Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Arpaio Obama probe finds 'national security threat' Hawaii found to be bogus birth-certificate factory

Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV
 Press Conference has just finished: Will have a Video loaded as soon as Possible here on FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER

120127arpaioPHOENIX  After determining earlier this year there is probable cause to suspect the document released by the White House as Barack Obama’s birth certificate is a forgery, Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio said today he believes his Cold Case Posse’s investigation should be advanced to the federal government, based on further information released today at a press conference under way now in Phoenix that is being live-streamed by WND.
Cold Case Posse lead investigator Mike Zullo said the new information confirms the document presented to the American public in April 2011 is undoubtedly fraudulent.
Watch the live stream of Sheriff Arpaio’s press conference now. When you sign up for access, you’ll receive a copy of the official press release distributed at the conference.
Arpaio told WND he intends to move the investigation and the new information to a higher authority within the federal government because of what he calls an imminent threat to national security and U.S. immigration laws. The threat is posed by a flaw in Hawaii’s law discovered by his investigators that allows a foreigner to obtain a Hawaii birth certificate.
“Although I am having a difficult time deciding who to forward this information to given the fact that the obvious choices report directly to the president, I cannot stand by and hold on to information that threatens to weaken national security,” Arpaio said.
Arpaio said he intends on keeping a case file open if more information surfaces or if federal authorities decide to ignore the case.
Zullo explained that along with new information discovered regarding the birth certificate since the posse’s March 1 press conference, his team has discovered Hawaii provides easy access to a birth certificate, even if the child wasn’t born in the state.
Join with Sheriff Arpaio in his work to uncover the truth by donating to the Cold Case Posse expenses, or contribute to a fund that supports investigations by both WND and the sheriff.
Under Hawaii Revised Statute 338-17.8, a person only has to be an established resident of Hawaii, not necessarily a U.S. citizen, and pay taxes there for one year to be able to register an out-of-state or foreign-born person with an official Hawaii birth certificate.
“If a nation’s security is only as strong as its weakest link, then America may be in serious trouble,” Arpaio said in a statement. “Hawaii may be our weakest link and could have a serious impact on our nation’s immigration policy.”
Among the new findings presented by lead Cold Case Posse investigator Mike Zullo:
  • The sheriff’s investigators have learned of a birth certificate coding system that indicates the White House document has been altered.
  • An interview with the Hawaii official who allegedly signed the Obama document in 1961, Verna K.L. Lee, provided further confirmation of the coding anomalies.
  • Investigators were troubled to find key information missing on the verification document Hawaii provided to Arizona’s secretary of state in May.
  • Hawaii’s deputy attorney general, Jill T. Nagamine, confirm the state has a birth document on file for Obama. But she would not confirm on the record that the White House document matched what was on file with the Hawaii Department of Health.
  • The sheriff’s investigators interviewed three persons of interest who have provided additional information in the case.
In prepared opening remarks, Arpaio chastised the media for the way it has handled the investigation.
“You have demeaned this investigation at every turn as silly and wasteful,” he said. “Your contempt about the subject and me for pursuing it has been duly noted.”
He urged media members to listen to Zullo’s presentation of the new evidence.
“Keep an open mind if you can,” he said. “Put away all you pre conceived ideas. Keep your eye on the ball.”
Arpaio’s investigation was initiated last October when 250 Maricopa County citizens approached him for help because they believed the electronic document presented by the White House to the American public was a forgery. Arpaio said he went ahead with the probe with the intent of being able to clear the president and put the matter to rest. But he explained the investigation found too many inconsistencies on the birth certificate.
“We also looked into the president’s selective service registration card and found that it, too, appeared to be fraudulent,” Arpaio said.
Investigators since then have traveled to Hawaii and have interviewed more witnesses, the sheriff said.
Addressing the coding issue, Zullo explained that the Hawaii Department of Health, which categorized vital information issued at the time of the president’s birth, used specific number codes that were written in pencil to transfer information from a paper birth certificate to a database file.
Hand written codes on Obama birth document
The codes seen on the document issued by the White House are not consistent with the information entered into the various fields, indicating the document has been altered or amended.
In the coding system, the number 9 indicates the information is not stated, meaning there should not be any information in the box in which the number is written.
However, the number 9 can be seen written in pencil next to the fields for “Usual Occupation,” “Kind of Business or Industry” and “Race of Father” on Obama’s document. Each of those fields are filled with information.
“This proves the document has been tampered with and information has been placed on it,” Zullo said.
Sheriff’s investigators tracked down the registrar who allegedly signed the White House’s birth document, U.K. Lee, who is now 95. She provided information that posed further inconsistencies with the story of Obama’s birth at the Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital in 1961.
The investigators also analyzed the Hawaii Department of Health’s response to Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett’s request that Obama’s birth information be verified.
They interviewed in person the Hawaii assistant attorney general to verify that the document presented by the White House was the same document on file with the Department of Health.
Investigators said they were troubled to find key information missing on the verification document, including the president’s date of birth.
They said they were equally troubled that the deputy attorney general would not confirm on record that the White House document matched what was on file with the health department.
The national security concerns raised by the investigation are based on Hawaii Revised Statute 338.17.8. which states:
338-17.8 Certificates for children born out of state.
Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
Arpaio and his investigators said they have deep concerns that the Hawaii Revised Statute is a loophole that makes it possible for foreign born children to illegally establish U.S. citizenship.
They said the concern is also relevant given the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling concerning Arizona’s proposed state immigration law, SB 1070, in which the federal court ruled state laws cannot be in contradiction or in conflict with federal law.
Zullo noted that, normally, when it’s necessary to prove a person is a U.S. Citizen, the main form of documentation is a state certificate of birth.
“It appears that in the case of Hawaii law, any person can obtain a birth certificate if any adult or their parents can prove that they resided in Hawaii for one year and paid taxes,” he said. “There is no requirement to show that the child itself was actually born in Hawaii or on U.S. soil.”
More to come

DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ AND HER MIDDLE CLASS ASS ?

Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV



DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz and President Barack Obama’s re-election campaign team have been waging a coordinated effort against Republican Presidential nominee Mitt Romney by repeatedly casting aspersion on the length of his tenure at Bain Capital as well as the limited disclosure of his past personal income tax returns.
Wasserman Schultz has been relentless in her mocking of Romney’s offshore holdings and tax records even after it was disclosed that she had her own offshore investments including a Swiss Bank Account and holdings in foreign drug companies and the State Bank of India. In a desperate attempt to distract from the president’s record of failure, Wasserman Schultz has tried to paint Romney as a “one percenter” who outsources American jobs overseas and is disconnected from the American people. Wasserman Schultz has even boldly claimed that “I’m a Middle Class American.”
But now the Shark Tank has come into possession of information that has never been publicly disclosed which completely undermines Wasserman Schultz’ credibility as it pertains to her calls for transparency or the claim that she qualifies as “middle class.”
Speaking of “offshore” interests, on 6/9/12 Congresswoman Wasserman Schultz took a one-week cruise aboard the Royal Caribbean ‘Oasis of the Seas’ luxury liner to the Western Caribbean, embarking from Port Everglades, Florida. According to an individual that we’ll simply identify as “Bruce from Weston” who was also on the same cruise along with his family, Wasserman Schultz took the cruise with her husband Steve and three children along with Broward County School Board member Robin Bartleman and her family.
“Bruce” informed us that his own son became friendly with one of Wasserman Schultz’ daughters while the kids were playing in one of the ship’s designated play areas. Wasserman Schultz’ daughter then invited him up to the suite that her family was staying in.
While it shouldn’t be remarkable that Wasserman Schultz and her family took a cruise, the extent of her accommodations are most certainly eye-popping.


