Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER CARTOONS WFZR FZTV
Where We Create & Share Music, Talk Radio Shows, Conservative
News & Cartoons for Our Subscribers, Viewers, Other Artists
& the General Public. (WFZR Radio / TV Coming Soon)
Friday, July 13, 2012
‘The Communist’ Part I: Obama’s Mentor Frank Marshall Davis Exposed
Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV & GBTV
magine an American man so devout in his Communist beliefs, that
during the Cold War the FBI placed him on its security index – meaning
that if an armed conflict were to have erupted between the U.S. and the
Soviet Union, Federal authorities would have looked to him as a prime
suspect for treason.
Now imagine that man mentored the leader of the free world.
On July 17th, Mercury Ink and author Paul Kengor, PhD, will introduce the world to the real Frank Marshall Davis
– the card-carrying member of the Communist Party U.S.A, and who all
accounts indicate was Barack Obama’s closest role model and mentor.
Devoid of outrageous conspiracy theories or sensational claims, Kengor
painstakingly documents the historical facts of this dynamic, at times
even sympathetic character, who walked the path from Republican roots
clear through to the radical fringe of unfettered Marxism.
Kengor was also interviewed about Frank Marshall Davis’ past, as well as
his connection to the president in Dinesh D‘Souza’s upcoming
documentary on Obama. An exclusive preview is featured below
~~~
~~~
Presently, certain news and commentary outlets are focusing on the
more outrageous aspects of Frank Marshall Davis’ life, such as his
self-admitted penchant for perverse sexual escapades as well as for
taking photos of naked women (including of Stanley Ann Dunham, Obama’s
mother). In fact, the recently released documentary, “Dreams From My
Real Father,” even posits that Davis is the president’s true biological
father. While much of Davis’ bizarre fetishes and sexual peccadilloes
provide subject matter worthy of consideration, Kengor believes that his
book, “The Communist,” focuses on the substantive ideological, rather than sensational aspects of Davis’ past.
At the end of the day, according to Kengor, mentors matter – and in
no small amount. The book opens by explaining how Ronald Reagan and
Hillary Clinton’s role models were extremely influential in each of
their lives, respectively. In fact, typically the first task of any
biographer is to examine the mentors of the subject he or she is writing
about. Oddly, when it comes to our current president, left-wing
biographers have somehow avoided this topic altogether.
Presidential mentors
During
Barack Obama’s first presidential campaign, the media and members of
the far left ignored discussing his influences and role models, leaving
conservatives in shock over how lax the vetting process turned out to be
for the man who would come to hold the highest office in the land. As
The Communist reveals that the “transformative change” Obama promised to
deliver (and did) eerily find their origin in the words and deeds of
his closest mentor.
CLICK BELOW TO READ MORE
WE NEED TO GET RID OF THE POLITICIANS
Posted By Woody Pendleton
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR/TV
We Need to Change the Politicians
In the end the Supreme Court of the United States didn’t untie the Gordian
Knot, but as Alexander had done, they cut it instead.
And by doing so they demonstrated what we have known all along: The only new
ideas Democrats-and D.C. bureaucrats- have are the old ideas of finding new ways
to tax Americans and creating new bureaucracies to spend that money. I won’t read the Obamacare opinion. I’ll leave that to legal scholars.
But I know this.
A tax is a tax is a tax.
Obamcare, when shorn of its Euro-Metro sophistication, is a tax.
A really big, fat, ugly tax, with a really big, fat, ugly bureaucracy
attached to it.
Thus the Democrats- and D.C. bureaucrats- have created a system that promises
to raise taxes on everyone. And still not make healthcare affordable for all.
Why did they do this? Not to “save” healthcare; nor yet to “reform” it. As I have said before, no one in D.C. gets paid to solve problems. That would give lobbyists nothing to do.
Instead, we have just created another pot of money that can be used for cronies, anti-capitalists and special interests to keep D.C. as the one major metropolitan area where home prices are steady.
Of course D.C. thinks things are great. For people in Washington the money machine is still open for business. You just have to have the right pin number.
Compare the two charts.
The one on top is the median sales price of all properties in the Washington, D.C. area since Jan 2000- which starts at $130,000. The real estate market peaked in 2007 at $460,000, yet home prices have remained remarkably steady, despite “the worst recession” since the start of time. The current median sales price for all homes in D.C. according to Trulia is $410,000. That’s about a 10 percent average annual return.
The chart below is the chart for the median sales price for homes listed in Chicago, IL. Remarkably, in January of 2000, median homes prices were at $145,000, higher than D.C. Chicago real estate values peaked at $329,000 in 2007 and now stand at $180,000. That’s about a 1.9 percent average annual return.
The rate of inflation over the same periods is just a tad higher.
What’s clear from the Supreme Court decision is that our revolution for
limited government and limited taxation is now broken. 236 years ago this
country was founded on the belief that governments that governed least, governed
best.
I think we still believe that.
But heaven forbid that that antique idea get in the way of the Washington
wealth machine.
The six million people who live in the D.C. bubble may only add up to two
percent of the population, but they truly are the One Percent that we’ve been
warned about. Wall Street?
