Saturday, January 12, 2013

VIDEO'S: MONEY THINGS 101

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER
SOME VIDEO'S ON MONEY









 





VIDEO: A LOST GENERATION - A PALINDROME

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER
A PALINDROME ?

LOST GENERATION (VIDEO) MUST WATCH

Very clever and interesting!

A palindrome reads the same backwards as forward.

This video reads the exact opposite backwards as forward

Not only does it read the opposite, the meaning is the exact opposite.
This is only a 1 minute 44 second video and it is brilliant.   Make sure you read as well as listen... ...forward and backward.

This video was submitted in a contest by a 20-year old.   The contest was titled "u @ 50" by  AARP and the video won second place.   When they showed it, everyone in the room was awe-struck and broke into spontaneous applause.  So simple and yet so brilliant.
 
 
Take a minute and watch it ~ Has sound too ~ 

 

Abandoning the Constitution By Bill Wilson

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER


 by Bill Wilson: For much of its 236-year history, the federal government has accumulated new power by whittling away at the essential protections afforded to American citizens under the U.S. Constitution. In recent years this wholesale abandonment of our founding principles has rapidly gained momentum — accompanied by a skyrocketing government debt that now eclipses our nation’s annual gross domestic product. “There’s a clear cause and effect here that is as neat and predictable as a law of physics,” former U.S. President Ronald Reagan said in his farewell address to the nation in 1989. “As government expands, liberty contracts.” No truer words have ever been spoken — yet in the last half-decade this nation has witnessed a stunning (and astronomically expensive) escalation of neo-fascism in America. And no political party, court nor ideological movement has proven able to blunt its building momentum. During the debate over “Obamacare” — a massive, budget-busting entitlement funded with money our country doesn’t have — former New Jersey Judge Andrew Napolitano pointedly challenged then-U.S. Majority Whip Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.) regarding the constitutionality of this socialized medicine monstrosity. Clyburn’s response? “There’s nothing in the Constitution that says the federal government has anything to do with most of the stuff we do,” he said. Therein lies the root of our problem. The overt contempt for our Constitution displayed by Clyburn and other elected officials is precisely why government has become so unruly, so fiscally unsustainable and so dangerous. Tragically for our Republic, the U.S. Supreme Court empowered this view in its Obamacare ruling — inventing a new taxing authority to accommodate this abomination rather than following the law and protecting our liberties. Decades of legislative overreach, executive power grabs and judicial activism have steadily diminished our freedom and free markets — a disintegration which may have already reached the point of terminal velocity. Our nation now prints unlimited piles of money with no congressional oversight. It taps our phones and emails with no probable cause. It compels us to purchase products or face stiff fines. And now it wants to strip us of our right to keep and bear arms. Yet even these egregious incursions are not enough for some members of the professional left. In a recent column published by The New York Times, Georgetown University law professor Louis Michael Seidman argues for the wholesale abandonment of the U.S. Constitution, decrying “all its archaic, idiosyncratic and downright evil provisions.” “We have to give up on the claim that we are a self-governing people who can settle our disagreements through mature and tolerant debate,” Seidman writes, “we ought to try extricating ourselves from constitutional bondage so that we can give real freedom a chance.” “Real freedom?” From “constitutional bondage?” These assertions are demonstrably illogical. Arguing one’s freedom would improve by allowing government to tighten its grip is like arguing one’s breathing would improve by allowing an Anaconda to do the same. Yet we are supposed to accept the ongoing suffocation of our freedom and free markets in the name of expediting a socialist agenda that is bankrupting our country? And give up more of our money — and our guns — to the new overlords? Like so many ivory tower leftists whose anti-American views hold sway in Washington, D.C., Seidman sees the Constitution as something to be shaken off — like a bad cold. Of course what he fails to recognize is that his prescription for constitutional emasculation would kill the very source of the federal government’s power and legitimacy. Absent the Constitution, there is no government — only anarchy. One cannot destroy our founding document without destroying the nation it created (or what’s left of it). And make no mistake — once freed from any real or implied constraint, government becomes the tyranny our Founding Fathers (and most present-day Americans) fear. In other words, it ceases to be America.

 

MISSOURI STATE REPUBLICAN IN FAVOR OF OBAMA GUN BAN'S ?

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER
 MISSOURI VOTER PAY ATTENTION
 


Dear READERS FROM MISSOURI,

Did you hear that Republican State Representative Jay Barnes opposes real pro-gun reform in Missouri?

More on that in a minute...

Unfortunately, sometimes folks assume that just because a politician is a Republican, they are a solid supporter of the Second Amendment.

I hope you don’t make that mistake.

You and I both know politicians will say and do practically anything to get your vote in election season, but during legislative season they fold like a house of cards as soon as the going gets tough.

And in this challenging time for our gun rights, that’s precisely what’s happening.

All across the country supposedly pro-gun NRA “A” rated politicians are falling like dominoes to the Obama gun control agenda.

That’s why when I heard about “A” rated Republican State Representative Jay Barnes’ latest waiver, I knew I had to tell you right away.

You see, Rep. Barnes is the vice chair of the all-powerful House Elementary and Secondary Education committee.

Earlier this week he came out and slammed Republican Rep. Mike Kelley’s proposal to legalize concealed carry for teachers and school administrators while on the job.1

This vital piece of legislation -- HB-70 -- would provide teachers with the legal protection and right to defend not just themselves, but their students in the event of an attack.

It very well may come before Rep. Barnes’ committee, giving him the opportunity to kill it.

Under current law, Missouri public schools are classified as gun-free “criminal safezones,” assuring criminal’s intent on causing destruction their victims will be unarmed and unable to defend themselves.

But Representative Jay Barnes opposes that proposal.

