Where We Create & Share Music, Talk Radio Shows, Conservative News & Cartoons for Our Subscribers, Viewers, Other Artists & the General Public. (WFZR Radio / TV Coming Soon)
A Circuit Court has decided that Florida election law applies to
everyone but Barack Hussein Obama. In response to a suit brought by
Florida resident and Democrat Party member Michael Voeltz challenging
Obama’s eligibility to the Florida ballot, Circuit Court Judge Terry
Lewis ruled that Florida election law “…is not applicable to the
nomination of a candidate for Office of President of the United
States.” This means that the Florida Statute which says,
“the… nomination of any person to office…may be contested in the
circuit court…by any elector or any taxpayer…” is null and void when it
comes to Mr. Obama’s nomination to the presidency.
“If the plaintiff was challenging the candidate’s eligibility for any
other office, his analysis would be correct and [the law] would apply,”
said Lewis of Voeltz’s suit. However, according to the Judge,
“…Political parties determine their [presidential] nominee at a national
convention pursuant to rules that the parties draft and approve…” In
short, Mr. Voeltz’s contest of Barack Obama’s
Obama’s birth certificate forger has been found, now what GOP?
By Coach Collins, on July 8th, 2012
By George Spelvin, staff writer
The mystery man alleged to have created
President Obama’s Hawaiian birth certificate has been found by Sheriff
Joe Arpaio investigators who are calling him their “person of interest”
as being the one who they are convinced pulled off the long form forgery
according to a GLOBE world exclusive investigative report!
The Cold Case Posse’s next blockbuster press conference coming soon will be SHOCKING according to lead sleuth Mike Zullo.
This monumental revelation comes on the
heels of the briefing paper given to Great Britain’s House of Lords by
Lord Christopher Monckton declaring “Mr. Obama’s legitimacy is now materially in doubt.”
Calling Obama’s disqualification from office a
“dislocation more severe than the fall of Nixon,” the author of the
Hereditary Peers’ Briefing Paper is predicting that the sheer enormity
of the Obama eligibility issue will drive it upward in America’s
political agenda even in spite of being ignored by the media and both
political parties! Lord Monckton tells his heritage peers that
considerable implications exist for Her Majesty’s government and the
West because of the great financial uncertainty such an upheaval bodes.
“Of central importance (is) to the United States who’s Constitution may
have been flouted and circumvented in a material way.”
The twenty page briefing, published last
month in London is a concise and very academic collection of what’s
wrong with the three birth certificate documents released by the White
House. “Yet the copy birth certificate (pg. 12) has a clipping mask
within the margins. This option can only occur by DELIBERATE
MANIPULATION,” says the British Lord. He expresses special unease by
Barack Obama’s signing Executive Order 13489 on Jan. 21, 2009, that
prevents disclosure of any of his records. “The sealing of the
President’s records appears to have been carried out to an exceptional
and costly degree.”
Dealing very specifically with duplication issues, the member
of the UK Parliament says, (pg. 7), “investigators show no optimization
or optical character recognition caused these layers,” in reference to
the nine layers in question. He also points out by virtue of U.S. legal
precedent in Brady v. Maryland (373 US 83, 1963) that “attorneys for
anyone accused of a criminal offence signed into statute by Obama have
the right to request access to Hawaii’s original birth record!”
Hawaii’s refusal to release the birth certificate of the deceased
Virginia Sunahara to her brother to prove “its sequential number was not
identical with that now showing on the President’s birth certificate,”
troubles Monckton because Hawaiian law allows sharing of long form birth
certificates to common ancestor relatives.
Now a news release by a Simi Valley Super PAC
puts Mitt Romney’s chief contact Helen Tansey on notice that “neither
Governor Bobby Jindal, nor U.S. Senator Marco Rubio’s nativity conform
to the American citizenship requirement of Natural Born Citizen outlined
under Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution.” The Article II
Super PAC team points out that Obama is a dual citizen, and not a
natural born citizen at birth. They request that the Romney campaign
honor our Constitution in selecting its vice presidential candidate.