Wall Street has done worse than the average home in Chicago.
In January of 2000, Wall Street peaked at 1498 on the S&P 500. The S&P now stands at 1362. That’s a rate of return of about .80 percent, or a 9.55 percent loss during the entire period.
“In many troubled relationships, both sides deserve some of the blame,” write pollster Scott Rasmussen. “But the United States is a nation founded on the belief that governments gain their legitimacy only from the consent of the governed. In the relationship between the people and the Political Class, that means the voters are right, and the politicians need to change.”
Or we need to change the politicians.
Now we know.
THE INVINCIBLE LIE PT1 &2
Posted By Woody Pendleton
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR/TV
The Invincible Lie
Ironically, actual spending by the Obama administration for the benefit of its political allies, such as the teachers' unions, is not called spending but "investment." You can say anything if you have your own private language.
MERCK JOINS BILL GATES IN WORLD DEPOPULATION
Posted By Woody Pendleton
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR/TV
Merck Teams With Gates Foundation to Further Worldwide Depopulation
Activist Post
At the London Summit on Family Planning (LSFP), the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) pledged $560 million to their campaign to depopulate underdeveloped nations. World leaders, private-sector corporations, UN representatives and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) attended the LSFP.
Warren Buffet, friend and fellow Elitist, has agreed to hand over most of his wealth to charity; contributed stock valued at $1.52 billion in his annual gift to the BMGF.
Buffet asserted in a YouTube video in 2011:
I urge people to unbutton their wallet, pull out a check, reach into their purse, whatever it takes. You will find that when you give a dollar and something of yourself, a lot more than a dollar comes out the other end.By 2020, Melinda Gates hopes to have extended the use of forced sterilization through manipulation of foreign governments to further the scheme of preventing 80 million of “unwanted pregnancies” in places like Africa, India and Southeast Asia.
Victoria Jennings, a director of Georgetown University’s Institute for Reproductive Health, said: “To have someone like her on the world stage saying ‘come on’, it does serve as a tremendous lever to ratchet up the concern.”
Pharmaceutical giant Merck announced in a formal statement that they will donate $25 million over an 8-year period as a “Merck for Mothers” campaign in line with the BMGF depopulation agenda. By claiming that this initiative is to “reduce maternal morality around the world” and will “advance efforts to help reach United Nations Millennium Development Goal 5, which calls for a 75 percent reduction in maternal mortality and universal access to reproductive health by 2015.”
Both Merck and BMGF have outlined a plan that focuses on 3 “key areas”:
- Use propaganda in the mainstream media to gain public support for reducing the world’s population.
- Employ drug and private-sector corporations to ensure “family planning” resources can be utilized in underdeveloped nations.
- Coerce governments, corporations and “civil society” to support the social meme of over-population and the BMGF remedies for quelling this problem.
Every Woman, Every Child, and innovative public-private and civil society partnerships developed through the Reproductive Health Supplies Coalition. The Summit also aligns with the broader framework established by the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) almost 20 years ago.
The
ICPD officially contended that universal education, reduction of infant births,
protection of maternal mortality as an excuse to sterilize millions of women,
and purveying “family planning” as a cover for preventing the most densely
populated areas from continuing to freely procreate were the most effective
course of action to ensure the agenda of the global Elite.As of now, the ICPD Beyond 2014 offers a “global consensus on the human populations” as a policy to guide reproduction under the guidelines of social progress and environmental sustainability because “human beings are at the center of development.”
The ICPD’s plan of action admonishes the cooperation of governments to support BMGF family planning schemes in relation to “protecting the environment” from over-growth of human population.
The GSWCH, working with the World Health Organization (WHO) is a global plan to bring vaccines, international interventions and financing to the UN for the purpose of:
- Controlling access to healthcare in underdeveloped nations.
- Use pre-determined drug corporations to treat third world nations so that they are no longer allowed to freely procreate.
- Monitor and evaluate the progress of depopulation in these areas.
- It is a sad day when American citizens join with other groups to plan and implement the murder of millions, possibly billions of human beings, to build a world in which they will reign as demi-gods over the rest. TRULY THE LOVE OF MONEY IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL WHEN PEOPLE WILL SELL THEIR SOULS, THEIR HUMANITY FOR THE GAIN OF POWER AND MONEY. MAY THE EVIL WITHIN NOT BE ALLOWED TO FESTER OUT AND HARM OTHERS. THESE PEOPLE [ sic] ARE TO BE PLACED WITH PEOPLE LIKE HITLER, GENGHIS KHAN AND OTHERS WHO ARE SO EVIL THEY HAVE NO RIGHT TO BE CALLED HUMAN BEINGS. by wp
Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism. Our alternative news site is dedicated to reporting the news as it actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporately funded mainstream media. You can find us on our Facebook page.
You can support this information by voting on Reddit HERE
DECORATED GENERAL STATES SHARIAH IS HERE NOW
Posted By Woody Pendleton
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR/TV
EXCLUSIVE
Decorated general: Shariah is here now!
