Saturday, February 1, 2014

History Lesson on Your Social Security Card

WH

 Dick Kantenberger
Gifted Education Writer

Examiner.com
                                                     
Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (& some older ones) didn't know this.
It's easy to check out, if you don't believe it. Be sure and show it to your family
and friends. They need a little history lesson on what's what and it doesn't matter
whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are Facts.


Social Security Cards up until the 1980s expressly stated the number and card were not to be used for identification purposes.
Since nearly everyone in the
United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the

message, NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION, was removed.


An old Social Security card with the "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION" message.
Our Social Security

Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social
Security (FICA) Program. He promised:

1.) That participation in the Program would be
Completely voluntary,

No longer Voluntary



2.) That the participants would only have to pay
1% of the first $1,400 of their annual
Incomes into the Program
,

Now 7.65%

on the first $90,000


3.) That the money the participants elected to put
into the Program would be deductible from
their income for tax purposes each year,
 

No longer tax deductible



4.) That the money the participants put into the
independent 'Trust Fund'
rather than into the
general operating fund, and therefore, would
only be used to fund the Social Security
Retirement Program, and no other
Government program, and,

Under Johnson the money was moved to
The General Fund and Spent



5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed
as income.


Under Clinton & Gore
Up to 85% of your Social Security can be Taxed


Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are
now receiving a Social Security check every month --

and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of
the money we
paid to the Federal government to 'put
away' --
you may be interested in the following:

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ----

Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the
independent 'Trust Fund' and put it into the
general fund so that Congress could spend it?

A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically
controlled House and Senate.


------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --

Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax
deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?

A: The Democratic Party.


------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -----

Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social
Security annuities?

A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the
'tie-breaking' deciding vote
as President of the
Senate, while he was Vice President of the US


------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

Q: Which Political Party decided to start
giving annuity payments to immigrants?


AND MY FAVORITE:

A: That's right!

Jimmy Carter
and the Democratic Party.

Immigrants moved into this country,
and at age 65,
began to receive Social Security payments! The
Democratic Party gave these payments to them,
even though they never paid a dime into it!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Then, after violating the original contract (FICA),
the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!

And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it!

If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of
awareness will be planted and maybe changes will
evolve.

Feds Cannot Require A State To Carry Out Federal Acts

WH

Feds Cannot Require A State To Carry Out Federal Acts
PHOTOS.COM
With a number of States now considering bills to thwart the implementation of Obamacare or legislation to turn off resources like water and power to National Security Agency facilities around the country, a number of political commentators are weighing in.
For example, Gail Kerr over at The Tennessean wrote about State Senator Mae Beavers’ bill to block Obamacare: “The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2012 that President Barack Obama’s Affordable Care Act is constitutional. State laws cannot trump federal laws.”
Jacob Gershman at the Wall Street Journal’s Law Blog suggested the same before having to retract shortly after.
The knee-jerk reaction of many “experts” is to claim that “Federal laws trump State laws when they conflict” whenever they write about a bill designed to take action against a Federal act.
Many of them don’t have a clue what they’re talking about.

The Legislation

The bills in question are not coming into “conflict” with Federal laws at all; they seek to direct State agents and employees to stop participating in the enforcement of various Federal acts.
In Washington State, for example, House Bill 2272 would ban all public employees from participating in any actions that aid the NSA in its mass surveillance programs. While this would immediately ban the use of warrantless data in court proceedings in the States, it has even more significant impact in a State like Washington, because there is a physical NSA facility there that relies on third parties, such as State agencies, to provide electricity or water to stay operational.
A similar bill has been introduced in Tennessee, where the NSA’s encryption-breaking facility at Oak Ridge resides. And another is expected to be introduced soon in Utah, where the new NSA data center requires as much as 1.7 million gallons of water every day to cool the supercomputers. That water is being supplied by the state of Utah.
In a rallying cry that sounds surprisingly simple, supporters know that no water equals no NSA data center.
Back in Tennessee, Senate Bill 1888 states, in part, “No state entity shall establish or administer, or assist in establishing or administering, any specific regulatory scheme to operate the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, or any subsequent federal amendment to such act, in this state.”
Similar bills have been introduced in Georgia, Indiana, Oklahoma and elsewhere.
Analyzing such state bills, FOX News Senior Judicial Analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano considered them an effective strategy against the Affordable Care Act. “If enough states do this, it will gut Obamacare because the federal government doesn’t have the resources… to go into each of the states if they start refusing,” he said.
In Florida yesterday, a bill was introduced in the State House to ban the entire State from enforcing or assisting in the enforcement of Federal gun control measures — all of them — past, present or future.
Napolitano last year urged States to do just this, suggesting that the Federal government simply does not have the manpower to carry out these measures. Such a bill in a single State, he said, would make “federal gun laws nearly impossible to enforce.”

