‘Uh, What’s A Founding Father?

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV

FREE ZONE VIDEO

~~~

Mark Levin: Obama Re-election Would Be ‘National Suicide’

Posted by bh

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV

FREE ZONE RADIO

Jeff Kuhner Blasts Obama’s Hypocrisy – Sealed Records

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV

FREE ZONE RADIO

Hank Williams Jr. Hammers Obama With ‘Take Back Our Country’

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV

POLITICAL QUOTES QUIZ

Posted By Woody Pendleton

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER   WFZR/TV

No cheating now!

Listed below are 10 direct quotes.
You have to guess which American politician said it.

Your four choices are:
Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin
Former VP Dan Quayle
President Barack Obama
Former President George W. Bush

Ready? Here we go!

1) "Let me be absolutely clear. Israel is a strong friend of Israel ’s."

A. Barack Obama
B. Dan Quayle
C. Sarah Palin
D. George W. Bush

2) "I've now been in 57 states I think one left to go."

A. Barack Obama
B. Dan Quayle
C. Sarah Palin
D. George W. Bush

3) "On this Memorial Day, as our nation honors its unbroken line of
fallen heroes, and I see many of them in the audience here today."

A. Barack Obama
B. Dan Quayle
C. Sarah Palin
D. George W. Bush

4) "What they'll say is, 'Well it costs too much money,' but you know
what? It would cost, about. It, it, it would cost about the same as
what we would spend. It. Over the course of 10 years it would cost
what it would costs us. (nervous laugh) All right. Okay. We're going
to. It would cost us about the same as it would cost for about hold on
one second. I can't hear myself. But I'm glad you're fired up, though.
I'm glad."

A. Barack Obama
B. Dan Quayle
C. Sarah Palin
D. George W. Bush

5) "The reforms we seek would bring greater competition, choice,
savings and inefficiencies to our health care system."

A. Barack Obama
B. Dan Quayle
C. Sarah Palin
D. George W. Bush

6) "I bowled a 129. It's like - it was like the Special Olympics, or
something."


A. Barack Obama
B. Dan Quayle
C. Sarah Palin
D. George W. Bush

7) "Of the many responsibilities granted to a president by our
Constitution, few are more serious or more consequential than
selecting a Supreme Court justice. The members of our highest court
are granted life tenure, often serving long after the presidents who
appointed them. And they are charged with the vital task of applying
principles put to paper more than 20 centuries ago to some of the most
difficult questions of our time."

A. Barack Obama
B. Dan Quayle
C. Sarah Palin
D. George W. Bush

8) "Everybody knows that it makes no sense that you send a kid to the
emergency room for a treatable illness like asthma, they end up taking
up a hospital bed, it costs, when, if you, they just gave, you gave
them treatment early and they got some treatment, and a, breathalyzer,
or inhalator, not a breathalyzer. I haven't had much sleep in the last
48 hours."

A. Barack Obama
B. Dan Quayle
C. Sarah Palin
D. George W. Bush

9) "It was interesting to see that political interaction in Europe is
Not that different from the United States Senate. There's a lot of I
don’t know what the term is in Austrian, wheeling and dealing."

A. Barack Obama
B. Dan Quayle
C. Sarah Palin
D. George W. Bush


10) "I have made good judgments in the past. I have made good
judgments in the future."

A. Barack Obama
B. Dan Quayle
C. Sarah Palin
D. George W. Bush



Sorry. This was a "trick" quiz. All of the correct answers are the
same person. Each of these quotes is directly from President Barack
Obama. And now you know why he brings his teleprompter with him
everywhere he goes ...even when talking to a 6th grade class.
And some members of the media continue to insist he is "The smartest
man ever elected to the Presidency".

 

 RIIIIGHT

 

 

DEFENSE ASKS FOR REMOVAL OF BIASED, PREJUDICIAL JUDGE

Posted By Woody Pendleton

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER   WFZR/TV

Ministry asks for removal of Maddow case judge

'Recusal is required' when judge exhibits 'high degree of favoritism'

Published: 17 hours ago

by Bob UnruhEmail | Archive

Bob Unruh joined WND in 2006 after spending nearly three decades writing on a wide range of issues for several Upper Midwest newspapers and the Associated Press. Sports, tornadoes, homicidal survivalists, and legislative battles all fell within his bailiwick. His scenic photography has been used commercially, and he sometimes plays in a church worship band.More ↓Less ↑

Su

A Christian minister who brought a defamation case against MSNBC personality Rachel Maddow, alleging she maliciously asserted the preacher advocated the execution of homosexuals, is asking that the judge in the case be removed because of her biased comments.

“Recusal is required when judicial remarks create the appearance that the court’s impartiality may be called into question, and ‘could suggest, to an outside observer, such a ‘high degree of favoritism or antagonism’ to defendants’ position that ‘fair judgment is impossble,”” says an affidavit filed with the Superior Court of the District of Columbia concerning the actions and statements of Judge Joan Zeldon.

WND was told by one of Zeldon’s staff members that she was out of the office, but a message was left requesting a comment from the judge on the issue.

The case was brought by a Christian preacher whose ministry features hard rock, high school seminars and an occasional letter exchange with Barack Obama. Attorney Larry Klayman brought the action on behalf of Bradlee Dean and his You Can Run But You Cannot Hide International ministry.

The case alleges Dean endured death threats after Maddow’s “malicious” criticism of him and his work.

Maddow’s “outrageous and maliciously published statements have severely harmed not only plaintiffs’ reputations, but also their financial well-being,” said a motion in opposition to Maddow’s request that the case be dismissed.