The two-story, spiral-staircase ‘Loft Suite’ that Bruce’s son was invited up to was on the 17th deck that overlooked the rear of the ship. According to Royal Caribbean, a 7-Day Cruise for 4 guests ranges from $15,264.08 in the Crown Loft Suite, to $19,364.08 in the Sky Loft Suite. These two types of suites are only found on the 17th Deck. (Source-Royal Caribbean)
So the question begs- how can someone earning a living on a congressional salary afford such a lavish suite on a cruise ship- especially someone who so adamantly claims she is “middle class?” Also take into consideration that Wasserman Schultz’ family was a party of five on board the cruise ship, meaning that they would have been charged an additional $1615 for the fifth guest, bringing the cost of the cruise somewhere between $16,879.08 and $20,979.08.
After the Shark Tank contacted and spoke to a Royal Caribbean sales agent, we were informed that  as per maritime laws enforced by the U.S. Coast Guard, families of five or more that wish to reside in a ‘Loft Suite’ are mandated to upgrade to the Royal Loft Suite as per safety regulations. That brings a one-week excursion in a Royal Loft Suite aboard the Oasis of the Seas for a family of five to $33,151.65, taxes included.(Source- Royal Caribbean Email)
Debbie Wasserman Schultz may be a Member of Congress and the Chair of the DNC, but she’s not the Sultan of Brunei.
So did the Schultz’ pay the full ticket price of the cruise or did they pay for a less expensive boarding arrangement and then receive an upgrade from the cruise ship? If Wasserman Schultz did receive a complimentary upgrade, it’s possible that she would be in violation of the House Ethics Gift Rule. (See- House Ethics Rules)
The possibility also exists that this cruise was paid for by the Democratic National Committee- perhaps this expenditure could be classified as “voter outreach?” If that’s the case, donors to the DNC might want to think twice about contributing hard earned dollars that wind up paying for the ultra-expensive cruises of the DNC Elite.
But that’s not Debbie’s only instance of hypocrisy.
Back on the mainland, Newbury, New Hampshire is a quaint little town that’s located in Merrimack County. According to public records, we’ve learned that Wasserman Schultz owns a second home here along with another land parcel. Based on our own public records search, these assets have never been previously disclosed by Wasserman Schultz.
As per congressional disclosure rules, Wasserman Schultz is not required to report either her personal residence or additional properties that do not generate rental income. If Wasserman Schultz were to release her personal income tax returns as requested by her Republican congressional opponent Karen Harrington, these assets would then be disclosed.(Source)
Debbie may not be not running for President, but she is running for federal office. We believe that what’s good for the goose is good for the gander- if you are repeatedly calling for your political opponents to fully disclose their tax returns, Debbie should be prepared to do the same.
To this point, Debbie continues to dodge our request for her tax returns. The question now arises- just what is the Congresswoman hiding?-Karen Harrington
Why was this not-so incidental piece of information never discovered? Wasserman Schultz signs her name on legislative documents using “Debbie Wasserman Schultz,” but when she signs public records that require her legal signature, Wasserman Schultz signs her name “Deborah Schultz.”
Example 1-Congressional Mailer-

 
Example 2-Personal signature on a mortgage agreement-
The first piece of property listed as owned by Wasserman Schultz is identified as Lot 17 at 17 Meadow Rd, Newbury, NH. The second property listed is as being owned by Steve and Deborah Schultz, located at 57 Meadow Rd, Newbury, NH. The Schultz’ have carried several mortgages on this property, the first on May 20, 2005 for $349,660, the second on June 30, 2008 for $371,250, the third on April 27, 2009, and the last one on November 24, 2010 for $374,500.
So let’s do some simple math. The Schultz’ 2010 value of their Newbury, NH home is estimated at$503,400, which includes the land and the 3 bedroom structure. When you add the total estimated value of her primary residence in Weston, Florida, valued in 2012 at $409,850, Wasserman Schultz has close to $1 million in total real property.
Combined with her recently disclosed foreign investments and her husband’s undetermined salary at the Community Bank of Broward, can Debbie Wasserman Schultz really count herself as just another “middle class” American who practices full disclosure of her own assets in the interests of transparency?
You can share the article below. Thanks.
Related:
Wasserman Schultz Boots

USNS RAPPAHANNOCK INCIDENT JULY 16, IN GULF

Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV
 

Download HiRes 

U.S. 5TH FLEET AREA OF OPERATIONS (July 16, 2012) An embarked security team aboard the Military Sealift Command fleet replenishment oiler USNS Rappahannock (T-AO 204) fired upon a small motor vessel after it disregarded warnings and rapidly approached the U.S. ship near Jebel Ali, United Arab Emirates. In accordance with Navy force protection procedures, the sailors aboard Rappahannock used a series of non-lethal, preplanned responses to warn the vessel before resorting to lethal force. The U.S. crew repeatedly attempted to warn the vessel's operators to turn away from their deliberate approach. When those efforts failed to deter the approaching vessel, the security team on Rappahannock fired rounds from a 50-caliber machine gun. The incident is under investigation. (U.S. Navy photo/Released) U.S. Central Command | USNS Rappahannock Fires after Vessel ignores warnings

Download HiRes 

U.S. 5TH FLEET AREA OF OPERATIONS (July 16, 2012) An embarked security team aboard the Military Sealift Command fleet replenishment oiler USNS Rappahannock (T-AO 204) fired upon a small motor vessel after it disregarded warnings and rapidly approached the U.S. ship near Jebel Ali, United Arab Emirates. (U.S. Navy photo/Released) http://www.centcom.mil/press-release...nores-warnings

Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV



Obama’s Radical Philosophy Revealed

Posted by bh
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV
" Obama Boat Leaking, Truth getting In, Sinking ?