Tells audience influence has penetrated 'deepest halls of our government'
by Michael CarlEmail | Archive
Retired Army Lt. Gen. William “Jerry” Boykin is warning that Islamic Shariah
law already is in the United States, and is forming a cloud over the future of
the nation.
Boykin, addressing a packed house at a synagogue today in Stoughton, Mass.,
said, “There is a threat to this country from Shariah and the Muslim
Brotherhood,” noting the Muslim Brotherhood has had a presence in the U.S. since
at least 1962.He said even Muslims pay a price for being indifferent to the agenda of the radical Muslim Brotherhood.
“Muslims who are not pushing for Shariah in the United States are pushed aside and don’t have a voice. They’re often marginalized in their mosques and sometimes not allowed to participate,” he said.
Boykin also says that Shariah law has deep ramifications for the United States.
Read Gen. Boykin’s own tales of heroism, in “Never Surrender: A Soldier’s Journey to the Crossroads of Faith and Freedom.
“People say that Shariah isn’t going to be a threat in the United States. Fifty-three cases in 28 states have been decided by Shariah law at the appellate level,” Boykin said.
“There are groups and websites in the United States pushing for Shariah law. They’re dedicated to spreading it and Mark Steyn has said that’s what’s happened in Europe.”
He continued, “The Europeans didn’t take the threat seriously and now Steyn has said that it’s not going to be more than a generation before Europe is overcome.”
Boykin told the crowd of the Muslim Brotherhood’s master plan for the United States.
“The Muslim Brotherhood is working to control the dialogue in the United
States, ensuring that people don’t talk about Shariah or its objectives for the
country,” he said.
“It’s gone into the deepest halls of our government too. It was no less than
FBI Director [Robert] Mueller that had a March meeting with the Muslim
Brotherhood. The leader of the Brotherhood complained about the counterterrorism
training manual,” Boykin said.
“In response, Mueller allowed the Muslim Brotherhood to expunge over 1,000
documents from the training manual,” Boykin said. “So please don’t say it can’t
happen here. You’ve been told a lot of lies and you’ve been told it’s a religion
of peace. You’ve been told that Islam and democracy are compatible and that’s a
lie.In an exclusive interview with WND, Boykin addressed related issues:
“We’ve been told we all worship the same God. That’s a lie. My God, you can
have a personal relationship with. With Allah, you can’t have a personal
relationship,” he said.
He noted that the roots between Israel and the United States go deep, and
it’s a necessary alliance for the United States to honor.He also blasted the Obama administration for its neglect of Israel and for its failure to take Iran seriously.
“We make a major mistake if we think Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is a clown. He is
deadly serious,” Boykin said.
“People who think he’s a clown like Hugo Chavez are dead wrong and know
nothing about the theology of Ahmadinejad,” Boykin said.
Boykin says that Ahmadinejad takes seriously the Islamic eschatological
belief in an apocalypse of the Jews followed by a return to the final imam.
Yet, there’s more.“Academia has been infiltrated. Churches have been infiltrated. The first Muslim Brotherhood organization in the United States is the Muslim Student Association,” Boykin said.
Boykin said this as a professor at Luther College proclaimed that he believes Jesus was Muslim.
Boykin then turned his attention to the political relationship between the government and Israel.
“The last four presidents have actually harmed the country’s relationship
with Israel, but this one is especially bad,” Boykin said. “This administration
has told the Israelis to go back to the 1967 borders, and that’s like telling
Israel to commit national suicide.”
The general had some very harsh words for the way Obama personally has
treated Israeli leaders.“We welcomed the Chinese to the White House. We had an official state function and rolled out the red carpet,” Boykin said. “But if some reports are correct, the president made Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sit in a room by himself for about an hour while the president went off and did something else.
“No president has ever done that to a sitting Israeli head of state,” he
said.
WND reported
recently that Israel and Iran may already be fighting a proxy war in the
Sudans, with Israel supporting South Sudan and Iran developing deeper ties to
Omar al-Bashir in Sudan.A war between Iran and Israel is a matter of deep concern for Boykin.
“Prime Minister Netanyahu may be waiting to see if Obama is re-elected. If Obama is re-elected, the Israelis may be willing to launch a pre-emptive strike against Iranian nuclear facilities,” Boykin said.
Two Israeli news sites speculate on how adverse a second Obama term would be for Israel.
Boykin agrees.
“If Obama is re-elected and he doesn’t have to worry about another four years, Israel will be on their own to have to act apart from any U. S. help which will likely not be forthcoming in a second Obama term,” Boykin said.
Boykin also has stated that a war between Israel and Iran is inevitable, and the U.S. needs to stand with Israel.
Boykin also talked about similar concerns in the interview with WND:
“As an American I am appalled at how little people in the United States know
about Israel. And I am appalled at the anti-Semitism that is coming from this
country,” Boykin said.
“The Jews began coming to American in 1650, thirty years before the Germans
and the Scotch-Irish,” Boykin said.
“It was Jews who ran the British blockade in the American Revolution. The
Jews fought for the independence of the United States,” Boykin said. “And it was
a Jewish banker who loaned the country money to keep the country solvent during
the years of the Articles of Confederation.”