How low can the media go? Meet ‘The Anti-Journalists.’ Not only do they refuse to report the truth – they attack you if you do

The lawsuit contends left-leaning interests were trying to undercut Republican Rep. Michele Bachmann’s presidential campaign by attacking people with whom she associated, including Dean’s ministry. Bachmann’s unsuccessful campaign was focused on a return to traditional values regarding marriage, fiscal policy and government.

The complaint by Dean, a former heavy metal rocker, is based on Maddow’s assertion that Dean advocated the execution of homosexuals.

The original complaint explained the characterization started with reporter Andy Birkey of the Minnesota Independent, even though those parties are not named as defendants.

It said Birkey took a special interest in Dean and YCR because “he is a secularist and/or atheist and gay activist with a politically left ideology who despises people of faith, including but not limited to the congresswoman Michele Bachmann, MN, who is running for the presidency of the United States, and is a conservative Christian as well.”

The case said following the first statements about Dean by Birkey and the Minnesota Independent, “Rachel Maddow, and NBC and MSNBC, in concert with others, have set out to and did willfully and maliciously harm the presidential campaign of congresswoman Michele Bachmann. Not coincidentally, Rachel Maddow is also of a leftist political ideology, who as a committed and also proud lesbian is active in the so called ‘gay rights’ movement. She views plaintiffs and congresswoman Bachmann a threat to ‘gay rights,’” the claim explained.

It continued: “On information and believe … [in defaming] plaintiffs Dean and YCR and holding in a false light plaintiff Dean, all of the defendants, each and every one of them, maliciously set out to and did harm not only the plaintiffs but by extension also the presidential campaign of congresswoman Michele Bachmann.”

In May 2010, Birkey wrote wrote an article titled “GOP-linked punk rock ministry says executing gays is ‘moral’” that tried to link Bachmann to the ministry. Bachmann had praised the ministry previously.

The complaint said it was Maddow who later “outrageously disparaged Bradlee Dean’s physical appearance, his first name and his profession as a heavy metal entertainer and his standing in the community and represented that he and YCR had advocated the execution of gays.”

But when Maddow asked the court to dismiss the complaint on a variety of grounds, Klayman’s opposition explained why it only would be fair to allow the case to continue.

“There are no justifiable bases to contend that plaintiff has not been placed in false light and defamed. What is most horrifying, however, is the effect defendants’ statements had on viewers, leading many viewers to not only discredit Dean but to also threaten Dean’s life. … As a father of four, nothing was more petrifying to Dean that continuously receiving death threats, such as one particular disturbing Internet threat that warned, ‘Now I’m gonna have to kill you! I thought we were gonna cut each others’ hair then have sex, but you stood me up! I am so upset that I think I may just have to blow up your ministry instead!’” the filing explained.

“Making the threats more imminent is that some radical homosexual activists went as far as posting a picture and plaintiffs’ physical address, providing a roadmap to where plaintiffs can be found and harmed,” the filing said.

The filing explains Maddow “altered plaintiffs’ previous statements and distorted them in order to defame plaintiffs and place them in a false light.”

According to a ministry statement today, since the defendants had cited the DC Anti-Slapp statute in their defense, and a recent federal court decision in Washington said that law was not applicable there, the plaintiffs sought to remove the case from the DC courts and refile in federal jurisdiction.

Zeldon responded by praising the defense attorneys and ordering Dean to pay some $24,000 in defense legal fees before she would be allow the case to be dismissed, even though that defense work would be equally applicable in the new filing in federal court, the ministry explained.

The move to another court was a “tactical, strategic decision,” the ministry statement said.

“However, Judge Zeldon, who it became apparent had hoped to rule against Dean and YCR and in favor of Maddow and MSNBC given her leftist ideology, sought to punish plaintiffs and throw a monkey wrench into the voluntary dismissal of the case before her. Judge Zeldon ruled that the case before her could not be dismissed unless Dean and YCR paid over $24,000 in attorneys fees and costs to Maddow … claiming that the defendants attorneys should be compensated for the legal work they did in her case.”

When Dean challenged the payments, the judge said he was not even allowed to ask questions about the billings. Klayman said a hearing on such fees is routine, but the judge refused even that.

“Incredibly, despite Dean and YCR having argued that Maddow and MSNBC’s fees and costs were fraudulent, Judge Zeldon stated in her order that defendants lawyers are ‘distinguished,’ and to the contrary disparaged Dean and YCR and their counsel, Larry Klayman. Because this, and other biased statements in the order, unmasked her prejudice, yesterday Dean and YCR filed pleadings to disqualify Judge Zeldon and have her order vacated…,” the filing said.

Dean said, “This is a new turn of events that was not anticipated when I brought the suit against Maddow and MSNBC. Judges are to enforce the law, not to defend lawbreakers and then award them money. This generation is being taught that wrong is right and right is wrong. As a preacher, I am combating that ideology, and in my view, I have learned that this ideology is often taught and put into effect by a judicial system that aligns itself with corrupted attorneys and lawbreakers.”

In an affidavit in support of the move, Dean wrote, “It became clear to me that the judge, Joan Zeldon, harbored an extra-judicial bias and prejudice against me and YCR stemming from our conservative Christian advocacy against the so-called gay and lesbian political agenda, which is based in part on teaching young children in public and private schools and homosexuality is ‘normal’ societal behavior. … Specifically, it became clear to me, based on Judge Zeldon’s statements and actions, that she favored defendant Rachel Maddow…”

He noted the judge’s comments “are offensive and quite personal, and … denigrate, disparage, berate, and mock my counsel and me.”

He cited Zeldon’s mockery of Klayman’s health issues, and he accuses her of “unprofessional and injudicious” cheap shots.

The affidavit continues, “It is evidence that Judge Zeldon held and continues to hold a bias against the plaintiffs and in favor of defendants [making her] unable to impartially rule upon this case.”

Klayman, the founder of Judicial Watch and now of Freedom Watch, affirmed his filings were in good faith.