This appears to be the first time a political action group has brought
up in writing the natural born citizen problem of Barack Obama. By
calling on the GOP to institute what they call a clean ticket, the Simi
Valley group may just be the force Lord Monckton outlined that will
drive the sitting President’s eligibility question into the November
crucible.
Follow Coach at twitter.com @KcoachcCoach
To reach your Congressional representative use this link:
1876: In Hamburg South Carolina, White Democrats attacked and
killed five innocent Blacks for being Republicans. Read about how the
Democrats have carried on a 200 year war against African Americans that
continues to this day, in Coach’s new book Crooks Thugs and bigots: the lost hidden and changed history of the Democratic Party available at: http://crooksthugsandbigots.com
In this world you may have knowledge or you may have repose, but you may not have both.
What have you done today to deserve to live in America?
'Iran elected to
top post at UN arms trade conference'
Conference aims to create binding multilateral treaty
regulating global arms trade • Iranian news agency says country was elected to
senior role of "deputy head" during the talks • U.N. Watch: After U.N. found
Iran guilty of illegally transferring weapons to Syria "it defies logic,
morality and common sense" for U.N. to elect same regime to the
conference.
Israel Hayom Staff
U.N.
General Assembly plenum. Iran was elected to the top post of the U.N. conference
on global arms trade.
|
Photo credit: AP
U.N.
General Assembly plenum. Iran was elected to the top post of the U.N. conference
on global arms trade.
|
Photo credit: AP
Iran has been named to a top post at the U.N. Arms Trade
Treaty Conference, which opened last week in Geneva, U.N. Watch reported on
Sunday.
Although the conference's website fails to name the 15
members who were elected to serve on the conference earlier this month, U.N.
Watch, a nongovernmental organization that monitors U.N. activities, revealed
that Iran was elected as a representative of the Asian working group, together
with Japan and South Korea, and deputy head of the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty
Conference earlier in the week
The conference, which continues until July 27, aims to
formulate a binding multilateral treaty regulating the global arms trade.
On Saturday, IRNA, Iran's official news agency, confirmed
the country's election to the conference, saying that Iran was selected for the
senior role of deputy head during the talks.
"Some 193 participating countries unanimously voted in
favor of Iran during the 4th day of the meeting underway in the United Nations
headquarters to draft a bill on regulating arms trade in the world," IRNA
reported.
In response to Iran's election, U.N. Watch has called on
U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, who spoke to the conference last week, to
condemn the move.
“Right after a U.N. Security Council report found Iran
guilty of illegally transferring guns and bombs to Syria, which is now murdering
thousands of its own people, it defies logic, morality and common sense for the
U.N. to now elect this same regime to a global post in the regulation of arms
transfers,” said Hillel Neuer, executive director of U.N. Watch.
"This is like choosing Bernie Madoff to police fraud on
the stock market. And the U.N.'s scandalous choice of Iran is exactly why we
fear that Syria's declared bid for a U.N. Human Rights Council seat is not
impossible," he added.
Last week, U.N. Watch revealed that Syria is a candidate for a seat on
the U.N. Human Rights Council, saying that the country would likely win a seat
on the council "due to the prevalent system of fixed slates, whereby regional
groups orchestrate uncontested elections, naming only as many candidates as
allotted seats."
Neuer said the U.N. secretary-general, "should remind
the conference that the Security Council has imposed four rounds of sanctions on
Iran for refusing to halt its prohibited nuclear program, and that Iran
continues to defy the international community through illegal arms shipments to
the murderous Assad regime."
The recent U.N. Security Council report on Iran said,
"Syria continues to be the central party to illicit Iranian arms transfers." It
cited the discovery of Iranian shipments to Damascus containing assault rifles,
machine guns, explosives, detonators, 60-mm and 120-mm mortal shells and other
weapons.
According to a U.N. Watch statement, Neuer has expressed
concern that Iran's election to the conference, "injects ambiguity about the
U.N.'s position on illicit Iranian arms transfers, fuels Iranian propaganda, and
grants international legitimacy to a regime that tortures student activists,
hangs gays and subjugates women."
The worlds insanity level continues to rise as governments devolve into organizations that have no grip on reality and common sense. GOD HELP US ALL. by wp
Two Russian strategic nuclear bombers entered the U.S. air defense zone near
the Pacific coast on Wednesday and were met by U.S. interceptor jets, defense
officials told the Free Beacon.
