searches and other
specific chores, “without robust safeguards for the privacy and security of
citizens … Americans will find themselves operating under a new paradigm marked
by round-the-clock surveillance and with little hope of real privacy.”He said not only can drones spy on people, many of them now are armed.
“Vanguard Defense Industries has confirmed that its Shadowhawk drone, which
is already being sold to law enforcement agencies throughout the country, will
be outfitted with lethal weapons, including a grenade launcher or a shotgun, and
weapons of compliance, such as tear gas and rubber buckshot.
“Such aerial police weapons send a clear and chilling message to those
attempting to exercise their First Amendment rights by taking to the streets and
protesting government policies – the message: stay home or you will be
punished.”
Further are the dangers from malfunctions, breakdowns and other mistakes,
including a takeover by a terrorist hacker.“A rush to adopt this technology before it is properly vetted for safety and privacy concerns will invite the wrath of many Virginians,” he said.
Also raising concerns is the Electronic Privacy Information Center, which has told the FAA there needs to be transparency and accountability in drone operations.
The organization has recommended the development of privacy protections before drones are used widely in the nation’s air spaces.
EPIC said it was part of a coalition of more than 100 organizations, experts and others who petitioned the FAA to conduct a formal rule-making procedure on the privacy implications of domestic drone use.
Several members of Congress also have expressed to the FAA their concerns about the privacy implications of drone use. In a letter to the FAA, the congressmen said, “There is … potential for drone technology to enable invasive and pervasive surveillance without adequate privacy protections.”
EPIC noted that because of the design and technology, drone surveillance
“often occurs without the knowledge of the individual being monitored.”
“These vehicles can gather detailed information on individuals,” the
organization said.
The federal government already has issued 78 certificates for commercial
drone operations, along with 273 active government licenses.
Among the specifics, EPIC reported: “The Miami-Dade Police Department in
Florida used federal grant money to purchase a small drone vehicle. Reports
dating back to 2008 explain that Miami was seeking to use a small drone … ‘to
gather real time information in situations which may be too dangerous for
officers.’ However, police have admitted that the drone can be used to look into
houses.”
EPIC said that “the increased use of drones poses an ongoing threat to every
person residing within the United States.”
“Companies are developing ‘paparazzi drones’ in order to follow and
photograph celebrities,” the group said. “Private detectives are starting to use
drones to track their targets. Google, Inc., has deployed street-level drones in
other countries to supplement the images of Street View. Criminals and others
may use drones for purposes of stalking and harassment.”Saturday, June 2, 2012
VATICAN DEMANDS CONTROL OF SITES IN JERUSALEM
Posted By Woody Pendleton
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR
Expose: The Vatican Wants to Lay its Hands on Jerusalem
The Vatican is now reiterating demands for control of religious
sites in Jerusalem. Jordan's occupation 1948-1967 didn't bother them.
AAFont Size
By Giulio Meotti, Italy
First Publish: 12/15/2011, 4:14 PM
Vatican - Jerusalem
Israel Radio Photo
“Peace negotiations in the Middle East must tackle the issue of the status
of the holy sites of Jerusalem”, Cardinal Jean-Louis Tauran, head of the
Vatican’s Council for Interreligious Dialogue, declared several days ago in
Rome.
The Vatican’s former foreign minister asked to place some Israeli holy places
under Vatican authority, alluding to the Cenacle on Mount Zion and the garden of
Gethsemane at the foot of the Mount of Olives in Jerusalem.
The first site also houses what is referred to as King David’s tomb. “There will not be peace if the question of the holy sites is not adequately resolved”, Tauran said. “The part of Jerusalem within the walls – with the holy sites of the three religions – is humanity’s heritage. The sacred and unique character of the area must be safeguarded and it can only be done with a special, internationally-guaranteed statute”.
The Israeli government and the Vatican are deadlocked in discussions over the
status of the religious sites. Vatican officials are now reiterating their
demand for control over the religious sites in the ancient and holy city founded
by King David as the capital of ancient Israel and now the capital of the
reestablished Jewish state.
Danny Ayalon, Israel’s deputy foreign minister, declared that Israel might
consider giving the Vatican “a greater role” in operating the sites. In the last
weeks, the Roman Catholic Church’s authorities increased their political
initiatives for Catholic control over some sites in Jerusalem.
The Vatican’s former arcibishop in Jerusalem, Michel Sabbah, just promoted an
appeal to the European Union and United States to “stop the Hebraization of
Jerusalem”.