“This case is filed as a matter of principle,” he said. “We need more Bradlee Deans in the world and hateful left wing television commentators must be made to respect not only his mission but the law.”

Dean became a Christian after suffering a hard life as a young boy and has dedicated his life to his ministry’s mission.

Klayman said: “Maddow and MSNBC clearly defamed my client. Maddow went way over the line, particularly in her second broadcast by claiming that Dean and Republicans like then-presidential candidate Michele Bachmann are ‘bloodthirsty’ and want to see more gays and lesbians killed. This was outrageous and harmful and for this, Maddow and MSNBC will be held legally accountable.”

You Can Run But You Cannot Hide International, founded by Dean, has reached more than 500,000 young people across the country with a message of truth and hope. His message focuses on basic constitutional issues. He’s also spoken at churches, festivals, prisons, detention centers and on radio and television programs.

Dean also is drummer for Junkyard Prophet, which has sold more than 40,000 albums in the Minneapolis area alone. Bradlee is endorsed by companies such as Sonor, Buttkickers, Beatnik (including his own signature drum pad), Hornet Drumsticks (including his own signature sticks) and Soultone Cymbals.

His letter exchange with Obama came just months ago when he asked the president to pursue a restoration of traditional morality in the United States.

In response, Obama, who has openly promoted homosexuality and other alternative sexual lifestyle choices in the Oval Office, said he appreciated Dean’s “perspective.” He said he takes such opinions “seriously.”

“Please know that your concerns will be on my mind in the days ahead,” he wrote.

---

US IMMIGRATION OFFICERS DOUBTED OBAMA BIRTH STORY

Posted By Woody Pendleton

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER   WFZR/TV

Immigration officers doubted Obama birth story

INS was prepared to investigate marriage, paternity in 1961

Published: 15 hours ago

by Jerome R. CorsiEmail | Archive

Jerome R. Corsi, a Harvard Ph.D., is a WND senior staff reporter. He has authored many books, including No. 1 N.Y. Times best-sellers "The Obama Nation" and "Unfit for Command." Corsi's latest book is "Where's the REAL Birth Certificate?"More ↓Less ↑

Subscribe to author feed

NEW YORK – Immigration documents filed in 1961 cast doubt on whether Barack Hussein Obama Sr. was the president’s biological father and indicate federal officers were prepared to investigate whether the Kenyan was married to the president’s mother, Ann Dunham.

Aside from the image of a long-form birth certificate released by the White House April 27, 2011 – a document Sheriff Arpaio’s law enforcement investigation has found probable cause to believe is a forgery – what documentary evidence is there that Barack Obama was the biological father?

Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s next news conference on his probe of Obama’s eligibility is set for Tuesday, July 17. Sign up to watch it live-streamed for free on WND.
The recent biography of the president by Washington Post editor and author David Maraniss, “Barack Obama: The Story,” quotes concerns about Obama Sr.’s sexual promiscuity expressed by Immigration and Naturalization Service officers, but he dimisses them as racially motivated.
Maraniss, on pages 162-163, examines a 1961 INS memo that indicates Obama Sr. continued to have multiple girlfriends at the University of Hawaii after his supposed marriage, Feb. 2, 1961, in Maui to Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham.
In the memo, written by a Lyle H. Dahlin, Obama Sr.’s student adviser, a Mrs. McCabe, indicated Obama Sr. was “very intelligent” but had been a “playboy,” “running around with several girls” since he arrived. The adviser also noted he was married to an American, though he already had a wife in Kenya.
Maraniss writes regarding the memo: “There was a fine line between how Obama acted and the racial attitudes and expectations of those who were working with him, the unanswerable but valid question being whether the official concern was heightened because he was a black man interacting with white women.”
However, a close analysis of the INS documents in Obama Sr.’s immigration file makes clear Maraniss either misunderstood the true concerns of the INS or misrepresented them.

The primary concern of the INS, according to the memos, was not that Obama Sr. was sexually involved with white women, but that he might have engaged in a sham marriage to Dunham so he could remain in the U.S. or gain U.S. citizenship.

See the evidence about Barack Obama’s heritage, in “Dreams from My Real Father.”

The INS documents indicate authorized government immigration agents suspected the evidence for an Obama-Dunham marriage was thin, and doubts that the Kenyan was the biological father were substantial.

 CLICK BELOW TO READ MORE

"TURST US" WE ARE YOUR GOVERNMENT

Posted by HS

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV

"WE THE PEOPLE" A MESSAGE TO MR. OBAMA

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV

OBAMA: DEBTOR ACCUMULATING SPENDTHRIFT

Posted By Woody Pendleton

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER   WFZR/TV

Obama: Anti-Founders Debt-Accumulating Spendthrift 

• 
• Chuck Norris
  

Jul 10, 2012

In 2007, when I began writing my New York Times best-seller "Black Belt Patriotism," unemployment was less than 5 percent; the annual federal budget was about $2.9 trillion; the federal deficit was $161 billion; and the national debt was $9 trillion.

Today unemployment is stuck at 8.2 percent; the federal budget is $3.8 trillion; the national deficit is $1.3 trillion; and the national debt quickly is approaching a staggering $16 trillion.

And to add insult to injury, our vassalage to other countries deepens as they bankroll increasing amounts of U.S. debt, and more than 50 percent of our public debt is held by private investors in foreign lands.

Last week, the International Business Times reported: "China overtook Japan as the largest holder of U.S. national debt in 2009. As of December (the most recent data available), it held about 23.1 percent, or $1.15 trillion, of all foreign investment in U.S. privately held federal debt, according to a newly released report by the Congressional Budget Office, or CBO. ... Without monetary policy change, the CBO warned in its 2012 Long-Term Budget Outlook on June 5, the U.S. federal debt could be twice the size of the U.S. gross domestic product by 2037."