“John Adams said the Hebrews have done more for the civilization of the world
than any other groups,” Boykin said.Boykin also says the drive for a Jewish homeland may have begun in the United States during the Second Great Awakening. Christian pastors started a petition to gather support for a Jewish homeland.
The United West President Tom Trento also spoke and he warned of a cataclysmic war between Iran and Israel.
“A war between Israel and Iran is coming. The problem is that few will stand with Israel,” Trento said. “Seven thousand miles from here, a piece of dirt, the Holy City, is the global epicenter of terrorism and the fight for freedom.
“We go to war with only a few who can be trusted. Few can be trusted, but two of them are sitting behind me,” Trento said, referring to the rabbi and Boykin.
“You in Stoughton are so fortunate to have a rabbi who has the heart and academic background – the heart of a lion and the will of a warrior,” Trento said.
Thursday, July 12, 2012
NEW OVAL: TRUST - A TWO WAY STREET !
Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV AND GBTV
The Oval: Trust – a Two-Way Street
.
They say America has a trust deficit. That we don’t trust our
institutions any more. We don’t trust Congress. Or the White House. Or
the Supreme Court. Everyone’s cutting deals! Everyone’s looking out for
themselves! Liberals and conservatives agree – you can’t trust the
media. The stories are slanted to fit an agenda… or just flat-out wrong!
And you sure can’t trust the banks! If you’re late on your loan, they
might foreclose on you. If you invest with them, they might sell you
junk wrapped in a pretty wrapper. And we just learned this week, that
they’ve been lying. Lying about the interest rate they charge each
other. All so they would look better to regulators. And so they wouldn’t
have to pay savers and investors as much.
We profess to be shocked. Shocked! How could banks lie? How could the media get it wrong? How could politicians be so inept?
I wonder. I wonder what the trust deficit means. Does it mean that
America’s great institutions. Its leaders and functionaries. Have their
work cut out for them? And that all they have to do is start telling the
truth? Start being honest? Start being accountable? I am not so sure.
It’s not just because I don’t think they CAN be honest. It’s because I
don’t think we should EXPECT them to be honest.Because frankly, that’s
not how America was designed. The Founding Fathers were suspicious of
big institutions: The Church of England, the big trading companies of
London, the King.
Exploiters. Taxers. It was their way – or banishment.
CLICK BELOW TO READ MORE AND 2ND VIDEO
TAXES THE UN WANTS ESTABLISHED
Posted By Woody Pendleton
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR/TV
Government
Here Is a List of Global Taxes Proposed by the United Nations Last Week
- Posted on July 7, 2012 at 5:15pm by
Erica Ritz
Survey author Rob Vos (Photo: UN)
Though the United Nations has no authority to enforce global taxes at the
current time, its propositions hold sway and are not unlike schemes proposed by
American politicians.
(Related: Biden to Crowd: ‘We Want…A Global Minimum Tax)Survey author Rob Vos explained in a statement, after lamenting the shortfall of international donations because of budget cuts:
“Although donors must meet their commitments, it is time to look for other ways to find resources to finance development needs and address growing global challenges, such as combating climate change…The related Huffington Post article includes this video, titled “What is the New World Order?” with the Chairman of the World Economic Forum USA, to explain why global governance will solve our issues:
“We are suggesting various ways to tap resources through international mechanisms, such as coordinated taxes on carbon emissions, air traffic, and financial and currency transactions.” [Emphasis added]
CNS News summarizes a few of the proposed changes:
Carbon Tax: A tax of $25 a ton of carbon dioxide (CO2) emitted in developed countries…The money could be collected by national authorities, but be earmarked for international cooperation. CO2 is the “greenhouse gas” blamed most often for climate change.However, conservative organizations (and those that value national sovereignty), worry about hundreds of billions of dollars more being allocated to the United Nations.
[...]
– Currency Transaction Tax: A tax of 0.005 percent on all trading in four major currencies – the U.S. dollar, the euro, the yen and pound sterling – would yield around $40 billion a year for international initiatives. The decades-old idea of levying a small charge on financial transactions is sometimes called a “Robin Hood tax” since it supposedly taxes rich nations to benefit poor ones.
The European Union’s executive Commission has proposed the introduction of such a tax – 0.1 percent for shares and bonds and 0.01 percent for derivatives – in the 27-member union with effect from January 1, 2014, an initiative expected to raise just over $70 billion a year. The WESS says a portion of that could be earmarked for international cooperation.
– SDRs: Allocation of International Monetary Fund Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) could yield $100 billion a year to purchase long-term assets that could then be used for development finance. Set up in the 1960s, SDRs are used by governments and some international institutions. It is not itself a currency, but its value is based on a basket of the dollar, euro, pound sterling and yen. Some countries, including Russia, China and Brazil, have been pushing the idea of SDRs replacing the greenback as the world’s reserve currency.
– Billionaire’s Tax: A tax of around one percent on individual wealth holdings of $1 billion or more, “with the revenue destined to finance internationally agreed global development purposes.” The WESS says this mechanism, which it estimates could raise $50 billion a year, is an option that could be explored but needs further technical elaboration.