Two weeks ago Msgr. David-Maria Jaeger, who was recently appointed by Pope
Benedict XVI to the Vatican’s highest court, talked in Washington about a current U.S. Supreme Court case over whether an American boy
born in Jerusalem should add Israel after the name of the historic city on his
U.S. passport. Jaeger said that the question about Jerusalem is not “whether it
is the capital of Israel, it is a question of whether it is a part of a national
territory”.A few days earlier, the Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, Fouad Twal, gave a speech to greet the bishops of Europe and North America during their annual pilgrimage in Israel, in which Twal denounced “the Israeli right wing invading more and more of Jerusalem and trying to transform it into an only Hebrew-Jewish city, excluding the other faiths”.
Claudette Habesch, the Caritas general-secretary in Jerusalem, a Vatican
NGO that works in social activities, just released an interview to Zenit
news agency, in which he “christianized” the Palestinian Intifada against
“what we call the Checkpoint of Humiliation”.
In September, Patriarch of Jerusalem Twal was at the White House for a
meeting with the American administration as well as to support the PA
statehood bid at the UN. Twal repeated Benedict XVI’s speech of May 13, 2009 in
the Aida refugee camp in Bethlehem, one of the most political speeches ever
pronounced by Ratzinger during his pontificate. It was given in front of the
most eloquent symbol of the conflict: the security wall between Israel and the
PA areas.On that day the Pope spoke specifically of an “independent Palestinian state”.
The Opera Romana Pellegrinaggi, the Vatican’s powerful agency for worldwide pilgrimages, just organized a “marathon for peace” in Jerusalem to protest against the security fence near Bethlehem and to support "Palestinian political rights". The march began on the Mount of Olives, “where the Last Supper took place”.
On December 1st, several Christian and Muslim dignitaries met in Beit Sahour for a conference on “How to live together in a future Palestinian state?”. Patriarch Emeritus of Jerusalem Michel Sabbah and Sheikh Muhammad Ahmad Hussein, Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, also attended the event organized by Al-Liqa, a Vatican ecumenical center based in Bethlehem.
Sabbah said that “recourse to the UN for a Palestinian state is a step toward peace”. Last summer, Latin Patriarch Twal took part in a meeting in London with Anglican Archbishop Rowan Williams of Canterbury, in which the Vatican envoy denounced the “more than 550.000 Israelis living in East Jerusalem and the West Bank” and “the demography of Jerusalem changing rapidly with the sacred space being threatened”.
In 2006, then Israel’s Prime Minister, Ehud Olmert and Foreign Minister, Tzipi Livni, negotiated to give away the “holy basin” to the Vatican.
At the time, President Moshe Katzav, in the face of increasing public pressure, was forced to deny any plans to sign away the King David’s complex in Jerusalem.
It now appears that this option has once again surfaced. A major voice for the Vatican’s plan is Hanna Siniora, the elder statesman of Palestinian 'peace' activists, whose office is in the Vatican’s Tantur Institute for Ecumenical Studies in Jerusalem.
The site known as King David’s Tomb is the major target in the Vatican’s
plan. It’s a complex of buildings of some 100,000 square feet where David and
Solomon, and kings of Judea, are said to be buried, although this is disputed by
historians.
The Upper Room, or Cenacle, as it is known, is on the second floor of the
Crusader-era building. During his visit to Israel in 2000, Pope John Paul II
held Mass there. The Roman Catholic Church has been fighting for more than 450
years to win back control over the sanctuary, which was seized from Franciscan
monks during the Ottoman Empire's rule around 1551.
The building was granted to the Diaspora Yeshiva over 40 years ago, and
yeshiva heads fear that the Vatican wishes to turn it into a pilgrimage site for
hundreds of thousands of Catholics and hold religious services there.
The Vatican wants Israel relinquishing sovereignty at the Western Wall and
the Temple Mount. The Holy See uses the expression “Holy Basin”, which refers to
the area of the Temple Mount, the Mount of Olives, Mount Zion and a variety of
Christian holy sites which the administration of former U.S. President Bill
Clinton began reccomending be administered under a “special regime”.
The Obama plan also calls for resolving the two thorniest issues in the
conflict by sharing Jerusalem and settling Arab refugees in Arab countries or a
future Palestinian state, but not in Israel. According to Obama, the Old City of
Jerusalem would be designated an “international zone”.
Israel’s President Shimon Peres, who has no authority, also agreed to hand
over to the Vatican the sovereignty of the holy sites.
Any Vatican claim to a seat at the negotiating table is undermined by the
complicity of the Vatican between 1948 and 1967. During the Jordanian
occupation, Judaism’s holiest sites were desecrated and Jews were barred from
visiting these shrines. The Jordanians built a hotel and a road through the
Jewish cemetery on Mount of Olives and they used the broken headstones to build
the latrines in the construction of the Intercontintental Hotel, which likely
rests on burial grounds.