It was the second time Moscow dispatched nuclear-capable bombers into the
200-mile zone surrounding U.S. territory in the past two weeks.
An earlier intrusion by two Tu-95 Bear H bombers took place near Alaska as
part of arctic war games that a Russian military spokesman said included
simulated attacks on “enemy” air defenses and strategic facilities.
A defense official said the Pacific coast intrusion came close to the U.S.
coast but did not enter the 12-mile area that the U.S. military considers
sovereign airspace.
The bomber flights near the Pacific and earlier flights near Alaska appear to
be signs Moscow is practicing the targeting of its long-range air-launched
cruise missiles on two strategic missile defense sites, one at Fort Greely,
Alaska and a second site at Vandenberg Air Force Base, Calif.
In May, Russian Gen. Nikolai Makarov, the chief of the Russian General Staff,
said during a Moscow conference that because missile defense systems are
destabilizing, “A decision on pre-emptive use of the attack weapons available
will be made when the situation worsens.” The comments highlighted Russian
opposition to planned deployments of U.S. missile defense interceptors and
sensors in Europe.
The U.S. defense official called the latest Bear H incident near the U.S.
West Coast “Putin’s Fourth of July Bear greeting to Obama.”
Retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney, a former Alaska commander for
the North American Aerospace Defense Command, said the latest Bear H intrusion
appears to be Russian military testing.
“It’s becoming very obvious that Putin is testing Obama and his national
security team,” McInerney told the Free Beacon. “These long-range aviation
excursions are duplicating exercises I experienced during the height of the Cold
War when I command the Alaska NORAD region.
McInerney said the Bear H flights are an effort by the Russians to challenge
U.S. resolve, something he noted is “somewhat surprising as Obama is about to
make a unilateral reduction of our nuclear forces as well as major reductions in
our air defense forces.”
“Actions by Russia in Syria and Iran demonstrate that Cold War strategy may
be resurrected,” he said.
“These are not good indications of future U.S. Russian relations.”
Pentagon spokesman Capt. John Kirby said the incident occurred July 4. He
said the “out-of-area patrol by two Russian long range bombers … entered the
outer [Air Defense Identification Zone]” and the bombers “were visually
identified by NORAD fighters.”
Kirby said the bombers did not enter “sovereign airspace.” He declined to
identify the specific distance the aircraft flew from the United States due to
operational security concerns. He also declined to identify the types of
aircraft used to intercept the bombers.
In last month’s intercept of two Russian Tu-95 bombers, U.S. F-15s and
Canadian CF-18s were used. The most likely aircraft used in Wednesday’s
intercept were U.S. F-15 jets based at Elmendorf Air Force Base, Alaska.
Kirby and U.S. Northern Command spokesmen, apparently in line with the Obama
administration’s conciliatory reset policy toward Russia, sought to play down
both bomber intrusions.
The Pentagon spokesman said the latest Pacific intrusion was “assessed as
another training activity.”
Rather than using traditional military terminology common during the Cold War
to describe the meeting of the violating bombers as an “intercept,” Kirby said
that the bombers were “visually identified” by jets described only as joint
U.S.-Canadian North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) jets.
“NORAD is postured to ensure air warning and control for the continental
United States, Canada, and Alaska,” Kirby said. “NORAD maintains an extensive
radar system around North America and has aircraft located throughout the United
States and Canada that can respond quickly to any unidentified flights
approaching the Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ).”
Kirby said the ADIZ is extends about 200 miles from the coast and is “mainly
within international airspace.”
“The outer limits of the ADIZ goes well beyond U.S. sovereign air space which
only extends 12 nautical miles from land,” he said. “As part of its mission,
NORAD tracks and identifies all aircraft flying in the ADIZ in advance of any
aircraft entering sovereign airspace.”
The Free Beacon reported June 28 that two Bear H’s intruded into the
Alaska ADIZ during war games that ended June 27.
A Northern Command spokesman later disputed the Free Beacon’s
assertion that the bombers violated U.S. airspace and said the air defense zone
is not the same as sovereign airspace since it includes international
airspace.