The Legal Doctrine

Is this legal?
In short, absolutely. The State laws do not come into conflict with Federal laws in any legal sense.
All of these proposals are based on the widely accepted legal principle known as the “anti-commandeering doctrine.”
This means the Federal government cannot require a State to carry out Federal acts. The Federal government can pass a law and try to enforce it, but your State isn’t required to help them.
The Supreme Court has repeatedly affirmed anti-commandeering, relevant court cases being:
  • 1842 Prigg: The court held that States weren’t required to enforce Federal slavery laws.
  • 1992 New York: The court held that Congress couldn’t require States to enact specified waste disposal regulations.
  • 1997 Printz: The court held that “the Federal Government may not compel the States to enact or administer a federal regulatory program.”
  • 2012 Sebelius: The court held that the Federal government could not require the States to expand Medicaid, even under the threat of losing Federal funding.
Constitutional scholar Randy Barnett told National Journal recently: “State governments are free to refrain from cooperating with federal authorities if they so choose. In general, states cannot attack federal operations, but that’s not the same as refusing to help.”
These noncompliance bills do not run afoul of the Supremacy Clause, even if one were to claim that all Federal laws are supreme, instead of just those made “in pursuance” of the delegated powers in the Constitution.
Claiming they do is like claiming people who are boycotting a business are actually setting fire to it instead of just choosing not to shop there.
It’s just as absurd.  Saying no to participation is far different than a physical standoff, both legally and practically.

Can It Work?

Simply put, the Federal government cannot force State or local governments to do the bidding of the Federal government. Such a tactic is an extremely effective way to stop a Federal government busting at the seams.
Even the National Governors Association admitted the same recently when it sent out a press release noting that “States are partners with the federal government in implementing most federal programs.”
That means States can create impediments to enforcing and implementing “most federal programs.”
James Madison, the “Father of the Constitution,” advised this very tactic. Madison supplied the blueprint for resisting Federal power in Federalist No. 46. He outlined several steps that States can take to effectively stop “an unwarrantable measure” or “even a warrantable measure” of the Federal government. Anticipating the anti-commandeering doctrine, Madison called for “refusal to cooperate with officers of the Union” as a method of resistance.
This same process was used effectively by Northern Abolitionists in resistance to the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850. And in Colorado, the whole world is able to see firsthand just how effective the States can be when they refuse to go along with Federal “laws.”
We should follow their courageous path against every other unConstitutional Federal act as well.
Moving forward, burning up the phone lines to your State House and asking legislators to introduce bills to refuse to participate in Federal acts like Obamacare, the NSA or gun control, can turn the tide toward liberty.
Many, if not most, Federal programs rely heavily on this kind of cooperation. Therefore, enacting anti-commandeering laws on various issues around the country can have the effect of a practical nullification — rendering Federal acts “nearly impossible to enforce.”
–Michael Boldin

FOOD AND YOUR HEALTH AND FUTURE ?

WH
A Disgusting Thought…..
made-in-china-american-flag1This may be a little lengthy, but it sure is enlightening.  It’s awful.  For your own and your family’s health sake, PLEASE read to the end…  Sometimes the bargains we think we are getting can really kill us.  It isn’t worth it…  I have also seen photos and film on this very subject.  They are so bad I got sick and could not watch them through.
This was shown on 60 minutes a few weeks ago.  Disgusting!
Starkist Tuna is now owned by Korea, and is in big conflict with the U.S. concerning quality, safety, and records, which Korea refuses to produce.
I read several articles on Google about this, and even one that was defending the eating of tilapia said to avoid the fish that came from China.  Also, I had just returned home from buying Albertson’s 4-day special of 4 bags of frozen tilapia for the price of one.  Sure enough, on the top of the bags, it read “farm raised”, and on the bottom in small print it said, “China”.