As was its practice during the Holocaust under Pius XII, the Vatican then
turned a deaf ear to these gross violations of Jewish human rights.
If Israel would cede Jewish sovereignty on the holy sites, it would mean
returning to a time when Jerusalem was separated by a seven-kilometer
wall, barbed wire, minefields and bunkers. A tourist visiting the holy
city would have found signs warning “Danger - Frontier ahead!”, “Snipers nearby”
and “shetah hahefker”, which in Hebrew means: No-Man’s Land.
It would be Sarajevo, not the Holy City of Jerusalem.
The writer, an Italian journalist with Il Foglio, writes a weekly column
for Arutz Sheva. He is the author of the book "A New Shoah", that researched the
personal stories of Israel's terror victims, published by Encounter. His writing
has appeared in publications, such as the Wall Street Journal, YNet, Frontpage
and Commentary.
Posted By Woody Pendleton
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR
New Bible strips 'God,' 'Jesus,' 'angels'
Believers warned: 'attuned to the times' is just 'watered down'
by Michael CarlEmail | Archive
The Voice translation, a joint project between Thomas Nelson and the Ecclesia Bible Society, was released this spring.
David Wells, a research professor at the Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary and member of the Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals, said debates over Bible translation are nothing new.
“This, actually, is an old debate,” he explained. “Do you translate Scripture word for word or sense for sense? The ESV is word for word (i.e. what we would call literal).
“I can tell that the Ecclesia Bible Society/Thomas Nelson version is sense for sense. It is more of a paraphrase like the old J.B. Phillips.”
Wells continued, “That’s OK if you read it as a paraphrase. But if you read
it as a translation, it is not OK because there is always commentary in the
paraphrase. Commentary is OK if it is read as commentary, but it should
not be read as the text itself.”
Thomas Nelson gives its reason for the new translation on its website.One of the byproducts of the information age in the church has been its focus on biblical knowledge. Many Bibles reflect this, packed with informative notes, charts, and graphs. While there’s nothing wrong with having a deep knowledge, a personal connection and deep relationship are far better. This is exemplified by Jesus’ comment to Martha, “Oh Martha, Martha, you are so … concerned about a million details, but really, only one thing matters. Mary has chosen that one thing, and I won’t take it away from her.” (Luke 10:41-42 The Voice).
A theologian and biblical scholar, who asked to remain nameless, said the
Nelson comment reveals a major social trend.
“The statement is right in line with a trend in current evangelicalism – [a]
trend that says experience with the Scripture is more important than actual
knowledge of the Scripture,” the theologian said.
An example of what Wells calls the “Sense for Sense” translation in the Voice
is God’s statement to the prophet, Zechariah, in Zechariah 4:6. The English
Standard Version (the translation Wells cited) reads as follows:“Not by might, nor by power, but by My Spirit, says the Lord of hosts.”The same verse in The Voice reads as follows:
“Your strength and prowess will not be enough to finish My temple, but My Spirit will be.”An example of the change in the names used for God and the emphasis placed on God’s law is seen in Matthew 22:37-40, where Jesus is answering a question about the most important commandment:
And he (Jesus) said to him, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. This is the great and first commandment. And a second is like it: You shall love your neighbor as yourself. On these two commandments depend all the Law and the Prophets.”The Voice version of the same set of verses is as follows:
Jesus (quoting Scripture): “Love the Eternal One your God with all your heart and all your soul and all your mind. This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is nearly as important, ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ The rest of the law, and all the teachings of the prophets, are but variations on these themes.”Another example is from the scene where Jesus reads from the prophet Isaiah in the synagogue in Nazareth in Luke 4:18-19.
The English Standard Version renders the passage:
“The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to proclaim good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim liberty to the captives and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty those who are oppressed, to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favour.”The same passage from the Voice reads:
“The Spirit of the Lord the Eternal One is on Me. Why? Because the Eternal designated Me to be His representative to the poor, to preach good news to them. He sent Me to tell those who are held captive that they can now be set free, and to tell the blind that they can now see. He sent Me to liberate those held down by oppression. In short, the Spirit is upon Me to proclaim now is the time; this is the jubilee of the Eternal One’s grace.”A second Christian ethicist and theologian who spoke on condition of anonymity said, “The differences may not seem significant. It’s a subtle and gradual effect.”
“Christians are correct in being concerned that versions like The Voice slowly contribute to a lessening reverence for the holiness of God,” the theologian said.
