Wednesday, August 22, 2012

EX- MARINE'S ;AWYER FILES FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Posted by Woody Pendleton

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER  WFZR/TV

Raub's lawyer petitions court for illegal detention


by: Cheryl K. Chumley
Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Raub's lawyer petitions court for illegal detention

Protesters gather outside John Randolph Medical Center Wednesday, Aug. 22, in Hopewell, Va., where Marine veteran Brandon Raub was detained for evaluation after allegedly making inappropriate Facebook posts. Photo Credit:WTVR.com
The attorney for the former Marine who was forced into a psychiatric ward for anti-government Facebook postings filed a petition Wednesday claiming law enforcement did not uphold Virginia laws for involuntary detentions.

“The law requires that within four hours of detaining someone, you have to have a magistrate write a petition for a temporary restraining order,” said John Whitehead, an attorney with the Rutherford Institute, the Virginia-based civil rights firm that is defending the ex-Marine. “They didn’t do that. That didn’t happen.”

Brandon Raub, 26, was taken into custody at his Richmond, Va., home Thursday, Aug. 16, by FBI and Secret Service agents and Chesterfield County Police. He has yet to be charged with a crime; he was handcuffed and placed in the back of a police vehicle and transported to the police department. From there, he was admitted to the John Randolph Medical Facility in Hopewell for a psychiatric evaluation.

His crime?

Officially, nothing.

“They did not charge him with anything,” Mr. Whitehead said in an interview Wednesday with Times247.com. “He was in his underwear, in his living room, he sees a group of police, FBI agents walking up, he talks with them, he’s asked about some Facebook postings, they handcuff him.”

CLICK BELOW TO READ MORE

CONGRESS SURRENDERS TO PRESIDENT ON SENATE CONFIRMATION HEARINGS

Posted by WP

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER  WFZR/TV

Congress Surrenders to the President on Senate Hearings
Written by Gary North on August 22, 2012 
 
The Senate must confirm appointments made by every President. This retains the Senate’s authority. It holds confirmation hearings.
That was then. This is now.
The Senate decided that it’s just too much trouble. It wanted out. So, the Senate persuaded the House to go along with a joint surrender to the President. It exempted 170 appointments from any hearings. If the President wants these people to run the bureaucracies — which cannot be fired — that’s his business.
No more advice. Universal consent.
The name of the law is the Presidential Appointment Efficiency and Streamlining Act of 2011.
We all want more efficiency, right? We don’t want to see the Senate bogged down, right?
The Senate passed the bill 79-20, in June 2011. The House passed it by 261-116 last month. Obama signed it on August 10.
Senator Chuck Schumer of New York explains what this means.
“This landmark bipartisan agreement strikes the right balance between getting important positions in the government filled quickly and preserving the Senate’s ‘advice and consent’ role. It isn’t often that Congress voluntarily takes steps to curb its own power. But for the good of our democracy, the Senate must become more efficient. This reform bill will help to break the gridlock that has dominated the Senate, allowing both parties to focus on driving an agenda designed to create jobs and reduce the deficit.”
I feel so much better now. The Senate will become more efficient. It will be able to pass more laws. Then the executive agencies will implement them with more pages in the Federal Register. It published only 83,000 pages in 2011. This new law will help reduce the legislative logjam. We will get far more pages in the future.
Continue Reading on www.lieberman.senate.gov

RIP UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 1776 - 2012

Posted by Woody Pendleton

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER  WFZR/TV

READ VERY, VERY CAREFULLY--Then Read Again.............
NOW TAKE A GOOD LOOK AT OUR OWN BACKYARD

In 1887 Alexander Tyler, a Scottish history professor at the
University of Edinburgh ,
had this to say about the fall of the
Athenian Republic some 2,000 years prior:

"A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government."

A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can
vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury.

From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the
most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally
collapse over loose fiscal policy, (which is) always followed by a dictatorship."

"The average age of the world's greatest civilizations from the beginning of history, has
been about 200 years.
During those 200 years, these nations always progressed through the following sequence:

From bondage to spiritual faith;
From spiritual faith to great courage;
From courage to liberty;
From liberty to abundance;
From abundance to complacency;
From complacency to apathy;
From apathy to dependence;
From dependence back into bondage."
 America is 236 years old
 The Obituary follows:
    The United States of America was born in the year 1776.   Formed by Christian men who had come to this land seeking freedom and the right to worship God as they felt led. Guided by the Will of God they formed America as a nation of free men.
   The United States was formally established as a Nation on April 30, 1789 in a sacred gathering of the new President George Washington, the Senate and the House of Representatives at St. Paul's Chapel in New York City.  They gathered to give thanks to God and to commit the future of into the Holy Protection and Blessings of Almighty God.