However, the ADIZ is defined by the military as a nation’s declared area
within which “the ready identification, the location, and the control of
aircraft are required in the interest of national security.”
Canadian Navy Lt. Al Blondin also said in an email that the Russian bombers
during the air defense intrusion last month did not violate U.S. airspace.
“NORAD will track and identify all aircraft flying in the ADIZ prior to those
aircraft entering sovereign airspace,” Blondin said.
“It is important to note the Russian flights followed international flight
rules and conducted their flight in a professional manner,” Blondin said. “As is
their right, the Russian Air Force continues to fly in international
airspace.”
Earlier, in response to questions about the Alaska Bear H intrusion, Marine
Corps Col. Frank H. Simonds, Jr., deputy chief of staff for NORAD-U.S. Northcom,
also defended the Russian bomber intrusion as nonthreatening.
“NORAD does not consider these flights a threat,” Simonds said, noting
“Russia and NORAD routinely exercise their capability to operate in the
North.”
Simonds identified the Alaska defense zone intruders as Tu-95MS bombers that
were met by U.S. F-15s and Canadian CF-18s.
“Interaction between NORAD fighters with these types of aircraft are carried
out routinely,” Simonds said. “As part of its responsibilities to identify all
aircraft in its area of operation, which includes the ADIZ, NORAD has visually
identified more than 50 Russian long range bomber aircraft over the last 5 years
and NORAD fighters have been interacting with Russian aviation for over 50
years.”
Simonds said NORAD and Russian aircraft since 2010 take part in an exercise
called Vigilant Eagle aimed at building cooperation on identifying and
intercepting hijacked aircraft that cross international boundaries.
Last week, Rep. Michael R. Turner (R., Ohio), chairman of the House Armed
Services Strategic Forces Subcommittee, said the Bear H intrusions near Alaska
showed Russia’s response to the administration’s reset policy. He said air
incursions, along with threats to attack U.S. missile defense sites
preemptively, were signs of Putin’s aggression in the face of President Obama’s
promised flexibility in talks with Moscow.
The Alaska bomber flights coincided with a summit between Obama and Putin in
Mexico June 18.
According to U.S. officials, some 30 bombers and support aircraft took part
in the war games, including the Bear Hs and Tu-160 Blackjack bombers.
Russian Air Force spokesman Lt. Col. Vladimir Deryabin, told reporters in
Moscow last month that the arctic strategic war games “practice destruction of
enemy air defenses and strategic facilities.”
Michael Carl is a veteran
journalist with overseas military experience and experience as a political
consultant. He also has two Master's Degrees, is a bi-vocational pastor and
lives with his family in the Northeast United States.More ↓Less ↑
A Muslim group has released its plan to “wipe Christianity from the face of
the earth,” Islamize the West and establish an Islamic system of world
government – placing those who resist “under a police state.” The 23-page booklet, “The Global Islamic Civilization: The Power of a Nation
Revived,” is the brainchild of the United Muslim Nations
International, a group led by Sheik Farook al-Mohammedi.The document
outlines a plan for Muslim world domination and the re-establishment of the
Caliphate.
Al-Mohammedi leaves no doubt about his view of Christianity.
“Christianity should be destroyed and wiped from the face of the earth,”
al-Mohammedi said. “It is an evil demonic and Anti-Christ system, all Christians
are in complete Ignorance.”
The sheik includes a veiled threat in his remarks.
“Islamic Power has returned upon the face of the earth and the Revived Global
Caliphate has set eyes on the West to once and for all rid the world of
Christianity and there is nothing you can do about it,” al-Mohammedi said.
He makes his objective clear.
“I have pledged and made a firm promise to the Caliphate of the United Muslim
Nations International organization that I will do my utmost to Islamize all of
the West within a short period of time,” al-Mohammedi said.
Al-Mohammedi’s views are reflected in the book, which calls on all Muslims
to, “listen attentively (to the teaching in the booklet) so they may be able to
feel the spirituality of an Islamic revival within themselves and they will be
able to achieve the much needed upliftment and also a means in gaining the
closeness of Allah Subahanhu wa-ta’ ala.”