The national debt is not merely the result of excessive spending; it is also the result of revenues not being high enough to pay for government outlays. In other words, while the feds have spent trillions of dollars bailing out everyone from automotive businesses to zebra-loving environmental companies, they have done virtually nothing to build up Main Street business productivity. (Disturbingly, just a few days ago, Vice President Joe Biden again called for more government spending.)
When the receipts don't cover the outlays, it should be a sign that the U.S. government is in trouble, but that's just another typical day of federal government operation. When the federal government wastes more than $100 million a year on minting pennies, which cost 2.41 cents each to make, and nickels, which cost 11.18 cents each, it should be the first to recognize that it runs the worst business in the world; but it is the last to admit it. (Between 2006 and 2011, the government's production of pennies and nickels is estimated to have generated losses of nearly $360 million.)

In 2008, the country elected Barack Obama to clean up Washington and lead the economic restoration of our country based upon his following campaign promises:

"Today I'm pledging to cut the deficit we inherited in half by the end of my first term in office." (Spoken at the opening of the fiscal responsibility summit on Feb. 23, 2009.) 
"We will launch a sweeping effort to root out waste, inefficiency and unnecessary spending in our government, and every American will be able to see how and where we spend taxpayer dollars by going to a new website called recovery.gov." (Spoken in a speech Jan. 28, 2009.)
"There is no doubt that we've been living beyond our means, and we're going to have to make some adjustments. Now, what I've done throughout this campaign is to propose a net spending cut." (Spoken during a presidential debate Oct. 15, 2008.)
"Under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase -- not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes." (Spoken in September 2008 at a town hall meeting in Dover, N.H.)
Last week, The Fact Checker, a service by The Washington Post, quoted Crossroads GPS' itemization of the Obama administration's fiscal debt record:

"January 20, 2009: The National Debt Was $10,626,877,048,913.08 (Obama Takes Office). (Treasury Department, accessed 5/23/12)

"May 22, 2012: The National Debt Was $15,721,218,607,447.09 (Most Recent). (Treasury Department, accessed 5/23/12)

"Obama Has Been In Office For 1,219 Days (1/20/09-5/22/12). (Convert Units, accessed 5/17/12)

"$5,094,341,558,534.01 (divided by) 1,219 Days (equals) $4,179,115,306/Day."

And people want to re-elect President Obama? Why?

It's tragically unfortunate that President Obama turned a deaf ear to the recommendations of the Bowles-Simpson deficit commission. Instead, while serially blaming his presidential predecessor for excessive spending, he skyrocketed the national budget, deficits and debt by trillions and trillions of dollars and, to boot, strapped upon our backs and those of our posterity trillions more for yet another socialized medicine program, called Obamacare.

Is the White House even listening anymore to anyone or just running amok its own way?

The actions of this White House remind me of an ancient proverb that says, "The way of a fool seems right to him, but a wise man listens to advice."

Next week, I will discuss how the first eight presidents handled national debt and what I know they would say to Obama, whether he wants to hear it or not.

 POLITICIANS LIE AND DISTRACT.   FACTS TELL THE TRUTH!

 BY  WP

 

83 PER CENT OF DOCTORS CONSIDERING CLOSING THEIR PRACTICES IF OBAMACARE IS NOT REPEALED

Posted By Woody Pendleton

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER   WFZT/TV

---

Report: 83 percent of doctors have considered quitting over Obamacare

Mark Levin: Obama re-election would be 'national suicide'

Congressional bully pushes anti-bullying legislation

Report: 83 percent of doctors have considered quitting over Obamacare

Published: 2:20 PM 07/09/2012

By Sally Nelson

An opponent of President Barack Obama's health care law demonstrates outside the Supreme Court in Washington, Thursday, June 28, 2012, before the court's ruling on the law. (AP Photo/David Goldman)

Eighty-three percent of American physicians have considered leaving their practices over President Barack Obama’s health care reform law, according to a survey released by the Doctor Patient Medical Association.
The DPMA, a non-partisan association of doctors and patients, surveyed a random selection of 699 doctors nationwide. The survey found that the majority have thought about bailing out of their careers over the legislation, which was upheld last month by the Supreme Court.
Even if doctors do not quit their jobs over the ruling, America will face a shortage of at least 90,000 doctors by 2020. The new health care law increases demand for physicians by expanding insurance coverage. This change will exacerbate the current shortage as more Americans live past 65.
By 2025 the shortage will balloon to over 130,000, Len Marquez, the director of government relations at the American Association of Medical Colleges, told The Daily Caller.
“One of our primary concerns is that you’ve got an aging physician workforce and you have these new beneficiaries — these newly insured people — coming through the system,” he said. “There will be strains and there will be physician shortages.”
The DPMA found that many doctors do not believe the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act will lead to better access to medical care for the majority of Americans, co-founder of the DPMA Kathryn Serkes told TheDC.
“Doctors clearly understand what Washington does not — that a piece of paper that says you are ‘covered’ by insurance or ‘enrolled’ in Medicare or Medicaid does not translate to actual medical care when doctors can’t afford to see patients at the lowball payments, and patients have to jump through government and insurance company bureaucratic hoops,” she said. (SEE ALSO: Jeremiah Wright: ‘White racist alien DNA’ running through synapses of Obama’s brain )

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/07/09/report-83-percent-of-doctors-have-considered-quitting-over-obamacare/#ixzz20EvixAPd

OBAMA'S 8 MOST SHAMEFUL MOMENTS

Posted By Woody Pendleton

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER   WFZR/TV

The 8 Most Shameful Moments of Barack Obama's Presidency

8) "The private sector is doing fine:" Know what hasn't been "doing fine" for a single day since Barack Obama came into office? The private sector. So when Barack Obama bizarrely proclaimed that "the private sector is doing fine" earlier this year, Obama was further out of touch than E.T. was when he wanted to phone home.