   They entered into a Covenant Relationship with the Most High on behalf of this Nation and its people.  This covenant established the obedience to the Eternal Rules Of right and Wrong and Morality as our National standards.  God's protection and blessings would be upon America as long as America kept these standards as its foundation.
   President Washington warned that  : the propitious smiles of Heaven can never be expected on a Nation that disregards the Eternal rules of order and right which Heaven itself hath ordained."
   America has broken her Oath and the Covenant with God.  She is no longer the Light to the World leading the lost, the helpless and starving to her sanctuary. God is no longer the guiding force that guides her.  America has turned her back upon God and claimed her own supremacy.  AND Heaven no longer smiles upon America for she has rejected the GOD of HER Fathers.....and refuses to repent and turn back to Him.  God has called out to America and continues to warn her of the judgement she is compelling to come upon her.  America still will not listen and judgement must fall.

  2nd Chronicles  7:14     
    IF,     MY PEOPLE,   WHO ARE CALLED BY MY NAME,   WILL  HUMBLE THEMSELVES,   AND PRAY,    AND SEEK MY FACE,   AND TURN FROM THEIR WICKED WAYS,        THEN     I WILL HEAR FROM HEAVEN,    AND  FORGIVE THEIR SIN,    AND  HEAL  THEIR  LAND.
     
 BORN 1776,    DIED  2012
  
 
It doesn't hurt to read this several times.

Professor Joseph Olson of
Hamline University School of Law in St. Paul , Minnesota ,
points out some interesting facts concerning the last Presidential election:

Number of States won by: Obama: 19 McCain: 29

Square miles of land won by: Obama: 580,000 McCain: 2,427,000

Population of counties won by: Obama: 127 million McCain: 143 million

Murder rate per 100,000
residents in counties won by: Obama: 13.2 McCain: 2.1

Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory McCain won was
mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the country.

Obama territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in low income
tenements and living off various forms of government welfare..."

Olson believes the
United States is now somewhere between the
"complacency and apathy" phase of Professor Tyler's definition of democracy,
with some forty percent of the nation's population already having reached
the "governmental dependency" phase.

If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal
invaders called illegal's - and they vote - then we can say goodbye to the
USA in fewer than five years.

If you are in favor of this, then by all means, delete this message.

If you are not, then pass this along to help everyone realize just how much is at
stake, knowing that apathy is the greatest danger to our freedom..

This is truly scary!
Of course we are not a democracy, we are a
Constitutional Republic .
Someone should point this out to Obama.
Of course we know he and too many others pay little attention to The Constitution.

There couldn't be more at stake than on
6 November 2012

If you are as concerned as I am please pass this along.

"Fathom the hypocrisy of a Government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured. But not prove they are a citizen."

WHY MUSLIMS KEEP COMMITING SUICIDE

Posted by WP
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER  WFZR/TV


Everyone seems to be wondering why Muslim Terrorists are so quick to commit suicide.
Let's have a look at the evidence:

- No Christmas 
- No television 
- No nude women
- No football 
- No pork chops 
- No hot dogs 
- No burgers
- No beer 
- No bacon 
- Rags for clothes 
- Towels for hats
- Constant wailing from some idiot in a tower
- More than one wife 
- More than one mother in law
- You can't shave 
- Your wife can't shave 
- You can't wash off the smell of donkey 
- You cook over burning camel dung 
- Your wife is picked by someone else for you 
- and your wife smells worse than your donkey

Then they tell you that, "When you die, it all gets better"??


Well no s..t Sherlock!....

It's not like it could get much worse!!