The document is a clear statement on the organization’s objective. Page 2
explains that the emergence of an Islamic Caliphate is the ultimate goal of all
Muslims.
“Firstly we will deal with the matter of the Global Islamic Civilization, its
honored status, the unrivaled Universal Brotherhood and Sisterhood of the Muslim
Ummah,” the document states.
“Islam the only true religion enjoins upon mankind Total Submission to the
will of Allah, which means that you are to live a life that is Totally Devoted
to the Almighty Allah by serving Him in the manner which He has prescribed for
us through the example of the Holy Prophet Mohammed Sallallahu ‘Alaihi
Wasallam,” the booklet said.
Al-Mohammedi declares that Western resistance to the worldwide Islamic
movement is futile.
“Today as I breathe the air of our newly found Islamic State of America
before my trip this week to Eurabia I leave behind me an Internationalist
Islamic Ideology which will be the future of America and Europe Inshallah,” he
said.
“None will resist, you will submit! Islam will conquer the hearts of all
christiandom, this is a definite reality. Every government has surrendered to
the Revived Global Caliphate and those nations who resist will be placed under a
police state within their realm.”
Al-Mohammedi added that non-Muslims have no place in his vision for the
world.
“The Dhimmis have no empire and no right to rule anywhere in the world. Earth
belongs to us, all of it,” he said.
“‘If you do not comply then WND and it’s (sic) employees will become targets
for our UIA agents who will eliminate you within America,’ said an email today
from Faarooq al Mohammedi, who has said he is working on behalf of a Muslim
organization called United Muslim Nations International organization,” the WND
story said.
“This document is dedicated to a ‘revival of Islamic culture,’ by which is
meant a restoration of ‘the Global Islamic Civilization, its honored status, the
unrivaled Universal Brotherhood and Sisterhood of the Muslim Ummah,’” Geller
said.
She also noted that the booklet is completely in line with the stated goals
of the Muslim Brotherhood.
“This refers, of course, to the restoration of the caliphate, the
pan-national unity of the Muslims (which is also the goal of the Muslim
Brotherhood),” she said.
Geller added that even though there are references to personal faithfulness
in the document, it’s really a battle cry.
“So while the document speaks largely of matters of individual piety,
marriage law, etc., it actually amounts to a call to warfare against and
subjugation of non-Muslims under the Sharia,” Geller said.
She added, “In Islamic law only the caliph is authorized to declare and wage
offensive jihad against infidel states. If the caliphate is restored, the
present jihads worldwide will look like a time of piece compared to the wars
that will be unleashed.”
On July 2, 1776, Congress voted for the Declaration of Independence. Most of
the members signed it on July 4, although more signed over the next month.
The problem was this: a declaration of independence from King George III (and
from Parliament, which was really the source of bureaucratic meddling and
taxation of a staggering 1% of GDP), was that it led within six years to massive
debt, hyperinflation, and increased taxation. After 1788, it led to more of the
same. It has finally led to Nanci Pelosi's ideological agent on the bench, John
Roberts.
In upholding Obamacare, which is in fact Pelosicare, Chief Justice Roberts
wrote the majority opinion. He indulged in some lawyer-like deception, as
lawyers are paid to do.The law specifically says that the mandatory payment for
not buying insurance is a
penalty, not a tax. He determined that this penalty would be
unconstitutional if it were a penalty (commerce clause), so, lo and behold, it's
a tax!
This is all nonsense, of course. The government has regulated lots of things
under the commerce clause, telling people what they must do, can do, and cannot
do. If the Supreme Court gives any regulation a thumbs-up, the regulation
continues. No single case is going to reverse the federal bureaucracy from
pursuing its agenda under the commerce clause.
One man's opinion on what the commerce clause means is merely his opinion.
This opinion does not bind the federal bureaucracy or any future Court decision.
It just gave Roberts a way to justify his theory of the legality of unlimited
federal taxation, now to be collected as fines for not buying health insurance.
He argued that the government can now force residents and citizens of the
United States to buy health care insurance that they do not want, or else face a
government-imposed fine for not buying it. He called this a tax. The majority
five accepted this.