Read all the way down.
I recently saw a Food inspector on TV.  He said he had lived overseas and he had seen the filthy conditions their foods are raised and processed in.
 
It is enough to make you throw up.  Some foreign workers have to wear masks as they work in these places, because the food is so rotten and filthy, it makes them want to throw up.  Many of their Fish on Fish Farms are fed Raw sewage daily.  He said he has seen so much filth throughout their food growing and processing that he would “never” eat any of it.  They raise this filth, put some food coloring and some flavorings on it, then they ship it to the USA & Canada for YOU to consume and feed to YOUR families.  They have no Food & Safety Inspectors.  They ship it to you to buy and poison your families and friends.
 
Imported food we eat and the junk we buy:
 
Green Giant frozen vegetables are from China, and so are most of Europe’s Best.
Arctic Gardens are Okay.  So is Birdseye.
 
Never buy the grocery store garlic unless it is clearly marked from USA or Canada.  The other stuff is grown in people poop (even worse than chicken poop).  China is the largest producer of garlic in the world.  The U.S. is next.
 
Buy only local honey; much honey is shipped in huge containers from China and re-packed here.
 
Cold-FX is grown and packed in China and is full of fecal bacteria.  Doesn’t work anyway; big scam.  If the country of origin is not clearly marked beware.
If produce, ask an employee.
 
Watch out for packages which state “prepared for”, “packed by” or “imported by”.  I don’t understand the lack of mandatory labeling, especially the produce.
The country of origin should be clearly shown on the item in the store.  I go to the local farmers’ markets in season and keep a wary eye open the rest of the year.
 
Please read this very carefully, and read to the very bottom.  It’s important for all of us.
 
How is it possible to ship food from China cheaper than having it produced in the U.S. or Canada?
 
FOR EXAMPLE THE “OUR FAMILY” BRAND OF MANDARIN ORANGES SAYS RIGHT ON THE CAN ‘FROM CHINA’.  SO, FOR A FEW MORE CENTS, BUY THE LIBERTY BRAND.
GOLD BRAND OR THE DOLE IS FROM CALIFORNIA.
Beware, Costco sells canned peaches and pears in a plastic jar that come from China.
 
ALL “HIGH LINER” AND MOST OTHER FROZEN FISH PRODUCTS COME FROM CHINA OR INDONESIA.
THE PACKAGE MAY SAY “PACIFIC SALMON” ON THE FRONT, BUT LOOK FOR THE SMALL PRINT.  MOST OF THESE PRODUCTS COME FROM FISH FARMS IN THE ORIENT WHERE THERE ARE NO REGULATIONS ON WHAT IS FED TO THESE FISH.
 
Recently The Montreal Gazette had an article by the Canadian Government on how Chinese feed the fish: They suspend chicken wire crates over the fish ponds, and the fish feed on chicken s–t.

If you search the internet about what the Chinese feed their fish, you’ll be alarmed; e.g., growth hormones, expired anti-biotic from humans.  Never buy any type of fish or shellfish that comes from these countries: Vietnam, China, Philippines.
 
Check this out personally.  I did.  Steinfeld’s Pickles are made in India — just as bad!
Another example is in canned mushrooms.  No-Name brand came from Indonesia .
 
Also check those little fruit cups.  They used to be made in Canada in the Niagara region until about 2 years ago.  They are now packaged in China!
 
While the Chinese export inferior and even toxic products, dangerous toys, and goods to be sold in North American markets, the media wrings its hands!
 
Yet, 70% of North Americans believe that the trading privileges afforded to the Chinese should be suspended!
 
Well, duh!  Why do you need the government to suspend trading privileges?
 
SIMPLY DO IT YOURSELF, CANADA AND THE U.S.!
 
Simply look on the bottom of every product you buy, and if it says ‘Made in China’ or ‘PRC’ (and that now includes Hong Kong), simply choose another product, or none at all.  You will be amazed at how dependent you are on Chinese products, and you will be equally amazed at what you can do without.
 
THINK ABOUT THIS:
 

If 200 million North Americans refuse to buy just $20 each of Chinese goods, that’s a billion dollar trade imbalance resolved in our favor — fast!  The downside?  Some Canadian/American businesses will feel a temporary pinch from having foreign stockpiles of inventory.
 