Romney Surrogate Wishes Obama “Would Learn How To Be An American”

Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV

 Former New Hampshire Governor John Sununu is on fire these days. First, he makes a fool out of Andrea Mitchell (from MSNBC) on air, now he is taking it to Obama himself. Can’t wait to see what he says next!


Demand Obama’s College Records

Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV

On Fox and Friends Monday morning that Romney should release more of his tax returns only after demanding Obama release his college records: “Obama should give his college applications and records — you talk about transparency, We will learn more about Obama when we look at those college applications than any other thing that can happen.”

HOW DO WE STOP THIS DICKTATOR FROM TAKING OVER.. READ THIE LATEST MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT ORDER ?

Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV

WHAT WILL ALL HIS SUPPORTERS SAY WHEN THEIR CELL PHONES GO DEAD AND INTERNET AND TV QUIT. QUIET ?

Barack Obama speech 11 SC Obamas Latest Executive Order
On Friday, July 6, 2012, without any fanfare or publicity, President Barack Obama signed an executive order titled Assignment of National Security and Emergency Preparedness Communications Functions. Chances are that Obama didn’t want to bring attention to this action because of the power it places in his grasp.
Section 1 of the executive order reads:
“The Federal Government must have the ability to communicate at all times and under all circumstances to carry out its most critical and time sensitive missions. Survivable, resilient, enduring, and effective communications, both domestic and international, are essential to enable the executive branch to communicate within itself and with: the legislative and judicial branches; State, local, territorial, and tribal governments; private sector entities; and the public, allies, and other nations. Such communications must be possible under all circumstances to ensure national security, effectively manage emergencies, and improve national resilience. The views of all levels of government, the private and nonprofit sectors, and the public must inform the development of national security and emergency preparedness (NS/EP) communications policies, programs, and capabilities.”
Basically, this executive order gives the president and Department of Homeland Security the authorization to take over and control any and all lines of communications any time they want to, as spelled out in Section 5.2 of the executive order:“Sec. 5.2. The Secretary of Homeland Security shall: (a) oversee the development, testing, implementation, and sustainment of NS/EP communications, including: communications that support Continuity of Government; Federal, State, local, territorial, and tribal emergency preparedness and response communications; non-military executive branch communications systems; critical infrastructure protection networks; and non-military communications networks, particularly with respect to prioritization and restoration;
(b) incorporate, integrate, and ensure interoperability and the necessary combination of hardness, redundancy, mobility, connectivity, interoperability, restorability, and security to obtain, to the maximum extent practicable, the survivability of NS/EP communications defined in section 5.2(a) of this order under all circumstances, including conditions of crisis or emergency;”

Savage: Obama Never Earned Anything In His Life!

Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV

DRUG DEALER AND IMPOSTER OBAMA IN THE WHITE HOUSE

Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV


Obama Jailbird Whos The Real Felon, Mr. Obama?
By his own admissionBarack Obama used drugs and almost certainly passed drugs to his friends. This makes it likely he has committed drug-related felonies. Even just passing drugs around in a circle of friends is a “sale of drugs” felony. Nevertheless, it’s not really important whether we have enough definitive evidence to convict Barack Obama in a court room. It is, after all, only the seriousness of the charges and not the nature of the evidence that counts.
During Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s March 1, 2012 press conference, his lead investigator presented a copy of Barack Obama’s draft registration card and explained how it was forged. It was clear that if the draft card Obama possessed was genuine, he, Barack Hussein Obama, received THE ONLY draft card issued since 1980 that was stamped with a single digit year. Every other draft card issued before and after Barack Obama’s special one includes four digits. Obama’s draft card is stamped with “80” for the year it was issued. Any legitimate stamp would say “1980.”
Obama’s draft card looks like it was made by a high school kid learning how to photo-shop a document. All of this strongly suggests Obama may very well be a felon under several statutes of both Hawaiian and federal law.
When Obama either made or received his obviously fake draft card, that could be a  felony violation of Jimmy Carter’s  Proclamation 4771, Registration Under the Military Selective Service Act,  which retroactively re-establishing the Selective Service registration requirement for all 18–26 year old male citizens born on or after January 1, 1960.
Failure to register for the draft – certainly indicated by possession of a forged draft card – makes a man born after December 31, 1959 liable for a maximum fine of $250,000 and a prison term of up to five years.
The law also stipulates that an unregistered male is not eligible for a job in the Executive Branch.  The means a forged draft card cannot be used to satisfy the requirements to be the president. It means Barack Obama may be guilty of federal felonies because he possessed and presented an identification document that is a fake.  It means he may have committed more federal felonies involving fraud when he presented a forged draft card to satisfy the requirements for any federal student aid he used to attend college in America.
My goodness, there may be a felon in the White House!