To the extent that his opinion has established a precedent, Roberts has at
long last legalized open economic fascism to America. Of course, it has been
alive and well ever since the New Deal, and really since the First Bank of the
United States (1791 to 1811). But now it has been placed under the judicial
umbrella of a Supreme Court decision.
Economic fascism is the doctrine that there is a government-business
alliance that makes the nation wealthy or strong militarily. This idea has
never had a judicial basis before. Now it does.
A tax in America prior to last week was a payment by the citizen or legal
entity to an agency of civil government. Not so in the new, improved American
fascism, as articulated by Chief Justice Roberts. In fascism, a compulsory
payment to a private, profit-seeking entity is considered a tax. You can pay
it to an insurance company, or you can pay a fine to the federal government.
Take your pick. They are both taxes.
CENTRAL BANKING
The first fascist agency in post-Constitution history was the First Bank of
the United States. It went out of existence in 1811. The Second Bank of the
United States created a replacement: 1816 to 1836.
In the historic case, McCulloch v. Maryland, Chief Justice John
Marshall announced that "the power to tax is the power to destroy." He got the
phrase from the attorneys who argued the case. It was not original with him.
Conservatives love to quote that phrase. Conservatives are blind. Marshall used
this doctrine to keep Maryland from levying a tax on a private entity: the
Second Bank of the United States. In striking down this state tax, Marshall
established the legality of economic fascism in America: the government-business
alliance.
Maryland correctly argued that Congress did not have the right to delegate
sovereignty to a private agency. This was the judicial heart of the matter. But
Daniel Webster, who was the Bank's legal counsel, argued that Congress did have
this right. Marshall sided with Webster.
The argument of Maryland is never discussed in the textbooks. This is one of
those crucial facts in history that has gone down Orwell's memory hole.
Marshall's creation of tax immunity for the Bank established the central legal
principle of central banking. This is the cornerstone of the Federal Reserve
System. It is sacrosanct. This is why any reference to Maryland's case against
the Bank is not discussed. The textbooks discuss Marshall's principle as if the
Bank's position as a private agency under the government's legal umbrella were
somehow constitutional. It is constitutional only because Marshall steadfastly
refused even to reply to the central argument of the state of Maryland.
Wikipedia provides the textbook version of the significance of this case.
This fundamental case established the following two principles:
The Constitution grants to Congress implied powers for implementing the
Constitution's express powers, in order to create a functional national
government.
State action may not impede valid constitutional exercises of power by the
Federal government.
Marshall's verbal smokescreen worked. In fact, the decision established this
principle above all: A privately owned central bank that is functionally
independent of Congress possesses the legal characteristic of federal
sovereignty, and is therefore immune from regulation by any lower
jurisdiction.
This is never discussed. This is why it is so difficult to find the text of
the opposing attorneys. Before the Internet, is was almost impossible. We never
saw an extract from Maryland's argument. We never saw even a summary: the issue
of delegated sovereignty to a private entity.
That decision handed over the nation to private central planners. The central
bank has the power over the central institution of the free market: money.
Marshall gave America economic fascism at the center of the economy: money.
Jackson and Congress removed it. He let the Second Bank's charter lapse in 1836.
(Note: the following year, 1837, was the only year in U.S. history in which the
U.S. government had no debt.)
Woodrow Wilson reimposed the system, under which we live.
Marshall's opinion stuck.
ROBERTS' OPINION
If Roberts' opinion sticks, the national fascist state has its marching
orders.
The central government in Washington now has the power to compel Americans to
pay private companies for services they do not want, on penalty of a fine. But
this fine is now called a tax.
I have read a conservative's whitewash of this monstrous decision. The writer
says this was a ruling of great cunning.
It was, indeed. This is one more example of terminally naive conservatives who
dream that the American fascist state can be reversed on a legal technicality.
Not now. Not if Roberts' argument sticks.
Roberts has enunciated as a principle of law the fundamental principle of
the fascist economy: there is a legitimate government-business alliance,
established by law, which places government over the private, profit-seeking
business, and the business in return is granted some of the immunities possessed
by the state. It means that a business can make you an offer you can't refuse.