Evangelical cultural analyst and publisher of the Christian-based “Movieguide,” Ted Baehr, said he shares the concerns of those who believe The Voice will harm people’s perception of the holiness of God.
“These translations are undermining the Truth of Jesus Christ and His Word written,” he said.
Baehr, who is also a leader in the Coalition on Revival, said there’s a very basic fundamental debate going on within the evangelical community.
“There is a lot of theology going on here as you well know,” he said. “That said, even if the translation captures some of the meaning of the terms. It is dreadfully watered down. C. S. Lewis once said something like, ‘Watered down Christianity is nothing.’”
Wells said the likely motive for the new project is profit: “Why did Nelson
do this? My guess – pure guess – is the dollar signs.”
His second another likely reason is due to weakness in the present
evangelical community.
“The Christian faith of the evangelical kind is somewhat distant from where
it started out, even in the immediate post-War period,” Wells said. “The Bible
doesn’t make as much sense today in the evangelical world as it once did – isn’t
that an irony? So, to a new translation more attuned to the times.
“Was it T.S. Eliot who said the less people read the Bible the more they
translate it?”
DOJ SUES VEGAS CASINO FOR FOLLOWING THE LAW
Posted By Woody Pendleton
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR
- illegal aliens
- June 1, 2012
While proponents of immigration enforcement have been told
that the federal government monitors the hiring of illegal aliens by the private
sector, including adherence to the federal employment verification (I-9) program, Attorney General Eric
Holder's Justice Department appears to have made a decision to penalize
organizations that zealously comply.
For example, on Thursday the Justice Department announced
that it filed a civil lawsuit against the Tuscany Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas,
Nevada, accusing the company of engaging in "a pattern or practice of
discrimination in theemployment eligibility verification and re-verification
process."
The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) requires
employers to treat all authorized workers equally during the hiring, firing and
employment eligibility verification process, regardless of their national origin
or citizenship status. However, it is still acriminal
offense to avoid the I-9 verification process in the hiring of job
applicants.
The DOJ complaint alleges that Tuscany treated non-citizens
differently from U.S. citizens during the employment eligibility verification
and re-verification process by requesting non-citizen employees to provide more
or different documents or information than required during the initial
employment eligibility verification process, and demanded specific documents
during the re-verification process.
The complaint further alleges that Tuscany subjected
lawful permanent residents to unnecessary re- verification based on their
citizenship status after requesting and entering into the payroll system the
expiration date of their Permanent Resident Cards (green cards) for purposes of
re verification.
Some believe this lawsuit is nothing more than payback by
the Obama DOJ since earlier this year the Tuscany Hotel and Casino booked a
special conference by a law enforcement group that was not favorable to the
Obama administration. The Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association
(CSPOA) has stated their goal is to "take back America from
the unlawful incursions and overreach of state and federal governments and their
agencies."
Speakers at the event included Sheriff Joe Arpaio, Sheriff
Bradley D. Rodgers, Sheriff Richard Mack, and Larry Pratt, founder and executive
director of Gun Owners of
America, none of whom are popular in the Obama White House or
DOJ.
According to a member of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the casino had an
interest in verifying immigration status as part of its loss prevention program
and may have exhibited over zealousness in its internal security program, but a
casino environment requires more security than most workplaces due to the
enormous amounts of cash involved in that industry.
The ICE agent, who requested anonymity, stated that Holderand his illegal alien-friendly department is more
interested in protecting illegal aliens than "in protecting Americans from the
crimes perpetrated including workplace crimes."
“Employers must not treat authorized workers differently
during the employment eligibility verification process based on their
citizenship status or national origin,” said Thomas E. Perez, Assistant Attorney
General for the Civil Rights
Division. “The department vigorously enforces the anti-discrimination
provisions of the INA so that authorized workers are treated fairly in the work
place.”
According to several sources, Perez is a zealot for protecting illegal aliens as proven by his
record of pursuing cases against entities that attempt to control or curtail
illegal immigration.
Perez's complaint, which seeks monetary and injunctive
relief, was filed before the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer
(OCAHO) of
the Department of Justice and served on the company on May 29,
2012.
The Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related
Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) is responsible for enforcing theanti-discrimination provision of the INA, which protects work
authorized individuals from employment discrimination on the basis of
citizenship status or national origin, including discrimination in hiring,
firing and the employment eligibility verification (Form I-9)
process.
MARTIAL LAW?? SOON ??
Posted By Woody Pendleton
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR
Something else to worry about. The
fact that reasonable people are starting to react as if there
is something to this is understandable. Stand by.
CLICK BLEOW TO READ MORE
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