OBAMA GIVES TOTAL CONTROL OF ALL COMMUNICATIONS TO HIMSELF AND THR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PERIOD.

Posted By Woody Pendleton

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER   WFZR/TV

Obama Signs Executive Order Giving Him and Federal Government Control of All Forms of Communication Under Any Circumstance

obama communications
On Friday, July 6, 2012, without any fanfare or publicity, President Barack Obama signed an executive order titled Assignment of National Security and Emergency Preparedness Communications Functions. Chances are that Obama didn’t want to bring attention to this action because of the power it places in his grasp.
Section 1 of the executive order reads:
“The Federal Government must have the ability to communicate at all times and under all circumstances to carry out its most critical and time sensitive missions. Survivable, resilient, enduring, and effective communications, both domestic and international, are essential to enable the executive branch to communicate within itself and with: the legislative and judicial branches; State, local, territorial, and tribal governments; private sector entities; and the public, allies, and other nations. Such communications must be possible under all circumstances to ensure national security, effectively manage emergencies, and improve national resilience. The views of all levels of government, the private and nonprofit sectors, and the public must inform the development of national security and emergency preparedness (NS/EP) communications policies, programs, and capabilities.”


Basically, this executive order gives the president and Department of Homeland Security the authorization to take over and control any and all lines of communications any time they want to, as spelled out in Section 5.2 of the executive order:
Sec. 5.2. The Secretary of Homeland Security shall: (a) oversee the development, testing, implementation, and sustainment of NS/EP communications, including: communications that support Continuity of Government; Federal, State, local, territorial, and tribal emergency preparedness and response communications; non-military executive branch communications systems; critical infrastructure protection networks; and non-military communications networks, particularly with respect to prioritization and restoration;
(b) incorporate, integrate, and ensure interoperability and the necessary combination of hardness, redundancy, mobility, connectivity, interoperability, restorability, and security to obtain, to the maximum extent practicable, the survivability of NS/EP communications defined in section 5.2(a) of this order under all circumstances, including conditions of crisis or emergency;”
Some analysts have reviewed the executive order and state that this section gives the Department of Homeland Security the authorization to seize any and all private communications facilities it deems necessary.
The National Communications System defines the communications infrastructure as:
“The communications infrastructure is a complex system of systems that incorporates multiple technologies and services with diverse ownership. The infrastructure includes wireline, wireless, satellite, cable, and broadcasting, and provides the transport networks that support the Internet and other key information systems.”
When you wade through the executive order and other related government documents, you discover that this document gives the president the power to seize and control every form of communication within the United States for any reason they so desire.
Now add this to the National Defense Authorization Act passed by Congress last year that gives the United States government to arrest, detain and hold indefinitely any American without a warrant, formal charges or any reason other than declaring the person is a threat to the nation. Any detained under this act will be sent to a military run prison and held until such time as the government decides to release them.
I have never been a conspiracy nut and usually avoid those that are, but I can’t help but see the evidence over the past year to indicate that Barack Obama has almost everything in place to allow him to declare martial law and suspend the American way of life. He has the power to control all forms of communication and detain anyone he wants. He has purposely driven the economy and job market to the brink of collapse.
As much as I hate to admit it, I honestly believe that if Obama gets re-elected, that he will finalize the economic collapse of America and in so doing, will declare martial law and take control of all communications. He will arrest and detain anyone who opposes him. In all likelihood, he will disband Congress, the Supreme Court and stop all elections. Ultimately, he will declare himself to be the supreme ruler of the nation and assume complete dictatorial control of the country.
This November’s election IS the most important presidential election in the history of America. It may very well be the last election we will ever have. I pray I’m wrong, but all of the evidence points to that conclusion.