7) Obama bows to Saudi king: If Barack Obama had spent his formative years in the United States instead of overseas, he'd know that real Americans don't bow. Moreover, no American, especially the President, should be bowing down to a dictatorial king like the one we had to overthrow in the Revolutionary War. Besides the Saudi king, Obama also continued to humiliate himself and his country by bowing to Japanese Emperor Akihito and the Chinese PM. We're lucky that the SEALs killed Osama Bin Laden as opposed to capturing him or we might have seen pictures of Obama bowing to him on MSNBC by now.
6) Son looked like Trayvon: At a time when George Zimmerman was publicly being threatened with death and white people were being beaten "For Trayvon," there was an opportunity for the President to show leadership and encourage people to calm down. Instead, after making some perfunctory remarks towards that end, Obama added fuel to the fire by noting, "If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon." This was a follow-up to Obama's similarly foolish decision to insert himself into another local situation that didn't concern him. After his friend Henry Gates smashed his own door in and made such an ass of himself that he was arrested when the police arrived, Obama noted that he didn't know the facts, but he did know that the "police acted stupidly." He then followed that up by suggesting racism was probably to blame. Fortunately, he managed to patch over that bit of idiocy with a "beer summit" as opposed to the Trayvon Martin case where he increased the chances that someone would get killed because he was thoughtlessly shooting off his mouth.
5) Refusing to pick up illegals from Arizona: After the Obama Administration refused to enforce federal immigration law in Arizona, the state passed a tough new law that allowed local police to do the job ICE wouldn't do. Disgracefully, Barack Obama held a White House press conference where both he and Mexican President Felipe Calderon ganged up against Arizona for doing little more than enforcing the laws on the book. The Obama Administration then sued Arizona and after it didn't emerge completely victorious, simply refused to pick up illegal aliens that aren't felons from Arizona. In other words, not only is Barack refusing to enforce the law of the land, he won't allow anyone else to uphold the laws he falsely swore to uphold when he became President.
4) Persecuting the Catholic Church: Obama spat in the face of the Catholic Church and violated its constitutionally-protected 1st Amendment religious rights by demanding that it provide birth control and abortifacient drugs in its hospitals. Unless this policy is stopped, millions of Americans will pay the price as the Catholic Church closes its hospitals rather than violate its deeply-held religious beliefs in order to cater to Barack Obama's whims.
3) Passing Obamacare: Health care reform was opposed by the Republican Party and the American people despite endless lies the Obama Administration told about what a wonderful program it would be. The Obama Administration lied when it said everyone could keep their health insurance, that it wouldn't increase the deficit, when it said there were no death panels in the bill, when it said it wouldn't increase taxes, and when it said abortion wouldn't be funded with your tax dollars. All of these lies were for a program that took 500 billion dollars out of Medicare to fund a new entitlement program that will cause large numbers of doctors to quit, dramatically reduce the quality of care, and force Americans to deal with the IRS just to get health care. It's one of the single worst bills in America history that delivers an incredibly expensive new entitlement program at the point in American history where we can least afford it.
2) Obama's lawless attempt to pass the Dream Act by Fiat: After the DREAM ACT failed to make it through Congress, Barack Obama illegally decided to implement it anyway. After instructing the Department of Justice to stop following the law in regard to illegals under 30, Obama decided to issue work permits for illegals. That's an illegal act that directly contradicts the existing immigration law. It also makes little sense to give somewhere between 800,000 and 3 million foreigners work permits when every job they take will keep another American out of work in tough economic times.
1) Eric Holder held in contempt of Congress after Obama uses executive privilege: On Barack Obama's watch, the Department of Justice helped put guns into the hands of Mexican cartels and these guns were used to kill hundreds of Mexicans along with American Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry. Did Eric Holder know about this beforehand? Did Barack Obama? We don't know for sure because they've been engaged in a Nixonian cover-up. They've dragged their feet, stonewalled, and when they couldn't hold off any longer, Obama declared executive privilege in an attempt to hide the truth about how deeply his administration is tied to the deaths of 300 plus people. Obama's behavior was so sleazy that 17 House Democrats felt compelled to vote with Republicans to find Eric Holder in contempt of Congress. Say what you want about Watergate, but at least no one was killed during the scandal, which is something that can't be said about Obama's Fast and Furious debacle.

STATE WANTS TO FORCE CHILD TO TAKE CANCER CAUSING ,DANGEROUS DRUGS

Posted By Woody Pendleton

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER   WFZR/TV

Boy forced to get cancer-causing treatment?

Young child tests free of sarcoma, but officials demand 'standard' procedures

Published: 13 hours ago

by Bob UnruhEmail | Archive

Bob Unruh joined WND in 2006 after spending nearly three decades writing on a wide range of issues for several Upper Midwest newspapers and the Associated Press. Sports, tornadoes, homicidal survivalists, and legislative battles all fell within his bailiwick. His scenic photography has been used commercially, and he sometimes plays in a church worship band.More ↓Less ↑

Subscribe to author feed

A hearing is scheduled before the Michigan Court of Appeals on Wednesday in a fight by the state Department of Human Services to forcibly administer more cancer-causing drugs to a child who was diagnosed with Ewing sarcoma, but following an earlier round of treatments has been declared either “in remission” or cured.
The case could be a foreshadowing of the decision-making process that soon will become mandatory under Obamacare.

WND reported several months ago when the state agency filed a lawsuit insisting that the child endure a dangerous course of medication because it was what some doctors wanted for him, despite a series of scans that indicate an absence of any cancer in the child.

The case is being fought on behalf of Ken and Erin Stieler and their son Jacob by attorneys with the Home School Legal Defense Association.
The organization concerns itself with home school rights, responsibilities and restrictions but also intercedes in cases that could have a significant impact on child and parental rights.
