HELLO DOC SMITH - "JUST THE FACT'S FOLKS, JUST THE FACTS ?

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV

Wednesday, August 23, 2012

CBO Report Warns Of "Significant Recession" WELLCOME  DR. BILL SMITH ARRA NEWS SERVICE

DR. SMITH (NEW FZMC WRITER)

Democrat Thelma and Louise Economics

. . . If Democrats Pursue "Thelma and Louise Economics" And Take Our Country Over Fiscal Cliff!

The Washington Post reports today, "The nation would be plunged into a significant recession during the first half of next year if Congress fails to avert nearly $500 billion in tax hikes and spending cuts set to hit in January, congressional budget analysts said Wednesday. The massive round of New Year’s belt-tightening — known as the fiscal cliff or Taxmageddon — would disrupt recent economic progress, push the unemployment rate back up to 9.1 percent by the end of 2013 and produce economic conditions 'that will probably be considered a recession,’ the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said."

The Hill adds, "In its most dire warning yet about the fiscal cliff, the CBO said the economy would contract by 0.5 percent in calendar year 2013 if the George W. Bush-era tax rates expireand automatic spending cuts are implemented. Unemployment also would rise from 8.2 percent in 2012 to 9.1 percent next year, the office estimates. . . .  CBO says the fiscal cliff will be worse than it had previously projected and that the ‘underlying strength’ of the economy is weaker.

CLICK BELOW TO READ MORE

ALERT ALERT ALERT

Posted by Woody Pendleton

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER  WFZR/TV

Anyone out there have any additional Info on this HR 4646 stuff? I checked it on snopes and it is correct.

BILL - HR 4646 Surprise, Surprise, Surprise !!! ON JANUARY 1, 2013, THE US GOVERNMENT WILL BE REQUIRING EVERYONE TO HAVE DIRECT DEPOSIT FOR SS CHECKS. WONDER WHY?

Subject: HR 4646
Be sure to read entire explanation. Watch for this AFTER November elections; remember this BEFORE you VOTE, in case you think Obama is looking out for your best interest. Ask your congressperson to vote NO. FORWARD THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW!

It's true! Check it out yourself ~ HR 4646.
President Obama's finance team is recommending a one percent (1%) transaction fee (TAX). Obama's plan is to sneak it in after the November elections to keep it under the radar.

This is a 1% tax on all transactions at any financial institution - banks, credit unions, savings and loans, etc. Any deposit you make, or even a transfer within your own bank from one account to another, will have a 1% tax charged.

If your paycheck or your Social Security or whatever is direct deposit, it will get a 1% tax charged for the transaction.

If your paycheck is $1000, then you will pay Obama $10 just for the privilege of depositing your paycheck in your bank. Even if you hand carry your paycheck or any check in to your bank for a deposit, 1% tax will be charged.
You receive a $5,000 stock dividend from your broker, Obama takes $50 just to allow you to deposit that check in the bank.
If you take $1,000 cash to deposit at your bank, 1% tax will be charged.

Mind you, this is from the man who promised that, if you make under $250,000 per year, you will not see one penny of new tax.
Keep your eyes and ears open, you will be amazed at what you learn about this guy's under-the-table moves to increase the number of ways you are taxed.

Oh, and by the way, if you receive a refund from the IRS next year and you have it direct deposited or you walk in to deposit that check, you guessed it. You will pay a 1% charge of that money just for putting it in your bank.

Remember, any money, cash, check or whatever, no matter where it came from, you will pay a 1% fee if you put it in the bank.
Some will say, oh well, it's just 1%. Are you kidding me? It's a 1% tax increase across the board. Remember, once the tax is there, they can also raise it at will. And if anyone protests, they will just say, "Oh,that's not really a tax, it's a user fee"!
Think this is no big deal? Go back and look at the transactions you made from last year's banking statements. Then add the total of all those transactions and deduct 1%. Still think it's no big deal?
The following is copied from Snopes:

1. snopes.com<http://snopes.com/> : Debt Free America Act ... Is the U.S.government proposing a 1% tax on debit card usage and/or banking transactions? ...It is true. The bill is HR - 4646 introduced by US Rep Peter deFazio D-Oregon and US Senator Tom Harkin D-Iowa. Their plan is to sneak it in after the... ...moved beyond proposing studies and submitted the Debt Free America Act
(H.R. 4646 ), a bill calling for the implementation of a scheme to pay down the... ....[2010] by Rep. Chaka Fattah (D-Pa.). His "Debt Free America Act" (H.R.
4646 ) would impose a 1 percent "transaction tax" on every financial transaction.. Wed, 02 Nov 201111:27:37 GMThttp://www.snopes.com/politics/taxes/debtfree.asp<http://www.snopes.com/politics/taxes/debtfree.asp>

BIBLE BELT NUDE-FEST PLANS CHARGING AHEAD BY JACK MINOR

Posted by Woody Pendleton

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR/TV

Bible belt nude-fest plans charging forward

Officials allowing topless event despite local protests

 Miss Rachel Riot Raleigh NC

Careful, baby, there’s a Riot in town, and that’s Miss Rachel Riot to you. North Carolina born and bred, she’s a honey-sweet gal by day, a fire-hot vixen by night. She’s your good-girl, bad-dream bombshell, baby, a red-lipped firecracker with moves to make your mama cry. As burlesque coordinator for WInston-Salem's Heavy Rebel Weekender in 2009 and 2010, she booked over 40 dancers for one event. She pioneered burlesque in Raleigh, founding the area's first burlesque troupe, the Demon Dolls, in 2008. She currently runs her own booking and events company: Riot Here Riot Now and produces sev