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

OBAMA AND THE MEDIA BY GLEN BECK

Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV & GBTV

THE NEW AXIS OF EVIL

 

GLEN VISIT'S THE Navajo Nation

Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV & GBTV


FREEDOM OR FREE STUFF BY Glen Beck

Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR/TV & GBTV


OBAMA SUPPORTERS DROPPING. DISCUSSION ON GBTV

Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV & GBTV


THE NEW WORLD DISORDER

Posted by Woody Pendleton

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER  WFZR/TV

The New World Disorder


The New World Disorder

After his great victory in Desert Storm, George H.W. Bush went before the United Nations to declare the coming of a New World Order. The Cold War was yesterday. Communism was in its death throes. The Soviet Empire had crumbled.
The Soviet Union was disintegrating. Francis Fukuyama was writing of "The End of History." Savants trilled about the inevitable triumph of democratic capitalism.
Yet, in 2012, sectarianism, tribalism and nationalism are all resurgent, reshaping a world where U.S. power and influence are visibly receding.
Syria is sinking into a war of all against all that may end with a breakup of the nation along ethno-sectarian lines -- Arab, Druze, Kurd, Sunni, Shia and Christian. Iraq descends along the same path.
A U.S. war with Iran could end with a Kurdish enclave in Iran's northwest tied to Iraqi Kurdistan, Iran's Azeri north drifting toward Azerbaijan, and a Balochi enclave in the south linked to Pakistan's largest province, Balochistan, leaving Iran only Persia.
The Middle and Near East seem to be descending into a Muslim Thirty Years' War of Sunni vs. Shia. Out of it may come new nations whose names and borders were not written in drawing rooms by 19th and 20th century European cartographers, but in blood.
India, too, is feeling the tremors. Ethnic violence in the Assam region has sent hundreds of thousands fleeing in panic.
In East Asia, ethnonationalism, fed by memories from the 20th century, is igniting clashes among former Cold War allies.
China's claim to the Spratly, Paracel and other islands in the South China Sea puts Beijing in conflict with Hanoi, which welcomes U.S. warships back to Cam Ranh Bay. Were not these the same people we bombed and blasted not so long ago? 
CLICK BELOW TO READ MORE

SERIOUSLY: LIBERALS ARE CHEAP WITH CHARITY

Posted by WP

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER  WFZR/TV

Seriously: Liberals Are Cheap with Charity


A new study produced by the Chronicle of Philanthropy shows that 14 out of the top 20 states in charitable giving are red, or Republican states, while 12 of the bottom 15 are blue, or Democrat states.
“The nation's sharp political divide can provide a clue to fundraisers,” writes the Chronicle. “The eight states that ranked highest in The Chronicle's analysis voted for John McCain in the last presidential contest while the seven lowest-ranking states supported Barack Obama.”
The study also found that the more religious states- which also happen to be more Republican- tend to give more than the less religious states.
But wait.
No, no, no: This can’t mean what we think it means.
It can’t mean that liberals are just cheaper than conservatives, despite outward appearances.
Let’s disregard what the data tells us, and go to that bastion of deconstructing EVERYTHING, white, liberal academia- with just a hint of Native American to satisfy a quota- so they can tell us what the study REALLY means.
So to make that point – in other words to make the point that liberals AREN’T really cheap- we need to cue the liberal social scientist whose job it is to explain to us that the results of the study don’t really say what they say.
We'll let Professor Running Mouth explain it.


From USAToday:
Alan Wolfe, a political science professor at Boston College, said it's wrong to link a state's religious makeup with its generosity. People in less religious states are giving in a different way by being more willing to pay higher taxes so the government can equitably distribute superior benefits, Wolfe said. And the distribution is based purely on need, rather than religious affiliation or other variables, said Wolfe, also head of the college's Boisi Center for Religion and Public Life.
Wolfe said people in less religious states "view the tax money they're paying not as something that's forced upon them, but as a recognition that they belong with everyone else, that they're citizens in the common good. … I think people here believe that when they pay their taxes, they're being altruistic."
In other words: You can’t build private charity efficiently-or anything else- without the government being involved. 
CLICK BELOW TO READ MORE

ALL MY EXES LIVE IN TEXAS ?