“Realizing the potential of these mechanisms will require international agreement and corresponding political will, both to tap sources as well as to ensure allocation of revenues for development,” said Vos.
(Related: Director of New Documentary ‘U.N. Me’ Tells Beck About Murder, Corruption, and Ineptitude of the United Nations)
Myron Ebell, director of energy and global warming policy at the free-market Competitive Enterprise Institute, noted that the taxing authority would be unaccountable to a sovereign authority, and Phyllis Schlafly, president of the conservative Eagle Forum
argue, s that the day the United Nations tries to impose a global tax should be the day the country pulls out of the U.N.
After all, we would essentially be paying the institution to tax us.
Conservative blog Hot Air sarcastically concludes: “It’s truly a brave new world, comrades…Welcome to
the age of international peace and prosperity.”
The UN has proven to be as inept and full of corruption and dishonesty as the Federal Government. The type of taxes they wish to force on everyone will benefit only the despots and tyrants of the world and the people will continue to suffer. GET OUT OF THE UN AND GET THE UN OUT OF THE US. by wp
ITS NOT THE CLINTON ERA ANYMORE B.O.
Posted By Woody Pendleton
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR
It's Not the Clinton Economy Anymore
Bringing back 1990s tax rates won't bring back that decade's economic
boom.
Like Dorothy in the Wizard of Oz, we're not in Kansas anymore. That
is, if Kansas is defined as the 1990s Internet boom. But Barack Obama has
constructed an odd time machine to take us back: returning to the
Seinfeld decade's top two income tax rates in exchange for keeping the
rest of the Bush tax cuts.
President Obama called on Congress to pass a one-year extension of those tax
cuts, with the exception of letting the 35 percent marginal rate rise to 39.6
percent and the 33 percent rate jump to 36 percent. That will deliver a tax
increase on individuals making more than $200,000 and families earning over
$250,000 while ostensibly protecting everyone else from tax hikes.
The planted axiom is that the good times rolled under those tax rates during
the '90s, so returning to them shouldn't hurt economic growth. After all, Obama
reminds us, we simply revert back to what "we were paying under Bill
Clinton."
Except the additional 0.9 percent payroll tax imposed under Obamacare and the
2.9 percent surchage on investment income would actually make marginal tax rates
a bit higher than under Clinton. We didn't have an individual mandate, backed by
a penalty the Supreme Court has pronounced a tax, during Slick Willie's tenure
either.
But note that Obama doesn't think it would be good for the economy to go back
to the Clinton-era bottom tax rate of 15 percent from the post-Bush rate of 10
percent. Only raising the top rates will help. "By the way, these tax cuts for
the wealthiest Americans are also the tax cuts that are least likely to promote
growth," he said Monday.
Savings and investment don't do anything to promote growth? This kind of raw
Keynesianism holds that burying canisters at the beach is a good way to create
shovel-ready jobs and that the broken window fallacy is a truism. Raw politics
is likely the bigger consideration: several polls have shown more than 60
percent of the American people -- including a majority of self-described
Republicans -- in favor of tax increases on the wealthy.
Yet those same polls show the public understands such tax hikes won't do much
good. According to a Washington Post/ABC News survey last year, only 4
percent thought raising taxes was the best way to deal with the deficit. Eight
times as many -- 32 percent -- preferred spending cuts. And if Obama was serious
about deficit reduction, why not get the larger amount of revenue theoretically
available from letting all the Bush tax cuts lapse?
Obama dismisses the idea that his proposed tax hike would hit small
businesses that report their income under the individual tax rates such as sole
proprietors and subchapter S corporations, saying that only 3 percent of small
business owners would be affected. But the top 3 percent hire the most workers.
The Joint Tax Committee estimates that roughly 940,000 taxpayers would get hit
-- a large number of potential employers when the economy is only adding 80,000
jobs a month.
Between 1993 and 2009, nearly two-thirds of net new jobs were created by
small businesses. Obama's tax increase would ensnare 53 percent of net business
income. Americans for Tax Reform estimates that a majority of small business profits and more
than a third of sole proprietor profits would face higher taxes.
Moreover, the original Clinton tax increases were enacted while the economy
was already growing. The recession that ended George Bush's presidency had been
over since March 1991. Initially, they probably slowed the growth somewhat. By
one estimate, the "Clinton crunch" resulted in 1.2 million fewer jobs being
created than if tax rates had remained the same.
This tax increase would come during a weak economic recovery, with GDP
growing at just a 2 percent rate. Unemployment has been over 8 percent for 41
consecutive months, something the country hadn't seen in over ten years when the
original Clinton tax increase became law. This economy, barely out of the Great
Recession, is not as capable of withstanding tax hikes.
Clinton agreed to cut capital gains taxes, reducing them to 20 percent before
they were knocked down to 15 percent in 2003. Obama seeks to raise them. Under
his proposal, the capital gains tax rate would climb to nearly 24 percent and
dividends would be taxed at 45 percent.
So no, Obama isn't exactly bringing back the Clinton-era tax rates. His tax
increases aren't going to bring back that era's growth either.