Published: 35 mins ago

by Jack Minor

Jack Minor is a former Marine who served under President Reagan. He has written hundreds of articles and has been interviewed about his work on multiple television and radio outlets. He is also a former pastor and has been acknowledged for his research ability in several books.More ↓Less ↑

Officials in Asheville, N.C., are allowing plans for a nude-fest to go forward in the Bible belt city this weekend, even though local residents have been fighting the event’s activities as a violation of state law.

Last year, WND reported on how the organization Go Topless conducted a public rally in Asheville that featured topless women engaged in sexually suggestive positions in the presence of children. Despite such public displays being prohibited by state statute, authorities did nothing to prevent the displays.

The pro-nudity organization, sponsored by an off-shoot religious group founded by a man, has announced that it intends to repeat the events of last year in the city on Aug. 26.
Despite being in the Bible belt, Ashville is considered to be one of the most liberal cities in America and has been called the “east-coast San Francisco” and the “Paris of the South.” The local Chamber of Commerce slogan is, “Asheville – Any way you like it.”
In an attempt to prevent a repeat of last year’s displays in the presence of children, a local group, GoBrainless.org, headed by former Asheville vice-mayor and clinical psychologist Carl Mumpower along with former Republican County Party Chair Chad Nesbitt, has been fighting to stop the event.
The two passed a resolution along to the city council supporting an ordinance that would prohibit organized topless events on public property.
The resolution notes that while North Carolina laws permit women’s breasts to be exposed in public in limited circumstances such as breast-feeding an infant, it draws the line at sexually suggestive displays.
The current applicable law states that anyone over 18 “who shall willfully expose the private parts of his or her person in any public place in the presence of any other person less than 16 years of age for the purpose of arousing or gratifying sexual desire shall be guilty of a Class H felony.”
“We have fought this every step of the way including asking the county commissioners, mayor, city council members and even the local school board to support the resolution and ordinance, but we were either told ‘no’ or faced resistance from all of them,” Mumford said.
“The proposed ordinance would allow women to appear topless in public, which is allowed under existing law, but would not allow them to stage any type of topless rally,” Mumpower said. “We find that a lot of cities in North Carolina have these types of ordinances.”
Mumpower said they have also challenged the permitting process for the group.

“We challenged the city for not charging Go Topless for parking, traffic management and security arrangements despite the city ordinance clearly saying they should pay for these services.”
 

Mumpower and others produced photographic evidence that the law was in fact violated at last year’s event, including pictures showing children as young as 3 or 4 years old watching the nude-fest. Some evidence also suggested that underage girls were among the exhibitionists that stripped nude to the waist.
CLICK BELOW TO SEE MORE AND LOT'S OF PICTURES

LETS RUN THROUGH THE RAIN

Posted by The Circuit Rider

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER  WFZR/TV

NEED WASHING?

A little girl had been shopping with her Mom in

Wal*Mart. She must have been 6 years old, this beautiful red haired, freckle faced image of innocence.

It was pouring outside. The kind of rain that gushes over the top of

rain gutters, so much in a hurry to hit the earth it has no time to flow

down the spout... We all stood there, under the awning, just inside the door of the WalMart.

We waited, some patiently, others irritated because nature messed up

their hurried day.

I am always mesmerized by rainfall. I got lost in the sound and

sight of the heavens washing away the dirt and dust of the world. Memories of running, splashing so carefree as a child came pouring in as a welcome reprieve from the worries of my day.

Her little voice was so sweet as it broke the hypnotic trance we

were all caught in, 'Mom let's run through the rain,'

She said. 'What?' Mom asked.

'Let's run through the rain!' She repeated.

'No, honey. We'll wait until it slows down a bit,' Mom replied.

This young child waited a minute and repeated: 'Mom, let's run

through the rain...'

'We'll get soaked if we do,' Mom said.

'No, we won't, Mom.. That's not what you said this morning,' the

young girl said as she tugged at her Mom's arm.

'This morning? When did I say we could run through the rain and not

get wet?'

'Don't you remember? When you were talking to Daddy about his

cancer, you said, ' If God can get us through this, He can get us through

anything! ' '

The entire crowd stopped dead silent.. I swear you couldn't hear

anything but the rain.. We all stood silently. No one left. Mom paused and

thought for a moment about what she would say.

Now some would laugh it off and scold her for being silly. Some

might even ignore what was said. But this was a moment of affirmation in a young child's life. A time when innocent trust can be nurtured so that it

will bloom into faith.

'Honey, you are absolutely right. Let's run through the rain. If GOD

let's us get wet, well maybe we just need washing,' Mom said.

Then off they ran. We all stood watching, smiling and laughing as

they darted past the cars and yes, through the puddles. They got soaked.

They were followed by a few who screamed and laughed like children

all the way to their cars. And yes, I did. I ran. I got wet. I needed washing.