Just one month of trading losses will hit the Chinese for 8% of their North American exports.
Then they will at least have to ask themselves if the benefits of their arrogance and lawlessness are worth it.
 
START NOW and don’t stop.

WEEKEND ,MOVIE "THE SUNSET LIMITED" WITH TOMMY LEE JONES AND SWMUEL L JACKSON

WH

Friday, January 31, 2014

Nancy Pelosi Says She Doesn't Know Why Obamacare Site Failed

WH



COUNTRY BOY GOES TO TOWN ?

WH


Steve Stockman: “I’m Considering Filing Articles of Impeachment” – It’s Time to Put Up or Shut Up

WH

Tea Party PatriotsSteve Stockman is potentially the most indignant member of congress, which is exactly why I like him. He obviously doesn't play the game of "good ole' boys" that so many do. Though this man goes largely unnoticed in the public eye, I have tried many times to give him a boost because I think we need more like him.
He was one of a small handful of Republicans to vote against John Boehner for Speaker. This is the man who exposed the Obama Administration for utilizing spambots in their anti-gun campaign. He proudly and openly passed out (third party) copies of articles of impeachment in the House. Stockman is one of the few who seem to understand the origination clause and threatened blue slips more than once to stop Senate bills. He is even one of the only members of our entire legislature who has shown any interest at all in the Obama Birth Certificate forgery.
At the same time, although I like Steve Stockman and hope he can defeat John Cornyn in the 2014 senate race, he is starting to develop a reputation of "all bark and no bite." I suppose that reputation fits nearly every one of our elected servants so I mean nothing personal by that, but Steve Stockman is the one man I feel that can be something truly special.
Stockman, never to be accused of being shy, did a little self-promotion on Facebook yesterday:

The story mentions Stockman walking out of the State of the Union address and again mentions the "I" word. The Washington Times article reports:
Mr. Stockman said Mr. Obama has repeatedly broken his oath of office to uphold the Constitution, and in response, he's seriously mulling legal action.

"I'm considering filing Articles of Impeachment against Barack Obama," he wrote on his website, as reported by The Blaze.

This isn't the first time the Texas congressman has broached the issue.

"Last year, I said I would consider impeachment as a last resort to stop Obama's abuse of power," he said, The Blaze reported. "And quite frankly, we're running out of options."
Indeed this is not the first time that he has broached the issue. I called his office last year to give my support.
At this point I don't care about the strategy of Impeachment. I honestly don't even care if it works because it probably won't. At one point the argument was that it would be successful in the House and the Senate would fail to convict. Honestly I am not even sure it would pass the House. All you have to do is look at how the House has been voting lately to see that the lower chamber is full or RINOs.
What a lot of Americans want is simply to see one man (or woman) who has the courage to try to do what is right. That's it. Just do your job. If a person tries and fails we can live with that because we understand how the deck is stacked.
What we are tired of is men and women who get our hopes up and do not follow through. So it's time to put up or shut up for Stockman in my opinion.
We are waiting to hang our hopes on men of honor and not men who are all talk and no action. Those are the types of men who built this country and those are the types it will take to rebuild it.
It's time to put Steve Stockman's feet to the fire. He may be the only man with the guts to do it so if you want to see Articles of Impeachment officially introduced then please call one of his offices (or all four) at:

Washington, DC Office
326 Cannon House Office Building
Independence Avenue
Washington, DC 20515
Phone: 202-225-1555
Fax: 202-226-0396
Hours: M-F 9-5:30pm

Cleveland, TX Office
907 E. Houston St.
Cleveland City Hall
Cleveland, TX 77327
Hours: Thursdays 8:30-4:30pm and by appointment.
Phone: 409-883-8028

Orange, TX Office
420 Green Avenue
Orange, TX 77630
Phone: 409-883-8075
Fax: 409-886-9918
Hours: M-F 8-4:00pm

Pasadena, TX Office
8060 Spencer Highway
San Jacinto College, Building 1, Room 108
Pasadena, TX 77505
Phone: 281-478-2799

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/01/steve-stockman-im-considering-filing-articles-impeachment-time-put-shut/#wBf8dWWADLx5fh8k.99

Running Scared: Senate Dems Don't Want Obama Anywhere Near Them

RB

ATROCITY ? LET ME EXPLAIN IT FOR YOU ?