WHEN AND WHY OBAMA LIES
Posted By Woody Pendleton
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR
NARCISSIST IN CHIEF
The real reason Obama constantly lies
Exclusive: David Kupelian uncovers what's really behind BHO's astonishing dishonesty
by 
S
“Mr. President, on what occasion do you lie?”
That was Barbara Walters during her painfully fawning interview
with Barack and Michelle Obama last Dec. 23. Walters got the interview rolling with tough questions like (to Obama), “If you were a superhero and you could have one super power, what would it be?” (Answer: “flying.”) And (to the first lady), “If you were to die and come back as a person or a thing, what would you want it to be?” (Answer: “Bo,” the family dog.) And (to both of them), “I’m looking at you. You’re holding hands. That’s very sweet. How many years married?”
“Twenty, next year,” said Obama. “And [you] still hold hands?” rejoined the adoring Walters. “Absolutely,” replied Obama.
Then, against this backdrop of irresistible holiday warmth and good cheer, came the big question:
“Mr. President,” Walters inquired delicately, “on what occasion do you
lie?”
“Usually, the only time I lie,” responded Obama, “is very personal
interactions with family members, [when] you say, ‘You look great,’ and they
don’t. ‘Wonderful dress …’ Uh, not so much.”
Chimed Michelle: “Things where the truth would hurt other people.”
“Right,” echoed Obama, “the things where truth would hurt other people. Not
too many big things. I said during the campaign that I’ll always tell you what I
think, and I will, always tell you where I stand. I’m not perfect, but you’ll
know what I believe.”
There you have it, folks. Welcome to The Matrix – where the elite media
specialize in creating virtual reality scenes like this one, which are so
pleasant and seem so real … except that they bear virtually no resemblance to
reality.For there, seated in the midst of this elegant, Norman Rockwell-esque Christmas setting, was Barack Obama, the perpetually churning and discontented radical, taking a needed break from his relentless campaign to “fundamentally transform” – that means destroy – the American way of free enterprise and free people. Barack Obama, the man who lies as easily as breathing – a serial deceiver regarding his birth, his childhood, his education, his influences and associations, his religion, his accomplishments, his policies, his true beliefs and his plans for America’s future. Barack Obama, the man whose entire presidency has been a seamless fabric of deception and duplicity, tells Barbara Walters and the American people that the only time he lies is to protect a family member from hurt feelings by occasionally offering reassurance that an unflattering dress is “wonderful.”
Wow.
The level of ongoing media dishonesty in covering Barack Obama is, of course, surreal. But let us now focus our attention on the man who is, in all likelihood, the most perfectly dishonest person ever to occupy the Oval Office.
After all, the correct answer to Walters’ question is obvious. When does Obama lie? Every single time he speaks to the American people.
Indeed, as another long-time ABC News personality, Pulitzer prize-winning columnist George Will, pointed out recently in the Washington Post: “Barack Obama’s intellectual sociopathy – his often breezy and sometimes loutish indifference to truth – should no longer startle.”
“Sociopathy” is a strong word, but used by many to describe Obama – not necessarily as a clinical psychiatric diagnosis, but just because the symptoms fit so darn well, as per this typical description: “Sociopaths are often well-liked because of their charm and high charisma, but they do not usually care about other people. They think mainly of themselves and often blame others for the things that they do. They have a complete disregard for rules and lie constantly. They seldom feel guilt or learn from punishments.” Remind you of anyone?
A vital, creative power
One veteran psychiatrist I know suggested a slightly different diagnosis for
Obama, but similar to “sociopathy” in many ways – namely, “malignant
narcissistic personality disorder.” The modifier “malignant” signifies the
version of “narcissistic personality disorder” that may cross over into
criminality, he explained. He even reviewed with me a list of some of the major symptoms of NPD, comparing them with Obama’s behavior as president. Among the key markers: 1) a grandiose view of one’s achievements (everything with Obama is “historic”), 2) an utter inability to handle criticism (everyone criticizing Obama or his policies is attacked as extremist or racist, his White House even condemning Fox News as “not a real news organization”), and 3) lack of genuine empathy (Obama gave a televised speech on the day of the Fort Hood terror attack in which a Muslim U.S. Army major shot 45 Americans, 13 fatally. With the entire nation reeling in shock and yearning for strong, reassuring words from their commander in chief, Obama instead engaged in small talk and an inane “shout-out” for two full minutes before even mentioning that the worst terrorist attack on our soil since 9/11 had just occurred hours earlier.)
To be sure, many mainstream analysts, including Pulitzer-winning columnist and former psychiatrist Charles Krauthammer, have repeatedly pointed to Obama’s extreme narcissism. Regardless of the “diagnosis,” one thing is certain: We’re talking about a person who absolutely does not consider serial lying to be in any way immoral or problematic.