Circumstances or people can take away your material possessions,

they can take away your money, and they can take away your health. But no one can ever take away your precious memories...So, don't forget to make time and take the opportunities to make memories everyday.

To everything there is a season and a time to every purpose under

heaven.

I HOPE YOU STILL TAKE THE TIME TO RUN THROUGH THE RAIN.

They say it takes a minute to find a special person, an hour to

appreciate them, a day to love them, but then an entire life to forget them.

Send this to the people you'll never forget and remember to also

send it to the person who sent it to you.. It's a short message to let them

know that you'll never forget them.

If you don't send it to anyone, it means you're in a hurry.

Take the time to live!!!

Keep in touch with your friends, you never know when you'll need

each other - and don't forget to run in the rain!

ANOTHER VETERAN RAIDED AND FIREARMS CONFISCATED

Posted by Woody Pendleton

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER  WFZR/TV

Another Veteran Raided & His Firearms Confiscated – Must Appear Before Judge For Mental Evaluation/Alert

Thursday, August 23, 2012 9:35

---

From: Steve Quayle

Date: August 22, 2012 10:44:39 PM MDT

To: Darrell

Subject: ANOTHER VETERAN RAIDED AND HIS FIREARMS CONFISCATED–MUST APPEAR BEFORE JUDGE FOR MENTAL EVALUATION/ALERT

Steve, please call me at your earliest convenience. I have some breaking information regarding an Army combat veteran (and Christian) in Ohio who was just raided this evening for the same reasons Brandon Raub was arrested. There were no criminal charges, no suspicions of criminal activity charge, and he was not arrested but all of his firearms were confiscated and he has been given a notice to appear before a judge. He is a Purple Heart recipient, no criminal background, no issues with prior VA psych evals. I just got off the phone with him and would like to pass along all of the information (and there is quite a bit) so others can be made aware of what is happening.

At 18:40 EST on 22/Aug/2012, I received a call from a very close friend of mine in west central Ohio, claiming he had just had all firearms confiscated. At first I thought he was joking, as we often do, so I made some sarcastic remarks, but he continued explaining what he had gone through. I stopped him and asked if he was being serious or just pulling my leg. He assured me he was being serious. I’ll provide you with the details as best I can- he conveyed all of this information to me during our second phone conversation after I had returned home at approximately 20:30 EST.

A search warrant was executed by Miami County Ohio Sheriff’s deputies at approximately 1730 EST at the home of my friend, at the exact time he was returning home from work. The minute he got in the back door from the garage, there was a knock at the front door, and a cruiser pulled up directly behind his truck (which he could see from inside the house.) There were seven Sheriff’s deputies in total, and the warrant they produced gave them the ability to find, secure, and obtain any deadly weapons. The reason stated on the warrant was for the “safety of the defendant (my friend,) and the general public.” The order was signed by a local judge around noon on 21/Aug/2012.

My friend was able to read off parts of the warrant to me, and I transcribed them as best I could:

“…Defendant shall not possess, use, carry, or obtain any deadly weapon and shall turn over all deadly weapons in defendant’s possession to the law enforcement agency that serves this order. Any law enforcement agency is authorized to take possession of deadly weapons pursuant to this paragraph and hold them in protective custody until further court order…”

NCIC[06]

“…if defendant is in possession of deadly weapons, defendant is guilty of violating Ohio revised code 2923.13(5). Whoever violates this section is guilty of having weapons while under disability, a felony of the third degree…”

Here’s the revised code the warrant referred to:

“2923.13 Having weapons while under disability.

(5) The person is under adjudication of mental incompetence, has been adjudicated as a mental defective, has been committed to a mental institution, has been found by a court to be a mentally ill person subject to hospitalization by court order, or is an involuntary patient other than one who is a patient only for purposes of observation. As used in this division, “mentally ill person subject to hospitalization by court order” and “patient” have the same meanings as in section 5122.01 of the Revised Code.”

The deputies confiscated one .45 caliber pistol, one .380 caliber pistol, a 12 gauge shotgun, two AR-15 rifles, and a stripped AR-15 lower receiver. My friend was able to see what the deputy/detective wrote on the evidence list regarding the firearm descriptions. The shotgun was listed as a “hunting shotgun,” the pistols were listed by their caliber, and the two ARs were listed as “tactical assault rifles.” What was even more strange is the detective then listed all the accessories on the ARs, including red dot sights, laser sights, foregrips, 30 round magazines, etc. It should also be stated one of those ARs was his fiancée’s, and the deputies claimed it was shared ownership and therefore had to be confiscated. A hunting knife was also confiscated. No magazines or ammunition were confiscated.

In addition to the confiscations, the deputies attempted to question my friend and his fiancée. I didn’t get specific details on the questions asked. They refused to answer any questions without an attorney present. When my friend stated, “This is bullshit,” one of the deputy detectives remarked, “Look man, I’m just doing my job.”