WH

There is a human tragedy smoldering in America’s inner cities. Twelve million poor children, mainly black and Hispanic, are trapped in failing government schools that are teaching them nothing. As a result, they will never get a chance at a middle-class life. Virtually every school board and every administration in inner city districts is controlled by Democrats, and has been for over fifty years. Everything that is wrong with inner city schools that policy can fix, Democrats are responsible for.


How bad is the inner-city school crisis? Almost half of black students in public schools, and almost half of Hispanic students drop out before graduation and fail to earn a diploma.[1] The dropout rates are especially high in urban areas with large minority populations, including such academic disaster zones as Washington, DC (57%), Trenton (59%), Camden (61.4%), Baltimore (65.4%), Cleveland (65.9%), and Detroit (75.1%).[2] As a result of high dropout rates, black and Hispanic students in these urban centers are denied the American dream and condemned to spend their lives in grinding poverty instead.
A significant percentage of black and Hispanic students who do manage to graduate are unable to read their own diplomas.[3] Overall, black high-school graduates are four academic years behind their white counterparts in achievement levels.[4] As political science professor Lydia G. Segal summed up the sad state of affairs in her book Battling Corruption in America’s Public Schools: “It is in cities such as New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, Detroit, and Philadelphia where the largest numbers of children cannot read, write, and compute at acceptable levels and where racial gaps between whites and blacks and Latinos are widest. It is in large cities that minority boys in particular, trapped in poor schools, have the greatest chance of flunking out and getting sucked into the downward spiral of crime and prison.”[5]
The school boards and school districts that control the public schools in America’s largest inner cities – schools, which year-in, year-out, fail to educate poor minority children – are run by big-government Democrats and progressives, and have been for generations.[6]The public schools are government monopolies run as jobs programs for adults and slush funds for the teacher unions and the Democratic Party. Through these organizations, progressives have fought tooth and nail to prevent bad teachers from being fired and good teachers from being rewarded. They have spent millions on electoral campaigns to deny inner city parents access to voucher programs that would provide scholarships for their children to attend schools that would educate them. These same progressives, fully aware of the bankruptcy of public education, send their own children to expensive private schools, where they will get the education the public schools would deny them. When Vice President Al Gore, a supporter of teacher unions and opponent of school vouchers, was asked why he opposed school vouchers for black children while sending his own son to a private school, he said: “If I was the parent of a child who went to an inner-city school that was failing, I might be for vouchers, too.”[7]
This is a social atrocity that has to be stopped.  ”Atrocity” is the first web ad created by an organization I have created called Go For the Heart.  I chose Atrocity to be our first project because what’s happening to poor mainly black and Hispanic children in our public schools is an atrocity, and it is one around which there is a great media silence. That is because the atrocity is being committed by the Democratic Party and its union supporters. “Atrocity” is an attempt to break that silence.
Atrocity-1
Notes:
[1] “Leaving Boys Behind: Public High School Graduation Rates,” Jay P. Greene and Marcus A. Winters,Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, April 2006, No. 48, http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/cr_48.htm
[2] “‘Crisis’ Graduation Gap Found Between Cities, Suburbs” Greg Toppo, USA Today, August 1, 2008, http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2008-04-01-cities-suburbs-graduation_N.htm;
“School Budgets: The Worst Education Money Can Buy,” Blaire Briody, The Fiscal Times, June 6, 2011, http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2011/06/06/School-Budgets-The-Worst-Education-Money-Can-Buy.aspx#page1
[3] “Only 13 Percent of 2011 Black Graduates Proficient in Reading,” Danielle Wright, BET, August 23, 2011, http://www.bet.com/news/national/2011/08/23/report-only-13-percent-of-2011-black-graduates-proficient-in-reading.html.html
[4] “Good Public Schools … for the Rich,” Clint Bolick, Hoover Institution, October 30, 2004, No. 4, http://www.hoover.org/publications/hoover-digest/article/7057
[5] Lydia G. Segal, Battling Corruption in America’s Public Schools, Northeastern, 2003, p. xix
[6] “Liberalism’s Greatest Failure?,” Jonah Goldberg, National Review Online, September 28, 2010, http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/247989/liberalisms-greatest-failure-jonah-goldberg
[7] “The Hollow Man,” Linda A. DiVall, Los Angeles Times, August 13, 2000, http://articles.latimes.com/2000/aug/13/opinion/op-3539