The organization reported today that HSLDA Chairman Mike Farris is traveling to Lansing, Mich., to represent the Stielers before the Michigan Court of Appeals on Wednesday.

At issue is the state’s demand to administer chemicals such as ifosfamide, etoposide and doxorubicin even though the U.S. Food and Drug Administration states that for ifosfamide and etoposide, the “safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients have not been established.”

The warning for doxorubicin is stronger, stating, “Pediatric patients are at increased risk for developing delayed cardiotoxicity.”

Farris told WND that the facts of the case are important, because Jacob underwent treatment for cancer and has been clean on the last four scans over the last year.

Further, the treatment demanded by the state, which insisted that prosecutors bring a medical neglect case against the parents, is not guaranteed to help and not even guaranteed to be safe.

Lower courts have ruled against the state, and Farris explained earlier, “If they succeed they will force Jacob to resume chemotherapy despite the fact that the drugs in question are not FDA approved (either for children in general or for this particular cancer). Moreover, these drugs do not promise anything close to a guaranteed cure. And, the FDA requires the drug manufacturers to disclose that these drugs cause new cancers to form, heart disease in children, failure to sexually mature, and many other serious side effects in some cases.”

Farris told WND that there is concern about the outcome of the case, as the state’s argument is that the drugs are demanded in the “national standard of care” for the condition.

That’s the same type of concern that has been raised by many organizations and individuals about Obamacare.

Officials from the state did not respond to WND’s request for comment.
In the brief to the appellate court argument against the state’s demands, HSLDA said the state misrepresented the facts in the case in its appeal.

“One glaring example of the erroneous nature of the statement of facts relates to the statement that ‘Dr. Beth Kurt could testify that Jacob’s tumor is not surgically respectable (sic).’ Since Jacob’s PET scans are clear, and have been clear since July 6, 2011, there is no evidence that Jacob has a tumor – resectable or not. No one – not even Dr. Kurt – would or could claim that Jacob currently has a tumor. His tumor was surgically removed and he is free from any objective signs of cancer. … The department’s statement of facts falsely represents the presence of a tumor as a current reality.”

Further, the treatment being demanded by the state would be experimental.

“While there is some dispute about the meaning of the lack of FDA approval, it is undisputed that this drug regiment, on the whole, has not been FDA-approved as safe and effective for the treatment of juvenile Ewing’s sarcoma. It is also undisputed that patients who received these drugs – particularly young children – face a risk of very serious side effects, including the capacity to cause secondary cancers, heart disease, or to inhibit proper sexual development,” the brief said.

Meanwhile, the family has set up a series of periodic scans to monitor Jacob, and have made plans for further treatment should circumstances develop that it is needed.
It was Erin Stieler who explained why the family made its own plans, and rejected the state plans.

“There is no doubt that I would continue to have Jacob treated with the recommended conventional therapy if the doctors could assure me that there was current evidence that he has cancer, that he would die without the treatment, that the treatment was safe and effective for his condition, that the treatment would cure him, and that there were no dangerous side effects,” she said.

Further, the state’s own agency investigator said procedure would be to close the case, but that officials from high in the department were applying pressure to force the treatment.

Farris said that the state’s plan is to follow the “standard” treatment, which has been described as dangerous.

“If we are put in a position where national standards are established, whether by practice or the government, it comes out the same,” he said. “This case may well shape parental rights principles for the long haul. We believe that parents, not doctors, should make tough decisions like this.”

The HSLDA earlier reported how Jacob was diagnosed with Ewing sarcoma, a dangerous bone cancer, and he had surgery to remove a tumor and then chemotherapy to follow up.

“The treatment was incredibly difficult, and Jacob’s mom, Erin, told me that when she looked her son in the eyes, she knew in her heart that he simply could not survive many more rounds of these drugs,” Farris reported.

They tapped into a prayer network and were joined by hundreds to pray for their son’s recovery.

“After all of these rounds of chemotherapy were completed, there was a PET scan done to check on the status of the cancer. There was no evidence of cancer detected in Jacob’s body. Jacob’s family and friends rejoiced in his healing – praising God for this wonderful outcome,” Farris said.

Farris said the treatment physician even testified that the drugs were safe and had been approved by the FDA as effective for children when they, in fact, carried a warning that they had not.

A warning accompanying another drug demanded by the doctors, vincristine, was typical of those in the case, he said.

That warning said, “Patients who received chemotherapy with vinchristine sulfate in combination with anticancer drugs known to be carcinogenic have developed second malignancies.”

He said the project is being supported by the organization’s Homeschool Freedom Fund.



 by  wp :   Having gone through this kind of experience with one of my sons I deeply pray for this family.  As with my son it got to the point where some of the doctors just wanted to test different types of drugs on him to see what kind of reactions they would get.  Sadly the Oath to do no harm does not carry much weight with some doctors.   We thank GOD for guiding us to a pediatrician with compassion, caring and a standard of providing the best for his patients.  Our son died at the age of 6 years of age but he died with dignity and at peace.

JOHNNY CASH - SING'S ABOUT OBAMA - YOU'LL LIKE THIS

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV

BECK GOES OFF THE GRID FOR 4TH OF JULY VACATION

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV

Glenn and his family went “off the grid” over the 4th of July week, heading to a farm in the middle of the country without internet, television, or cell phone service. How were they able to survive?

“Barely came back from vacation. We went up to some farmland and we herded cattle, we rode horses. I’m going back up in a couple of weeks and we’ll have chickens and lambs,” Glenn said.

“I contend that the problem with our society is that we have gotten away from cows. We have gotten away from nature. We’ve gotten away from the farmlands,” he explained.

“I contend that because we’ve gotten away from the farms, we no longer see nature in practice. We never see. My son doesn’t understand. He saw something naturally happening in front of him. Instead, what we see off the farm, what we see in our cities, what we see in our schools, what we see every night spilling into our houses is what we think is natural on television, which is completely unnatural. We see all these TV shows and everything else that are not real. They’re not based in anything that’s real.”