The icing on the police-state-cake was a notice to appear before a judge for “an evaluation of mental competency.” The judge will decide if he has to see a state psych. Keep in mind, too, if during the time between now and the judge’s decision, another search warrant could be executed. If they find any “deadly weapons” in his house, he’ll be charged with a FELONY and arrested. Ohio revised code is extremely vague on the definition of a “deadly weapon,” maybe intentionally so. Like Brandon Raub, there were no criminal charges, no suspicions of criminal activity. Unlike Brandon Raub’s case, however, the state of Ohio won’t allow law enforcement to involuntarily commit a person unless there is an immediate need to do so, such as holding a gun to their head or another person’s head. Ohio law requires a judge to make the decision on having a person evaluated for mental illness. Of course, you’re then evaluated by a state-appointed psych, and that isn’t exactly going to play out in your favor. Had my friend lived in Virginia, he may be sitting in a metal hospital (prison) right now. Or worse.

Steve- this man is an Army combat veteran, a Purple Heart recipient, a Christian working for a Christian company, his father is a pastor and a police officer, he has no criminal record aside from a speeding ticket many years ago, and no psychiatric problems, no PTSD, etc. He’s not on any medication. He and his fiancée have three children, and their wedding is in 30 days. Heck, he even quit smoking earlier this year until this assault on his freedom happened. He is an upstanding person with strong values and a good heart. This should not be happening, and yet it is. We know why he was raided, but we don’t know why he was raided, if you know what I mean. There is no indication of anybody filing a complaint against him, and no indication of who asked for the judge’s signature or why.

My friend does have a lawyer (after shelling out $2500…Thank God he and his fiancée have good jobs and live responsibly so they could have money saved up for an emergency. Of course, that money was earmarked for prep items like food, clothing for their kids, etc.) The lawyer will be filing motions tomorrow. I told him to keep on his lawyer and to be extremely aggressive with discovery- find out how far up these orders came from, because I can assure you this wasn’t a local operation. He has only lived in the county for five weeks!

When I hung up with my friend at around 21:30, I told him to be safe and that we’d be praying for him.

 by WP:  THE GOVERNMENT IS USING "HIT AND RUN " TACTICS TO GET THIS TAKEOVER STARTED. BY HITTING IN WIDELY SEPARATED LOCATIONS IT DOES NOT LOOK LIKE AN ATTACK ON ALL AMERICAN PATRIOTS.   BUT IT IS.

Related Stories

• Nazca Lines
• Creepy Illuminati Clock Counting Down Sept 9th, 2012
• Look! Up in the sky! It’s a bird! It’s a plane! It’s… your FUTURE!
• David Icke – DNA, Royals And Iluminati History (Video)
• Electronic Voice Phenomenon
• Ancient Builders Created Monumental Structures That Altered Sound And Mind
• The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms
• Psychic Surgery
• Temp Agencies
• Trilateral Commission
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  
•  

Posted by Woody Pendleton

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER  WFZR/TV

Feds admit Obamacare mandate 'a burden'

Yet another lawsuit targets White House requirement to pay for abortificients

Published: 2 hours ago

by Bob UnruhEmail | Archive

Bob Unruh joined WND in 2006 after spending nearly three decades writing on a wide range of issues for several Upper Midwest newspapers and the Associated Press. Sports, tornadoes, homicidal survivalists, and legislative battles all fell within his bailiwick. His scenic photography has been used commercially, and he sometimes plays in a church worship band.More ↓Less ↑

Attorneys fighting Obamacare’s contraception mandate on behalf of a Missouri company say a court should issue an injunction preventing its application because the government already has determined that the mandate is a “burden” on religious rights.
“Indeed, defendant [Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen] Sebelius herself has publicly acknowledged that the mandate raises religious concerns,” said a new court filing from the the American Center for Law and Justice.

“In a press release issued on Jan. 20, 2012, announcing the finalization of the mandate and the temporary safe harbor period for nonprofit entities that object to contraceptive services, defendant Sebelius opined that the temporary reprieve ‘strikes the appropriate balance between respecting religious freedom and increasing access to important preventative services.’
“Subsequently, in a press release issued on July 31, 2012, Sebelius stated that ‘the Obama administration will continue to work with all employers to give them the flexibility and resources they need to implement the health care law in a way that protects women’s health while making common-sense accommodations for values like religious liberty.’”
The legal brief, filed in U.S. District court for the Eastern District of Missouri, continued. “The defendants cannot make a straight-faced argument in this litigation that the mandate does not impose a substantial burden on the exercise of religious beliefs. Indeed, the defendants have postponed for a year the application of regulations that purportedly advance a compelling governmental interest solely because of the burden the defendants themselves recognize that these regulation impose on the exercise of religion.
“Clearly, nothing but a burden of a ‘substantial’ nature could justify such a postponement,” the brief said.
The injunction request was filed on behalf of Frank R. O’Brien and O’Brien Industrial Holdings LLC, a company based in St. Louis. O’Brien is chairman of the company that explores, mines and processes raw materials, exporting to 40 nations.
Like others, the company faces a Jan. 1, 2013, deadline to have a new health care policy in place for 87 employees, or face possible fines and penalties in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.
A federal judge in Denver recently granted such a motion for a Denver company, and in a Michigan dispute, the government itself agreed not to enforce its requirements until a court case there is finished.
“We’re asking the court to intervene right now because in a very short time our client, Frank O’Brien, will be faced with a choice no government has the right to impose on him: abandon his business, or abandon his beliefs,” said Francis J. Manion, senior counsel of the ACLJ, who is representing O’Brien.