This principle is now the law of the land.
Americans must now pay insurance companies their pound of flesh or else pay a
fine to the federal government. This fine is called a tax by Roberts.
Watch premiums rise!
ECONOMIC FASCISM: INDIRECT AND DIRECT
In 1819, the attorney for the state of Maryland argued against the chartering
of a profit-seeking central bank is the name of the power to tax or in the name
of the commerce clause. His words seem prophetic. He asked the right questions.
John Marshall rejected the obvious answer: "no." He said "yes." He upheld the
Second Bank of the United States. We would be wise to understand the issues
raised by the losers.
But we contend, that the government of the United States must
confine themselves, in the collection and expenditure of revenue, to the means
which are specifically enumerated in the constitution, or such auxiliary means
as are naturally connected with the specific means.
But what natural connection is there between the collection of taxes, and the
incorporation of a company of bankers? Can it possibly be said, that because
congress is invested with the power of raising and supporting armies, that it
may give a charter of monopoly to a trading corporation, as a bounty for
enlisting men? Or that, under its more analogous power of regulating commerce,
it may establish an East or a West India company, with the exclusive privilege
of trading with those parts of the world? Can it establish a corporation of
farmers of the revenue, or burden the internal industry of the states with
vexatious monopolies of their staple productions?
Justice Roberts also said "yes" -- not on the commerce clause,but on taxes.
The power to tax is the power to destroy. It is also the power to force
Americans to pay for insurance they do not want to fund high-risk participants
in the program.
In 1819, American economic fascism was indirect and limited to central
banking: a prohibition against a state tax on a privately owned, federally
chartered agency. This indirectly subsidized a private corporation. Under
Roberts' economic fascism, Americans will be taxed by the government unless they
do business with privately owned agencies. This indirectly subsidizes private
insurance agencies.
CONCLUSION
Economically, nothing has changed. It's the same old system. What
makes this new variant new is that it is judicially protected under the taxation
clause rather than the commerce clause.
It's like dog turds or cat turds. Take your pick
by wp. Many AMERICANS have never been taught how devious the Federal Government in all of its branches have been from the very beginning of our nation. The Founding Fathers tried to warn us of the veniality of many people in America. Their goal is and always has been their own self interests which include the domination and submission of the American People as their slaves. When we begin to search out the truth we find a sinister method of congressional and judicial mixed in with presidential collusion to subvert the constitution and its system of laws for their benefit. The system of historical lies and deceptions used show a huge lack of personal honor and decency in many of the officials we held in respect. Americans have one distinct flaw in our character and that is the desire to see and expect only the best out of fellow Americans. We find it very hard to see the evil within our fellow citizens and realize the dishonor they display. Hopefully we will awaken and realize the feet of clay we all are susceptable to and start seeking the best and most honest men and women to represent us rather than the smooth talking, pretty looking con artists that all PROFESSIONAL POLITICIANS are. A prime example is the Bobble-headed, snake oil salesman we now have in the white house. How any nation of supposedly intelligent citizens could elect6 a person with zero establishable qualifications in any area of business or government, or a established past is beyond comprehension. AND YET WE DID. And we sit and watch him destroy our economy, our history, our laws, our national reputation, our faith in The GOD, that formed our nation and prospered it. AND WE DO NOTHING! For too long we have let "George " do it rather than stand up and make our will known. Now we have a choice: we can continue as we have and become the serf feudal nation the elites have tried to make us for over two centuries or we can stand up and say"ENOUGH". Whatever it takes we will do to return our nation to the position it has held for two centuries. We will restore our relationship with the GOD of our Fathers. We will return him to his position of honor as the protector of our nation and the source of our security and prosperity. And then, only then will HE hear our prayers and heal/ restore our land. BUT WILL WE DO IT???
When shipping
and supply managers were quizzed about their current outlooks by two separate
reporting agencies, their answers were the same: Orders are slowing and so is
production of manufactured goods.The Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI),
released in late June, and the Report on Business of the
Institute of Supply Management (ISM), which was released on Monday, each showed
significant slowing. The PMI’s manufacturing index came in at its lowest level
since last July, while new orders for durable goods (autos and appliances) fell
sharply in June, continuing a trend downward since early spring. It also showed
a decline in the backlog of orders, the first since last September.