Muslims Are Taking Over The World at an ALARMING Rate - MUSLIM IMMIGRATION

WH



LIMBAUGH: Amnesty Is The 'Mother Of All Scams'

RB

SANDY HOOK - The Real Truth Documentary - FULL VIDEO

RB

Immigration, World Poverty and Gumballs

WH


Immigration by the Numbers -- Off the Charts

WH


Thursday, January 30, 2014

I CAN'T BELEIVE I MADE IT ? JUST PINCHED MYSELF, YEP STILL HERE, WOW !

WELCOME TO THE U.S.A. POLICE STATE: NDAA MESSAGE FROM ANONOMOUS * * * * * * * * *

WH
WELCOME TO THE U.S.A. POLICE STATE:   NDAA

A MAN DIED PERTAINING TO THE BOSTON BOMBING - WHY DID HE DIE - YOU TELL ME ?

WH


Watch Business Employees Learn How Obamacare Affects Them

RB

BEN SWAN INTERVIEWS RON PAUL

WH


100 YEARS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE

WH


Newly Released Documents Confirm DEA Involved in Cocaine Smuggling

WH
YOUR GOVERNMENT DRUG DEALER ?

HOLDER IS HOLDING ? GIMMI SOME BRO ? AND WE SHOULD NOT JUST FIRE HIS ASS ? HOW BOUT WE KICK IT AND THEN FIRE IT !
DEA-CocaineNewly released documents and testimony from Justice Department and Drug Enforcement Agency officials now confirm the stories that the federal government has been smuggling cocaine are true. This should come as no shock to many of us who were convinced it has been going on for some time, which is why we've been calling for an end to the "War on Drugs."
Business Insider reported, "An investigation by El Universal found that between the years 2000 and 2012, the U.S. government had an arrangement with Mexico's Sinaloa drug cartel that allowed the organization to smuggle billions of dollars of drugs while Sinaloa provided information on rival cartels.
There have long been rumors that the federal government was engaged in drug running. One can recall the allegations against former President Bill Clinton and his cocaine trafficking in Arkansas. The feds have always denied this was going on.
However, newly released documents refute those claims.
According to a recent Next news report, an investigation conducted in Mexico found the American government allowed that country's largest drug cartel, Sinaloa, to operate without fear of persecution. That groups is estimated to be responsible for 80 percent of the cocaine coming into the country through Chicago. In exchange, the leaders of Sinaloa provided the DEA information on rival gangs.
LET'S SEE,  CHICAGO IS WHERE OBAMA AND HOLDER ARE FROM:  GEE ISN'T THAT STRANGE ?
The drug cartel working with the federal government is run by Joaquín El Chapo Guzmán . He is considered to be the world's most powerful drug trafficker. In addition to Chicago, his group also maintains cocaine operations in several major cities around the country.

Written statements were provided to a U.S. District Court in Chicago, confirming the alliance between the DEA and Mexico's largest cocaine cartel. The written testimony, combined with other evidence, shows DEA officials met with leaders of the Sinaloa cartel more than 50 times between 2000 and 2012. This would mean DEA-authorized drug smuggling goes back to at least the beginning of the George W. Bush administration, and continued for year under Barack Obama.

One of the group's leaders, Vincente Zambada-Niebla, claims the American government also sent military-grade weapons to Sinaloa. According to the latest revelations, it was these weapons which were part of the Fast-and-Furious scandal. Automatic firearms which disappeared during that operation, led by Eric Holder, were used to kill U.S. Border agents.

This latest evidence and testimony points toward a massive scandal, involving both Republican and Democratic administrations. At the very least, this provides the best evidence so far that the Federal government was sponsoring the smuggling of billions of dollars of cocaine into the United States. Worse still, weapons purchased for the U.S. military may have been sent to the cartel, and used to kill American agents.