Posted by Woody Pendleton
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER  WFZR/TV

All My Exes Live in Texas


All My Exes Live in Texas
A former Texas high school teacher was convicted of multiple felonies after having sex with five 18-year-old students at her home. The conviction was a victory for the prosecution but it was a setback for the feminist movement. It was also a setback for the homosexual uncivil rights movement, which seeks unlimited authority to redefine relationships among consenting adults. Brittni Nicole Colleps, 28, of Arlington, was found guilty of 16 counts of having an inappropriate relationship between a student and teacher. In Texas, this second-degree felony is punishable by two to 20 years in prison per count. Because none of her students sodomized her, the relationships have not yet been enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. What makes this case difficult for some to fathom is that Colleps is Mrs. Colleps, not Miss Colleps. She is married and has multiple children. She also likes to have sex with multiple school kids at the same time. In fact, she had to turn herself in after one of the student athletes she was having sex with video recorded the encounter using a cellphone. That’s one of the disadvantages of taking on several athletes at once. It’s tough for a girl to know what all the boys in the room are doing at any given time. And it’s tough to keep track of all the electronic devices. Police Detective Jason Houston testified at trial saying that charges were filed because, whether they are 18 or not, it's a crime for a teacher to have sex with her students. This has some feminists upset because they think it should only be a crime for a teacher to have sex with his students. They think that a woman having sex with high school students is empowering while a man having sex with
CLICK BELOW TO READ MORE

TOP 10 REASONS NOT TO RE-ELECT OBAMA PART 2 OF 3

Posted by Woody Pendleton
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER  WFZR/TV

Top 10 Reasons Not to Re-elect Obama 

Top 10 Reasons Not to Re-elect Obama (Part 2 of 3)
The New York Times reported, "With waning approval ratings and a stagnant economy, the possibility that Mr. Obama will not be re-elected has entered the political bloodstream." It's more than entered; it's flowing strong. Last week in Part 1, I began to list my Top 10 reasons not to re-elect President Obama. Though I would encourage readers to read the details of each of those points, here they are in summary:
10) Obama's economic actions have failed to lower the unemployment rate in the U.S. below 8 percent for last 42 record months. 9) The Obama administration's out-of-control spending has lead America to the economic brink and destroyed our country's credit rating. 8) Obama's reckless spending and fiscal policies have added more to the national debt than most U.S. presidents combined: roughly $6 trillion in his first term in office (making the total debt nearly $16 trillion, and by White House projections alone, $21.3 trillion by the end of fiscal 2017, $25 trillion in 2021 and $25.9 trillion in 2022). 7) Obama has not only detrimentally increased the costs of entitlements but the dependency of citizens upon government subsidies, rather than empowering the people's autonomy, responsibility and freedom. 6) Obama demeans private enterprise and the entrepreneurial spirit -- the very heart of America -- and instead believes that "only" government is our savior.
Here are a few more unquestionable justifications for ousting him from office. 5) President Obama has left the U.S. in a weaker and more disrespected position in the global community. In 2009, President Obama began his presidency by humiliating our superpower nation and parading U.S. weaknesses and mistakes to the world on what many now call his "apology tour," in which he embarked on global travel with his apologetic Top 10 decries of America, as detailed by the Heritage Foundation. And is the U.S. better off among the nations? The Washington Times report that, according to a poll by even two left-leaning groups, "A majority of Americans say the United States is less respected in the world than two years ago and believe President Obama and other Democrats fall short of Republicans on the issue of national security." In February 2012, Gallup reported that "Americans continue to express much greater dissatisfaction than satisfaction with the United States' position in the world, and their views have improved little since hitting a low point in 2008." The Bipartisan Policy Center, including many of the original 9/11 Commission members, reported on national preparedness 10 years after those catastrophic terrorist attacks: "Our country is undoubtedly safer and more secure than it was a decade ago," but "we fail to achieve the security we could or should have." The report concluded that the federal government has failed to meet nine of the original 9/11 Commission's 41 recommendations. And what is President Obama's response? He plans to initiate more than $500 billion in automatic cuts to the defense budget over a decade, starting next January. And Bloomberg Businessweek recently reported that Obama's Democratic-controlled Senate voted to authorize another reduced Pentagon war and defense-related spending package. 4) Obama has broken or unfulfilled 324 campaign promises. In the over 500 promises Obama made during his campaign and presidency, even the pro-Obama PolitiFact website and their Obamameter has rated his scorecard: 184 promises kept, 60 compromised, 71 broken, 61 stalled, 130 in the works and two not yet rated. What that verbiage means is that even according to the political left, Obama has fulfilled 184 promises and left 324pledges broken and unfulfilled. In 2010, feeling a bit defensive and maybe insecure, Obama fired back in anger to those who were accusing him of selling out by breaking so many of his campaign promises. Wielding his verbose verbal sword, the president retorted: "Take a tally. Look at what I promised during the campaign. There's not a single thing that I've said that I would do that I have not either done or tried to do. And if I haven't gotten it done yet, I'm still trying to do it." "Not a single thing?" That's right -- it's 324 single things. 3) Through his presidency, President Obama is invoking and enabling a radically progressive secular state in the U.S. In 2010, before his run for the presidency, Newt Gingrich stated on the tour for his insightful book "To Save America" that the Obama regime is "the most radical administration in America's history. This is a secular socialist machine ... deeply opposed to God being in public life, deeply opposed to religious values defining how we think about things ... they clearly represent a value system that any reasonable person would call secular ... on a scale that is the opposite of the Founding Fathers." When New York churches can no longer meet in public school settings, a federal court orders a Rhode Island public school to remove a prayer banner that has been posted for over five decades (and it complies), the federal government mandates Catholic institutions to cover abortion-inducing drugs, contraceptives and sterilization (at no cost to the patient), the U.S. Air Force removes "God" from the motto of the Air Force Rapid Capabilities Office, the National Park Service omits the words "Laus Deo" (Latin, "Praise be to God") from a Washington Monument capstone replica, atheists continue to contest "under God" in our Pledge of Allegiance, town councils can't pray to start their meetings, evangelical pillars like Franklin Graham are subdued by gotcha-gangs in the mainstream media and cultural icons like football superstar Tim Tebow can't even bow in silent prayer without criticism, etc., you can be assured that religious liberty (and Christianity, in particular) is under assault by secular progressives across America. And leading the national charge is none other than our own president, Barack Obama. Is it any wonder Obama hasn't fought for a single Christian cause or crisis in culture? Is it any surprise that his ethical campaign promises have fallen flat? Remember when Obama promised during his 2008 campaign to "clean up both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue" with "the most sweeping ethics reform in history." He repeatedly declared that "an Obama administration is going to have the toughest ethics laws of any administration in history." Who are you kidding, Mr. President? (In Part 3 next week, I will complete my Top 10 reasons not to re-elect President Obama.)