Far from it. For a super-ambitious and vainglorious person such as Obama, lying is a vital and creative power. Lies open doors that would otherwise remain shut. Thus in a very real sense, for Obama, lies are “magic words,” the invocation of which represents the exercise of real power – power to impress voters, raise money, demonize critics, win elections, pass legislation and transform a nation. Ordinary people don’t possess this power, as they are constrained from such brazen lying by their conscience and/or the fear of being caught. But a highly narcissistic person like Obama feels he has the freedom – indeed, the mandate – to reshape America by creatively speaking into existence his preferred version of reality, without regard for any higher standard of truth. In other words, to lie.
Here’s how psychiatrist M. Scott Peck, M.D., explains it in his classic best-seller, “People of the Lie”:
As we will now see, Obama has been preparing to “control others” for a long time.Malignant narcissism is characterized by an unsubmitted will. All adults who are mentally healthy submit themselves one way or another to something higher than themselves, be it God or truth or love or some other ideal. They do what God wants them to do rather than what they would desire. “Thy will, not mine, be done,” the God-submitted person says. They believe in what is true rather than what they would like to be true.… In summary, to a greater or lesser degree, all mentally healthy individuals submit themselves to the demands of their own conscience. Not so the evil, however. In the conflict between their guilt and their will, it is the guilt that must go and the will that must win.The reader will be struck by the extraordinary willfulness of evil people. They are men and women of obviously strong will, determined to have their own way. There is a remarkable power in the manner in which they attempt to control others.
‘I serve as a blank screen’
In his second autobiography “The Audacity of Hope,” Obama makes an audacious admission: “I serve as a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views.” While it’s amazing that anyone could openly brag about such a manipulative life-strategy, Obama has long cultivated his appealing yet ambiguous public persona in preparation for a career as political messiah. For instance, he voted “present” no less than 129 times while a member of the Illinois state Senate to avoid taking a position that might alienate one side or the other – including on bills he had supported and even sponsored! Taking a position, you see, might have compromised the purity and universality of his “blank screen,” which would one day serve to reflect the aspirations for “hope” and “change” of millions of Americans.
Appearing as all things to all people has been key to Obama’s meteoric rise, requiring constant deception. As one blogger put it recently:
He is Muslim, he is Christian, he is a capitalist, he is a socialist, he is black, he is white, … he is a constitutional professor, he is an average collegian who smoked dope and did cocaine, he is a foreigner, he is American-born, he is “EVERYMAN.”
With America now in precipitous decline on his watch, many have tried to
explain the enigma of Obama and his prodigious ability to lie so confidently,
comfortably and continually:
- Some cite the disturbing degree to which Obama manifests full-blown clinical symptoms of narcissism and/or sociopathy, as previously discussed.
- Some cite his far-left ideology: Whether you label it liberalism, progressivism, socialism, left-wing radicalism, Marxism, communism, anti-capitalism, European-style social democracy or statism, leftist “true believers” have always justified as moral not just lying, but ruthless suppression of dissent, violence and tyranny – as long as these measures seemed to advance their glorious utopian cause. “Exhibit A” for this point would be the entire 20th century.
- Some cite Obama’s childhood, which was awful, and others cite his early
influences, which were more awful. A Berkeley, Calif., psychotherapist who
writes under the pseudonym Robin
of Berkeley weighs in this way:
My gut tells me that Obama was seriously traumatized in childhood. His mother disregarded his basic needs, dragged him all over the place, and ultimately abandoned him.
But I think there may be something even more insidious in his family background. While I can’t prove it, the degree of Obama’s disconnect reminds me of my sexually abused clients.
With serious sexual abuse, the brain chemistry may change. The child dissociates – that is, disconnects from his being – in order to cope. Many adult survivors still dissociate, from occasional trances to the most extreme cases of multiple personality disorder.
Apparently, young Barry was left in the care of communist Frank Marshall Davis, who admitted to molesting a 13-year-old girl. As a teenager, Obama wrote a disturbing poem, “Pop,” that evoked images of sexual abuse – for instance, describing dual amber stains on both his and “Pop’s” shorts.
Would trauma explain Obama’s disconnect? In many ways, yes. A damaged and unattached child may develop a “false self.” To compensate for the enormous deficits in identity and attachment, the child invents his own personality. For Obama, it may have been as a special, gifted person. - Some cite Obama’s religious background – his 20-year affiliation with his “spiritual mentor,” the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, who preached raw hatred of America, capitalism and white people, and whose “black liberation theology” gospel amounted to Afro-centric Marxism dressed up with Bible verses. Complicating this picture and suggesting even more questions is the well-documented fact that during his youth in Indonesia, Obama was raised and schooled as a Muslim.
- Some cite his background in “Chicago politics” – a euphemism for wall-to-wall corruption and criminality. Indeed, the state of Illinois, where a staggering total of four recent governors – Otto Kerner, Dan Walker, George Ryan and Rod Blagojevich – have gone to prison for corruption, remains a political cesspool to this day, as confirmed by a recent study from the University of Illinois at Chicago’s political science department. Obama is a product of this legendarily corrupt “Chicago machine” and played the game ruthlessly while rising in the ranks there.
- Some cite Obama’s education, the most important part of which, by his own admission, came via Saul Alinsky. During the 2008 campaign, Obama said of his years steeped in the Chicago Marxist’s revolutionary “community organizing” methods: “It was that education that was seared into my brain. It was the best education I ever had, better than anything I got at Harvard Law School.”