“The HHS mandate is an unprecedented attack on the religious liberty of millions of Americans. It’s a clear violation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the First Amendment. We are asking the court to intervene and enjoin the government from continuing to suppress the liberty of Frank O’Brien and his company to run their business in a manner consistent with their religious beliefs.”

The motion seeks a judge’s decision now, to avoid what could be crippling ramifications for the company that could develop as its court case over the White House requirement that companies provide health coverage for contraceptives, including abortion pills and the like progresses.
A multitude of Christian organizations around the company have launched legal action, but as in the case of O’Brien, the process unlikely will come to a resolution before the White House starts enforcing the mandate. In fact, for most, the enforcement period already has begun.
“The same government that wants to coerce O’Brien into violating his beliefs is, at the same, exempting millions of other employers from complying with the mandate. This is not only unfair but unconstitutional as well,” Manion said.
“The government has no right to decide which religious believers are ‘religious’ enough to qualify for an exemption from the HHS mandate. Our constitution and laws do not give HHS Secretary Sebelius or any other official the power to start handing out ‘Seals of Government-Approved Godliness’,” he said.
O’Brien, a Catholic, says his religious beliefs provide the framework for the operation of his businesses. The company website states the mission “is to make our labor a pleasing offering to the Lord while enriching our families and society.”

OIH’s statement of the company’s values begins with the following: “Integrity. Our conduct is guided by the Golden Rule and the Ten Commandments. We will not discriminate based on anyone’s personal belief system.”

The ACLJ argument is simply that O’Brien should be allowed to run his business in a manner consistent with his religious values.
The original lawsuit was filed in March, but without a decision seen anytime soon, the law firm is requesting an injunction to maintain the present status while arguments are made.
The Michigan case is being pursued by the Thomas More Law Center on behalf of Ann Arbor, Mich.-based Weingartz Supply Co. and Legatus, the nation’s largest organization of top Catholic business leaders.
In the most recent filing there, attorneys for Weingartz said the Obama administration either doesn’t care about or doesn’t like Catholics so much it is forcing them to choose between their beliefs or the federal law,.
“The defendants offer numerous secular and even religious exemptions to the HHS mandate, but fail to offer the same respect to the Catholic beliefs of the plaintiffs – showing that defendants either care so little about those professing Catholic beliefs that they will not be bothered to address their concerns or showing that defendants are patently discriminating against and disrespecting those holding Catholic beliefs,” said the brief filed this week in support of a preliminary injunction that would protect the plaintiffs while the case moves through the courts,” the filing said.
In Denver, a case is making the same challenge. WND reported earlier when U.S. District Judge John J. Kane of Colorado granted a Christian-owned company a temporary injunction blocking Obamacare’s mandated coverage of sterilization, contraception and abortion-inducing drugs from being applied to the private business.
That mandate took effect nationwide Aug. 1, but Hercules Industries of Denver, a company that manufactures air conditioning products, filed suit against the government in April, arguing Obama’s mandate conflicts with the Christian faith of the business’ owners.

The government fought back, claiming Hercules is not a faith-based organization. It threatened the company, which employs 265 people, with millions of dollars in fines if it refused to comply.

In a radio interview with WND’s Greg Corombos, Hercules Vice President Andy Newland said, “We realized we had a choice nobody should really have to face. That’s the choice to do business according to our faith, which we think is really important, or pay onerous crippling fines. And nobody, we believe, should be forced to make that decision.”
There already have been several dozen lawsuits filed across the nation to stop the contraception mandate from applying to various businesses. Earlier, Wheaton College announced it had joined the Catholic University of America in filing suit before District of Columbia federal court. Other organizations filing similar lawsuits include the University of Notre Dame, the Archdiocese of New York and the Catholic University of America.
And leaders of of a multitude of religious-advocacy groups are warning of the Obamacare contraception mandate consequences for business owners of faith:

• Larry Cirignano, president of Faithful Catholic Citizens: “Give up your religion or go bankrupt. This is not a mandate; it is an ultimatum. Buy insurance and kill babies or go bankrupt fighting us. Not all of us can afford lawyers to fight this ‘mandate.’”

• Matt Smith, president of Catholic Advocate: “Aug. 1 will be remembered as the day our most cherished liberty was thrown in a government dumpster and hauled away. A day when family owned small businesses were forced to abandon their religious beliefs to provide products and services for free. And if they don’t, they will be taxed and fined at a time when job creators are struggling with enough costs and bureaucratic red-tape at every level of government just to stay in business. While the courts have provided a reprieve for one family business in Colorado, the government will never be able to repair the broken conscience of thousands of others until this mandate is removed.”

• Brent Bozell, chairman of ForAmerica: “August 1st is a day that will live in infamy for the First Amendment and the fundamental freedoms and rights we as a people have enjoyed since the founding of our nation. The HHS mandate imposed on the American people is the beginning of the end of freedom as America has known it and loved it. August 1st marks the day when many family owned and operated businesses lose their rights to exercise their faith in their daily lives. The government has told them – either comply with this mandate in violation of your faith and do what we tell you, or you will pay crippling faith fines to the federal government. With the stroke of a pen, the Obama administration has shredded the First Amendment and the Constitution right before our eyes.”