" ISSUES " OR AMERICA??

Posted by Woody Pendleton

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER  WFZR/TV

Click here to find out more!

"Issues" or America?


There are some very serious issues at stake in this year's election -- so many that some people may not be able to see the forest for the trees. Individual issues are the trees, but the forest is the future of America as we have known it.
The America that has flourished for more than two centuries is being quietly but steadily dismantled by the Obama administration, during the process of dealing with particular issues.
For example, the merits or demerits of President Obama's recent executive order, suspending legal liability for young people who are here illegally, presumably as a result of being brought here as children by their parents, can be debated pro and con. But such a debate overlooks the much more fundamental undermining of the whole American system of Constitutional government.
The separation of powers into legislative, executive and judicial branches of government is at the heart of the Constitution of the United States -- and the Constitution is at the heart of freedom for Americans.
No President of the United States is authorized to repeal parts of legislation passed by Congress. He may veto the whole legislation, but then Congress can override his veto if they have enough votes. Nevertheless, every President takes an oath to faithfully execute the laws that have been passed and sustained -- not just the ones he happens to agree with.
If laws passed by the elected representatives of the people can be simply over-ruled unilaterally by whoever is in the White House, then we are no longer a free people, choosing what laws we want to live under.
When a President can ignore the plain language of duly passed laws, and substitute his own executive orders, then we no longer have "a government of laws, and not of men" but a President ruling by decree, like the dictator in some banana republic.
When we confine our debates to the merits or demerits of particular executive orders, we are tacitly accepting arbitrary rule. The Constitution of the United States cannot protect us unless we protect the Constitution. But, if we allow ourselves to get bogged down in the details of particular policies imposed by executive orders, and vote solely on that basis, then we have failed to protect the Constitution -- and ourselves.
Whatever the merits or demerits of the No Child Left Behind Act, it is the law until Congress either repeals it or amends it. But for Barack Obama to unilaterally waive whatever provisions he doesn't like in that law undermines the fundamental nature of American government.
President Obama has likewise unilaterally repealed the legal requirement that welfare recipients must work, by simply redefining "work" to include other things like going to classes on weight control. If we think the bipartisan welfare reform legislation from the Clinton administration should be repealed or amended, that is something for the legislative branch of government to consider.
There have been many wise warnings that freedom is seldom lost all at once. It is usually eroded away, bit by bit, until it is all gone. You may not notice a gradual erosion while it is going on, but you may eventually be shocked to discover one day that it is all gone, that we have been reduced from citizens to subjects, and the Constitution has become just a meaningless bunch of paper.
ObamaCare imposes huge costs on some institutions, while the President's arbitrary waivers exempt other institutions from having to pay those same costs. That is hardly the "equal protection of the laws," promised by the 14th Amendment.
John Stuart Mill explained the dangers in that kind of government long ago: "A government with all this mass of favours to give or to withhold, however free in name, wields a power of bribery scarcely surpassed by an avowed autocracy, rendering it master of the elections in almost any circumstances but those of rare and extraordinary public excitement."
If Obama gets reelected, he knows that he need no longer worry about what the voters think about anything he does. Never having to face them again, he can take his arbitrary rule by decree as far as he wants. He may be challenged in the courts but, if he gets just one more Supreme Court appointment, he can pick someone who will rubber stamp anything he does and give him a 5 to 4 majority.