“Because we’ve gotten away from nature and we are just taking other people’s words for it, we also are for things like green energy. That’s the biggest pile of bullcrap I’ve ever seen, and I have been ‑‑ I’ve spent ten days with bullcrap. Not all the actual bullcrap, but the wind‑power and solar power. We have a farm that is off the grid and it’s wind‑power and solar power. That’s bullcrap.”

Glenn explained that the solar and wind power was not enough to keep the electricity on the farm running. Even the small refrigerator, powered by propane, could only get to fifty-one degrees.

“If we still lived down on the farm and we would listen to people who were actually using it, well, then we’d know it’s a pile of crap. It’s nice to augment, but by Thursday of last week, we just had the generators running the whole time.”

Stu added, “When countries try to implement this sort of power in a large sense, that’s exactly what happens. The wind‑power isn’t running all the time, the solar power obviously at night isn’t running all the time and they have to augment it with good old fossil fuel.”

Pat said, “If solar worked great, we would all be fine with solar. That would be great.”

“We’ve just disconnected from reality and sanity because we’re so far away from it,” Glenn said.

“You know, I went to church yesterday in this small town. There’s about 400 people who live in this town. I think about 390 of them, I haven’t met all of them, but I bet about 390 of them I would wish I could be. The people that I met were all rock solid people and they’re the people that honestly that if you go to New York, they are the people that on, you know, Central Park would make fun of, mocking. Mock them. Guarantee it. Guarantee it. Because they’re all people that work with a tractor. They’re all people that really work for a living. You never think you work for a living? I mean, I played on a tractor last week. I played on it. I didn’t work. I mean, yeah, I herded some cattle. Really? And if it didn’t work, I could call somebody and go, ‘The cattle won’t listen to me. Can you come get them?’” Glenn said.

“These are people who actually work for a living. And it’s because of that, their children are different,” Glenn said.

“I saw a difference in my children within three days. Within three days. No Internet, no television, no phones, no texting. Unfortunately no electricity, which kind of made the ice cream a little soggy. That one we have to fix. The rest of it… they change. We’ve changed as a culture because we no longer see nature in action. And when you see nature in action, you see the patterns of life. Because we’re no longer close to anything that’s not ‑‑ that you don’t plug in, we don’t see the patterns in life, we don’t see the pattern of the family in life. And the more we plug in, the more we tune out and the weaker we become as people.”

“Go find yourself some farmland. Go vacation. In some town that you probably would have made fun of when you were a kid. This is exactly the kind of town that I would have made fun of as a kid. This is exactly the kind of town that I would say no way that I would ever live there or want to live there. I do now.”

OBAMA TEAM COVERS UP LIES WITH MORE LIES

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV

The White House has pulled out all the stops in their efforts to defeat Mitt Romney. They’ve used some odd fundraising tactics, like asking people to donate to the campaign in lieu of wedding gifts, and now they are running campaign ads with blatant lies in them. The lies are so bad that they’ve been debunked by multiple sources like factcheck.org and PolitiFact. But when Obama advisor Robert Gibbs was grilled on the ads, he double downed on the lies.

Mediaite reported, “On CNN’s State of the Union today, Candy Crowley grilled Obama campaign advisor and former White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs on a recent attack ad released hitting Mitt Romney for outsourcing. Crowley ran the ad, pointing out that The Washington Post rated it false (“four Pinocchios”), and challenged Gibbs to explain why this is still being used as a line of attack against Romney.”

Watch

IF NOT NOW, WHEN???

Posted By Woody Pendleton

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER   WFZR/TV

If Not Now . . .

Posted by Erick Erickson (Diary)

Monday, July 9th at 4:46AM EDT

84 Comments

“At what point do we hold our side accountable? Contrary to what some of you want to think, it was not the Democrats who got us to $16 trillion in national debt. It was bipartisan.”

Despite making clear that I was not advocating a third party, but rather recognizing that one will spring up if the Republican leadership does not pay attention to the state of its own party, many not only assumed wrongly my advocacy, but resorted to the worn out argument of the Republican leaders over several generations — “we must fight the Democrats first” or the variant “the top priority is beating Barack Obama.”
The problem with this argument is it never ends. How many more trillion dollars must we add to the national debt before the “wait and focus on the other side first” crowd wakes up to what they have enabled?
When George Bush decided to pass Ted Kennedy’s No Child Left Behind plan as his own, conservatives were told they needed to rally and help the President, given his victory while losing the popular vote. We needed unity.

After steel tariffs for Pennsylvania, “hush,” we were told because we were trying to set the stage for a re-election.

Then came the prescription drug benefit and we better not challenge the President because … 9/11 … patriotism … build the party.

He nominated Harriet Miers and more than half the conservative establishment beclowned themselves standing with him.

Then came immigration reform and those who disagreed from the right were racists. Solidarity!

TARP . . . the General Motors bailout . . . still Republicans told Republicans we couldn’t hold our own side accountable because we needed to fight the left “and oh my goodness litmus tests!!!!!”

Earmarks? “Litmus tests!!!!” and “pshaw, they’re just a little teeny-tiny piece of the budget.”

That was some time around $10 trillion in national debt.

Then the GOP began cutting deals with Barack Obama. “Trust them,” others said, “they have a plan.” The tea party led them to victory and the tea party congressmen started voting just like their leadership. The debt ceiling increased, spending expanded, Pledge to Nowhere pledges were breached, and still we hear “we have to fight the other side first.”

And then there was the Senate variant, “Oh Mitch McConnell had to do that or else Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins and . . . and . . . and . . .”