• Grace-Marie Turner, president of the Galen Institute: “The Obama administration’s assault on religious liberty is taking root … Failure to comply with the mandate will result in penalties that could cost business millions of dollars. The administration clearly did not reach a much-vaunted ‘accommodation’ with business owners who strongly oppose the mandate and believe it is a clear violation of their constitutional protection of religious liberty. The HHS mandate forces business owners to choose between following their religious beliefs or obedience to the federal government. The Obama administration clearly believes the government is supreme and that individuals and businesses must bow to its dictates or suffer severe consequences. We know that Obamacare is wrong for America. The HHS anti-conscience mandate is clear evidence of why the law violates the most fundamental principles upon which our country is founded.”

• Gary Marx, executive director of the Faith & Freedom Coalition: “Confidence in the system and hope for religious liberty was mildly restored when a federal district judge issued a temporary injunction blocking Barack Obama’s health-care mandate from compelling a business to provide insurance coverage of sterilization, contraception, and abortion-inducing drugs. This is certainly a victory, but the fact that it only applies to one company means the federal government is still going to force millions of Americans to choose between having health insurance or their conscience and faith. With an administration intent on suppressing religious liberty, we can expect a historic turnout of voters of faith show up in November.”

• Penny Nance, president and CEO of Concerned Women for America: “The only solution that has been provided to the majority of Americans is to stand up and fight for their religious rights by refusing to comply or battling in court. … We must remember the wise words of Thomas Jefferson, ‘All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.’ To force religious groups to deny their deeply held convictions is not called balance; it is called tyranny.”

• Jeanne Monahan, director of the Family Research Council’s Center for Human Dignity: “Today as a result of this initial implementation of the HHS mandate, the relationship between the separation of church and state is critically changed. Americans can no longer follow their consciences or religious dictates on issues as critical as abortion-inducing drugs. Organizations such as Wheaton College, or businesses such as Weingartz Supply of Ann Arbor, Mich.,will be forced to violate their consciences. On this sad day Americans have no ‘choice’ in this matter.”

• David Stevens, MD and CEO of the Christian Medical Association: “What will stop this administration, with its radical pro-abortion agenda, from further undermining conscience rights and pursuing policies that effectively force out of medicine physicians with life-honoring convictions? Who will keep government panels from effectively denying physicians and patients choice about what are the most effective and appropriate medicines, surgeries and treatments? We call on Congress to turn back this law’s assault on our freedoms and restore American values and constitutional principles in health care.”

• Paul E. Rondeau, executive director of American Life League: “History tragically teaches us that if our government can abolish one constitutional right, then all constitutional rights are put in jeopardy. This path sets a dangerous and foolish precedent that First Amendments rights such as freedom of speech, association, freedom of the press and the rights to assemble and petition the government may be just as easily curtailed in the future. We call on all citizens to tell their elected representatives that this erosion of rights must not stand.”

• Kristin Hawkins, executive director of Students for Life of America: “Today marks the beginning of the end of religious and conscience rights in America. As an employer, I am forced to make a false choice between providing a vital service to my employees and violating my conscience and values. The abortion-pill mandate is an egregious attack upon my rights, as well as the rights of all people of values and faith in America.”
•  by WP:  I find it odd that while our Constitution sets definitive limits to the powers held and to be exercised by the Federal Government we, The People, continue to allow them to usurp and use powers they are not allowed to use.   It is readily apparent to every semi-intelligent person that the Federal Government has neither the Authority or legal right to continue this attack on American Freedom.  JUST SAY NO.  WE WILL NO LONGER ACCEPT THIS TYRANNY AND VIOLATION OF LAW.  CUT THE MONEY OFF AND DECLARE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT A ROGUE AGENCY THAT NO LONGER REPRESENTS THE PEOPLE OR NATION OF AMERICA.  WE HAVE THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT AND AUTHORITY TO DO SO.
•  
•  
•  
•  

ICE AGENTS SUE OBAMA FOR BAD LAW

Posted by WP

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER  WFZRTV

Immigration Agents File Suit Over Obama 'Amnesty' Program

Thursday, 23 Aug 2012 02:21 PM

By Newsmax Wires

More ways to share...

Ten employees at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement are suing the Obama administration to block a new program to let many young illegal immigrants avoid deportation and get a work permit.

The suit also claims that directives from the Department of Homeland Security and its secretary, Janet Napolitano, force agents to break the law by not arresting certain illegal immigrants.
Kris Kobach, the Kansas secretary of state and an immigration adviser to presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney, is representing the employees. The lawsuit was filed Thursday in federal court in Dallas.

The 22-page filing, which names Napolitano and ICE Director John Morton as defendants, contends that the Obama administration's Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals plan violates federal law.

The Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Napolitano has previously defended the plan.

The suit says the mandate "unconstitutionally usurps and encroaches upon the legislative powers of Congress."

Kobach equated the move to give thousands of illegal immigrants a reprieve to the failed Fast and Furious gun-walking operation.

"In both instances, the Obama administration ordered federal law enforcement agents to break the law, to ignore the laws that they're supposed to enforce, and, in the case of the ICE agents, to actually break federal laws that say you're supposed to deport certain people," he told Fox News."And in each case, the Obama administration seems to be doing so for political reasons."