Monday, August 20, 2012

JUST PLAIN FACT'S FOLKS ?

Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV


No Matter What By Dr. Walter Williams, LIBERTERIAN

Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV

YOUR VOTE'S ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN ANY ANY ELECTION  EVER....

DR. Walter E. Williams
Walter E. WilliamsDr. Walter E. Williams, PhD; is an American economist, commentator, and academic. He is the John M. Olin Distinguished Professor of Economics at George Mason University, as well as a syndicated columnist and author known for his libertarian views. Wikipedia
Born: June 30, 1936 (age 76), Philadelphia
Education: University of California, Los Angeles
Books: Liberty versus the Tyranny of Socialism, state against Blacks, More
 
If you love the USA you will read this all the way to the end!  If you want our country to remain a democracy you will be watching all of the news stations and not just the ones owned by the Democratic Party--NBC, CBS, & ABC...watch Fox for awhile and pay very close attention because the truth is out there if you just pay attention.
Maybe you have read some newspaper articles written by Dr. Williams---a conservative. libertarian economist who happens to be Black. He has taught at several Universities and is currently teaching at George Mason University .
 
No Matter What

By Dr. Walter  Williams

  Can  President Obama be defeated in 2012?  No. He  can't.  I am going on record as saying that  President Barak Obama will win a second term.
The media won't tell  you this because a good election campaign means hundreds of millions (or in Obama's case billions) of dollars to them in advertising.

But the truth is,  there simply are no conditions under which Barak Obama can be defeated in 2012.
The  quality of the Republican candidate doesn't matter.   Obama gets reelected.
Nine percent unemployment?   No problem.  Obama will win. 
Gas  prices moving toward five  dollars a gallon?  He still wins. 
The economy soars or goes into the gutter.  Obama wins. 
War in the Middle East ?  He wins a second term.

America's role as the leading Superpower disappears? Just what he wants!
The U.S. government rushes toward bankruptcy, the  dollar continues to sink on world markets and the price of daily goods and services soars due to inflation fueled by Obama's extraordinary deficit spending? No matter.  Obama wins handily.

Many will say, “You are crazy Williams.  Don't you understand how volatile politics can be when overall economic, government, and world  conditions are declining?”  Sure I do.

And that's why I know Obama will win.  The American people are notoriously ignorant of economics.  And economics is the key to why Obama should be defeated.

Even when Obama's  policies lead the nation to final ruin, the majority of the American people are going to believe the bait-and-switch tactics Obama and his supporters in the media will use  to explain why it isn't his fault.  After all, things were much worse than understood when he took  office.

Obama's reelection is really a very, very simple math problem.  Consider the  following:

1) Blacks will vote for Obama blindly.  Period.  Doesn't matter what he does.  It's a race thing.  He's one of  us.
That’s why the media destroyed Herman Cain so handily. Too big a threat.

    
 2)  College educated women will vote for Obama.  Though they will be offended by this, they swoon at his oratory.   It's really not more complex than that.

 3)  Liberals will vote for Obama.  He is their great hope.

 4)  Democrats will vote for Obama.  He is the leader of their  party and his coat tails will carry them to victory nationwide.

 5)  Hispanics will vote for Obama.  He is the path to citizenship for those who are here illegally and Hispanic leaders recognize the political clout they carry in the Democratic  Party.

 6) Union  members will vote overwhelmingly for Obama. He is their  key to money and power in business, state and local politics.