According to the ISM, its index fell below 50 for the
first time since July 2009, indicating continuing contraction in the
manufacturing sector of the economy and echoing the PMI’s report. What was
startling in the ISM’s report was the decline in new orders: down by an
astonishing 12.3 percentage points in the month of June. ISM’s production index
also declined severely, by 4.6 percent, and was down by 10 percent since the end
of March.
Retailers’ inventories are climbing as well, indicating
lack of demand by consumers. More troubling was ISM’s index of new export
orders, which has tumbled nearly 12 percent since March, the first month of
contraction since June 2009.
The release of
the Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank’s survey showed sharply lower numbers as
well, bordering on disastrous. Its index of current activity dropped from an
already negative 5.8 in May to a minus 16.6 in June, with nearly 40 percent of
the firms in the survey reporting declines in activity compared to just 22
percent reporting increases. New orders and shipments in the Philadelphia region
covered in the report fell 19 and 17 percent respectively, in just one
month.
The Economics
Group at Wells Fargo looked over the numbers and concluded
that “today’s report[s] will certainly cause the market to question the
sustainability of the economic recovery.”
Even more unsettling than the sharp decline in these
numbers was that the so-called “experts” never saw it coming. Bloomberg surveyed
70 economists prior to the release of the ISM report, and not one of them got it
right, with the average of their estimates predicting the ISM index to come in
at 52. The actual number of 49.7 was a huge miss.
The United
States’ economy is being hindered further by weakness in Europe, where
manufacturing has declined now for 11 straight months, while its
unemployment rose to 11.1 percent, the highest since 1995 when such statistics
were first recorded.
Auto and light
truck sales also declined to a 13.7 million annual rate in May, down from
April’s 14.4 million pace and the lowest for the year. By comparison, the auto
industry sold nearly 17 million units every year between 2000 and the start of
the Great Recession.
The reason these numbers are important is not because
manufacturing represents such a large part of the American economy (about 13
percent) but because of what they say about consumers’ attitudes and behavior.
As economist Gary North put it:
Why is [the PMI] a leading
indicator? Because it indicates customers’ willingness to buy new stuff, as
distinguished from continuing services. Buyers can more easily defer buying hard
goods than services….
Manufacturing declines tell
us that customers are lightening up. The fall in new orders says they are
tightening sharply.
. Lakshman
Achuthan’s call back in September is turning out just
about as he predicted. The co-founder of Economic Cycle Research Institute
(ECRI), Achuthan has had his hands full responding to doubters and scoffers at
his prediction that not only had the economy already entered a new recession but
that “it’s going to get a lot worse.” At the time he added:
The vicious cycle is starting
where lower sales, lower production, lower employment and lower income [leads]
back to lower sales…. You haven’t seen anything yet….
A new recession isn’t simply
a statistical event. It’s a vicious cycle that, once started, must run its
course.
As the economy
appeared to rebound a little bit, Achuthan defended his bearish call. In March he reiterated:
Since our recession call five
months ago the definitive hard data [we] used to determine official recession
dates have gotten worse, not better, despite the consensus view [that] things
have been improving.
Other indicators support ECRI’s call. For instance:
• Corporate
profits declined for the first time in four years, from $16.8 billion in the
fourth quarter of last year to a minus $6.4 billion in the second
quarter, the largest decline since the third quarter of 2008;
• Job growth
is disappointing, having fallen sharply this spring, with expectations that Friday’s report will show job growth at 100,000, way
less than needed just to absorb new workers entering the workforce.
George Vrba,
at AdvisorPerspectives.com, has refined ECRI’s predictive model on the economy
even further and has concluded that the
U.S. economy has already entered a recession.But it will take the National
Bureau of Economic Rese arch (NBER) — the official statistical group in charge of
announcing such events — several months to catch up with reality and declare,
just in time for the election, that, yes, the U.S. economy has been in recession
since May.
by wp The Federals have denied the truth for so long attempting to prove their decisions are working, but THE TRUTH IS ABOUT TO BITE THEM IN THE ASS.