Read more: http://godfatherpolitics.com/6180/obama-signs-executive-order-giving-him-and-federal-government-control-of-all-forms-of-communication-under-any-circumstance/#ixzz20uP37D2O

32 REPUBLICAN SENATORS REJECT LAW OF THE SEA TREATY

Posted By Woody Pendleton

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER   WFZR/TV

GOP Senators Sink Law of the Sea Treaty; 'This Threat to Sovereignty'

(CNSNews.com) – Thirty-four Republican senators have now signed on to a letter circulated by Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) declaring that they will not support ratification of the Law of the Sea Treaty.
Ratification would have required a two-thirds vote in the Senate to pass, meaning that 67 Senators would have needed to vote for the treaty in order for the U.S. to formally agree to it.
Now that 34 senators have pledged to vote against ratification, there are not enough votes to ratify the treaty.
“President Obama and Massachusetts Senator John Kerry were trying to ram through a misguided treaty that conveys ownership of the oceans (2/3 of the earth surface) to a United Nations agency and subjects the U.S. to international environmental judgments,” said Sen. DeMint in a statement released today. “But conservatives defeated this threat to sovereignty by rallying together enough senators to block the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST).”
Earlier today, DeMint announced that four additional Republicans had signed his opposition letter stating that they will vote against ratification.
Those four senators – DeMint had collected 30 signatures as of last week – were Sen. Mike Johanns (R-Neb.), Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.), Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.), and Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio.).
The Law of the Sea Treaty – formally known as the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Seas (UNCLOS) – has been awaiting Senate ratification since 1982, when it was rejected by former President Ronald Reagan whose administration had participated in drafting the treaty but ultimately rejected the final document.

The treaty was reworked in 1994 to satisfy concerns raised by the Reagan and Bush administrations that it would disadvantage the United States. However, the Senate again failed to get enough votes to ratify the treaty, citing some of the same concerns Reagan had originally cited.
The treaty codifies the legal obligations of all states regarding passage of ships and commerce in their territorial off-shore waters, defining each state’s rights in what is known as the Outer Continental Shelf. It also provides for an international body whose purpose is to settle claims and administer disputes in deep water, offshore areas known as the International Seabed Authority (ISA).
Originally, the United States rejected the treaty because it felt that ratifying it would cede some measure of sovereignty to the ISA. This concern was addressed in the 1994 revision by giving the United States a permanent seat on the ISA’s governing body and giving the U.S. government a veto over all ISA decisions.
Still, many Republican senators oppose the treaty on the grounds that the ISA would have too much power over U.S. commercial interests.
The treaty has the backing of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the U.S. military, and all former U.S. secretaries of State.
The full list of Republican senators opposing the treaty can be found here.

HOW IS THIS FOR CONTROVERSY??

Posted By The Circuit Rider

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER   WFZR/TV

You may have read this before but it is still news worthy
today!!



How’s this for controversy..