7) Big  Business will support Obama.  They already have.  He has almost $1 Billion dollars in his reelection purse gained largely from his connections with Big Business and  is gaining more every day.  Big Business loves Obama because he gives them access to taxpayer money so long as they support his social and political agenda.

 8) The  media love him.  They may attack the people who work for him, but they love him.  After all, to not love him would be racist.

 9) Most  other minorities and special interest groups will vote for him.  Oddly, the overwhelming majority of Jews and Muslims will support him because they won't vote Republican.  American Indians will support him.  Homosexuals tend to vote Democratic.  And lastly…;

10) Approximately half of independents will vote for Obama.  And he doesn't need  anywhere near that number because he has all of the groups previously mentioned.  The President will win an  overwhelming victory in 2012. 

--  Dr.  Walter Williams

IN ADDITION TO THE VOTING BLOCKS HE MENTIONS, THERE IS ANOTHER HUGE GROUP:  NEARLY ONE-HALF OF ALL ADULTS DO NOT PAY ANY TAXES.  MOST OF THEM RECEIVE ENTITLEMENT MONEY FROM THE GOVERNMENT. THESE PEOPLE WILL NOT DO ANYTHING TO STOP THE FLOW OF TAXPAYER MONEY TO THEMSELVES.
 
It's  believed the United States is now somewhere between the "complacency and apathy" phase of   democracy, with some forty  percent of the nation's population already having reached the  "governmental dependency" phase. 

If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal  invaders called illegal's - and they vote - then we can say goodbye to the  USA in fewer than five years. 

If you are in favor of this, then by all means, delete this message.

If you are not, then pass this along to help everyone realize just how much  is at stake, knowing that apathy is the greatest  danger to our freedom.
WE CAN PROVE DR WILLIAMS WRONG
Please think this through. And then vote. The future of our Republic is literally at stake. WHICH CATAGORY ARE YOU IN ABOVE... VOTE   VOTE  VOTE  VOTE  VOTE..........




HIT THE ROAD BARRACK ?

Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV


At the beginning of 2012, Newsweek asked “Why are Obama’s critics so dumb?”
This was par for the course, as with the rest of the mainstream media, they had joined in the hagiography of Obama when he was dutifully crowned with divinity:
I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above the world, he’s sort of God.”
Oh how the mighty are fallen!
Sunday morning conservatives were knocked out of their chairs with the just-released Newsweek with the magazine’s cover of a photo of Barack Obama, suit jacket swung over his shoulder, and looking arrogantly into the camera. The caption: “Hit the Road, Barack. Why We Need a New President.”
Inside is a 3000-word article by economist Niall Ferguson, excoriating Barack Hussein Obama for gutting the economy and putting us on a road to financial ruin. In slick magazine fashion, there are charts of the economy’s unemployment rate, sluggish growth, and skyrocketing debt.
It also delves into the fact that Obama’s lack of experience in either business or management has equated into a man that is clearly over his head; in which Niall Ferguson quotes Ron Suskind’s book, Confidence Men, of Larry Summers and Peter Orzag (Obama’s economic team) in conversation:
You know, Peter, we’re really home alone…I mean it. We’re home alone. There’s no adult in charge.
A home where the children are left without adult supervision is problematic. But a country, the sole superpower in the world, without adult supervision is a recipe for disaster, as Niall Ferguson shows with Obama’s disastrous foreign policy leading to the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood in the Middle East and the country’s path to financial ruin.
Is this the beginning of the end of the mainstream media’s love affair with Barack Hussein Obama? Will they send him packing? Will they tell him to “Hit the Road, Barack. And don’t you come back no more, no more…”
Let us hope so.

AMERICIA HALFTIME TWO BY CLINT EASTWOOD

Posted by BH
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV


Whoa: Newsweek’s Latest Cover May Surprise You

Posted by HS
FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV

Now, we all know Newsweek isn’t shy when it comes to controversial cover photos and headline stories. Indeed, on more than a few occasions, Newsweek Editor Tina Brown has had to defend the magazine’s less-than-flattering photos and oftentimes incendiary articles.
Everyone’s also familiar with the publication’s left-leaning tendencies, right? Right.
Well, that’s precisely why Newsweek’s latest cover may surprise you:
Whoa: Newsweeks Latest Cover May Surprise You
“Hit the Road, Barack”
Whoa. Well, that‘s certainly a departure from the type of headline stories and cover photos we’ve grown accustomed to
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...