Worse, Representative Jay Barnes also indicated he may support new “mental health treatment” -- or in other words -- allowing a government bureaucrat to dictate whether or not you are fit and worthy of your Second Amendment rights
.

All this begs the question...

What else will aspiring RINO Representative Barnes cave in on?

•   Would he support a so called “assault weapons” ban and limiting the capacity of your magazines?
•   Would he vote to increase government mandated training, taxation and registration just to own or carry a firearm?
Make no mistake, when a politician starts to waiver on your gun rights, it’s a virtual certainty they are hiding more anti-gun views.

That’s why I need you to do two things, right now.
1.  Give Republican State Representative Jay Barnes an earful at (573) 751-2412. Demand he apologize for his anti-gun positions and tell him to vocally oppose any and all efforts to chip away at your gun rights.
2.  Call your State Representative at (573) 751-3659 or click here to find out who represents you. Tell them to vocally support HB-70 and oppose each and every effort aimed at imposing more gun control this session.
There's no time to waste.
Please act today!
For Freedom,

Friday, January 11, 2013

PURE PURSUIT EDITORIAL: WAS CLINTON GRAVELY INJURED IN C-12 HURON CRASH-LANDING?

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER



CAVEAT: I can not vouch for veracity or authenticity of the information posted on some of the web sources cited below as this story is heavily laden with conjecture. But somewhere in between, is the truth.
Nena Wiley
President
Pure Pursuit Intelligence Network

PURE PURSUIT EDITORIAL: WAS CLINTON GRAVELY INJURED IN C-12 HURON CRASH-LANDING?
Over the past weeks, I received many queries about a Russian (GRU) Foreign Military Intelligence report stating Sec. Hillary Clinton was gravely injured, and Navy Seal Commander Job W. Price was killed, in a C-12 Huron helicopter crash-landing early in December 2012.  
JOHN W. PRICE
HILLARY CLINTON

            












The story was first made public on 30 Dec 2012 by an infamous "intelligence" writer code-named "Sorcha Faal" who claims Clinton was on a secret mission to meet Mahmoud Ahmadinejad about Iran's nuclear program (see http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1641.htm). 
What is known is that a C-12 Huron did crash-land about a month ago near the Iraq/Iran border. Moreover, this incident happened in the vicinity of an Iranian airport named Ajwaz where Ahmadinejad was known to have just made an "unscheduled" arrival!
In researching the story as thoroughly as possible, I've found that the timelines, concerning main media reports, of Clinton's "(1) stomach virus/flu, (2) dehydration, (3) fall with a subsequent 
concussion, (4) hospitalization and (5) blood clot," all coincide with Faal's original posting as do the entire cancellation of Clinton's schedule of public events during this time.
And, questions remain:  
-Was there a U.S. mission involving a C-12 Huron with Clinton and Price on board? Was that the chopper that was reported to crash-land and if so, what caused it to go down? Why was the public not made aware of this incident? And, why is the State Department denying it? 
-Head concussions do not cause leg or lung clots so why was Clinton's clot reported as being located between her brain and skull in the vicinity of the right ear? Was the story made-up and if so, why? 
-If SEAL Commander Price was on board and killed or died of his injuries while on duty, why is his death being perpetuated as a suicide regarding "non-combat injuries"? 
Please review the following headlines of selected / related stories listed in chronological order, and read those that may interest you. Like me, you may be at your computer for hours. 
DECEMBER 2012:
11th: Stomach virus forces Hillary Clinton to cancel on Syrian summit
15th: Hillary Clinton faints, falls, suffers concussion; official cites stomach virusHillary Clinton faints, falls, suffers concussion; official cites stomach virus | Fox News

19th: Panel on Benghazi attack heaps blame on State, citing 'systemic failures' (+video)
21st: Obama nominates John Kerry to be secretary of state
23rd: Navy SEAL Commander Dead in Afghanistan in Suspected Suicide
24th: Questions Abound Over SEAL Team 4 Commander's Apparent Suicide
30th: Clinton Injured, US Navy Seal Killed in Secret Mission To Iran http://www.eutimes.net/2012/12/clinton-injured-us-navy-seal-killed-in-secret-us-mission-to-iran/
30th: Iran: US Plane Leaves After Emergency Landing
31st: ABC News Report on Emergency Landing of a US Plane in Iran
Spin Machine Alert: Hillary's "Concussion" Story Not Vindicated By Blood Clot Episode
Hillary Clinton in hospital amid speculation of plane accident in Iranhttp://www.debka.com/article/22645/Hillary-Clinton-in-hospital-amid-speculation-of-plane-accident-in-Iran
Clinton Injured, US Navy Seal Killed In Secret US Mission To Iran?
State Department Denies Hillary Clinton Injured in Plane Crash
JANUARY 2013:
5th: Hillary Clinton's Plane Crashes, Death Warning Issued to Obama Administration
7th: Hillary Clinton Returns To Work After Blood Clot Hospitalization 
9th: Clinton Expected to Testify on Benghazi attack in two Weeks 

This list is now closed.
PURE PURSUIT INTELLIGENCE NETWORK is a service to Military and Air Defense Communities with the purpose of offering relevant and timely information on (open source) defense, aviation, emergency, law enforcement and terrorism issues. This post may be reprinted or sent to other individuals, organizations and lists for non-commercial purposes. To unsubscribe please contact

GUN CRITICS CHALLENGED TO GIVE UP THEIR ARMED SECURITY AND WEAPONS

FREE ZONE MEDIA CENTER

Gun critics challenged to be without their guns

'We think they should demonstrate their belief in their own programs'


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/gun-critics-challenged-to-be-without-their-guns/#CUiOBYLZsP5BjbeC.99
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...