Kobach is a co-author of the Arizona illegal immigration law.

Napolitano has in the past defended the mandate.

"These policies promote the efficient use of our resources ensuring that we do not divert them away from the removal of convicted criminals by pursuing the removal of young people who came to this country as children and who have called no other country home," she said.

A BLACK MAN'S POINT OF VIEW BY LLOYD MARCUS

Posted by Woody Pendleton

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER  WFZR/TV

"A Black man's point of view. By Lloyd Marcus   As millions of my fellow Americans, I am outraged, devastated and extremely angry by the democrat's unbelievable arrogance and disdain for We The People. Despite our screaming "no" from the rooftops, they forced Obamacare down our throats. Please forgive me for using the following crude saying, but it is very appropriate to describe what has happened. "Don't urinate on me and tell me it's raining." Democrats say their mission is to give all Americans health care. The democrats are lying. Signing Obamacare into law against our will and the Constitution is tyranny and step one of their hideous goal of having as many Americans as possible dependent on government, thus controlling our lives and fulfilling Obama's promise to fundamentally transform America . I keep asking myself. How did our government move so far from the normal procedures of getting things done? Could a white president have so successfully pulled off shredding the Constitution to further his agenda? I think not. Ironically, proving America is completely the opposite of the evil racist country they relentlessly accuse her of being, progressives used America 's goodness, guilt and sense of fair play against her. In their quest to destroy America as we know it, progressives borrowed a brilliant scheme from Greek mythology. They offered America a modern day Trojan Horse, a beautifully crafted golden shiny new black man as a presidential candidate. Democrat Joe Biden lauded Obama as the first clean and articulate African American candidate. Democrat Harry Reid said Obama only uses a black dialect when he wants. White America relished the opportunity to vote for a black man naively believing they would never suffer the pain of being called racist again. Black Americans viewed casting their vote for Obama as the ultimate Affirmative Action for America 's sins of the past. Then there were the entitlement loser voters who said, "I'm votin' for the black dude who promises to take from those rich SOBs and give to me." Just as the deceived Trojans dragged the beautifully crafted Trojan Horse into Troy as a symbol of their victory, deceived Americans embraced the progressive's young, handsome, articulate and so called moderate black presidential candidate as a symbol of their liberation from accusation of being a racist nation. Also like the Trojan Horse, Obama was filled with the enemy hiding inside. Sunday, March 21, 2010, a secret door opened in Obama, the shiny golden black man. A raging army of democrats charged out. Without mercy, they began their vicious bloody slaughter of every value, freedom and institution we Americans hold dear; launching the end of America as we know it. Wielding swords of votes reeking with the putrid odor of back door deals, the democrats landed a severe death blow to America and individual rights by passing Obamacare. The mainstream liberal media has been relentlessly badgering the Tea Party movement with accusations of racism. Because I am a black tea party patriot, I am bombarded with interviewers asking me the same veiled question. "Why are you siding with these white racists against America 's first African American president?" I defend my fellow patriots who are white stating, These patriots do not give a hoot about Obama's skin color. They simply love their country and oppose his radical agenda. Obama's race is not an issue." Recently, I have come to believe that perhaps I am wrong about Obama's race not being an issue. In reality, Obama's presidency has everything to do with racism, but not from the Tea Party movement. Progressives and Obama have exploited his race from the rookie senator's virtually unchallenged presidential campaign to his unprecedented bullying of America into Obamacare. Obama's race trumped all normal media scrutiny of him as a presidential candidate and most recently even the Constitution of the United States . Obamacare forces all Americans to purchase health care which is clearly unconstitutional. No white president could get away with boldly and arrogantly thwarting the will of the American people and ignoring laws. President Clinton tried universal health care. Bush tried social security reform. The American people said "No" to both presidents' proposals and it was the end of it. So how can Obama get away with giving the American people "the finger?" The answer.... He is black. The mainstream liberal media continues to portray all who oppose Obama in any way as racist. Despite a list of failed policies, overreaches into the private sector, violations of the Constitution and planned destructive legislation too numerous to mention in this article, many Americans are still fearful of criticizing our first black president. Incredible. My fellow Americans, you must not continue to allow yourselves to be "played" and intimidated by Obama's race or the historical context of his presidency. If we are to save America , the greatest nation on the planet, Obama must be defeated. SHARE THIS WITH AMERICA ! ! ! !"

VIDEO I FIGHT & I FI WANTED AMERICA TO FAIL

Posted by BH

FROM ARRA NEWS SERVICE - BILL SMITH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV

Free Market America officially releases its new video --- We Fight --- tomorrow morning. But, the ARRA News Service is joining in the efforts to early promote this video and thus are doing this early release so our readers, subscribers and followers on various social media sites can see this video right away.  I am sure after you have seen it, you will share it.

The prior video by Free Market America --- If I Wanted America to Fail -(SEE FIRST VIDEO BELOW)-- caused such a stir that it was banned by Twitter. The ARRA News Service joined with Americans For Limited Government and others in releasing the first video in April, 2012 which presently has 2.5 million views on YouTube even though it was banned. If you haven't viewed it -- view it!