You may recall in August of 2012, we reported on Vincente Zambada- Niebla's claim following his extradition to Chicago to face federal drug charges. Isn't it interesting that these drugs were being run through Chicago, the very place that gave us Barack Obama?
The question now arises: How can these people not be brought to justice under the law? Where is the outrage among the people, especially those being put away fro years for simple possession of illegal substances? Where is the outrage of the Congress? So far, all I'm hearing are crickets. Perhaps that is because it is damning to a Republican administration as well.

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/01/newly-release-documents-confirm-dea-involved-cocaine-smuggling/#1ibU4qWw3aTewpmu.99

SONG: STAND BY ME PLAYED AROUND THE WORLD

WH


What are the Odds?...Signs They Are Planning A Superbowl Attack!

RB

The NSA Fiasco: A Carefully Choreographed Stage Show

RB

The NSA Tyranny: Where's the Outrage?

RB

RUSSIA TO U.S.: WHO’S ‘GODLESS’ NOW?

WH


At the height of the Cold War, it was common for American conservatives to label the officially atheist Soviet Union a “godless nation.” More than two decades on, history has come full circle, as the Kremlin and its allies in the Russian Orthodox Church hurl the same allegation at the West. “Many Euro-Atlantic countries have moved away from their roots, including Christian values,” Russian President Vladimir Putin said in a recent keynote speech. “Policies are being pursued that place on the same level a multi-child family and a same-sex partnership, a faith in God and a belief in Satan. This is the path to degradation.”  In his state of the nation address in mid-December, Mr. Putin also portrayed Russia as a staunch defender of “traditional values” against what he depicted as the morally bankrupt West. Social and religious conservatism, the former KGB officer insisted, is the only way to prevent the world from slipping into “chaotic darkness.” As part of this defense of “Christian values,” Russia has adopted a law banning “homosexual propaganda” and another that makes it a criminal offense to “insult” the religious sensibilities of believers. More  

Wednesday, January 29, 2014

WARNING! Proof Obama’s IRA Savings Is A Trap Set To Cripple Economy!

RB

RAND PAUL SPEAKS OUT ON THE SOTU MESSAGE LAST NIGHT...

WH


I DON'T REMEMBER ?

WH
WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?
By Paul Harvey
*Conveniently Forgotten Facts*
Back in 1969 a group of Black Panthers decided that a fellow black
panther named Alex Rackley needed to die. Rackley was suspected of
disloyalty. Rackley was first tied to a chair. Once safely immobilized,
his friends tortured him for hours by, among other things, pouring
boiling water on him.

When they got tired of torturing Rackley, Black Panther member, Warren
Kimbro took Rackley outside and put a bullet in his head. Rackley's body
was later found floating in a river about 25 miles north of New Haven,
Connecticut.

Perhaps at this point you're curious as to what happened to these Black
Panthers?

In 1977, that's only eight years later, only one of the killers was
still in jail. The shooter, Warren Kimbro, managed to get a scholarship
to Harvard and became good friends with none other than Al Gore. He
later became an assistant dean at an Eastern Connecticut State College.
Isn't that something!!! As a '60's radical you can pump a bullet into
someone's head and a few years later, in the same state, you can become
an assistant college dean! Only in America!!!

Erica Huggins was the woman who served the Panthers by boiling the water
for Mr. Rackley's torture .. Some years later Ms. Huggins was elected to
a California School Board.

How in the world do you think these killers got off so easily? Maybe it
was in some part due to the efforts of two people who came to the
defense of the Panthers. These two people actually went so far as to
shut down Yale University with demonstrations in defense of the accused
Black Panthers during their trial.

One of these people was none other than Bill Lan Lee. Mr. Lee, or Mr.
Lan Lee, as the case may be, isn't a college dean. He isn't a member of
a California School Board. He is now head of the United States Justice
Department's Civil Rights Division, appointed by none other than Bill
Clinton.

O.K., so who was the other Panther defender? Is this other notable
Panther defender now a school board member? Is this other Panther
apologist now an assistant college dean? No, neither! The other Panther
defender was, like Lee, a radical law student at Yale University at the
time. She is now known as The "smartest woman in the world." She is none
other than the former Democratic senator from the State of New York ----
our former First Lady, and the Secretary of State, the incredible
Hillary Rodham Clinton.

And now, as Paul Harvey said: "You know the rest of the story."
Pass this on! This deserves the widest possible press. Remember this if
and when Hillary runs for President!!


 Regards, 
 Joe...
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...