> The following is a copy of an article written by Spanish
> writer Sebastian Vilar Rodriguez and published in a
> Spanish newspaper on Jan. 15, 2008. It doesn't take much
> imagination to extrapolate the message to the rest of Europe - and
> possibly to the rest of the world.
>
> REMEMBER AS YOU READ -- IT WAS IN A SPANISH PAPER
> Date: Tue. 15 January 2008
>
> ALL EUROPEAN LIFE DIED IN AUSCHWITZ By Sebastian Vilar
> Rodrigez
>
> I walked down the street in Barcelona , and suddenly
> discovered a terrible truth - Europe died in Auschwitz ...
> We killed six million Jews and replaced them with 20 million
> Muslims. In Auschwitz we burned a culture, thought, creativity,
> talent. We destroyed the chosen people, truly chosen, because
> they produced great and wonderful people who changed the
> world.
>
> The contribution of this people is felt in all areas of
> life: science, art, international trade, and above all, as the
> conscience of the world. These are the people we
> burned.
>
> And under the pretense of tolerance, and because we wanted
> to
> prove to ourselves that we were cured of the disease of
> racism, we opened our gates to 20 million Muslims, who brought
> us stupidity and ignorance, religious extremism and lack of
> tolerance, crime and poverty, due to an unwillingness to work and
> support their families with pride.
>
> They have blown up our trains and turned our beautiful
> Spanish
> cities into the third world, drowning in filth and crime.
>
> Shut up in the apartments they receive free from the
> government, they plan the murder and destruction of their
> naive hosts.
>
> And thus, in our misery, we have exchanged culture for
> fanatical hatred, creative skill for destructive skill,
> intelligence for backwardness and superstition.
>
> We have exchanged the pursuit of peace of the Jews of
> Europe
> and their talent for a better future for their children,
> their
> determined clinging to life because life is holy, for
> those who pursue death, for people consumed by the desire
> for death for themselves and others, for our children and
> theirs.
>
> What a terrible mistake was made by miserable Europe!
>
> The Global Islamic population is approximately
> 1,200,000,000;
> that is ONE BILLION TWO HUNDRED MILLION or 20% of the
> world's population. They have received the following Nobel
> Prizes:
>
> Literature:
> 1988 - Najib Mahfooz
>
> Peace:
> 1978 - Mohamed Anwar El-Sadat
> 1990 - Elias James Corey
> 1994 - Yaser Arafat:
> 1999 - Ahmed Zewai
>
> Economics:
> (zero)
>
> Physics:
> (zero)
>
>
> Medicine:
> 1960 - Peter Brian Medawar
> 1998 - Ferid Mourad
>
> TOTAL: 7 SEVEN
>
> The Global Jewish population is approximately 14,000,000;
> that
> is FOURTEEN MILLION or about 0.02% of the world's
> population. They have received the following Nobel Prizes:
>
> Literature:
> 1910 - Paul Heyse
> 1927 - Henri Bergson
> 1958 - Boris Pasternak
> 1966 - Shmuel Yosef Agnon
> 1966 - Nelly Sachs
> 1976 - Saul Bellow
> 1978 - Isaac Bashevis Singer
> 1981 - Elias Canetti
> 1987 - Joseph Brodsky
> 1991 - Nadine Gordimer World
>
> Peace:
> 1911 - Alfred Fried
> 1911 - Tobias Mi chae l Carel Asser
> 1968 - Rene Cassin
> 1973 - Henry Kissinger
> 1978 - Menachem Begin
> 1986 - Elie Wiesel
> 1994 - Shimon Peres
> 1994 - Yitzhak Rabin
>
> Physics:
> 1905 - Adolph Von Baeyer
> 1906 - Henri Moissan
> 1907 - Albert Abraham Michelson
> 1908 - Gabriel Lippmann
> 1910 - Otto Wallach
> 1915 - Richard Willstaetter
> 1918 - Fritz Haber
> 1921 - Albert Einstein
> 1922 - Niels Bohr
> 1925 - James Franck
> 1925 - Gustav Hertz
> 1943 - Gustav Stern
> 1943 - George Charles de Hevesy
> 1944 - Isidor Issac Rabi
> 1952 - Felix Bloch
> 1954 - Max Born
> 1958 - Igor Tamm
> 1959 - Emilio Segre
> 1960 - Donald A. Glaser
> 1961 - Robert Hofstadter
> 1961 - Melvin Calvin
> 1962 - Lev Davidovich Landau
> 1962 - Max Ferdinand Perutz
> 1965 - Richard Phillips Feynman
> 1965 - Julian Schwinger
> 1969 - Murray Gell-Mann
> 1971 - Dennis Gabor
> 1972 - William Howard Stein
> 1973 - Brian David Josephson
> 1975 - Benjamin Mottleson
> 1976 - Burton Richter
> 1977 - Ilya Prigogine
> 1978 - Arno Allan Penzias
> 1978 - Peter L Kapitza
> 1979 - Stephen Weinberg
> 1979 - Sheldon Glashow
> 1979 - Herbert Charles Brown
> 1980 - Paul Berg
> 1980 - Walter Gilbert
> 1981 - Roald Hoffmann
> 1982 - Aaron Klug
> 1985 - Albert A. Hauptman
> 1985 - Jerome Karle
> 1986 - Dudley R. Herschbach
> 1988 - Robert Huber
> 1988 - Leon Lederman
> 1988 - Melvin Schwartz
> 1988 - Jack Steinberger
> 1989 - Sidney Altman
> 1990 - Jerome Friedman