In action, one does not always enjoy the luxury of a decision that is consistent both with one’s individual conscience and the good of mankind. The choice must always be for the latter. Action is for mass salvation and not for the individual’s personal salvation. He who sacrifices the mass good for his personal conscience has a peculiar conception of “personal salvation”; he doesn’t care enough for people to be “corrupted” for them.That, friends, is one of the most twisted things I’ve ever heard. To believe it and act on it is to abandon your greatest gift, your moment-to-moment connection with the Living God – your conscience. Maybe that’s why Alinsky dedicated “Rules for Radicals” to “the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom – Lucifer.”
In the final analysis, Obama lies because that’s how he gets his way, and
getting his way is all he cares about.
GOP TO BOEHNER: DEFUND OBAMACARE NOW!!
Posted By Woody Pendleton
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR/TV
DOCTOR'S ORDERS
GOP lawmakers to Boehner: Defund Obamacare now!
Dozens in House sign on to block spending needed to implement programs
by 
Su
That would be a simple refusal to appropriate money to set up the programs
Obamacare needs to function.
They are urging members of the House to sign onto the letter “urging our
leadership to defund the implementation of Obamacare” by noon on Friday.
The letter is addressed to House Speaker John Boehner and House Majority
Leader Eric Cantor.It explains, “We are outraged by the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to rewrite and largely uphold the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“Obamacare”), as we know you are as well. And we know that our sentiments are in line with the vast majority of Americans who believe that healthcare should be controlled by patients and doctors, not by the government.”
The letter continues, “We appreciate your willingness to schedule a vote on the full repeal of Obamacare. We should continue efforts to repeal the law in its entirety this year, next year, and until we are successful. However, in the meantime, there is more we can do in Congress.”
He’s a doctor and a congressman, and now he’s written a prescription for what really would fix America’s health care system, in “Doctor in the House,” by Rep. Michael Burgess.
The letter points out that “much of the implementation of Obamacare is a function of the discretionary appropriations process” and that “most of the citizens we represent believe that Obamacare should never go into effect.”
“We urge you not to bring to the House floor in the 112th Congress any legislation that provides or allows funds to implement Obamacare through the Internal Revenue Service, the Department of Health and Human Services, or any other federal entity. We also urge you to take legislative steps necessary to immediately rescind all Obamacare-implementation funds,” the letter suggests.
Quoting Federalist No. 58, the letter cites James Madison’s comment that the
“power over the purse may, in fact, be regarded as the most complete and
effectual weapon … for obtaining a redress of every grievance…”
Dozens of names already have been posted on the letter, and organizers are
hoping to add many more before the Friday deadline at which time it is expected
to be forwarded to the House leadership.Bachmann said after the vote to repeal, which is not expected to be duplicated in the Democrat-controlled Senate at this time, “It’s been two years since President Obama signed into law one of the most expensive and invasive pieces of legislation in the history of the United States. More and more we are seeing what then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi meant when she said the bill would have to pass in order for us to figure out what was in it. The more we learn about the scope and reach of Obamacare, the clearer it becomes that it isn’t about ‘affordable care’ – it is about bureaucratic control.”
She said, “For the first time in American history, the federal government is forcing citizens to purchase a private product simply because they breathe, and then will penalize them if they refuse to comply. The 20 new or higher taxes within Obamacare punish companies and individuals of all income levels, despite this administration’s promises otherwise. And an expanding IRS plans to enforce more than 12,000 pages of new regulations. Americans should not have to make their healthcare decisions out of fear of being intimidated by the IRS.”
The House vote was widely applauded by groups that have analyzed the legislation and found it constitutionally suspect. According to one such group, Liberty Counsel Action, the House determined that for individuals buying their own private health coverage will cost an additional $2,100 in 2016, Medicare recipients will lose more than half a trillion dollars in benefits, and medical treatment decisions will be made by the Independent Payment Advisory Board, not doctors and patients.
The Liberty Counsel Action report also said there are 21 new or higher taxes and millions of Americans will be forced by the government to violate their strongly held religious beliefs and pay for abortion services.
“Obamacare is the biggest power-grab by the federal government in our lifetimes,” said Mat Staver, chairman of the organization. “It expands government control over health care, adds trillions of dollars to our debt, drives up healthcare costs, and puts healthcare decisions in the hands of bureaucrats, instead of doctors and patients. Additional, Obamacare is the largest funding of abortion in history.”
The U.S. Supreme Court, on the deciding vote of Chief Justice John Roberts,
decided to call Obamacare a tax instead of a penalty, as the Obama
administration had argued, and determined it was constitutional on that
basis.
Even more so, Obamacare is the major factor in establishing the fact that the Federal Government is no longer listening to, or willing to obey the will of the majority of Americans. The Federal Government is stating by its actions that they are the controlling entity in America. THE FEDS ARE IN REBELLION AND VIOLATING THE CONSTITUTION AND THE LAWS IT ESTABLISHES. THEY ARE ROGUE AND TYRANT. by wp
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