Friends, at what point do we hold our side accountable? $20 trillion in debt? $50 trillion in debt? Contrary to what some of you want to think, it was not the Democrats who got us to $16 trillion in national debt. It was bipartisan. Some of it legitimate, much of it not, and all to the tune of “let’s focus on the Democrats instead. They’re the real bad guys here.”

The leaders of the GOP give lip service to smaller government but just last week shut down legitimate private businesses to feed the leviathan more tax revenue. Republicans in the House of Representatives are now urging candidates not to sign the ATR tax pledge and Republicans in the Senate are cutting deals that will boost revenue because — deficits. And still they add to the debt.

So if not now, when? Not until we’re all speaking Chinese apparently.

If the conservative movement cannot fight on two fronts, we’re screwed. But some of you will be okay with that as long as its an elephant and not a donkey screwing you.

 by  wp
 WE are screwed and WE are doing it to ourselves because WE refuse to see and admit that it is the majority of both parties in Washington who are playing the distraction games while feathering their own nests at OUR expense.  WHEN or better yet if, WE will wake up and face reality, WE might have a reasonable chance of cleaning this mess up.  But it is going to take a lot of house cleaning, hard work and a lot of time to turn this disaster around.       YOUR CHOICE, AMERICA.

MAY BE WE DO NEED A THIRD PARTY

Posted By Woody Pendleton

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER   WFZR/TV

Maybe We Really Do Need a Third Party

Posted by Erick Erickson (Diary)

Saturday, July 7th at 12:48PM EDT

No Comments

“The problem for the GOP is that it is in danger of fracturing, not because it has moved so far right, but because it refuses to actually practice what it preaches.”

Senator Max Baucus of Montana receives campaign donations from the parent company of Phillip Morris. Senator Baucus then puts a provision in the highway transportation bill banning roll your own cigarette operations, a business that does not exist in Montana.

Forty people in Harry Reid’s Nevada and elsewhere will lose their jobs because a transportation bill actively and willfully legislated a legal business out of business by driving up the regulatory burden so excessively. Major cigarette manufacturers championed the legislation and Republicans supported it because it will increase tax revenue without them voting to raise taxes.

Put bluntly, Republicans voted to do exactly what they they accuse the Democrats of doing — shut down businesses by driving up regulatory burdens in an effort to increase taxes.

Max Baucus may have inserted the provision, but it made it through Republican House of Representatives. Maybe we do need a third party to do the job Republicans campaign on doing, but then get to Washington and don’t actually do.
I am not at the point of really advocating a third party. But I know me writing this will get the attention it needs to get.

The Republicans in Washington really have no clue.

For several months members of the media have lusted after a third party candidate — a serious “grown up” to speak the hard truths about the deficit, the need to raise taxes, etc. In fact, pay attention you people in the media, there is a very simple formula I have developed to explain the media these days:

Greater the number of stories about Americans Elect and No Labels

Equals

The lower the number of viewers and readers of the media outlet The media elite who get positively orgasmic about things like No Labels and Americans Elect are convinced they are tapped into the pulse of the American people, but in fact are only tapped into the pulse of their throbbing for people like themselves being put in charge instead of the hicks and rubes from America’s river valleys the tea party types keep agitating for.
A third party could have been successful in the United States this year, but it would have required a populist attack against Washington and spending. Done right, it would have resonated across Tea Party and Occupy circles. But it did not happen.
As media ratings have declined and the talk within Beltway media circles of “serious” “adult” “third party” challenges has increased, Republican leaders in Washington who have more and more in common with the media that covers them and less and less in common with their constituents back home — hell, look at Indiana’s Senator who does not even live in Indiana anymore and consequently got thrown out much to the outrage of Beltway elites — have become less and less like the Party of Reagan and more and more like the Party of John Anderson.

The problem for the GOP is that it is in danger of fracturing, not because it has moved so far right, but because it refuses to actually practice what it preaches.

The Republican Party’s actual policy positions help small businesses and individuals. It is the party of the individual against the collective. But Republican leaders are not willing to actually fight for those values in the face of media criticism.

In fact, the very types of people the media and more senior Republicans and Democrats alike are advocating are the very people who made the compromise decisions to get us to $16 trillion in debt. And, by the way, we spent ourselves there we didn’t tax ourselves there.
This comes full circle.

A Republican Party that has been unwilling to cut spending has now let go through Congress legislation to shut down lawful, legal businesses because cigarette industry lobbyists and a Senate Democrat wanted it done.

We’re not ready for a third party and both this site and I will continue advocating for conservative Republicans, but if the GOP doesn’t finally get a clue, I won’t be surprised to see it implode. By the way, this year fewer and fewer Republican candidates are signing the tax pledge on the advice of Republican members of Congress. This is another warning sign that the Eric Cantor led Republican conference is going far afield from what those who vote Republican actually want.

The GOP better get back to its pro-liberty roots quickly.

One editorial note: to save you all from yourselves, I’m not even going to entertain comments on this post. You can agree or disagree with me on twitter @ewerickson.

 by wp:    The biggest problem WE have is that the concept of two parties in Washington,D.C. is a fallacy.  The Professional Organization of  Politicians in Washington has degenerated into the Progressive Party of take care of ourselves.  They look out for themselves at the expense of WE, THE PEOPLE.  They have abandoned Americas ideals and laws for ones that allow them to line their own and each others pockets using methods WE would face prison for.  THEY are the ELITES and consider themselves ENTITLED to all the perks, high living and dishonest dealing that goes on constantly in Washington.  A third party????    HOW ABOUT ONE PARTY ,MADE UP OF AMERICANS WHO BELIEVE IN HONOR, HARD WORK, HONESTY, PATRIOTISM, THE CONSTITUTION AND A DEPENDENCE ON ALMIGHTY GOD.  LIKE OUR FOUNDING FATHERS DID.  ITS WHAT BUILT THIS NATION AND MADE HER GREAT.  But the pols don't care about that.  It doesn't pay as well.