Now, watch We Fight -(SECOND VIDEO BELOW) it will move you and then join us and get out there, share the video and join the Fight for freedom and our American way of life!

WATCH "THE NEW WE FIGHT" VIDEO

Liberal bias in academia

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV

STORM CLOUDS GATHER FOR DNC CONVENTION BY J B WILLIAMS

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV

By J.B. Williams
August 23, 2012
NewsWithViews.com

As Vice President Joe Biden heads to Tampa in a no-class attempt to crash the GOP Convention in opposition to Romney and Ryan, the real protest is gearing up against Obama and Biden at the upcoming DNC Convention in Charlotte, NC.

White House Insider asks a valid question – “That Biden visit to Tampa got my wheels spinning. What the hell are they up to? How far is Biden willing to go to remain relevant?” – and the answer was nothing short of shocking!

“I’m giving you and your readers a heads up here. False flag. The real deal. They will try and control it but make it look uncontrolled. Dangerous. Make it reflect poorly on the Republicans and their supporters. A dangerous and desperate operation here. Even a dimwit like Biden has to know how dangerous.”

Desperate people do desperate things… White House Insider may be on to something here. The DNC is getting very desperate and here’s why.

The Occupy Wall Street movement, hatched by the Obama White House in response to the Tea Party, is turning its anger on Obama and Biden, planning to stage their next major march at the DNC Convention. According to Occupy organizer John Penley, - “Occupy the Military Industrial Complex will very much target President Barack Obama.”

“We're targeting Obama's out of control military spending,” he told Whispers. “It's the key to so many problems in the U.S. That, and the drone strikes on American citizens -- And the NDAA. People feel so upset with Obama.”

This might explain why DNC wicked witch of the West Nancy Pelosi is calling for democrats to “stay home” and not attend the DNC Convention. When is the last time you heard a party leader tell their party faithful to stay home from their party convention?

Obama surpassed Jimmy Carter early in his term, as the worst individual to ever occupy the White House. Obama’s list of major faux pas’s is second to none in the world wide history of political flops. The Oval Office is one of the loneliest places on earth when things aren’t going well. But nobody has ever lost friends faster than Obama.

Many 2008 Obama supporters voted for Obama in opposition to the “Bush’s wars” in Iraq and Afghanistan, and what they deem to be cruel and unusual punishment for jihadists at Club Gitmo.

Our troops are still in Iraq and Afghanistan, with KIAs skyrocketing in Afghanistan under Obama and Sec. Clinton has launched new military and agency offensives in Lebanon, Egypt, Pakistan, Syria and Yemen under the guise of some so-called “Arab Spring” march to democracy that left the Middle East under the boot of the Muslim Brotherhood. No wonder Code Pink will be protesting the DNC Convention with Occupiers.

CLICK BELOW TO READ MORE

Washington Times' Jeff Kuhner Blasts Obama's Hypocrisy; Obama's Sealed Records

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV

JEFF KULNER FROM THE WASHINGTON TIMES FILL IN

FOR MICHAL SAVAGE ON RADIO SHOW.. LISTEN TO THIS

Jeff Kuhner: "Obama to give us WW3 if re-elected" - AMAZING Middle East Analysis!

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV

Some of the clearest analysis of the dynamics unfolding in the Middle East you will ever hear. Listen to Jeff Kuhner explain with stunning clarity what we should expect in the coming six months. Listen to this audio now!

Catch all the news you need to know at our blog...

ATF official tied to 'Furious' sting on leave, earning second paycheck, lawmakers allege.

Posted by BH

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER WFZR FZTV 

ADMINISTRATION CONTINUES TO SCREW THE TAXPAYER

~~~

Republican lawmakers allege in a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder that a key figure in the failed Fast and Furious anti-gunrunning operation has been allowed to earn a second paycheck while still receiving his government salary.
The new allegations come as Holder reviews the long-awaited internal report detailing what happened in -- and who is to blame for -- Fast and Furious, in which the U.S. knowingly let some 2,500 weapons slip into the hands of the Sinaloa Cartel in Mexico, failing to track the guns as planned. 
Sources tell Fox News the Office of Inspector General delivered the report to the Department of Justice on Tuesday. Under existing protocols, the department has a month to respond to the report's findings, after which, the inspector general typically releases the document to the public.
Meanwhile, Sen. Charles Grassley and Rep. Darrel Issa, the two Republicans leading the charge against Holder on Capitol Hill, claimed in a letter Tuesday that ATF Assistant Deputy Director Bill McMahon has received a leave of absence allowing him to pull down two salaries. Taxpayers pay him six figures to do his ATF job while he's also reportedly pulling down in excess of $100,000 as the full-time director of global security and investigations for JP Morgan in the Philippines.
The arrangement allows McMahon to retire in December with a full government pension.
Records show McMahon approved Fast and Furious and supervised it as director of western operations. In July 2011, before a Congressional Committee, he apologized for his mistakes.
"As the ATF senior executive of the West Region, I share responsibility for mistakes that were made in the Fast & Furious investigation," McMahon said. "The advantage of hindsight, a thorough review of the case, clearly points me to things that I would have done differently."  

Issa, Grassley and some agents inside the ATF are livid over the special treatment given McMahon. They say personnel codes 

CLICK BELOW TO READ MORE