> 1992 - Rudolph Marcus
> 1995 - Martin Perl
> 2000 - Alan J. Heeger
>
> Economics:
> 1970 - Paul Anthony Samuelson
> 1971 - Simon Kuznets
> 1972 - Kenneth Joseph Arrow
> 1975 - Leonid Kantorovich
> 1976 - Milton Friedman
> 1978 - Herbert A. Simon
> 1980 - Lawrence Robert Klein
> 1985 - Franco Modigliani
> 1987 - Robert M. Solow
> 1990 - Harry Markowitz
> 1990 - Merton Miller
> 1992 - Gary Becker
> 1993 - Robert Fogel
>
> Medicine:
> 1908 - Elie Metchnikoff
> 1908 - Paul Erlich
> 1914 - Robert Barany
> 1922 - Otto Meyerhof
> 1930 - Karl Landsteiner
> 1931 - Otto Warburg
> 1936 - Otto Loewi
> 1944 - Joseph Erlanger
> 1944 - Herbert Spencer Gasser
> 1945 - Ernst Boris Chain
> 1946 - Hermann Joseph Muller
> 1950 - Tadeus Reichstein
> 1952 - Selman Abraham Waksman
> 1953 - Hans Krebs
> 1953 - Fritz Albert Lipmann
> 1958 - Joshua Lederberg
> 1959 - Arthur Kornberg
> 1964 - Konrad Bloch
> 1965 - Francois Jacob
> 1965 - Andre Lwoff
> 1967 - George Wald
> 1968 - Marshall W. Nirenberg
> 1969 - Salvador Luria
> 1970 - Julius Axelrod
> 1970 - Sir Bernard Katz
> 1972 - Gerald Maurice Edelman
> 1975 - Howard Martin Temin
> 1976 - Baruch S. Blumberg
> 1977 - Roselyn Sussman Yalow
> 1978 - Daniel Nathans
> 1980 - Baruj Benacerraf
> 1984 - Cesar Milstein
> 1985 - Mi chae l Stuart Brown
> 1985 - Joseph L. Goldstein
> 1986 - Stanley Cohen [& Rita Levi-Montalcini]
> 1988 - Gertrude Elion
> 1989 - Harold Varmus
> 1991 - Erwin Neher
> 1991 - Bert Sakmann
> 1993 - Richard J. Roberts
> 1993 - Phillip Sharp
> 1994 - Alfred Gilman
> 1995 - Edward B. Lewis
> 1996- Lu RoseIacovino
> TOTAL: 129!
>
> The Jews are NOT promoting brain washing children in
> military
> training camps, teaching them how to blow themselves up
> and cause maximum deaths of Jews and other non Muslims.
> The Jews don't hijack planes, nor kill athletes at the
> Olympics, or blow themselves up in German restaurants.
> There is NOT one single Jew who has destroyed a church.
> There is NOT a single Jew who protests by killing people.
>
> The Jews don't traffic slaves, nor have leaders calling
> for Jihad and death to all the Infidels.
>
> Perhaps the world's Muslims should consider investing more
> in
> standard education and less in blaming the Jews for all
> their
> problems.
>
> Muslims must ask 'what can they do for humankind' before
> they
> demand that humankind respects them.
>
> Regardless of your feelings about the crisis between
> Israel
> and the Palestinians and Arab neighbors, even if you
> believe there is more culpability on Israel 's part, the following
> two sentences really say it all:
>
> "If the Arabs put down their weapons today, there would be
> no
> more violence. If the Jews put down their weapons today,
> there would be no more Israel ." Benjamin Netanyahu
>
> General Eisenhower warned us it is a matter of history
> that
> when the Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces, General
> Dwight Eisenhower, found the victims of the death camps he
> ordered all possible photographs to be taken , and for the
> German people from surrounding villages to be ushered through
> the camps and even made to bury the dead.
>
> He did this because he said in words to this effect:
>
>
> 'Get it all on record now - get the films - get the
> witnesses
> - because somewhere down the road of history someone will
> get up and say that this never happened'
>
> Recently, the UK debated whether to remove The Holocaust
> from
> its school curriculum because it 'offends' the Muslim
> population which claims it never occurred. It is not
> removed as yet. However, this is a frightening portent of
> the fear that is gripping the world and how easily each country is
> giving into it.
>
> It is now more than 60 years after the Second World War in
> Europe ended. This e-mail is being sent as a memorial
> chain, in memory of the, 6 million Jews, 20 million
> Russians, 10 million Christians, and 1,900 Catholic priests who
> were 'murdered, raped, burned, starved, beaten, experimented on
> and humiliated' while the German people looked the other
> way.
>
> Now, more than ever, with Iran , among others, claiming
> the
> Holocaust to be 'a myth,' it is imperative to make sure
> the world
> never forgets.
>
> This e-mail is intended to reach 400 million people. Be a
> link
> in the memorial chain and help distribute this around the
> world.
>
> How many years will it be before the attack on the World
> Trade
> Center 'NEVER HAPPENED' because it offends some Muslim in
> the United States ?
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...